The Church Fathers on this verse

Exodus 14:2Meaning & Commentary from the Church Fathers

Speak to the children of Israel: Let them turn and encamp over against Phihahiroth, which is between Magdal and the sea over against Beelsephon: you shall encamp before it upon the sea.

Douay-Rheims

דַּבֵּר֮ אֶל־בְּנֵ֣י יִשְׂרָאֵל֒ וְיָשֻׁ֗בוּ וְיַחֲנוּ֙ לִפְנֵי֙ פִּ֣י הַחִירֹ֔ת בֵּ֥ין מִגְדֹּ֖ל וּבֵ֣ין הַיָּ֑ם לִפְנֵי֙ בַּ֣עַל צְפֹ֔ן נִכְח֥וֹ תַחֲנ֖וּ עַל־הַיָּֽם׃

Hebrew (Masoretic text)

The Church Fathers on this verse

2 Church Fathers comment on this verse

Vissarion (Nechaev)

19th centuryCommentator

From Othom, the last Egyptian city bordering the Arabian desert, the Israelites had the option of heading north into Canaan, where, without any hindrances, they could have reached their destination in three or four days, or journeying south toward Sinai. The route to Sinai likely occupied Moses' thoughts, as he recalled the divine assurance delivered to him from the Tabernacle: "This is a sign unto thee, when My people shall bring thee out of Egypt, and pray unto God in this mountain" (Ex. 3:12). However, the Lord chose not to allow the Hebrews to take either path at this moment. The northern route was deemed unsuitable due to the potential confrontation with the Philistines, which might instill in the Israelites a longing for their life in Egypt (Ex. 13:17).

Read more (285 words)

Meanwhile, the second route was to be avoided temporarily to make way for a momentous event that would glorify the Lord even more significantly than previous miracles, thus strengthening the Hebrews in their commitment to Him (Ex. 13:17). Therefore, at the Lord's direction, the Israelites from Othom were instructed to divert southward along the western side of the Suez arm of the Red Sea, thereby returning to Egyptian territory. Their new itinerary required the entire assembly to position itself between the Red Sea and Magdol (a tower or fortress). Due to the ambiguous nature of ancient Egyptian geography, the exact location of this site, along with others where the Israelite assembly was ordered to halt, remains uncertain. One site mentioned in court texts, and identified in Numbers 33:7 as the mouth of Iroth (interpreted as the mouth of the caves), suggests that these locations may have been fortified either naturally or through human construction, serving as a secure point for Egyptian interests on the eastern side. Located about 20 versts from Suez along the western shoreline of the Suez arm of the Red Sea, the Arabs still indicate a place known as the Baths of Pharaoh (Hamam Pharaun), linked to the legend of Pharaoh’s drowning in the sea nearby. This area lies within a narrow coastal strip, referred to by the Arabs as the valley of the miracle (Bedea) or the path of the children of Israel (Tga-Bene-Israel). It exists between the sea and the mountains, with desert land to the north and south. It is likely that the Israelites encamped for the night in this region on the third day of their journey, where the locations mentioned in the discussed verses can be found.

Wlastow G.K.

19th centuryCommentator

On the evening of the Passover, the Israelites were granted permission to depart. Following prior instructions, they moved away from the city of Rameses and other areas in the land of Goshen (also referred to as Rameses in Genesis 47:11) toward Sokhof, which translates to huts or tents. This location likely served as a settlement for numerous Israelite workers living in temporary shelters. Consequently, the regulations regarding the Passover are reiterated here, along with the law concerning the redemption of the firstborn (at the close of chapter 12 and the start of chapter 13).

Read more (370 words)

From Sokhof, this newly formed group advanced ‘by military organization’ to the strategic outpost of Epham, which bordered the narrow and often treacherous isthmus connecting Lake Timsa to the Gulf of Suez, where routes diverged toward Palestine and the copper mines of Egypt. However, instead of proceeding along this path, Moses, acting upon a distinct command from the Lord, abruptly directed the people toward the mountains adjacent to the Red Sea, placing them in a precarious predicament, as they seemed trapped between the sea, the mountains, and the pursuing Egyptian army. The text (and the introduction to this chapter) illustrates how the Lord delivered Israel. It is worth mentioning a few insights regarding the locations referenced in this passage, drawing from the perspectives of scholars such as Cook, Dom Calmet, O. Gerlach, Schabas, and others.

Pi-Gahiroth denotes the entrance to caves; this name has Semitic roots, but the initial syllable is of Egyptian origin, meaning a house. This site is thought to correspond with the fortress of Airod, or Ajirud, which contains a substantial well of potable water (as cited in Put. Niebuhr I. 176). The term Migdol translates to tower in Hebrew. It is believed that this location corresponds to Bir Suweis, situated about two miles from Suez. Schabas discovered in an Egyptian manuscript that he had disassembled (refer to Vou. d'bn Egyptien. Edition de Chalon sur Saon 1866; pp. 286-287) the name of a fortress called Mictal, which he associates with Migdol. This site was equipped with a well, of which remnants can still be found (Niebuhr, Robinson). Baal-Cephon. Schabas (in the previously mentioned source) suggests that this name represents a transcription of the Egyptian name for the northern goddess, linking Baal-Tsephon to the house of Uati as noted in his manuscript, indicating that the Hebrews incorrectly rendered it with a masculine name, given that Uati was the female aspect of Baal. Cook and O. Gerlach propose that the northern Baal corresponds to the Sutekh of the Phoenicians, who established colonies in Lower Egypt; however, the actual location is not in dispute. Baal-Tsephon was close to modern-day Suez (Colsum). Therefore, on an expansive plain stretching southward from Suez, the camp of Israel had its divisions extending towards Ajirud.

Cross references

Passages read together with this verse.