John Chrysostom
After he had enacted vengeance and found some relief from his deep sorrow, did he find time to savor the satisfaction of that vengeance? Yet, with the arrival of the new day, a weightier trial than before afflicted the righteous man, filled with such dread that he was forced to leave Egypt entirely. It is difficult to hear harsh words from anyone; however, when one who is esteemed speaks ill, belittling for the grace he has received and taunting him with, "Do you intend to kill me as you killed the Egyptian?" the offense becomes intolerable, possibly driving the wronged one to lose patience, as it stirs irritation alongside anguish.
Read more (349 words)
To Stagirius the ascetic, concerned with despair, the Judaean confronted Moses with the threat, "Do you think to kill me?" Yet, even this served a purpose, orchestrated by God, so that Moses could be honored with a vision in the wilderness, that the appointed time might be realized, enabling him to gain wisdom in solitude and secure safety. Despite the afflictions imposed upon him by the children of Israel, he emerged even more glorious. Moses, out of love for his people, chose to abandon wealth and abundant treasures, opting instead to endure suffering alongside the people of God, and even prior to his anointing, he demonstrated through his actions his leadership over them. For this reason, a Hebrew foolishly questioned him, "Who made you a ruler and judge over us?" What do you argue? You observe the actions but doubt the authority? It is akin to someone watching a skilled doctor perform surgery to mend a sick limb and asking, "Who appointed you as a physician to operate?" The response would be, "My skills, and your affliction." Likewise, Moses was called to his role through his understanding. For leadership is not merely a title but an art, indeed one that surpasses all others. While civil leadership requires skill and knowledge, spiritual leadership demands even greater depth. This man questioned Moses, expressing disbelief in his authority, and who would not be disturbed by such remarks? If the prior action stemmed from anger and reckless impulsiveness, then Moses could have harmed this man too. The reason for the reproach was their relation; however, Moses, being offended, refrained from such statements, wondering why they did not voice such doubts the day before. It was their offense and cruelty that elevated him to prince and judge. Today, some even direct similar thoughts toward God, wishing Him to be harsh towards those who wrong them, while accusing Him of being patient with them, even as they act unjustly toward others. What could be more offensive than such claims? Yet, even in the face of ingratitude and unrecognition, Moses went forth, undeterred in his mission.