John Chrysostom
"The God of Abraham, and of Isaac, and of Jacob, the God of our fathers." See how often he turns to the ancestors, so they may not think he is introducing some new teaching.
There he mentioned the patriarch David; here he mentions Abraham and the other patriarchs. "He glorified His Son Jesus." Again he speaks humbly, as in the preface.
Then he dwells upon their crime and plainly sets before them what they had done. He no longer conceals it as before. He acts this way in order to draw them more effectively.
The more he showed that they were guilty, the more he achieved this end. "He glorified," he says, "His Son Jesus, whom you delivered up and denied in the presence of Pilate, when he had determined to release Him."
Read more (355 words)
There are two accusations: that Pilate wished to release Him, and that when Pilate wished it, you did not. Everywhere he reminds them of their evil deed, both to show the miracle and to confirm the resurrection.
Here he also adds something else. He no longer calls Christ the Nazarene. How does he name Him? "The God of our fathers," he says, "glorified His Son Jesus."
Notice also his modesty. He did not accuse them and immediately say, "Now believe; behold, a man lame for forty years has risen in the name of Jesus Christ."
He did not speak so, because by this he would have made them still more stubborn. Instead, he first praises them for marveling at what had happened.
Again he gives them a name derived from their ancestor. He does not say, "Jesus healed the lame man," although He truly had healed him.
He does this so that they might not say, "How is it possible for God to glorify a transgressor of the Law?" Therefore he reminds them of the trial before Pilate.
He shows that, if they had wished to pay attention, they would have known that He was no transgressor. Otherwise Pilate would not have wished to release Him.
Then, lest they think God's decree served as an excuse for them, he first rebukes them. Their denial of Christ before Pilate, when he wished to release Him, was not accidental.
You cannot deny this, because the one whom you asked for in His place accuses you. Thus in this too there was a great divine economy.
Here the apostle shows their shamelessness and insolence. A Gentile, who then saw Him for the first time and had heard nothing great about Him, was releasing Him.
But they, raised among miracles, acted in the opposite way. And that Pilate judged rightly in deciding to release Him, and did not act from mercy, hear what he says elsewhere.
"But you have a custom that I should release someone to you at the Passover. Do you therefore want me to release to you the King of the Jews?" (Jn 18:39; Mt 27:15).