Jerome of Stridon
The conclusion of a discourse holds greater value than its commencement. An epilogue in a speech is more significant than an introduction. This is because the speaker's efforts culminate in the former, whereas they begin in the latter. Alternatively, one might interpret this to mean that when a person starts to engage with a discourse by approaching the teacher, they are still in the introductory phase, while those who receive the concluding teachings are at the completion of the effort and have attained maturity. Furthermore, it can be understood that during our time on earth, our knowledge represents merely the beginning; when the perfect comes, we will reach the end and fullness.
Read more (193 words)
One Hebrew interpretation illustrates this concept with the verse: it is better to consider the conclusion of a task than its initiation and to exhibit patience rather than succumb to frustration. From this insight, we also gather that humanity lacks wisdom if remaining silent is deemed preferable to speaking. This may further imply that once we have finished communicating, the listener has time to reflect on what has been expressed, while at the onset of speech, they have yet to derive any benefit. It is better to be patient than to be quick in spirit. Previously, there was an endorsement of anger, as stated: 'better anger than laughter.' To prevent the notion that anger as an emotion is endorsed, we are now instructed that anger must indeed be carefully contained; there it was understood in the context of admonishing sinners and guiding the imperfect, while here it emphasizes the importance of managing impatience. Patience is essential not only in hardships but also in joyful circumstances, to prevent undue exuberance. It seems that here, the lofty in spirit are contrasted with the humble in spirit, to whom blessings have been promised in the Gospel.