John Chrysostom
How did he bring low their spirits? By recalling to them their essence. After referring to them as ‘nations,’ he included the phrase “earth-born and sons of men,” highlighting the origin of our existence and reminding them of our common ancestry. Why introduce the term ‘sons of men’? By mentioning ‘earth-born,’ he aimed to counter the pagan legends that suggested humanity sprouted from the soil. Such tales misconceive men as having been seeded rather than created; thus he emphasized: ‘sons of men.’ Acquaint yourselves with your origins, for while your ancestors were human, your being, like theirs, stems from the earth. “What is the earth proud and ashes?” (Sir.
Read more (512 words)
10:9) Contemplate your origin, quell your pride, and subdue your arrogance; recall that “dust thou art and unto dust thou shalt return” (Gen. 3:19), and abandon all futility. I desire a listener such as this; it is for this reason I humble you, so you may be open to the message proclaimed. ‘The rich together with the poor.’ Observe the profound honor of the Church. Is it not remarkable that it differentiates not among its congregants based on status but imparts the same teachings to all, providing a shared feast to both the affluent and the needy? Having addressed the commonality that we all share an earthly origin as sons of men, the prophet acknowledges the apparent disparities and inequities of worldly life, dismissing those differences. He calls all in general, recognizing our shared existence within the cosmos; you may have fabricated a hierarchy of wealth and poverty, imposing division, but I challenge that notion, welcoming both rich and poor together—neither favoring the wealthy nor diminishing the status of the destitute, nor inviting only the poor while excluding the rich, but addressing both groups as equals. Let there be a united congregation, a singular proclamation, a shared listening experience. Although you are wealthy, you emerged from the same dust, entered this world in the same manner as the impoverished: both are sons of men. If the most vital and fundamental aspects are shared among you, why then do you elevate yourself based on trivial distinctions? You possess a shared essence, a unified birthright, a common inheritance; why allow superficial possessions to engender division? I cannot condone this, and thus I summon you together with the less fortunate: ‘the rich together with the wretched.’ Typically, you would not see the rich and the poor alongside one another—in courts of law, royal chambers, marketplaces, or at banquets; there, one holds honor, while the other faces scorn, one speaks boldly and the other in shame: “the wisdom of the poor man is neglected, and his words are not listened to” (Eccl. 9:16); “the rich man spoke, and all were silent and raised his words to the clouds; the poor man was troubled, and yet they chastised him; he spoke wisely, and was not heard” (Sir. 13:27, 28). Yet, this is not the case here. Within the church, I do not allow such distinctions or foolishness, but extend the same teachings to all. Consider the teacher’s wisdom—before he commenced his preaching, he imparted the greatest lesson through one announcement. By gathering all, he neither elevated the rich nor kept the poor in shame, illustrating that neither riches are truly beneficial nor poverty inherently negative, but that both are transient and external states. To me, he conveys, there exists no distinction between your standings; I perceive no advantage in your wealth, nor any disadvantage in your poverty. Yet, someone may challenge him: if you share our nature, what makes you worthy and capable of being a teacher to all, summoning those from distant lands? Do you possess anything significant to offer such a gathering? Indeed, he affirms.