The Church Fathers on this verse

Matthew 5:37Meaning & Commentary from the Church Fathers

But let your speech be yea, yea: no, no: and that which is over and above these, is of evil.

Douay-Rheims

εστω δε ο λογος υμων ναι ναι ου ου το δε περισσον τουτων εκ του πονηρου εστιν

Greek (Byzantine text)

The Church Fathers on this verse

14 Church Fathers comment on this verse · 23 commentaries

John Chrysostom

4th centuryChurch Father

Note how He exalts the elements of the world, not from their own nature, but from the respect which they have to God, so that there is opened no occasion of idolatry.

Or; of evil, that is, from their weakness to whom the Law permitted the use of an oath. Not that by this the old Law is signified to be from the Devil, but He leads us from the old imperfection to the new abundance.

For no man can swear often, but he must sometimes forswear himself; as he who has a custom of much speaking will sometimes speak foolishly.

Theophylact of Bulgaria

11th centuryChurch Father

Do not say: How can they have faith in me? - He responds that they will trust you if you consistently speak the truth and refrain from taking oaths, for nothing undermines one's credibility more than the act of swearing. Swearing, aside from affirmations and denials, is unnecessary and originates from the adversary. You may wonder if the law of Moses, which also permitted oaths, was not worse. Understand that during that era, swearing was not seen as negative; however, after Christ, it is considered improper, much like circumcision and Judaism as a whole. Just as it is suitable for an infant to nurse, it is inappropriate for a husband to do the same.

Augustine of Hippo

5th centuryChurch Father

Inasmuch as the sin of perjury is a grievous sin, he must be further removed from it who uses no oath, than he who is ready to swear on every occasion, and the Lord would rather that we should not swear and keep close to the truth, than that swearing we should come near to perjury.

This precept also confirms the righteousness of the Pharisees, not to forswear; inasmuch as he who swears not at all cannot forswear himself. But as to call God to witness is to swear, does not the Apostle break this commandment when he says several times to the Galatians, The things which I write unto you, behold, before God, I lie not. (Gal. 1:20.) So the Romans, God is my witness, whom I serve in my spirit. (Rom. 1:9) Unless perhaps some one may say, it is no oath unless I use the form of swearing by some object; and that the Apostle did not swear in saying, God is my witness. It is ridiculous to make such a distinction; yet the Apostle has used even this form, I die daily, by your boasting. (1 Cor. 15:31.) That this does not mean, your boasting has caused my dying daily, but is an oath, is clear from the Greek, which is νὴ τὴν ὑμετέραν καύχησιν.

But what we could not understand by mere words, from the conduct of the saints we may gather in what sense should be understood what might easily be drawn the contrary way, unless explained by example. The Apostle has used oaths in his Epistles, and by this shews us how that ought to be taken, I say unto you, Swear not at all, namely, lest by allowing ourselves to swear at all we come to readiness in swearing, from readiness we come to a habit of swearing, and from a habit of swearing we fall into perjury. And so the Apostle is not found to have used an oath but only in writing, the greater thought and caution which that requires not allowing of slip of the tongue. Yet is the Lord’s command so universal, Swear not at all, that He would seem to have forbidden it even in writing.

Read more (58 words)

But since it would be an impiety to accuse Paul of having violated this precept, especially in his Epistles, we must understand the word at all as implying that, as far as lays in your power, you should not make a practice of swearing, not aim at it as a good thing in which you should take delight.

Therefore in his writings, as writing allows of greater circumspection, the Apostle is found to have used an oath in several places, that none might suppose that there is any direct sin in swearing what is true; but only that our weak hearts are better preserved from perjury by abstaining from all swearing whatever.

Or; It is added, By the Heaven, &c. because the Jews did not consider themselves bound when they swore by such things. As if He had said, When you swear by the Heaven and the Earth, think not that you do not owe your oath to the Lord your God, for you are proved to have sworn by Him whose throne the heaven is, and the earth His footstool; which is not meant as though God had such limbs set upon the heaven and the earth, after the manner of a man who is sitting; but that seat signifies God’s judgment of us.

Read more (225 words)

And since in the whole extent of this universe it is the heaven that has the highest beauty, God is said to sit upon the heavens as shewing divine power to be more excellent than the most surpassing show of beauty; and He is said to stand upon the earth, as putting to lowest use a lesser beauty. Spiritually by the heavens are denoted holy souls, by the earth the sinful, seeing He that is spiritual judgeth all things. (1 Cor. 2:15.) But to the sinner it is said, Earth thou art, and unto earth thou shalt return. (Gen. 3:19.) And he who would abide under a law, is put under a law, and therefore He adds, it is the footstool of His feet. Neither by Jerusalem, for it is the city of the Great King; this is better said than ‘it is mine;’ though it is understood to mean the same. And because He is also truly Lord, whoso swears by Jerusalem, owes his oath to the Lord. Neither by thy head. What could any think more entirely his own property than his own head? But how is it ours when we have not power to make one hair black or white? Whoso then swears by his own head also owes his vows to the Lord; and by this the rest may be understood.

And he who has learned that an oath is to be reckoned not among things good, but among things necessary, will restrain himself as much as he may, not to use an oath without necessity, unless he sees men loth to believe what it is for their good they should believe, without the confirmation of an oath. This then is good and to be desired, that our conversation be only, yea, yea; nay, nay; for what is more than this cometh of evil. That is, if you are compelled to swear, you know that it is by the necessity of their weakness to whom you would persuade any thing; which weakness is surely an evil.

Read more (44 words)

What is more than this is thus evil; not that you do evil in this just use of an oath to persuade another to something beneficial for him; but it is an evil in him whose weakness thus obliges you to use an oath.

Jerome of Stridon

5th centuryChurch Father

This was allowed under the Law, as to children; as they offered sacrifice to God, that they might not do it to idols, so they were permitted to swear by God; not that the thing was right, but that it were better done to God than to dæmons.

Lastly, consider that the Saviour does not here forbid to swear by God, but by the Heaven, the Earth, by Jerusalem, by a man’s head. For this evil practice of swearing by the elements the Jews had always, and are thereof often accused in the prophetic writing’s. For he who swears, shews either reverence or love for that by which he swears. Thus when the Jews swore by the Angels, by the city of Jerusalem, by the temple and the elements, they paid to the creature the honour and worship belonging to God; for it is commanded in the Law that we should not swear but by the Lord our God.

Therefore Evangelic verity does not admit an oath, since the whole discourse of the faithful is instead of an oath.

Euthymios Zigabenos

11th centuryCommentator

Let your affirmation be a simple yes and your denial a simple no. This is the sole expression you should use for affirmation, without resorting to oaths. Any addition to this, he terms an oath. If oaths are of the adversary, then why was their use permitted in the ancient Law? This is because sacrifices of animals were also influenced by darkness and intertwined with idolatry; nevertheless, the Law permitted such practices in response to the frailty of the Israelites. Due to their insatiable desires, they were drawn to idolatry, and due to their mistrust, they relied on oaths. Thus, to prevent them from later offering sacrifices to false gods and swearing by them, the Law permitted sacrifices and oaths, always directing these acts toward God.

Read more (128 words)

However, the time would come when such practices would be rendered obsolete by a higher authority. Just as it is appropriate for young children to be nourished with milk, it is unnecessary for mature men; we accept milk for the young while restricting adults from it. What should we do if someone insists on an oath and demands it? Let the reverence for God take precedence over such compulsion, and choose to endure any hardship rather than violate God's commandment. Throughout every commandment, you are likely to face opposition and peril; if you do not regard God's commandment as paramount everywhere, all will remain void and unfulfilled for you. The Lord later remarked, 'The kingdom of heaven suffers violence, and the violent take it by force' (Matthew 11:12).

Hilarius of Poitiers

4th centuryChurch Father

Otherwise; They who live in the simplicity of the faith have not need to swear, with them ever, what is is, what is not is not; by this their life and their conversation are ever preserved in truth.

Rabanus Maurus

9th centuryChurch Father

Having forbidden swearing, He instructs us how we ought to speak, Let your speech be yea, yea; nay, nay. That is, to affirm any thing it is sufficient to say, ‘It is so:’ to deny, to say, ‘It is not so.’ Or, yea, yea; nay, nay, are therefore twice repeated, that what you affirm with the mouth you should prove in deed, and what you deny in word, you should not establish by your conduct.

Gregorios Palamas

14th centuryChurch Father

He who refrains from making oaths should not simply respond with ‘yes’ or ‘no’; rather, he should express these affirmations in harmony with complete truth, ensuring that actions reflect words. In this way, ‘yes’ will truly signify ‘yes’ and ‘no’ will genuinely represent ‘no,’ in alignment with the teachings of the Gospel. Conversely, when words are detached from reality, and actions violate those words, then ‘yes’ becomes ‘no’ and ‘no’ turns into ‘yes.’ This contradiction originates from evil and represents a falsehood: for lies come from the enemy, the devil, the very source of deceit. Those who speak falsehoods draw closer to him, becoming part of his realm, and they have no share in the Spirit of Truth, preventing them from being members of Christ’s body.

Read more (64 words)

This is why the Apostle writes in his letter to the Ephesians: ‘Be renewed in the spirit of your mind, and put on the new man, created according to God in truth and in the favor of the truth; put away falsehood, speak the truth every one to his own sincere heart: for we are one to another’ (Eph. 4:24-25). See also Matthew 6:23.

Philaret (Amphiteatrov)

19th centuryChurch Father

The Gospel imparts another command from our Saviour aimed at shielding us from falsehood, to which a heart tainted by sin is all too susceptible. The ancient law expressly prohibited breaking an oath made in the presence of the Lord. Affirming this law, Christ our Saviour disallows any oath that is within our power to control. It is essential to clarify that this prohibition does not extend to oaths mandated by civil authority, such as pledging loyalty to the Sovereign or being legally obliged to testify under oath. Such oaths align with the divine directive to respect established authority. However, frivolous oaths are forbidden, often made without substantial reason.

Read more (373 words)

These oaths contravene the eternal commandment of God: Thou shalt not take the name of the Lord thy God in vain (Exodus 20:7). These kinds of vows and oaths diminish reverence for God within a person, subtly fostering a tendency towards deceit while also undermining the respect for legitimate oaths, potentially resulting in grave violations of them. Thus, desiring to eradicate the root of this evil from our hearts, the Saviour instructs us not to swear by the sacred and awe-inspiring name of God, nor by heaven—God’s throne, nor by the earth—His footstool, nor by Jerusalem—the holy city of the King of Israel, nor even by our own heads, for we cannot create a single strand of hair or alter its color. To uphold truth in all circumstances, Jesus emphasizes the simplicity of communication with "yes" or "no"; anything beyond these words is a ploy of the malevolent one—the devil, the father of lies, who seeks to sow deceit in our hearts, gradually leading us to the serious breach of oaths. The most insidious tactic of this evil spirit is convincing us that disobeying the commandments of Christ is trivial and that those who do face excessively harsh consequences. This deception is aimed at erasing the fear of God’s judgment from our hearts, a fear that safeguards our souls. Once the spirit succeeds in stripping away this divine protector, it can invadir our hearts unimpeded, plundering the treasures of grace and imprisoning our souls while using our bodies as instruments of wickedness. Therefore, it is crucial for us, dear brethren, to vigilantly guard our hearts, which are consecrated as the dwelling place of God, ensuring that our bodily senses operate solely as instruments for fulfilling His commandments, as the wise Proverb states: guard your heart with all diligence, for out of it are the issues of life (Proverbs 4:23). We must continually pray to our Lord, God, and Saviour Jesus Christ to protect our hearts with the saving fear of His righteous judgment, to touch them with His love, and to help us love Him with all our heart, soul, mind, strength, and thoughts (Matthew 22:37). In walking blamelessly in the light of His commandments, may we become heirs of eternal life. Amen.

Nicephoros (Theotokis)

18th centuryCommentator

God, in His love for humanity, desires that human virtues reflect honesty, righteousness, and a sanctified heart. He instructs us with these words: “But let your statement be, ‘Yes, yes’ or ‘No, no’; anything beyond that is from evil" (Matthew 5:37). He urges us to let the word ‘yes’ resonate in our minds and on our lips, as well as the word ‘no.’ Beyond these, it is the cunning and deceitful speech—representing falsehood and duplicity—that stems from wickedness. When your thoughts and words do not align, when you verbally affirm one thing while your actions betray another, or when you declare one thing but demonstrate its opposite, you partake in the fruits of malevolence, which are the devil's schemes.

Read more (82 words)

This echoes the warning from James, who states: “But above all, my brothers, do not swear, either by heaven or by earth or by any other oath. But let your yes be yes and your no be no, so that you may not fall under condemnation” (James 5:12). When your inner thoughts clash with what you express, when your commitments do not match your actions, you commit the sin of hypocrisy—you become a liar, a deceiver, and an opponent to the truth.

Abbot Panteleimon about the Trinity

19th centuryCommentator

Let your affirmation be clear: YES, YES; NO, NO. Any frivolous oath, any fabricated vow concocted by the Pharisees, is indeed deceitful. Even those oaths that God commanded through Moses—swearing by My name—are permitted only because of humanity's tendency toward falsehood. These solemn oaths, uttered with respect as a form of prayer, exist solely to counteract the presence of lies and sin in the world. Until the days of deceit are over, such oaths may be necessary for preventing falsehood. This understanding aligns with the teachings of Christ, who advised not to swear at all. St. John Chrysostom articulates this by saying that one who lives according to the commandments of Christ earns respect from others and is not compelled to swear.

Read more (255 words)

It is a grave matter that a servant would not utter his master’s name without appropriate respect, yet we approach the name of the Lord of Hosts with such irreverence. Christ is merciful, forbidding us to swear by our own heads, yet we disregard the honor of the Lord by invoking Him so casually. You—mere dust, ashes, and smoke—bring the Lord into your certainties, compelling Him to serve as a guarantor. What audacity! If you had never spoken falsely, even a mere gesture would elicit greater trust than a thousand oaths.

However, in matters of significant importance, the saints have not shunned oaths. For instance, the Venerable Ephraim the Syrian spoke in his final testament with solemnity, saying: "I, Ephraim, am nearing death and writing this farewell... I swear by Him who descended on Mount Sinai and spoke from the rock, by the One whose cry of Eloi shook all creation; I swear by Him who was betrayed by Judas and scourged in Jerusalem; I swear by the power of Him who bore the lantern and by the majesty of Him who spat—it is true that I have not separated from the Church."

The holy martyrs Iamvlichus and Apollonius invoked God's name in their oaths, as did the monk Zosima, the Apostle Paul, and others. Oaths have also been utilized during the Ecumenical Councils (V and VI) and are prescribed for Orthodox Christians in critical situations when legitimate authority requires it; these oaths must be offered with solemnity and a resolute intent to uphold them.

Kochomski S.W.

19th centuryCommentator

The Mosaic Law prohibited swearing oaths in the name of God for trivial or deceptive purposes. The third commandment among the Ten Commandments, which derives its meaning from the Hebrew term shaveh, captures the essence of both unnecessary and deceptive use of God's name (as stated in ‘thou shalt not take the name of thy Lord in vain’, Exodus 20:7). This commandment thus disallows not only the frivolous invocation of God's name but also its use for deceit. Jesus Christ clarifies this commandment, indicating that swearing by God's name is prohibited when it is done to deceive, as denoted in the Greek phrase, οὐκ ἐπιορκήσεις.

Read more (619 words)

In response to this prohibition, the Jews during Christ's time avoided using God's name in vain, opting instead to swear by other entities such as heaven, earth, Jerusalem, and even their own heads; this practice often resulted in both falsehood and deception without invoking God's name directly.

The New Testament Law reaffirms this prohibition, stating, ‘I say to you, do not swear by any oath, neither by heaven, nor by earth, nor by Jerusalem...’. It is critical not to separate the Greek word for ‘any’ from the following examples or interpret it as implying an absolute prohibition since there are instances in both Testaments where swearing by God's name has been appropriate (see Rom. 1:9; 2 Cor. 1:23; Phil. 1:8; 1 Thess. 2:5, 10; Rev. 10:6). Thus, when framing His teachings within the context of swearing, the Lord’s words imply a complete renunciation of oaths: ‘by heaven, by earth, by Jerusalem, in any circumstance, do not swear’.

Those who interpret this to mean a total rejection of oaths assume the Greek term σ῞λως refers broadly to all oaths. This understanding is echoed in certain Russian translations of the Gospel. The term ὅλως appears three times in the New Testament: 1) in 1 Cor. 5:1, suggesting a condition not reliant on the Corinthians' desires; see also Matt. 4:21, (2) in Matthew 6:7, possibly indicating a similar idea of ‘without’; and (3) in Matthew 15:20, conveying the thought that there would be no point in baptizing if there is no resurrection of the dead. In none of these contexts does ὅλως imply ‘in any way or at all’; rather, it suggests something like ‘as it were’ or ‘regardless’.

Thus, the speaker transitions from one question to another, leaving the significance of one point unclear while establishing another. In the same manner, in Matthew 5:33, it is indicated that what was forbidden to the ancients should still be forbidden, yet with a note of emphasis, ‘neither by heaven nor by earth’. In this light, the third commandment remains intact; it prohibits the misuse of oaths but does not eliminate the validity of calling upon God as a witness to our promises and as a guide for fulfilling them. However, Christ does indeed prohibit swearing by heaven, earth, Jerusalem, or even one’s head. Why is this the case? As expressed in Hebrews 6:16, ‘Men swear by the highest things,’ which explains why Jews would refer to such signs near to the divine as objects of their oaths. The Lord affirms this understanding, indicating that heaven serves as God’s throne, earth as His footstool, and Jerusalem as the city of the great King; thus, in these places, God's presence is particularly revealed, reflecting His perfection and sovereignty.

Even our own heads, despite seeming our own, are ultimately under God's authority and are of special concern to Him. These things symbolize divine majesty and goodness to the faithful believer. Yet, the practice of swearing by them originated in fear and served only to disguise the act of swearing falsely or frivolously rather than calling upon God's name directly. This Pharisaic evasion intended to bypass the third commandment resulted in oaths without using God's name, instead invoking heaven, earth, or Jerusalem in vain. The Lord condemns this hypocritical practice in His admonitions to the scribes and Pharisees, as seen in Matthew 23:20-22; this highlights how swearing by heaven and earth became an emblem of their deceitful religion (Matthew 23:37) and is thus categorically prohibited.

Therefore, when the Lord commands that your word should be a straightforward affirmation or negation, He establishes a clear alternative to the misuse of oaths, cautioning against the hollow promises that arise from temptation, specifically from the influence of the evil one.

Lopuchin A.P.

19th centuryCommentator

But I tell you, do not swear at all. Rather, let your statements be simple: yes or no; anything beyond this comes from the evil one. The more powerful the oath, the greater the chance it may be broken, influenced by the deceiver who is the original father of lies. Other principles must apply within the kingdom of the New Testament and the foundation of all mutual relationships.

Michail (Lusin)

19th centuryCommentator

Indeed, the affirmation or negation of what has been stated or done stands as a simple expression; however, this does not imply that a believer must always resort to these exact words in lieu of an oath. It signifies that one should plainly and directly affirm the truth or refute falsehood, consistently speaking truthfully and refraining from deceit (Theophylact). Beyond this, any assurance supported by a divine entity is rooted in wickedness; it derives from evil and unrighteousness. The source of all malevolence is the devil, hence such affirmations are from him (Chrysostom, Theophylact, Euthymius Zigabenus). When the Savior admonishes against swearing, He clearly does not prohibit legitimate oaths required in public or private matters, especially those taken in God's name.

Read more (133 words)

He Himself validated the oath in a judicial setting, responding to the high priest's declaration, "I adjure you by the living God," with the words, "You have said," as during that time the oath was a customary formalism in Jewish courts, which the accused acknowledged by affirming, "Amen, so be it, you have said" (Matthew 26:63-64). The Apostle Paul invokes God as a witness to affirm the veracity of his statements, which is indeed akin to an oath (Rom. 1:9; Rom. 9:1; 2 Cor. 1:23; 2 Cor. 2:17; Gal. 1:20; Phil. 1:8; 1 Thess. 2:5; Heb. 6:16). Oaths were enjoined by the Law of Moses, yet the Lord did not annul these oaths (Ex. 22:11; Lev. 5:1; Num. 5:19; Deut. 29:12-14). However, oaths that are insincere, pharisaical, hypocritical, or trivial are rendered void.

Cross references

Passages read together with this verse.

The original text

Greek text, 17 words with lemma, transliteration and Strong’s number. Tap to expand.

  1. ἔστω
    estō
    I am
    G1510 · εἰμί
  2. δὲ
    de
    but
    G1161 · δέ
  3. ὁ
    ho
    the
    G3588 · ὁ
  4. λόγος
    logos
    a word
    G3056 · λόγος
  5. ὑμῶν
    hymōn
    you
    G4771 · σύ
  6. Ναὶ
    nai
    yes
    G3483 · ναί
  7. ναί
    nai
    yes
    G3483 · ναί
  8. οὒ
    ou
    no
    G3756 · οὐ
  9. Οὔ
    ou
    no
    G3756 · οὐ
  10. τὸ
    to
    the
    G3588 · ὁ
  11. δὲ
    de
    but
    G1161 · δέ
  12. περισσὸν
    perisson
    abundant
    G4053 · περισσός
  13. τούτων
    toutōn
    this
    G3778 · οὗτος
  14. ἐκ
    ek
    from out
    G1537 · ἐκ
  15. τοῦ
    tou
    the
    G3588 · ὁ
  16. πονηροῦ
    ponērou
    evil
    G4190 · πονηρός
  17. ἐστιν
    estin
    I am
    G1510 · εἰμί