The Church Fathers on this verse

Acts 15:24Meaning & Commentary from the Church Fathers

Forasmuch as we have heard that some going out from us have troubled you with words, subverting your souls, to whom we gave no commandment:

Douay-Rheims

επειδη ηκουσαμεν οτι τινες εξ ημων εξελθοντες εταραξαν υμας λογοις ανασκευαζοντες τας ψυχας υμων λεγοντες περιτεμνεσθαι και τηρειν τον νομον οις ου διεστειλαμεθα

Greek (Byzantine text)

The Church Fathers on this verse

5 Church Fathers comment on this verse

John Chrysostom

4th centuryChurch Father

And see how strongly they rebuke the opponents in their epistle. The rebuke is sufficient for the folly of those men and worthy of the meekness of the Apostles, who said nothing more. And see: they do not say, “certain men who went out from us commanded you to keep the law,” but, “they troubled you with words.” It is impossible to speak more precisely. No one could have expressed it so well. “They unsettled,” he says, “souls already established,” as though in a building they were shifting what others had already laid down. “To whom,” they say, “we gave no such commandment.”

Alexander Gorsky

19th centuryChurch Father

In it they clearly said that these men, acting on their own authority, had not been authorized to act in this way either by the Apostles or by the presbyters of Jerusalem.

Bogolepow D.P.

19th centuryChurch Father

The written decree of the council was expressed in the words of the Apostle James. After greeting the brethren from the Gentiles in Antioch, Syria, and Cilicia, the council first gives a strict rebuke to the Judaizing false teachers who had caused disturbance and wavering in Antioch. By contrast, it praises Barnabas and Paul, calling them beloved and men who have given up their lives for the name of the Lord Jesus Christ. It also indicates the purpose for which it sends Judas and Silas together with Paul and Barnabas. After this the council states the very rules which, by its decree, Christians from the Gentiles must strictly fulfill in life, while being generally free from the yoke of the law.

Read more (114 words)

Yet beforehand it expresses the unchangeable obligatory force of these rules for them, saying that this seemed good to the Holy Spirit and to us. The decree of the Jerusalem council should have been binding for Gentile Christians already because it was an assembly. In it the voice of the Catholic Church was expressed, and moreover of the Jerusalem Church, the mother of all Christian Churches, from which the word of God went forth, 1 Cor 14:36. This Church also continued to be guided by the very apostles of Christ. Yet the decree becomes still more immutably binding because it was inspired by the Spirit of God Himself, Who gave life to the assembly.

Michail (Lusin)

19th centuryChurch Father

"Since we have heard," and so forth. The motive and occasion for writing the letter are set forth briefly, yet in strong and decisive expressions against the disturbers of brotherly peace and tranquility in the Churches. The Council declares that the words which disturbed the peace of the Syrian and Cilician Churches were the unauthorized words of these self-appointed preachers. They had indeed come from the Jerusalem community, or from the Palestinian community in general. Yet the apostles, presbyters, and brethren had not entrusted them with preaching what they preached. They had neither commission, nor authority, nor the community's approval for teaching that circumcision and observance of the Mosaic law were necessary for Gentile Christians.

Read more (148 words)

The work of these unauthorized preachers is described with strong words of disapproval: they troubled you and unsettled your souls. The first of these expressions is used in a disapproving sense by the holy Apostle Paul in the Epistle to the Galatians on a similar occasion. He threatens such disturbers, whoever they may be, with God's punishment, Gal 5:10. The latter expression occurs neither in the Septuagint nor elsewhere in the New Testament, but is found only here. It signifies the shaking and destruction, intentional and violent, of a building. It expresses a concept opposite to ordering and edification. Compare Acts 9:31. Therefore it characterizes the activity of these preachers as violently destructive, tearing down the building of God or the temple of God, 1 Cor 3:17. Thus the Council does not spare those who caused the disturbance, but directly and strongly censures them and their false teaching.

Nikanor (Kamenski)

19th centuryChurch Father

After indicating its destination, the conciliar epistle contains a brief greeting: "rejoice." This was customary among the first Christians, who in this imitated the risen Christ. Compare Col 1:24. It then sets forth the occasion, namely the appearance of teachers preaching the necessity of circumcision for Gentile Christians. It is clarified that they taught this on their own authority, since they had received no authorization for it. Then the judgments of the Council are briefly stated, and finally the decree itself is set forth, verses 28-29. Concerning the opening words of the epistle, Saint John Chrysostom says that "in their epistle they strongly rebuke the opponents and give an admonition sufficient to condemn their folly, yet worthy of the meekness of the apostles.

Read more (194 words)

They say nothing insulting against them, but are concerned with one thing only: to correct what had happened. They did not say, 'you deceivers, destroyers,' but 'troublers.' It is impossible to speak more precisely. No one could have said it so well. They say, 'souls already shaken,' as though shifting in a building what others had already laid." The very form of the epistle, its brevity and simplicity, speaks with sufficient force for its originality and authenticity. Its belonging to Saint Luke is shown by the fact that the epistle bears the undeniable mark of Saint Luke's highly characteristic style. This may be seen from parallel comparisons, for example Acts 15:23 and 23:26, and 15:29 and 21:26. But the correspondence between Lk 1:1-2 and Acts 15:24-26 is especially striking. This formal closeness of the apostolic epistle to the language of the sacred historian permits the conclusion that, when writing the history of the Apostolic Council, he did not have before him a copy of the apostolic decree. Rather, he reproduced it from memory. The sacred historian paraphrased the epistle, undoubtedly preserving fully its principal thoughts. Its artlessness and brevity speak in favor of this.

Cross references

Passages read together with this verse.

The original text

Greek text, 17 words with lemma, transliteration and Strong’s number. Tap to expand.

  1. Ἐπειδὴ
    epeidē
    when
    G1894 · ἐπειδή
  2. ἠκούσαμεν
    ēkousamen
    I hear
    G191 · ἀκούω
  3. ὅτι
    hoti
    that
    G3754 · ὅτι
  4. τινὲς
    tines
    any one
    G5100 · τις
  5. ἐξ
    ex
    from out
    G1537 · ἐκ
  6. ἡμῶν
    hēmōn
    I
    G1473 · ἐγώ
  7. ἐξελθόντες
    exelthontes
    I go out
    G1831 · ἐξέρχομαι
  8. ἐτάραξαν
    etaraxan
    I agitate
    G5015 · ταράσσω
  9. ὑμᾶς
    hymas
    you
    G4771 · σύ
  10. λόγοις
    logois
    a word
    G3056 · λόγος
  11. ἀνασκευάζοντες
    anaskeuazontes
    I pervert
    G384 · ἀνασκευάζω
  12. τὰς
    tas
    the
    G3588 · ὁ
  13. ψυχὰς
    psychas
    the soul
    G5590 · ψυχή
  14. ὑμῶν
    hymōn
    you
    G4771 · σύ
  15. οἷς
    hois
    who
    G3739 · ὅς, ἥ
  16. οὐ
    ou
    no
    G3756 · οὐ
  17. διεστειλάμεθα
    diesteilametha
    I give a commission
    G1291 · διαστέλλω