The Church Fathers on this verse

Titus 3:11Meaning & Commentary from the Church Fathers

Knowing that he that is such an one is subverted and sinneth, being condemned by his own judgment.

Douay-Rheims

ειδως οτι εξεστραπται ο τοιουτος και αμαρτανει ων αυτοκατακριτος

Greek (Byzantine text)

The Church Fathers on this verse

15 Church Fathers comment on this verse

John Chrysostom

4th centuryChurch Father

What does “being self-condemned” mean? He cannot say that no one spoke to him, that no one admonished him. And when, after admonition, he remains the same, then he is “self-condemned.”

Theophylact of Bulgaria

11th centuryChurch Father

How then does Paul say elsewhere, “Perhaps God may grant them repentance” (2 Tim 2:25)? There he spoke of people who offer hope of correction. Here he speaks of an incorrigible heretic, utterly corrupted, who is self-condemned, that is, without excuse. For he cannot say, “No one admonished me, no one taught me.” Therefore, if after admonition he stubbornly persists in the same thing, he has condemned himself.

Athanasius the Great

4th centuryChurch Father

In that case, being put to shame by the stench of their names, perhaps they will be able to understand into what depth of impiety they have fallen.

Although justice would require that we not answer these heretics, according to the apostolic counsel, "Reject a heretic after the first and second admonition, knowing that such a one is perverted and sins, being self-condemned."

This is especially so since the prophet also says of such people: "For the fool speaks folly, and his heart thinks lawlessness" (Isa 32:6).

Yet, since they too, like their leader, walk about as lions, seeking someone to devour (1 Pet 5:8) from among the simple, it became necessary for us to write to your reverence.

Thus the brethren, taught again by your admonition, may consign their vain words to still greater condemnation.

Ephraem the Syrian

4th centuryChurch Father

For such a man, for whom there is neither certain truth nor falsehood, is perverted in his mind and sins, because he has tasted the truth and turned back. By the very fact that he goes away and comes back, he condemns himself, that is, he subjects himself to deserved condemnation.

Ambrose of Milan

4th centuryChurch Father

It is written, "Stop your ears," and elsewhere, "Beware of dogs, beware of evil workers" (Phil 3:2).

And again: "Reject a heretic after the first and second admonition, knowing that such a one is perverted and sins, being self-condemned."

Therefore, like good helmsmen, let us pass by the cave of heresies in the most cautious way. Let us spread the sails of faith and equip the tackle of the Scriptures.

By their hard and unbending fleshly mind they can in no way depart from their sin. Therefore the Apostle says: "Reject a heretic after one admonition," knowing that such people are corrupted.

Christ, the true Interpreter of the Scriptures, leads them into error so that their attacks may prove futile and be unable to harm.

Euthymios Zigabenos

11th centuryChurch Father

“Knowing that such a one is perverted.” He has been utterly perverted, utterly corrupted, and suffers from an incurable disease. “And sins.” The more he persists, the more he sins. Therefore do not give him an occasion to continue in sin. “And is self-condemned.” He cannot say that no one reproved him when he strayed from the straight path, and that no one admonished him.

Cyprian of Carthage

3rd centuryChurch Father

That the Church can neither be outside herself, nor be cut or divided against herself, but represents the unity of an undivided and whole house, is explained by the testimony of Holy Scripture.

Here it is mystically proclaimed that those who are preparing for victory and desire to escape the destruction of the world must gather in one house alone, that is, in the Church.

Whoever goes out from those gathered there, that is, whoever has received grace in the Church and then falls away and departs, will be guilty against himself.

This means that he must blame himself for his own destruction. According to the clear teaching and commandment of the Apostle Paul, such a man must be avoided as a heretic, perverted, sinning, and self-condemned.

Maximus of Turin

5th centuryChurch Father

A heretic condemns himself when he expels himself from the catholic Church and departs from the assembly of the saints, although no one compels him. For he himself, who by his own decision separates himself from all, shows that he brings condemnation upon himself from all. I say that the heretic condemns himself because all criminal men are expelled from the Christian community by the bishop’s decision. But the heretic, forestalling the voices of all, is overthrown by the voice of his own will.

Jewgenij A. Popow

19th centuryChurch Father

"He is perverted, and sins, and is self-condemned" is said about a heretic.

This means a man who, without refuting the Orthodox teaching as a whole, has arbitrarily distorted some dogma of the faith, as Arius once did concerning the Son of God, or as certain special sects do in our schism.

Mere doubts in faith, or error, or even schism itself, as well as the defense of one's false convictions, do not yet constitute heresy.

Heresy is the denial or distortion of a divine dogma, or of an essential article of faith, and this with extreme obstinacy.

Therefore the full guilt of a person who has invented a heresy or accepted one already prepared begins only after the Church has reproved him, and he continues stubbornly to hold his opinion, which is contrary to the catholic faith.

After this, the Church's canons strictly forbid having religious, and even ordinary, communion with such a person (Apostolic Canon 45; Laodicea 9 and 37).

Michail Cheraskov

19th centuryChurch Father

Why not try a third and fourth time to turn the heretic to the path of truth? Brotherly love for one's neighbor would seem to oblige us to this.

One may suppose that the Apostle is not appointing here a strictly fixed number of attempts to persuade heretics.

He only impresses upon Titus that attempts at persuasion made once and twice should show whether they should be continued further, or whether every further attempt should be abandoned.

Saint Chrysostom reasons precisely in this sense: "When someone has become so corrupt that he will by no means decide to change his opinion, why should you labor in vain, sowing seed on stone?

"That earnest labor can be used for your own people, conversing with them about mercy and the other virtues."

Read more (68 words)

That the Apostle truly means a heretic hopeless for conversion is clear from the features by which he defines him in the following, eleventh verse.

He says: "Such a one is perverted," that is, he has as though lost the capacity to see the truth. "He sins," that is, he impiously persists in his error.

"And is self-condemned," that is, there is no longer any justification for him.

Nicodemus (Milash)

19th centuryChurch Father

The appropriate punishments for crimes committed are imposed by Orthodox ecclesiastical law either by a condemnatory, that is, accusatory, sentence, or by a declaratory, that is, explanatory, sentence.

In a condemnatory sentence, it is an unconditional requirement that the proper ecclesiastical court fulfill all prescriptions concerning judicial procedure. In this way it becomes acquainted with the punishable matter and verifies it. Accordingly, it imposes the fitting punishment upon the guilty person.

But it happens that a person guilty of a certain crime is subject to punishment even without such a sentence. This occurs when, at the very moment of committing the crime, the offender has already fallen under the punishment determined by law.

Read more (678 words)

In such a case the court has no need to proceed to an investigation of the crime committed. By the very committing of it, the corresponding punishment has already come upon the offender. It remains only to establish the commission of the punishable act and the punishment. The judicial sentence in this case is only declaratory.

Corresponding to this difference in sentences, the relevant punishments also receive different names. With a sentence of condemnatory character, the punishment is called διχαστική ποινή, a judicial punishment. If the sentence is of declaratory character, the punishment is called, and is, νομική ποινή, a juridical or lawful punishment.

This latter occurs when the crime places the guilty person in such a position that the court has no need to judge him and punish him by deprivation of certain rights. The crime itself is bound up with their deprivation, and as soon as the crime is committed, the loss of rights follows of itself.

For certain grave crimes, especially those concerning church unity or the legal capacity of a given person to fulfill certain duties in the church order, such a punishment is imposed by ecclesiastical law itself.

For example, if a Christian has openly renounced the Christian faith and entered some non-Christian religious community, that person, by the very act of apostasy, has lost all rights belonging to him as a Christian. Consequently, a sentence of an ecclesiastical court declaring him deprived of these rights is superfluous.

Or if a member of the Church, for some punishable act of a secular character, is sentenced by the proper civil court to imprisonment or another similar punishment, then by that very fact this person is subjected to canonical infamy. In this case the ecclesiastical court has no need on its own part to impose this punishment specially.

In such and similar cases, punishment follows of itself as the immediate consequence of a certain punishable act. From this there developed in ecclesiastical law the concept of juridical or lawful punishment, as distinct from punishment imposed after proper judicial inquiry and declared by the proper ecclesiastical court.

The basis for this kind of punishment is found in Holy Scripture. The Apostle Paul, reminding Titus about a heretical man who does not wish to heed the exhortation to turn to the Orthodox faith, but remains stubborn in heresy, says that such a man is perverted, being self-condemned, και άμαρτάνει, ων αυτοκατάκριτος, Tit 3:10-11.

The same meaning is found in all the canons of the Council of Gangra that prescribe regarding as excommunicated from the Church all who have committed one of the crimes mentioned in those canons. The Gangran canons do not say that only an ecclesiastical court must declare the punishment for the crime. Rather, concerning each such offender, the relevant canon, like the Apostle Paul, says: ανάθεμα έστω. Such a stubborn sinner is already condemned.

All who dare to violate the decree of the holy and great Council held in Nicaea, in the presence of the most pious and God-beloved king Constantine, concerning the holy feast of saving Pascha, shall be excommunicated and rejected from the Church, if they continue contentiously to rise up against the good ordinance. This is said concerning laymen.

But if any of those who preside in the Church, whether bishop, presbyter, or deacon, after this decree dares, to the corruption of the people and disturbance of the churches, to separate himself and celebrate Pascha with the Jews, the holy Council henceforth judges such a one to be alien from the Church. He has become the cause not only of sin for himself, but also of the disorder and corruption of many.

The Council not only removes such men from sacred ministry, but also all who dare to be in communion with them after their deposition from the priesthood. Those deposed are also deprived of the external honor in which they had shared by the holy canon and the priesthood of God. Apostolic 7, 64, 70, 71; Second Ecumenical 7; Trullo 11; Laodicea 7, 37, 38; Carthage 34, 51, 73, 106.

Nikanor (Kamenski)

19th centuryChurch Father

Concerning the relation to heretics, the Apostle says that after the first and second admonition they must be rejected. That is, they must be put away from the composition of the Church.

They give no hope of conversion, are hardened in their prejudices, and have condemned themselves to destruction in life outside the Church, outside her saving mysteries, and outside eternal blessed life.

According to Saint John Chrysostom's explanation, the Apostle speaks here as if saying: "When someone has become so corrupt that he will by no means decide to change his opinion, why should you labor in vain, sowing seed on stone?

"That earnest labor can be used for your own people, conversing with them about mercy and the other virtues.

Read more (174 words)

"One may care for people who give hope of correction and merely offer resistance. But when someone holds to heresy plainly and openly before all, why dispute with him in vain? Why beat the air?"

"He is perverted," according to Bishop Theophan's explanation, "means that he has taken on a distorted mind, with which nothing can be done, because he has lost the capacity to see the truth, being filled with prejudices.

"The false principles he has adopted darken his eyes. In broad daylight he does not see the light that surrounds him and enlightens all others.

"He sins by disobedience to the clear indications of Holy Scripture, stubbornly persisting in falsehood.

"And he is self-condemned. This suggests that his conscience condemns him for disagreement with the truth, but he does not listen to it, being ashamed to be disgraced by yielding.

"He sacrifices to his self-love the truth which he clearly knows, and sins by going against conscience. A heretic stubbornly standing in heresy sentences himself to deprivation of the Kingdom" (Gal 5:2).

Rosanow N.P.

19th centuryChurch Father

If, in this matter, heretics hinder him and provoke him to disputes about the prescriptions of the Law, Titus must withdraw from them. To argue with ignorant and prejudiced men is useless.

Nevertheless, the heretic should be addressed once and twice with persuasion. But this persuasion must have the character of admonition, νουθεσία, and not of dispute.

After this, one must withdraw from him completely if the admonition has no effect on him. This is a sign that such a man sins no longer from weakness or lack of understanding, but with definite intention.

He also knows the condemnation to which he is subject.

Theophan the Recluse

19th centuryChurch Father

The reason why, after a heretic has been admonished twice, one should no longer concern oneself with him is this: "he is perverted and sins."

"He is perverted," ἐξέστραπται, means he has become utterly corrupt. He has taken on a distorted mind, with which nothing can be done.

He has lost the capacity to see the truth, being filled with prejudices contrary to it. The false principles he has adopted darken his eyes. In broad daylight he does not see the light that surrounds him and enlightens all others.

"He sins," ἁμαρτάνει, is usually used of moral sins, or of transgressions of the commandments.

But here it is said of false teaching. In relation to this, sin may be considered disobedience to the clear indications of the word of God, or resistance to the clearly expressed will of God.

Read more (324 words)

It is obstinacy in falsehood for the sake of personal prejudices, despite its contradiction of the clear truth of God.

"He sins" means: he stubbornly remains in his error despite all admonitions.

"And is self-condemned." How is he self-condemned when he is not aware of his error?

Perhaps this means the same as: he himself is to blame. They spoke to him and admonished him, but he did not want to listen. Let him reap the fruits of obstinacy. Who is to blame?

The fruit of obstinacy in heresy is the loss of the Kingdom of God. Elsewhere the Apostle, after listing the works of the flesh, among which he places heresies, concludes: "those who do such things shall not inherit the Kingdom of God" (Gal 5:21).

A heretic who stubbornly stands in heresy already sentences himself to this deprivation of the Kingdom. He sentences himself not by words, but by the very act of obstinacy in heresy, despite the exposure of the lie he loves.

Here, for the present, he does not see or hear such a sentence over himself.

But at the Apostle's word, one's thought may turn to the last judgment. There the heretic himself will see his error and condemn himself, because seeing he did not see, and he will have nothing to say in his defense.

In that case "self-condemned" will be the same as "without excuse," having nothing to say in his defense (see Oecumenius).

In Greek it says, "he sins, being self-condemned," ὢν αὐτοκατάκριτος. This suggests the thought that his conscience condemns him (see Oecumenius) for his disagreement with evident truth.

Yet he does not listen to his conscience, being ashamed to be disgraced by yielding. He sacrifices the truth, clearly known by him, to his self-love and sins by going against conscience.

Not all heretics are like this. Yet among those who resist the truth, there are not a few to whom such a judgment applies.

Tertullian

3rd centuryTeacher of the Church

Let us not dwell any longer on this subject, because the same Apostle, in the Epistle to the Galatians, places heresy among the works of the flesh, cf. Gal 5:20.

He also counsels Titus: "Reject a heretic after the first and second admonition, knowing that such a one is perverted and sins, being self-condemned."

In almost all his epistles, Saint Paul indicates that we should withdraw from every false teaching. By this name he means heresies, whose fruit is false teaching.

Heresy comes from the Greek word αἵρεσις, meaning "choice," because the heretic truly chooses the teaching which he invents or accepts.

For this reason the Apostle says that the heretic is self-condemned.

Cross references

Passages read together with this verse.

The original text

Greek text, 9 words with lemma, transliteration and Strong’s number. Tap to expand.

  1. εἰδὼς
    eidōs
    I know
    G1492 · εἴδω
  2. ὅτι
    hoti
    that
    G3754 · ὅτι
  3. ἐξέστραπται
    exestraptai
    I change for the worse
    G1612 · ἐκστρέφω
  4. ὁ
    ho
    the
    G3588 · ὁ
  5. τοιοῦτος
    toioutos
    of such a kind
    G5108 · τοιοῦτος
  6. καὶ
    kai
    and
    G2532 · καί
  7. ἁμαρτάνει
    hamartanei
    I sin
    G264 · ἁμαρτάνω
  8. ὢν
    ōn
    I am
    G1510 · εἰμί
  9. αὐτοκατάκριτος
    autokatakritos
    self-condemned
    G843 · αὐτοκατάκριτος