The Church Fathers on this verse

2 Corinthians 3:10Meaning & Commentary from the Church Fathers

For even that which was glorious in this part was not glorified by reason of the glory that excelleth.

Douay-Rheims

και γαρ ου δεδοξασται το δεδοξασμενον εν τουτω τω μερει ενεκεν της υπερβαλλουσης δοξης

Greek (Byzantine text)

The Church Fathers on this verse

8 Church Fathers comment on this verse

John Chrysostom

4th centuryChurch Father

Then he returns again to the same point, saying, “For if the ministry of condemnation had glory” (v. 9). Explaining more clearly the meaning of the words, “the letter kills,” the Apostle says what we have already said above.

The Law only reveals sin. It does not produce it. “Much more does the ministry of justification abound in glory.”

Those tablets only revealed sinners and punished them. But this ministry of righteousness not only does not punish sinners. It also makes them righteous, because Baptism grants this justification.

“What was made glorious has not even been made glorious in this respect, because of the glory that surpasses it” (v. 10).

Read more (143 words)

First he showed that this ministry of justification also is in glory, and not only in glory, but overflowing with glory. He no longer says, as above, “will not the ministry of the Spirit be much more in glory?”

Rather, he says, “it abounds in glory,” drawing this from the preceding arguments. Now he also shows how great this superiority is.

He says, “If I compare this glory with that Old Testament glory, the glory of the Old Testament will not even be glory.”

Yet by this he does not wholly take glory away from the Old Testament. He speaks of it comparatively, and therefore adds, “in this respect,” that is, by comparison.

In speaking this way, he does not disparage the Old Testament. On the contrary, he even approves it, because things that are compared usually have some kinship with each other.

Theophylact of Bulgaria

11th centuryChurch Father

Why, he says, do I compare the Old and New Covenants with one another? The superiority of the New Covenant is such in this respect, that is, in comparison, that the glorified one, the Old Covenant, appears to have no glory at all.

This is because of the extraordinary glory of the New. For although the law was glorious in itself, because of the superiority of the Gospel's glory it appears inglorious.

Notice that by this also he approves the Old Covenant, for things compared are usually of the same kind.

Ephraem the Syrian

4th centuryChurch Father

For even what was glorified is not shown to be glorious in this respect, because of the surpassing glory. That is, in comparison with the glory received by the Apostles, the glory given at the communication of the law is counted as nothing.

Jerome of Stridon

4th centuryChurch Father

It is evident that the righteousness of the law, in comparison with Gospel grace, does not appear to be righteousness. For "if what is passing away was glorious, much more what remains is glorious."

Ambrosiaster

4th centuryChurch Father

The ingloriousness of the first is evident, and this is connected with the glorious shining face of Moses (see Ex 34:29-35).

Although the glory of his face benefited no one, but rather hindered many, the law did not have the fruit of this glory. This was not because of the law itself, but because of the vices of sinners.

Theodoret of Cyrus

5th centuryChurch Father

Such is the glory preserved for the latter that, when looking upon them, one would quite justly not even call the glory allotted to Moses glory.

The light of a lamp seems very strong at night, yet at midday it becomes imperceptible and is not even counted as light. Then the Apostle makes the comparison in another way: v. 11. "For if what is passing away was glorious, much more what remains is glorious."

Michail Cheraskov

19th centuryChurch Father

By contrast, the Christian revelation itself glorifies its preachers (2 Cor 3:6) as “ministers of the new covenant.” They are ministers “not of the letter that kills,” that is, of the Old Testament Law, which threatened punishment to transgressors, as Chrysostom says.

They are ministers of “the Spirit that gives life,” that is, of grace, which through the mystery of Baptism gives life to those dead in sins, as Chrysostom says.

It glorifies them more than Moses, who covered before the people the radiance received on his face with a veil (2 Cor 3:7-11).

“For,” says the Apostle, “if the ministry of letters that bring death” was glorious. They bring death because they not only threatened death to violators of the Law, but also could not turn them away from it.

Read more (287 words)

If this ministry, “engraved on stones,” meaning the tablets of the Law, “was so glorious that the children of Israel could not look at the face of Moses because of the glory of his face. Which was passing away,” then how much more glorious must the ministry of the Spirit be (2 Cor 3:7-8), and the ministry “of justification” (2 Cor 3:9)?

The light of Moses’ face shone only for a time and then faded. According to the Apostle, the superiority of the New Testament ministry over the Old is so great that the glory of the latter’s ministers cannot even be compared with the glory of the ministers of the New Testament.

This is true even if one speaks of Moses himself, whose face shone with light. “What was made glorious,” that is, the Old Testament ministry, “has not even been made glorious in this respect, because of the glory that surpasses it” (2 Cor 3:10).

For it is not passing away, as the Old Testament religion was, but abiding (2 Cor 3:11).

Chrysostom’s words on the deadly character of the letters of the Old Testament Law, and on the life-giving power of New Testament grace, are very characteristic.

“If the Law catches a murderer, it condemns him to death. But if grace catches a murderer, it sanctifies him and gives him life.

But why do I speak of a murderer? The Law even seized and stoned the man who gathered sticks on the Sabbath. This is what it means that the letter kills.

By contrast, grace catches countless murderers and robbers, washes them with the waters of Baptism, and releases them from their former evils. This is what it means that the Spirit gives life.”

Theophan the Recluse

19th centuryChurch Father

An explanatory thought is inserted concerning the preceding conclusion. It is as though an objection were heard: how can this be? Was not that order of ministry so visibly glorified?

The Apostle answers: let it be glorified. Yet know that it was not glorified in the sense that nothing more glorious could ever appear, or that it was the highest glory, beyond which no other could be expected.

Kai gar oude dedoxastai means: for even what was glorified was not glorified in this respect. That is, in the ordering of the Old Testament ministry.

Heneken tes hyperballouses doxes means: because of that, or in the sense that this was the most excellent glory. That glory was not of the final degree. It was moderate.

Read more (260 words)

It was given only to make an impression on the perceptive children of Israel. It was given at the institution of the Law, so that they might always see on it a reflection of its heavenly origin.

When the establishment of the Law was completed, that glory ceased. The following verse is directly connected with this thought: if what is passing away was glorious...

If this passing thing is glorious, how much more glorious must the abiding thing be?

Understanding the passage in this way, we keep our attention on Mount Sinai, before Moses with his glorified face. We measure his glory by the same measure there, given by the later course of events.

But one may also set that glory before the glory of the New Testament order and understand this passage in another way.

What was glorified does not even seem glorious before the Gospel, because of the superiority of the Gospel’s glory. It is “as the light of a lamp, strong in itself, becomes unnoticeable at midday before the light of the sun,” as Theodoret says.

Chrysostom says, “First the Apostle showed that the ministry of justification is also in glory, and not only in glory, but overflowing with glory.

Now he shows how great this superiority is, saying: if I compare this glory with the Old Testament glory, then the glory of the Old Testament will not even be glory.”

Theophylact adds, “The Law was glorious in itself and in its measure. Yet because of the abundance of the Gospel’s glory, it now appears not glorious.”

Cross references

Passages read together with this verse.

The original text

Greek text, 14 words with lemma, transliteration and Strong’s number. Tap to expand.

  1. καὶ
    kai
    and
    G2532 · καί
  2. γὰρ
    gar
    for
    G1063 · γάρ
  3. οὐ
    ou
    no
    G3756 · οὐ
  4. δεδόξασται
    dedoxastai
    I glorify
    G1392 · δοξάζω
  5. τὸ
    to
    the
    G3588 · ὁ
  6. δεδοξασμένον
    dedoxasmenon
    I glorify
    G1392 · δοξάζω
  7. ἐν
    en
    in
    G1722 · ἐν
  8. τούτῳ
    toutō
    this
    G3778 · οὗτος
  9. τῷ
    tō
    the
    G3588 · ὁ
  10. μέρει
    merei
    a part
    G3313 · μέρος
  11. εἵνεκεν
    heineken
    for the sake of
    G1752 · ἕνεκα, εἵνεκεν
  12. τῆς
    tēs
    the
    G3588 · ὁ
  13. ὑπερβαλλούσης
    hyperballousēs
    I surpass
    G5235 · ὑπερβάλλω
  14. δόξης
    doxēs
    honor
    G1391 · δόξα