The Church Fathers on this verse

Romans 7:21Meaning & Commentary from the Church Fathers

I find then a law, that when I have a will to do good, evil is present with me.

Douay-Rheims

ευρισκω αρα τον νομον τω θελοντι εμοι ποιειν το καλον οτι εμοι το κακον παρακειται

Greek (Byzantine text)

The Church Fathers on this verse

9 Church Fathers comment on this verse

John Chrysostom

4th centuryChurch Father

"I find then a law, that when I want to do good, evil is present with me." What is said is unclear. What does it mean?

Paul is saying, "I praise the law according to conscience, and when I want to do good, I find in it a defender for myself, one who strengthens my will. As I delight in the law, so it approves my disposition."

Do you see how the Apostle proves that an understanding of good and evil was implanted in us from the beginning? He also proves that the Law of Moses praises this understanding and is itself praised by it.

Earlier he did not say, "I learn from the law," but, "I praise the law" (Rom 7:16). So now he does not say, "I am educated by the law," but, "I delight in the law."

Read more (203 words)

What does "I delight in" mean? I agree with it as good, just as it agrees with me when I want to do good.

It was given to man from above to desire good and not to desire evil. When the law appeared, it became an accuser of many things in evil and a praiser of still more in good.

Do you see that the Apostle ascribes to the law nothing more than a certain strengthening and supplement?

Although the law praises the good, and I delight in it and desire the good, nevertheless evil is still present, and its action has not been abolished.

Thus, for one who intends to do some good, the law is only an ally in this respect, and only insofar as he himself desires the same thing.

Because the Apostle expressed this unclearly, he later explains it and brings it into greater clarity. He shows how evil is present and how the law assists the one who desires to do good.

"For I delight in the law of God according to the inward man." "I knew the good even before the law," says the Apostle, "and when I found it depicted in the writings, I praised it."

Theophylact of Bulgaria

11th centuryChurch Father

The expression is unclear; something is missing in it. He ought to have said, "Therefore, when I want to do good, I find in the law a defender for myself. Yet I do not do the good, because evil is present with me."

The meaning of this passage is as follows. Knowledge of the good was implanted in me from the beginning. I also find that the law defends it and praises it, and I desire to do the good.

Yet I am drawn in by some other power, and evil is present with me. That is, the action of evil is not abolished in me.

However, Chrysostom, having interpreted this passage as incomplete, suggests that it may also be understood otherwise. Namely, "I find that the law was given not to someone else, but to me, who desire to do good."

For the law is law only for those who desire to do good, since it desires the same thing that they desire. This will become clear from what follows.

Cyrill of Alexandria

5th centuryChurch Father

If evil is present with me as something dwelling in the flesh, the Apostle says, then the law gives help and is understood as a counselor, but not as a deliverer.

Those who are wounded by sin must necessarily not only know that they should act better, but also be able to do what is good and what the law commands.

Notice again with what wisdom and skill he accepts the law. It is not because the law can dull the sting of sin, nor, certainly, because it can put to death the sin within us.

Rather, it is only because the law teaches the mind the knowledge of what is profitable. For if the law tells me that evil is present because it dwells in the flesh, then it plainly declares this evil to be depraved.

Read more (137 words)

It gives help and may be considered a counselor, but still not a deliverer. Those who are possessed by sins need more than exact knowledge that they ought to act better.

They also need the power to perform what will be good and what has been ordained by the law.

So also, those who wish to succeed in battles are not sufficiently aided by bare knowledge of military art. If they also possess strength, then, not without toil, they may become brilliant and glorious.

Therefore, if the law teaches skill in good works, yet in no way helps those who suffer the violence of sin by weakening it, then it is indeed a good teacher.

Yet it cannot justly be considered equal to the grace given by Christ, Who can make us wise and stronger than evil.

Ephraem the Syrian

4th centuryChurch Father

Thus I see a certain law that wishes to accomplish some good in me, something difficult for my will, since it is inclined toward doing evil.

Ambrosiaster

4th centuryChurch Father

Paul says that the law of Moses agrees with his desire not to commit the sin that dwells in his flesh and urges him to do something contrary both to his own desire and to the command of the law.

Theodoret of Cyrus

5th centuryChurch Father

"I find, then, the law, when I wish to do good"—a punctuation mark should be placed here—"that evil is present with me." Again, because of brevity, the Apostle expressed this obscurely. He means that the law also seems good to me, because I praise what it prescribes as something good. I myself, like the law, love the good and hate what is contrary to it. Yet evil is present with me, that is, sin, because I have a mortal and passionate body, and negligence and weakness of soul. Then the Apostle shows more clearly the struggle of the mind and the passions.

Ivanov A.V.

19th centuryChurch Father

The Apostle depicts the condition of the unregenerate man, in whom an inward struggle takes place between mind and will, between spirit and flesh.

With man's fall, the will ceased to heed the suggestions of reason. Reason still preserved the knowledge of the good and desires it, striving toward it. Yet it lacks the power to move the will to accomplish what it wants.

The voice of conscience, the inward judge of man's actions, is likewise too weak to guide and restrain human activity. It too becomes confused and irresolute, so that it is difficult even to follow its indications.

Read more (280 words)

The flesh, from being the instrument of the spirit, became its master. It even drew the spiritual faculties into devising various means to satisfy its needs. It became weak in serving spiritual demands, and even hostile to them.

The Mosaic Law, given to define the action of the will, could only reveal more clearly the inward division and impotence of fallen man. It could also awaken in him a thirst for gracious help.

This Law assisted the natural law of man's conscience. By positive external punishments it restrained man's sinful inclinations, and by rewards it encouraged the fulfillment of good.

But the weaknesses of the flesh, inborn inclinations, and acquired habits of sin became so usual and constant that the Apostle directly calls them, taken together, the law of sin.

From the chief place of their activity, he calls them the law of the flesh, the law of the members, which opposes the law of the mind, or conscience.

The opposition of this law to the law of the mind is so strong that man does what he does not want. For what he does want, he does not find sufficient strength within himself.

Therefore the Apostle cries out on behalf of all suffering humanity: "O wretched man that I am! Who will deliver me from this body of death?"

The Western Church, following the opinion of Augustine, Ambrose, and others, confirmed by the decrees of the Council of Trent, applies the condition described above to regeneration.

Yet even among Western interpreters, some, such as Calmet, Allioli, and Bisping, rely on Chrysostom, Theodoret, Theophylact, and other Eastern Fathers. They find it more consistent to see here man's condition before regeneration.

Michail Cheraskov

19th centuryChurch Father

To awaken in us the greatest possible revulsion and hatred toward sin, the Apostle depicts the grievous violence which sin works upon us. He also depicts the unnatural division that arises in our nature because of sin: "I do not understand what I do. For I do not do what I will, but what I hate, that I do. But if I do what I do not will, I agree with the law that it is good. Now then, it is no longer I who do it, but sin that dwells in me... According to the inward man I delight in the law of God. But in my members I see another law, warring against the law of my mind and bringing me into captivity to the law of sin."

Theophan the Recluse

19th centuryChurch Father

If "law" is taken here in the sense of the written law, the syntactical structure becomes difficult, and the thought of the text unclear. To determine it, one would have to supply and insert whole sentences.

It is therefore better to understand by "law" the law of life acting in me, or the constant order of phenomena taking place within me, as the Russian translation does.

Oecumenius cited various paraphrases used by interpreters to clarify this passage when law is understood as the written law. He finally adds, "One may also take it thus, more closely to the words: I find that, when I want to do the good according to the law, evil lies before me."

Read more (286 words)

But there is no need to refer the word "law" to "good," in order to say "good according to the law." Good itself contains the thought that it is according to law, whether written or unwritten.

It is therefore better to leave this word in its own place, joining with it the concept of law in general, as the order of the course of phenomena once for all established.

The result is this: I find in myself such a law, such a law of events accomplished or taking place within me, that when I want to do good, evil at the same time lies before me, or is presented to me: parakeitai.

This does not indicate anything exceptional, but what everyone knows by experience. Here is the beginning of temptation to sin. Against every good there is in us an opposite evil.

When a man intends to do good, whether directly from himself or because of external occasions, the opposite evil immediately emerges from within and presents itself to his attention instead of the good.

It does not yet compel; it only presents itself. Someone asks for help: I want to share. But self-interest appears and says, "You need it yourself; keep it for yourself, and refuse."

So it is with every good work. One must not lose sight of the expression, "when I want to do good." The evil living in us is silent, as though it were not there.

But as soon as we think of doing something good or move toward it, it appears from somewhere and begins to obstruct us. It binds hands and feet, thoughts and desires.

What follows? A dispute arises: the good draws one way, and evil draws another.

Cross references

Passages read together with this verse.

The original text

Greek text, 15 words with lemma, transliteration and Strong’s number. Tap to expand.

  1. Εὑρίσκω
    heuriskō
    I find
    G2147 · εὑρίσκω
  2. ἄρα
    ara
    then
    G686 · ἄρα
  3. τὸν
    ton
    the
    G3588 · ὁ
  4. νόμον
    nomon
    a law
    G3551 · νόμος
  5. τῷ
    tō
    the
    G3588 · ὁ
  6. θέλοντι
    thelonti
    I will
    G2309 · θέλω
  7. ἐμοὶ
    emoi
    I
    G1473 · ἐγώ
  8. ποιεῖν
    poiein
    I do
    G4160 · ποιέω
  9. τὸ
    to
    the
    G3588 · ὁ
  10. καλὸν
    kalon
    beautiful
    G2570 · καλός
  11. ὅτι
    hoti
    that
    G3754 · ὅτι
  12. ἐμοὶ
    emoi
    I
    G1473 · ἐγώ
  13. τὸ
    to
    the
    G3588 · ὁ
  14. κακὸν
    kakon
    bad
    G2556 · κακός
  15. παράκειται
    parakeitai
    I am present with
    G3873 · παράκειμαι