John Chrysostom
He said, “It is unnecessary to write to you.” But see how he gives counsel: “For I know your zeal and boast of you before the Macedonians” (v. 2). It is already important that he himself knows it, but far more important that he tells others of it. This has special force, because they would not wish to be put to shame before so many people.
Read more (388 words)
Do you see the wisdom of his counsel? He persuaded them by the example of others, namely the Macedonians: “We make known to you, brethren, the grace of God given to the Churches of Macedonia” (8:1). He persuaded them by their own example: “You not only began to do this, but also desired it since last year” (8:10). He persuaded them by the example of the Lord Himself: “You know the grace of our Lord Jesus Christ, that though He was rich, yet for your sake He became poor” (8:9).
Then again he resorts to the strongest means of persuasion, the example of others, because people are inclined to emulation. The example of the Lord and the promised rewards ought to have affected them more. But since they were still weak, he draws them by the example of those like themselves, for nothing acts so powerfully as emulation.
See in what new form he offers them the same exhortation. He did not say, “Imitate them.” What, then? “Your zeal has encouraged many” (v. 2). What are you saying? You yourself recently said of the Macedonians, “of their own accord, with much entreaty, begging us.” How, then, do you now say, “your zeal,” that of the Corinthians?
“Yes,” the Apostle answers, “we did not advise them, nor persuade them. We only praised you and boasted of you, and this was enough to persuade them.”
Do you see how he stirs them by the mutual example of one another, the Corinthians by the example of the Macedonians, and the Macedonians by the example of the Corinthians? He intensifies this emulation still more by adding great praise.
In order not to give them occasion for pride, he expresses himself with special skill: “and your zeal has encouraged many.” Consider what it would be like for those who were the motivating cause of such generosity for others to fall behind them in beneficence!
This is why he did not say, “Imitate them,” for by those words he would not have stirred such emulation. How did he speak? “They imitated you. You, the teachers, must not prove worse than the disciples.” And see how, in order to stir and inflame them still more, he appears to intervene on their behalf and defend their case, as though there were dispute and contest over it.