The Church Fathers on this verse

Psalm 3:1Meaning & Commentary from the Church Fathers

The psalm of David when he fled from the face of his son Absalom.

Douay-Rheims · Hebrew numbering, Septuagint numbering in brackets.

מִזְמ֥וֹר לְדָוִ֑ד בְּ֝בָרְח֗וֹ מִפְּנֵ֤י ׀ אַבְשָׁל֬וֹם בְּנֽוֹ׃

Hebrew (Masoretic text)

The Church Fathers on this verse

9 Church Fathers comment on this verse · 10 commentaries

John Chrysostom

4th centuryChurch Father

Kings often raise monuments in celebration of their victorious leaders, just as rulers honor triumphant charioteers and warriors with images and pillars that proclaim their achievements, as if giving voice to their triumph. Some document the accolades of these victors in texts, hoping to demonstrate their own strength through praise. Orators, painters, sculptors, and entire nations, as well as cities and towns, marvel at their victories; yet, there are no depictions honoring those who flee or refuse to engage in battle, like David, who exemplifies this in the phrase, “A Psalm of David, when he fled from Absalom his son.”

Read more (1011 words)

When is a fugitive ever celebrated? When does an exile merit an inscription? Such individuals are apprehended by written accusations rather than honored by memorials. However, my dear friend, grasp the significance of this psalm and safeguard your soul; let this account guide your conduct and permit the suffering of a righteous individual to protect your mind. Understand why Absalom turned against David. Let this knowledge strengthen you with reverence for God, for just as a building crumbles without a strong foundation, so too is writing of no worth if its significance is overlooked.

In this psalm, the blessed David aimed to convey the importance of living a virtuous and pure life, steering clear of wrongdoing and adhering to God's commandments. He wished to ensure that those who sin do not endure the same adversity he faced. David fled his son due to his own departure from purity; he distanced himself because he fractured marital fidelity. He turned away from the divine law, which commands, ‘Thou shalt not murder, thou shalt not commit adultery’ (Exodus 20:13, 14). He invited trouble into his home by taking another man's wife and, in turn, faced rebellion from his own family. This is not merely my reflection; it is the declaration of God, and where the Lord speaks, there can be no debate.

Indeed, Absalom rebelled against David because of his transgressions regarding Uriah; God delivered this message through Nathan the prophet. God proclaimed, "I have anointed thee king over Israel, and I have delivered thee out of the hand of Saul; and I have given thee the house of thy lord, and I have given thee the house of Israel and Judah; and if this be not enough for thee, I will add more unto thee. Why then hast thou despised the word of the Lord, having done evil in His sight? Thou hast struck down Uriah the Hittite with the sword; thou hast taken his wife to be thy wife. Therefore, the sword shall not depart from thy house for ever" (2 Samuel 12:7-10). By inflicting harm upon another’s household, you will find judgment in your own.

Thus, David fled from his son, experiencing the consequences of his choices in the sight of God's commandments. This psalm, composed during his flight from Absalom, serves as a warning about the causes of conflict rather than recounting the conflict itself. Our observation of the righteous fall should inspire us to avoid perilous paths. Many still contend within their homes: one faces strife from a spouse, another is besieged by a child, and yet another finds trouble with a sibling or servant; every individual is tormented, agitated, and embroiled in conflict. Yet, few pause to reflect that if they had not sown seeds of sin, their homes would not be overrun by thorns and thistles.

It is evident in divine Scriptures that private calamities stem from personal sins and that God allows one’s household to execute punishment against the sinner. Is your wife waging war against you, confronting you with hostility? It is lamentable when a companion becomes an adversary; however, scrutinize whether you have wronged any woman in your past. The vendetta of a woman often emerges from a man’s previous transgressions. Regardless of their awareness, God, the divine healer, operates through them as instruments of retribution. Though the afflicted may not realize their role, God understands the necessity of such afflictions.

The Scriptures affirm that a wicked wife can be a consequence of a man’s wickedness, serving as a corrective to his offenses (cf. Sirach 25:21 and 26). Abundant evidence demonstrates that attacks from children result from parental sins, which David exemplifies through his distress from Absalom. Similarly, the enmity among brothers arises from sin, as demonstrated in the book of Judges, where the tribe of Benjamin faced the wrath of the eleven other tribes due to their sin against a traveling man's concubine. Their rebellion led to their defeat, revealing that all suffered the consequences of turning away from God.

When brothers oppose one another, do not simply assign blame; rather, review the sins prompting such enmity. Yet not all familial opposition is due to sin; Joseph faced wrongful attacks from his brothers without sinning. Likewise, Job endured suffering from his wife that had no root in his own misdeeds. Most familial disputes arise from sins, as even friends can become foes when sin corrupts their love, as seen in Psalm 104:25, regarding the Egyptians' hatred towards God's people.

Thus, even servants have risen against their masters, all as ramifications of sin. Prior to Adam's transgression, the wild animals obediently served him, but upon sinning, they turned against him. When disobedience stained his purity, the creatures no longer acknowledged his authority.

Daniel, a righteous man, was saved by the lions as they recognized his purity (Daniel 6:22), while a false prophet met his end at the paws of a lion when his deceit became evident. Domestic strife can even arise from the very body that serves us, for when we sin, it retaliates through ailments. Christ addressed this when He said to the healed paralytic, "Behold, thou art healed; sin no more, lest something worse happen to thee" (John 5:14). Thus, let us realize that the conflicts within households, among kin, and even bodily sufferings often stem from our transgressions.

David's choice to take a married woman resulted in rebellion from his son, who sought to forcibly claim the kingdom. David endured the bitterness of Absalom’s rebellion, which was ultimately met with divine retribution. Absalom’s attempts to usurp his father led to his own demise at the hands of Joab, a practical demonstration of poetic justice. The judgment that fell upon Absalom serves as a illustration of God’s overarching justice; he who sought to impose discord and rebellion met with a fate reflective of his ambitions.

In the end, David's lament for Absalom highlights the tragic consequences of sin and rebellion, encapsulating the truth that reckless ambition and hostility can lead not only to one's downfall but to the suffering of others involved.

Augustine of Hippo

5th centuryChurch Father

The central voice of this psalm clearly represents the expression of Christ, as indicated in the line: I fell asleep, slept, and rose again, for the Lord will defend me (Ps 3:6). This interpretation aligns more closely with the suffering and resurrection of the Lord rather than the account of David fleeing from his son during their conflict.

The phrases “I slept and rested; and rose again, for the Lord shall raise me up,” suggest that this Psalm pertains to Christ Himself. These words appear to resonate more with the Passion and Resurrection of our Savior than with the account of David's flight from his rebellious son. Additionally, since it is stated about Christ's disciples that "The sons of the bridegroom fast not while the bridegroom is with them" (Matt. 9:15), it is fitting to interpret the phrase ‘disobedient son’ as referring to the disciple who betrayed Him.

Read more (328 words)

Historically, while it can be seen that Christ fled when He withdrew to the mountain with His followers, on a spiritual level, this implies the moment when the Son of God—the embodiment of divine Power and Wisdom—departed from Judas, allowing the Devil to fully take hold of him, as written, “The Devil entered into his heart” (John 13:27). It is crucial to grasp that Christ did not flee in fear of the Devil, but rather after His departure, the Devil seized control. This departure is described as flight in the Psalm, perhaps due to its sudden nature, which echoes the words of our Lord, “Whatsoever thou doest, do it quickly” (John 13:27). In everyday language, we might express forgetfulness as something that “has escaped me,” while for an educated person we might say that nothing eludes him. Thus, the truth departed from Judas when he ceased to be illuminated by it.

Furthermore, Absalom, according to some interpretations, signifies "the peace of the father." This idea raises questions within the context of both the royal narrative and the New Testament, particularly concerning Judas's betrayal. Readers who examine the text closely note that David maintained a sense of peace towards his son during the conflict, mourning deeply for him and lamenting, “O Absalom, my son, if I had died for thee!” (2 Sam. 18:33). In the New Testament context, the profound and remarkable patience of our Lord is evident in His long-suffering attitude towards Judas. Jesus was aware of Judas's treachery, yet He permitted him to join the Last Supper, where He instituted the Communion of His Body and Blood. Notably, He even accepted the kiss of peace from Judas at the moment of betrayal, illustrating how Christ extended peace toward His betrayer despite the inner turmoil resulting from such a heinous act. Consequently, Absalom symbolizes the peace of his father because, while his father had peace in his heart, Absalom was embroiled in the conflict that he himself initiated.

Athanasius the Great

4th centuryChurch Father

The title commonly associated with this psalm indicates that it reflects the experiences of the prophets enduring persecution at the hands of the Jewish people. The term ‘David’ can be understood as a reference to avarice, which mirrors the demeanor of the prophets. Just as Absalom conspired against his father, David, in a bid for power; similarly, the Jewish people turned against their forebearers, the prophets, rejecting God's decrees and contradicting His will.

Theodoret of Cyrus

5th centuryChurch Father

This account may be familiar to those who pay close attention, yet I will briefly summarize it for the less vigilant. The illustrious King David, after committing a severe transgression, became engulfed in numerous and diverse misfortunes. Not only did neighboring nations rise in hostility and warfare against him, but even his own household experienced insurrection. One wrongdoing led to another; the slaying of Absalom was the result of Amnon's sin, and this act of violence eventually sparked rebellion against his father and caused his followers to turn away. While divine grace safeguarded David, he was shielded from such tribulations. However, once grace receded due to his wrongdoing, sin took over, resulting in heartbreak and extensive suffering. In this moment of fleeing from his son and those allied with him who had revolted, he composed this psalm; for, through the deep repentance he expressed, the Holy Spirit was actively at work within him.

Euthymios Zigabenos

11th centuryCommentator

The title of this psalm is evident, particularly to those well-acquainted with the accounts in Kings (2 Sam. 15:14). It speaks not just for David but for everyone who faces opposition from foes, whether seen or unseen.

Theophan the Recluse

19th centuryChurch Father

The third Psalm was written by the Prophet and King David during the time of Absalom's insurrection. To grasp the Psalm's thematic progression, those familiar with the circumstances referenced in the title are encouraged to recall them, while a brief summary is provided for those less acquainted (2 Sam. 15ff.). Following his grave transgressions involving Bathsheba, King David experienced profound repentance before the Lord. In response, the Lord, through the prophet Nathan, assured David of His forgiveness; however, He also revealed that David would face temporary chastisements as a form of purifying penance, which would arise from within his own household due to the nature of his sins.

Read more (1195 words)

These tribulations soon manifested, beginning with Absalom's vengeance against his brother Amnon for the sake of their sister Tamar, leading to Amnon's death. Absalom then fled to his maternal grandfather, the king of Geshur. After three years, David permitted Absalom's return, yet kept him from appearing before him for two additional years.

Once Absalom was finally allowed to see his father, he began plotting against him, seeking to usurp the throne. To gain favor, he started engaging with individuals entering Jerusalem from various tribes, offering a welcoming presence and demonstrating fairness in their disputes. Through these efforts, Absalom garnered widespread support, leading many to desire his kingship over David’s. Feeling confident in his plan, Absalom solicited his father’s permission to go to Hebron to fulfill a vow. Meanwhile, he sent his allies across the land to proclaim that he had been made king in Hebron as soon as they heard the trumpets. Their call was evidently effective, as crowds gathered to support him. Notably, 200 men from Jerusalem accompanied Absalom, unaware of his treachery, alongside Ahithophel, David's trusted advisor, which further fueled the belief that Absalom had achieved kingship.

When word reached David that the hearts of the Israelites were with Absalom, he felt defeated and saw no chance to quell the uprising or safeguard Jerusalem. He resolved to flee, declaring that there was no refuge for them there. As he and his followers crossed the Kidron River, Jerusalem mourned aloud. The chief priests and Levites wished to carry the Ark of the Covenant with them, but David instructed Zadok the high priest to return it to the city, expressing his faith that if he obtained favor from the Lord, he would again witness the Ark and its grandeur. Conversely, if the Lord had turned away from him, he accepted whatever outcome might ensue. He instructed Zadok and Abiathar, the priest, to inform him of developments in Jerusalem through their sons while he waited in the wilderness.

As David ascended the Mount of Olives, he wept, head covered and feet bare, accompanied by those who shared in his grief and sorrow. Upon learning that Ahithophel had sided with Absalom, David cried out to the Lord to thwart Ahithophel's counsel. Reaching the summit where the view of Jerusalem and Zion was obscured, the holy king worshipped the Lord who resided in the tabernacle, wherein he had often sought help. Was this not the moment when God, attentive to David's humble plea, resolved to thwart Ahithophel's advice and safeguard David? Under such duress, David did everything within his power. Hushai, a reputable companion, sought to accompany him, but the king urged him to return to Jerusalem instead. There, he could counter Ahithophel's counsel, conveying information back to David as previously arranged. After Hushai departed for Jerusalem, David continued his journey with his men into the wilderness.

Having traversed through Judah, they approached Bahurim, a village of Benjamin, where Shimei, a descendant of Saul's house, emerged to curse David, hurling insults and stones. Those with David suggested silencing Shimei, yet David, in a posture of humility before the Lord, instructed them to let him be; if the Lord had directed Shimei's curses, who was he to intervene? David expressed hope that perhaps the Lord would recognize his humility and respond with kindness instead. Shimei persisted in his tirade as David's group pressed onward and rested in the wilderness.

Meanwhile, Absalom convened a council in Jerusalem about how to proceed. Ahithophel advised an immediate pursuit of David, arguing that the weary are easy prey. However, Hushai successfully dissuaded the council, arguing that David and his men were ferocious as lions, making them formidable foes. He suggested mustering all Israel, from Dan to Beersheba, to pursue David, ensuring no one would escape unharmed. Ultimately, the counsel of Hushai was favored over that of Ahithophel, shifting the tide in David's favor. He rallied his forces and engaged in battle, resulting in the defeat of Absalom's army and the death of Absalom himself.

The context surrounding this event is crucial for understanding the composition of the third Psalm. Notably, the aspersions cast upon David during his flight, reflected in the Psalm, demonstrate the distress he faced. The historical account reveals that the support of the Israelites was with Absalom, leading to the Psalm's reflection on the vastness of those who feared him. The Psalm articulates, "There is no salvation for him in his God." In returning the Ark, David reaffirmed his commitment to the will of God, mirrored in the Psalm's assertion: "Thou, O Lord, art my shield." Additionally, upon Mount Olivet, David worshipped the Lord, paralleling the Psalm's declaration: "Unto the Lord will I lift up my voice."

Crucially, the spirit that filled King David during his exile from Absalom aligns with the Psalm's essence—characterized by humble submission to God and unwavering trust in divine assistance. When did this Psalm emerge from the depths of David's soul? The morning after his departure from Jerusalem, he noted, "I lay down and slept; I awoke, for the Lord sustains me." While still in prayer on Olivet, David likely felt reassured of God's support. His journey was marked by a prayerful demeanor, intensifying as night fell, fortified by faith in God's safeguarding presence. Ultimately, he laid down to rest peacefully and rose with renewed resolve to praise God, reflecting on his dire circumstances and total reliance on the Lord: "Arise, O Lord; save me, O my God!"

Thus, the psalm may be succinctly outlined: 1. I am in great distress. 2. I have but one hope in You, O Lord. 3. Save me. This detailed structure reveals three main aspects:

1. The Prophet acknowledges the extremity of his situation: a. Due to the multitude of his foes, as expressed in verse 2, b. Their ferocity is described in verse 3.

2. The prophet's sole hope rests in God: a. This revelation is made evident: aa. Through spoken word (v. 4), bb. Through action (v. 5). b. Subsequently, the prophet finds tranquility in the Lord, demonstrated by: aa. The calmness of his spirit despite surrounding chaos (v. 6), bb. His lack of fear before his enemies (v. 7).

3. Turning towards God in prayer for salvation: a. He articulates this plea succinctly but powerfully (v. 8), b. Reinforcing it through: aa. Past experiences of God's deliverance (same v. 8), bb. The fundamental truth that salvation and blessing come from the Lord—this concluding notion encapsulates the essence of the psalm.

As readers meditate on this Psalm, it is important to bear in mind that, while it historically pertains to St. David the Prophet, it applies universally to anyone grappling with inner struggles against sin or external adversities, as taught by Gregory of Nyssa. It serves as a reminder to remain hopeful, regardless of the magnitude of one’s sins or tribulations, emulating David’s legacy of faith amidst overwhelming despair. Such reflections assist the contrite sinner in discovering a path back to the Lord, countering any despair that may arise with the realization that no matter the depth of their failures, God's mercy and salvation are attainable. Thus, this Psalm importantly stands at the forefront of penitential prayers.

Irenaeus (Klementjewsky)

18th centuryCommentator

INSCRIPTION AND CONTENTS. A Psalm of David when he fled from his son Absalom. The inscription clearly indicates that this psalm, in its straightforward interpretation, reflects David's earnest plea for rescue from the trials inflicted by his son. Moreover, because David serves as a foreshadowing of Christ, and the Prophets refer to Christ as David (Jeremiah 30:9; Ezekiel 34:23; Hosea 3:5), this psalm may also be understood as pertaining to Christ.

Ireneus (Orda)

19th centuryCommentator

The title inscription indicates that this psalm was composed during the time of David's trials caused by Absalom's rebellion, a claim that lacks significant internal dissent. In deep sorrow and with bare feet, David fled from Jerusalem, accompanied by the few loyal companions, traversing the Mount of Olives and entering the wilderness of Jericho. There, he found some respite for his weary body (v.6; cf. 2 Samuel 16:14). However, that very night (2 Samuel 17:21-22), he was compelled to continue his escape, crossing the Jordan River to reach Mahanaim. After crossing safely, he earnestly prayed in the early morning (2 Samuel 17:22), and the heartfelt prayer he uttered constitutes the essence of this psalm.

Psalter with Commentaries (Cave Monastery in Kiew)

19th centuryCommentator

The Psalm attributed to David, inspired by the Holy Spirit, expresses the voice of Christ addressing God the Father, particularly during His Passion in light of the numerous adversaries and the cries of the Holy Church seeking to triumph over her persecutors while imploring divine assistance. The Holy Spirit guides us through the history and examples of Israel, encouraging a life of purity, urging us to harm no one and uphold the commandments of God. For from the origin of sin arises the affliction of punishment. The Babylonian exile, the ruin of Jerusalem, and all forms of distress, plagues, and foreign invasions are consequences of sin and disbelief in Christ God.

Cross references

Passages read together with this verse.