John Chrysostom
An extraordinary and unforeseen occurrence! When Peter witnessed the Master being arrested, he was so consumed with zeal that he took up a sword and severed the ear of the servant. Yet, in a moment when he should have been filled with righteous anger at the insults hurled, he instead denies his association with Christ! Who among us would not feel a surge of fury at the injustices unfolding at that moment? Nevertheless, the disciple, paralyzed by fear, not only fails to express any outrage but also disowns his Lord, cowering before the threats posed by a mere servant girl. And this happens not just once but twice and even a third time; all the while, he remains in the courtyard, answering the maid's inquiries as he exits through the gate.
An unusual and unforeseen event! When Peter observed the Lord being arrested, he became so agitated that he drew a sword and severed the ear of one present; however, instead of expressing greater outrage upon hearing such insults, he chose to deny his association. Who, indeed, could remain unperturbed in such a situation? Yet, this disciple, paralyzed by fear, not only failed to show any indignation but also denied the truth before a simple and powerless servant girl. And it wasn't just once; he renounced it another two times. This all took place swiftly, not in a court of law but in the courtyard, where the maid questioned him as he exited through the gate. Remarkably, he did not immediately recognize his own failure. Luke recounts that Jesus turned and looked at him, Lk.
Read more (260 words)
22:61, indicating that, not only did he deny knowing Christ, but that even in the moment when the rooster crowed, he did not recall his actions unless reminded by the Teacher. It was this gaze that awakened him to the truth. Fear overwhelmed him! Mark informs us that the rooster crowed when Peter denied Christ for the first time, and then again after the third denial, Mark 14:68-72, thereby providing a clearer account of the disciple's weakness and his bewilderment due to terror; and it is noted that Mark learned this from Peter himself, as he was his companion. Thus, it is even more remarkable that he not only did not mask the failure of his teacher but instead elucidated it more than others, for he was a follower. It raises questions regarding the accuracy of Matthew's assertion, as he reports that Jesus declared, ‘Truly I say to you that this night, before the cock crows, you will deny Me three times,’ Matthew 26:34, while Mark, discussing the tripartite denial, notes that the rooster crowed a second time, Mark 14:72. There is no inconsistency here. It is common for a rooster to crow multiple times in succession; hence, Mark’s mention was intended to illustrate that even the crowing could not prevent Peter’s fall nor remind him of his pledge. Both accounts hold truth. Even before the rooster completed its first crowing, Peter had denied his Lord three times. And when Jesus brought his sin to light, he could not weep openly for fear of accusation but left to weep bitterly.