The Church Fathers on this verse

Deuteronomy 25:2Meaning & Commentary from the Church Fathers

And if they see that the offender be worthy of stripes: they shall lay him down, and shall cause him to be beaten before them. According to the measure of the sin shall the measure also of the stripes be:

Douay-Rheims

וְהָיָ֛ה אִם־בִּ֥ן הַכּ֖וֹת הָרָשָׁ֑ע וְהִפִּיל֤וֹ הַשֹּׁפֵט֙ וְהִכָּ֣הוּ לְפָנָ֔יו כְּדֵ֥י רִשְׁעָת֖וֹ בְּמִסְפָּֽר׃

Hebrew (Masoretic text)

The Church Fathers on this verse

2 Church Fathers comment on this verse

Cyrill of Alexandria

5th centuryChurch Father

Cyril emphasized that to quell resentment, control anger, and align punishment with the offenses of individuals, along with rendering righteous and faultless judgments, stems from a deep love for one’s fellow believers. Palladius concurred with this notion. Cyril then presented the opportunity to reflect on the commandment that states, “Thou shalt have no malice against the children of thy people” (Lev.

Read more (525 words)

19:18), and further, the directive, “If there be litigation between men, let them be brought into court, and let them be judged; let the righteous be acquitted, and the guilty be condemned; and if the guilty be worthy of a beating, let the judge order him to be put down, and let him be beaten with him, according to his guilt, according to the score; forty blows may be given him, and not more, lest by many blows thy brother be disfigured before thine eyes” (Deut. 25:1-3). Palladius inquired as to why the law specifies a limit of forty blows for the guilty, seeking clarity on how a greater number would lead to shame. Cyril responded by noting that the ancient commandments artfully foreshadow the mystery of Christ, serving as a vivid portrayal of the redemptive suffering through which we are liberated from all that has the power to harm us and draw us into grave troubles.

He further explained that the practice of forgiving debts after seven years represents a profound mystery pertaining to the period of universal forgiveness, reflecting our justification in Christ, which we echo in our prayers to our Heavenly Father, asking “Leave us our debts.” Similarly, the allocation of forty strokes in punishment serves as a significant reference to the time when the Only Begotten took on flesh—a period in which “by His wounds we are healed” (Is. 53:5; cf. 1 John 1:1; 1 Pet. 2:24). This is the moment when “He was wounded for our sins, and tormented for our iniquities” (Is. 53:5), during which the Israelites scornfully mocked Him and Pilate delivered blows to His back. Yet, we are free from punishment, for there were “many wounds to the sinner” (Ps. 31:10) prior to Christ’s scourging on our behalf: He died for all and endured suffering for all, being uniquely qualified to bear the sins of humankind.

If one divides the number forty into five and eight, it becomes evident that these numbers both signify this pivotal time, as the Only Begotten entered the world in the fifth hour, following the parable of the laborers in the vineyard (Matthew 20:1-16). He rose on the final day, having vanquished the power of death and eradicated sin, which made possible the cessation of scourging along with its associated penalties. Thus, the law restricts scourging to a maximum of forty strokes, establishing the measure of punishment until Christ’s arrival and heralding a time of forgiveness, with images serving to encapsulate the essence of truth.

It is also noteworthy that due to their transgressions, Israel wandered for forty years in the wilderness, as God had sworn not to lead them into the promised land. This forty-year span marked the extent of divine wrath; however, once that period concluded, their descendants crossed into the promised territory and the anger was quelled by the fortieth year. This event is mirrored in the prescription of a maximum of forty blows for some, as it symbolizes the era of clemency, inaugurating the enigmatic crossing over the Jordan and spiritual circumcision—which signifies the leadership of Jesus, who followed Moses and the law. Palladius agreed with these observations.

Philaret of Moscow (Drosdow)

19th centuryChurch Father

The Jews later adjusted the prescribed forty lashes to a total of thirty-nine. This aligns with the apostle Paul's statement in 2 Corinthians 11:24, where he recounts having received from the Jews a total of five times, each time receiving the blows described. To justify this change, some interpret the passage as suggesting that the lashes brought upon Him would be close to forty without exceeding that number, but they overlook the dividing element in the original text. Opinions vary; some believe this reduction was an act of Jewish mercy, while others argue it was a deliberate measure to adhere to the legal limit.

Read more (54 words)

It is clear that the law specifies forty lashes as outlined in Deuteronomy 25:3, and this alteration arose later when Jewish scholars, eager for innovation, conceived a method that allowed for administering three lashes at once. Consequently, a total of thirteen strikes would result in the thirty-nine lashes, with fourteen surpassing the legal limit.

Cross references

Passages read together with this verse.