The Church Fathers on this verse

Genesis 29:11Meaning & Commentary from the Church Fathers

And having watered the flock, he kissed her: and lifting up his voice wept.

Douay-Rheims

וַיִּשַּׁ֥ק יַעֲקֹ֖ב לְרָחֵ֑ל וַיִּשָּׂ֥א אֶת־קֹל֖וֹ וַיֵּֽבְךְּ׃

Hebrew (Masoretic text)

The Church Fathers on this verse

4 Church Fathers comment on this verse

Cyrill of Alexandria

5th centuryChurch Father

He regarded the young individual as deserving of love. The name Rachel signifies "the flock of God," and it aptly represents the Church of the Gentiles. This Church is considered the flock of Christ, intertwined with the ancient congregations, and resides within the embrace of the Savior. Thus, He proclaimed, “I have other sheep which are not of this fold; them also I must bring, and they will hear My voice; and there will be one flock and one Shepherd” (John 10:16). The Divine Apostles cared for the Church of Christ, or the flock that it represents, nurturing it as their beloved and presenting it to God as “a chaste virgin, not having spot, or wrinkle, or any such thing; but that it should be holy and without blemish” (2 Cor. 11:2) (Eph. 5:27).

Ephraem the Syrian

4th centuryChurch Father

After revealing to God regarding Rachel through this remarkable act (Genesis 29:10), he proposed to her using a spoon.

Ambrose of Milan

4th centuryChurch Father

The experience of Rachel is poignant—she cried and lamented as soon as she received a kiss, and her tears would have persisted had she not recognized a kinsman (Gen. 29:11-12). In that moment, she demonstrated both her innocence and the depth of her affection. Furthermore, while it is cautioned regarding husbands that "of virgins thou shalt not naze, lest thou be tempted" (Sir 9:5), what should be said of the devoted virgin who, when loved, encounters sin in her thoughts and when loved, succumbs to sin in her actions?

Caesarius of Arles

6th centuryChurch Father

Brothers and sisters, if you observe closely, you will notice that it is not mere coincidence that the patriarchs found their brides at wells or springs. Had this occurrence been singular, one might argue it was by chance and devoid of significance. However, the revered Rebekah, destined to join with the esteemed Isaac, was discovered at a spring (see Genesis 24:10-67). Likewise, Rachel, whom the blessed Jacob was to take as his wife, was identified at a spring; and Zipporah, who became the wife of Moses, was also found at a spring (see Exodus 2:16-21). There should be no doubt that we ought to perceive divine ordinances in these events.

Read more (137 words)

Each of these patriarchs serves as a prefigurement of our Lord and Savior, and so they found their spouses at these sources of water, just as Christ was to locate His Church at the waters of baptism. Furthermore, when Jacob arrived at the well, Rachel first tended to the flock before he kissed her—indeed, beloved, until Christians are cleansed from all wrongdoing through the waters of baptism, they are unworthy of experiencing the peace of Christ. Might it not have been possible for the blessed James to have kissed his cousin at first sight, that is, prior to her watering the animals? Undoubtedly, he could have, but there was a sacrament at play: it was essential for the Church, through the grace of baptism, to be liberated from all injustice and conflict to attain peace with God.

Cross references

Passages read together with this verse.