The Church Fathers on this verse

Psalm 22 (21):19Meaning & Commentary from the Church Fathers

They parted my garments amongst them; and upon my vesture they cast lots.

Douay-Rheims · Hebrew numbering, Septuagint numbering in brackets.

יְחַלְּק֣וּ בְגָדַ֣י לָהֶ֑ם וְעַל־לְ֝בוּשִׁ֗י יַפִּ֥ילוּ גוֹרָֽל׃

Hebrew (Masoretic text)

The Church Fathers on this verse

8 Church Fathers comment on this verse

John Chrysostom

4th centuryChurch Father

The precision of prophecy is evident as the soldiers shared the clothing among themselves, yet they refrained from dividing the seamless robe. Observe how prophetic words come to fruition through their wrongful actions, a truth foretold long ago. Although three individuals faced crucifixion, the predictions of the prophets were realized solely in relation to Him. Why did they not take similar actions with the attire of the others, but rather only with His? Take note of the meticulousness of the prophecy: the prophet declared not only that they would divide, but also that they would refrain from dividing. They did indeed share the garments, yet they left the seamless robe untouched, entrusting that decision to chance.

Augustine of Hippo

5th centuryChurch Father

Beloved, acknowledge the attire of your Bridegroom. For what purpose was the garment discarded? Inquire of the Gospel, discern to whom you are betrothed, and understand from whom you have received the covenant of marriage. Explore the Gospel; see what it reveals to you about the suffering of the Lord. There was a chiton. Let us consider its nature: woven from above (John 19:23). What significance does a chiton woven from above hold if it lacks love? What does this chiton represent if not the bond of unity? Contemplate this chiton, which even those who persecuted Christ chose not to rend. For the Gospel states, ‘They said to one another, “Let us not tear it, but cast lots about it”’ (John 19:24). Reflect on what you have been told in the psalm. The oppressors did not rip their garments, yet Christians are known to tear apart the Church.

Euthymios Zigabenos

11th centuryCommentator

The evangelist John provides a clear understanding of these events when he writes, “So the soldiers, when they had crucified Jesus, took his garments and divided them into four parts, each soldier a part, and the lower garment; but this garment was not sewn, but was woven from top to bottom. So they said to one another, ‘We will not tear it, but we will draw lots to decide who shall have it. Thus, he says, was fulfilled what was said in the Scripture” (John 19:23-24). These words by David convey that ‘garments’ refer to the sewn pieces that the soldiers shared among themselves, while the unstitched garment signifies the chiton woven completely from top to bottom, for which they cast lots.

Read more (391 words)

It is astonishing that despite the fulfillment of this prophecy regarding Christ, the unfortunate Jews remain in disbelief.

Isidore of Pilusiot provides insight into the meaning of the unstitched woven garment: “As for the necessary, light, and simple garments that do not uphold the divine practice of asceticism, consult John the Theologian, who describes the Lord's chiton as not sewn but entirely woven from top to bottom.” It is widely recognized that this type of garment, commonly used by the less fortunate Galileans, was crafted with a special technique similar to padded breast garments. Euthymius Zigabenus, in the second volume of his commentary on Matthew, reflects on the number of garments worn by the Lord. Some believe there were five—four divided among the soldiers and a fifth unstitched chiton—though he finds this improbable, arguing that the Lord, being temperate, would not have an excessive number of garments. Instead, he speculates that the Lord had three: one chiton directly on His body, the second over that, and the third over the second. The soldiers shared the latter two, ripping them into four parts, not due to their value but as a sacrifice, and they cast lots for the unstitched chiton or shirt.

The question arises: why did Christ instruct the Apostles not to carry two garments (Matthew 10:10) when He Himself had two? To this, it can be answered that the Lord wore only one chiton on His body or shirt, as the chiton represents the innermost layer, while the others were different types of garments. The God-bearing Maximus interprets the Lord’s clothing in a symbolic sense, stating that the top unstitched chiton represents a continuous weaving of virtues and the unification of divine grace, covering our understanding, which can sometimes be obscured by negligence and laziness, allowing malicious forces to confuse our sense of virtue. Thus, we are always aware of it, even if we do not actively engage with it. The divided garments signify outer appearances and the material riches fragmented into four worldly aspects, to which the deceivers of humanity entice us to cling. Alternatively, one might interpret the unstitched chiton as representing the soul of every individual, which is divinely inspired. It remains unsewn, signifying its simplicity and unity; it is indestructible, whereas the garments that are divided correspond to the body, which decays into the four elements.

Cyrill of Jerusalem

4th centuryChurch Father

Yet someone might argue, 'Provide me with another sign. What greater indication could there be regarding this matter? Jesus was crucified: He wore a single lower garment and a single upper garment. The soldiers split the upper garment into four parts, but the lower garment remained intact, for if it were torn, it would serve no purpose. Thus, the soldiers cast lots for it. They divided that garment and drew lots for the other. Isn't this also recorded? The devoted Psalmists of the Church understand this; they imitate the heavenly hosts and continuously exalt God, being privileged to proclaim on Calvary, 'They have divided My garments among them, and for My clothing they cast lots': and that 'lot' belonged to the soldiers.

Maximus of Turin

5th centuryChurch Father

The Hands of Heretics I hold that the rizas serve as prophecies or readings from the holy scriptures that anticipate the sacrifice of our Lord Christ. By repeatedly declaring and proclaiming these passages, the adversaries of the Savior—namely, the contemptible heretics—extend their impure hands toward Him each day. In a manner akin to the soldiers, they fragment Him at their convenience, shredding the seamless garment of the one Body into tiny pieces, and by stripping the Lord of His robes, they outfit their erroneous teachings in them.

Eusebius of Caesarea

4th centuryTeacher of the Church

They cast lots for His garments and divided His clothing, as the splendor of the Word, represented by the proclamations of holy Scriptures, became fragmented through various interpretations. Subsequently, the evidence of His truth was overshadowed by twisted teachings, often propagated by faithless heretics.

Irenaeus (Klementjewsky)

18th centuryCommentator

Once more, David expresses his grievances against his adversaries, illustrating their ruthless nature. When they encountered a destitute individual, worn out in both body and spirit, on the verge of death, they showed no compassion. Instead, they reveled in his suffering. The subsequent verse, referring to the division of garments, serves as a façade, as if David were declaring that his foes had taken all his possessions for themselves, a common practice of victors who either seize the spoils or cast lots to determine the distribution. By equating his hard-earned belongings with his garments, David laments that his enemies, having stripped him of everything, dishonorably shared the spoils among themselves, treating them as if they were a prize of conquest. This further amplifies the disgraceful behavior of his enemies, who celebrated their triumph over David as though he were a mere corpse.

Psalter with Commentaries (Cave Monastery in Kiew)

19th centuryCommentator

The soldiers split the garments of Christ into four sections, corresponding to the four soldiers who executed Him. Regarding the seamless tunic, it represents the body of the Lord, which remains united with the Divine essence (John 19:23-24).

Cross references

Passages read together with this verse.