The Church Fathers on this verse

Psalm 35 (34):11Meaning & Commentary from the Church Fathers

Unjust witnesses rising up have asked me things I knew not.

Douay-Rheims · Hebrew numbering, Septuagint numbering in brackets.

יְ֭קוּמוּן עֵדֵ֣י חָמָ֑ס אֲשֶׁ֥ר לֹא־יָ֝דַ֗עְתִּי יִשְׁאָלֽוּנִי׃

Hebrew (Masoretic text)

The Church Fathers on this verse

6 Church Fathers comment on this verse

Augustine of Hippo

5th centuryChurch Father

Let us hear from our Lord, who proclaimed, "False witnesses have risen up, accusing Me of things which I did not know." (Psalm 34:11). Yet we may ask our Lord: What was it that You were unaware of? Did You truly know nothing? Were You not aware of the intentions of those who brought false accusations against You? Did You not anticipate their deceit? Did You not willingly place Yourself in their grasp? Did You not come to endure their suffering? What is it that You did not know? He was without sin, which is why He was untouched by sin—not because He lacked the ability to discern but because He never committed it. Such expressions are common in daily conversations; you might say of someone, "He knows he cannot stand," meaning he indeed cannot stand.

Read more (86 words)

He lacks the knowledge of doing good because he does not perform good deeds; he is unaware of evil because he does not engage in wickedness. What was it that Christ was unaware of, to the point of not committing blasphemy? For this very reason, He was interrogated by His accusers, and because He uttered the truth, they deemed it blasphemy. (Matt. 26:65) And by whom was this claim made? By those who, as it is written, repaid Me evil for good, rendering My soul desolate.

Athanasius the Great

4th centuryChurch Father

This verse presents the visage of Christ, who is characterized by false testimony during the magistrate's trial.

Theodoret of Cyrus

5th centuryChurch Father

The prophet declares that he was falsely accused, charged with intentions he never harbored. Saul, driven by jealousy, believed that David was conspiring to usurp his throne. This fueled his animosity towards David, and his adversaries exploited the situation, relentlessly spreading rumors against him. David refers to these individuals as false witnesses, including the likes of Doeg and Ziba, along with numerous others.

Euthymios Zigabenos

11th centuryCommentator

Saul, he claims, along with his associates, served as witnesses against him, yet their testimony was unjust and based on falsehoods. They accused him with malicious intent, questioning whether he had conspired against the kingdom, a scheme they alone claimed knowledge of, while he remained unaware of any such plot, akin to an innocent man. This mirrors the actions of those who falsely testified against the Lord Christ during that period. They interrogated and accused Him of things He did not recognize, as the Gospel narrative reveals.

Irenaeus (Klementjewsky)

18th centuryCommentator

The prophet moves on to discuss a different form of persecution, specifically false accusations, where the wicked no longer hide their intentions but openly attack the righteous. He intensifies the malice of their slanders by first stating: Having risen, indicating that the accusers acted on their own accord to bring false testimony, without any expectation of being summoned. Next, he asserts I do not know, revealing that the righteous is falsely accused by those who are devoid of law, not only of actions he didn’t commit but also of thoughts he never entertained.

Read more (224 words)

He further adds: Question me, highlighting the audacity and shamelessness of these false accusers, who, uncontent with merely testifying against the righteous in front of the authorities, have the nerve to interrogate him directly.

Additionally, he mentions, The wicked have rewarded me with good things, to illustrate that these false witnesses, seemingly undeterred and even favored, have united in slander out of pure malice. Finally, he reflects on the desolation of my soul, emphasizing that these unscrupulous individuals aim not for minor harms but for substantial destruction, targeting life itself. This sentiment resonates clearly with the Hebrew text, which states, “The evil one repaid me for good, (wishing) to take away my soul.” However, aligning with the translation of the seventy interpreters, the heartlessness of the soul can be understood in two significant ways. Firstly, it signifies total ruin, akin to what befell the righteous Job, who lost his wealth, children, and health in a single day. Secondly, it refers to a form of profound suffering recognized as significant by both the adversary, who seeks to impose this pain through his agents, and the righteous, who must endure it. This suffering particularly involves the loss of honor; a person of integrity, when tarnished by falsehoods, feels as if he is left fatherless, abandoned, and like a tree uprooted, no longer able to yield fruit.

Psalter with Commentaries (Cave Monastery in Kiew)

19th centuryCommentator

Witnesses against Christ the Lord included unrighteous Jews who claimed, “This man stated, ‘I am able to destroy the temple of God, and in three days raise it up’” (Matthew 26:61). Furthermore, they accused Him of refusing to pay tribute to Caesar. These wicked Jews question Christ as if He were a sinner; yet, He is without sin, and no deceit is found in His speech (1 Pet. 2:22).

Cross references

Passages read together with this verse.