The Church Fathers on this verse

Exodus 2:14Meaning & Commentary from the Church Fathers

But he answered: Who hath appointed thee prince and judge over us? wilt thou kill me, as thou didst yesterday kill the Egyptian? Moses feared, and said: How is this come to be known?

Douay-Rheims

וַ֠יֹּאמֶר מִ֣י שָֽׂמְךָ֞ לְאִ֨ישׁ שַׂ֤ר וְשֹׁפֵט֙ עָלֵ֔ינוּ הַלְהָרְגֵ֙נִי֙ אַתָּ֣ה אֹמֵ֔ר כַּאֲשֶׁ֥ר הָרַ֖גְתָּ אֶת־הַמִּצְרִ֑י וַיִּירָ֤א מֹשֶׁה֙ וַיֹּאמַ֔ר אָכֵ֖ן נוֹדַ֥ע הַדָּבָֽר׃

Hebrew (Masoretic text)

The Church Fathers on this verse

6 Church Fathers comment on this verse

John Chrysostom

4th centuryChurch Father

After he had enacted vengeance and found some relief from his deep sorrow, did he find time to savor the satisfaction of that vengeance? Yet, with the arrival of the new day, a weightier trial than before afflicted the righteous man, filled with such dread that he was forced to leave Egypt entirely. It is difficult to hear harsh words from anyone; however, when one who is esteemed speaks ill, belittling for the grace he has received and taunting him with, "Do you intend to kill me as you killed the Egyptian?" the offense becomes intolerable, possibly driving the wronged one to lose patience, as it stirs irritation alongside anguish.

Read more (349 words)

To Stagirius the ascetic, concerned with despair, the Judaean confronted Moses with the threat, "Do you think to kill me?" Yet, even this served a purpose, orchestrated by God, so that Moses could be honored with a vision in the wilderness, that the appointed time might be realized, enabling him to gain wisdom in solitude and secure safety. Despite the afflictions imposed upon him by the children of Israel, he emerged even more glorious. Moses, out of love for his people, chose to abandon wealth and abundant treasures, opting instead to endure suffering alongside the people of God, and even prior to his anointing, he demonstrated through his actions his leadership over them. For this reason, a Hebrew foolishly questioned him, "Who made you a ruler and judge over us?" What do you argue? You observe the actions but doubt the authority? It is akin to someone watching a skilled doctor perform surgery to mend a sick limb and asking, "Who appointed you as a physician to operate?" The response would be, "My skills, and your affliction." Likewise, Moses was called to his role through his understanding. For leadership is not merely a title but an art, indeed one that surpasses all others. While civil leadership requires skill and knowledge, spiritual leadership demands even greater depth. This man questioned Moses, expressing disbelief in his authority, and who would not be disturbed by such remarks? If the prior action stemmed from anger and reckless impulsiveness, then Moses could have harmed this man too. The reason for the reproach was their relation; however, Moses, being offended, refrained from such statements, wondering why they did not voice such doubts the day before. It was their offense and cruelty that elevated him to prince and judge. Today, some even direct similar thoughts toward God, wishing Him to be harsh towards those who wrong them, while accusing Him of being patient with them, even as they act unjustly toward others. What could be more offensive than such claims? Yet, even in the face of ingratitude and unrecognition, Moses went forth, undeterred in his mission.

Cyrill of Alexandria

5th centuryChurch Father

They, instead of embracing this teaching and being awestruck by the peacemaker, the source of love, and the champion of their finest beliefs, committed profound evil against Him. They failed to acknowledge Him as their guide. Despite the fact that He had clearly declared through the Psalmist, “I have anointed My King over Zion, My holy city” (Psalm 2:6), they boldly opposed Him with incredible shamelessness, exhibiting hard-heartedness and ungodliness, questioning Him, “Who gave Thee such authority?” (Matt. 21:23) and asserting, “We know that God spoke to Moses; but we do not know from where this man is” (John 9:29). Thus, the very means by which they could have been redeemed was foolishly turned into a charge against Him.

Read more (78 words)

Even Moses, the revered servant, faced accusations of having slain the Egyptian, who had cruelly tormented and oppressed the Israelites. In contrast, Christ cast the malevolent spirits into the abyss, liberating those afflicted by them from their torment, yet He still faced condemnation from those quick to criticize. It was they who, transforming His miraculous deeds into grounds for accusation, had the audacity to claim, “He casts out demons only by Beelzebub, the prince of demons” (Matthew 12:24).

Gregory of Nyssa

4th centuryChurch Father

However, he was dismissed by someone whose intent was solely to cause harm.

Ephraem the Syrian

4th centuryChurch Father

The wrongdoer, rather than accepting the rebuke, openly charges the Tsar's son with murder, asserting: ‘Who appointed the Prince...? over us? How can you, someone so brazenly rebellious, question the Tsar's son: Who appointed the Prince...? over us? He also holds authority over the bailiffs who oversee you. How can he not have authority over you? Moses, however, was taken aback upon discovering that his situation had become known to all. It was not the Hebrew whom he had rescued who condemned him for taking a life. If that reproach was unwarranted, it suggests that Moses did not slay the Egyptian for that man's sake. The Hebrew who was saved from the Egyptian felt wronged, much like the maidens who were aggrieved concerning the treasure. In his act of killing the Egyptian, Moses intended to relieve the burdens of the Hebrews oppressed by the Egyptian. Yet, the delivered individual confided in another Hebrew in friendship, and this other, motivated by spite, accused Moses.

Vissarion (Nechaev)

19th centuryCommentator

The events recounted in these two verses affirm the truth of the martyr Stephen's statement that the Hebrews did not grasp the significance of the Egyptian’s death at Moses' hands the previous day. They failed to recognize that through Moses, the Lord was sending them a savior. Rather than appreciating Moses’ attempt to mediate the conflict between the two Hebrews, the offender reacted with haughty accusations, claiming Moses was usurping authority not his own and acting contrary to the law by killing the Egyptian. Yet, how could the Hebrews have known when they heard of the Egyptian's death that it was not a rash act by Moses, but rather one aligned with God's purpose?

Read more (245 words)

It is reasonable to assume Moses shared insights that might have led them to this understanding, and the severity of the oppression they endured under Pharaoh likely made them anticipate divine intervention, prompting them to notice every peculiar event related to their suffering and to question whether such occurrences signified God's favor.

However, Moses was troubled, exclaiming, “Why is this word revealed?” What was the source of his fear? Was he concerned that the news of the murder would become known among the Hebrews? One might think he would welcome such exposure, since he struck down the Egyptian to persuade the Hebrews of his divine appointment to lead them to freedom. Indeed, Moses desired to publicize his act, but he was taken aback by the negative perceptions held by his people. He realized that their long-standing captivity had extinguished their hope for liberation, breeding skepticism toward the very one chosen to deliver them; they may have even been inclined to report him to the Egyptian authorities as a threat. This reaction from the Hebrews caught Moses off guard, leading to his fear and astonishment when such unexpected outcomes arose. Thus, he lamented, “If this verb be revealed,” expressing dismay that a deed done through divine inspiration for the benefit of his fellow Israelites was misunderstood, with word of it spreading carelessly and unfavorably about him, potentially reaching the Egyptians. The term "verb," understood in the context of action, is also found in Scripture (Luke 2:15).

Wlastow G.K.

19th centuryCommentator

In the Slavonic translation, which is founded on the Septuagint, this verse is presented as “who hath made thee ruler and judge over us.”

Cross references

Passages read together with this verse.