John Chrysostom
If sinning and escaping punishment did not worsen our condition, He would eliminate the consequences for us. However, it is evident that the lack of retribution for the sinful is as detrimental to their souls as the sins themselves. Thus, He administers discipline, not for the past, but as a means to guide towards a better future. To illustrate this, consider His words to Moses: ‘Leave Me, that My wrath may be kindled against them, and I will destroy them.’ When He asked Moses to depart, it was not because Moses could prevent Him, as he remained silent; rather, it was to give him the opportunity to intercede for the people. They had engaged in transgressions deserving of judgment, yet He chose not to punish them, wishing instead to extend mercy.
Read more (181 words)
However, in doing so, their negligence increased. Therefore, He orchestrates matters so that punishment does not occur, preventing them from becoming complacent due to their lack of consequences. They must recognize that their reprieve from divine anger comes not from their own worthiness, but because of Moses' advocacy on their behalf.
This scenario is often mirrored in our conduct; rather than imposing discipline on those who have erred, we might appeal to others to intervene, ensuring that the sense of accountability remains strong while sparing them from immediate consequence. God similarly acted, as evidenced by His command to ‘forsake Me,’ revealing that His desire for separation was for the purpose of unleashing His anger. When we seek to discipline but are prevented from doing so, we find ourselves frustrated. Yet in His statement, ‘Leave Me, and let My anger be kindled,’ we understand that divine wrath does not denote a flaw in His nature, but rather that the penalties we face are referred to in such terms.
When He instructed, ‘Leave Me,’ it was a clear invitation for Moses to intercede.