The Church Fathers on this verse

Exodus 4:27Meaning & Commentary from the Church Fathers

And the Lord said to Aaron: Go into the desert to meet Moses. And he went forth to meet him in the mountain of God, and kissed him.

Douay-Rheims

וַיֹּ֤אמֶר יְהוָה֙ אֶֽל־אַהֲרֹ֔ן לֵ֛ךְ לִקְרַ֥את מֹשֶׁ֖ה הַמִּדְבָּ֑רָה וַיֵּ֗לֶךְ וַֽיִּפְגְּשֵׁ֛הוּ בְּהַ֥ר הָאֱלֹהִ֖ים וַיִּשַּׁק־לֽוֹ׃

Hebrew (Masoretic text)

The Church Fathers on this verse

2 Church Fathers comment on this verse

Gregory of Nyssa

4th centuryChurch Father

There follows a significant encounter with Aaron, who was also led by God to be present in the midst of the situation.

We ought to refocus on the unfolding of the narrative so that we, too, in the face of the trials akin to those of Egypt, might benefit from fraternal support. It is evident that Moses, at the onset of his noble journey, experiences a conflict: an Egyptian mistreats a Hebrew, and conversely, one Hebrew contends with another of his own faith. However, as Moses develops his virtues through steadfast dedication and reaches a profound level of divine enlightenment, he experiences a harmonious and peaceful reunion, motivated by God’s guidance. If we consider this historical moment allegorically, it can be insightful for our purposes.

Read more (647 words)

The one who genuinely thrives in virtue acts as God's assistance to human nature, which, though originating in perfection, becomes manifest and acknowledged when we diligently engage with a higher calling, preparing ourselves for the most arduous challenges.

To clarify our perspective, let us articulate our understanding more explicitly. There exists a doctrine rooted in sacred tradition stipulating that when humanity fell into sin, God did not abandon His creation but instead sought to aid each individual by assigning a specific Angel from the realm of the incorporeal. In contrast, the adversary employs a malevolent spirit designed to corrupt human life. Thus, as humanity navigates these opposing influences, the individual has the agency to strengthen one over the other. The benevolent angel inspires thoughts of virtuous benefits, which become evident through faith and trust. Meanwhile, the malevolent entity entices with fleeting earthly pleasures that yield no lasting good, only binding the senses with vanities.

Therefore, if someone turns away from the temptations that lead to wickedness and actively focuses on the good, leaving vice behind, their soul, akin to a reflective surface, may align itself with the promise of divine gifts. This soul shall encounter a brother in the Spirit, for through the potency of the Word and the rationality of the human spirit, the angel becomes a companion to humanity, especially when we draw near to the challenges represented by Pharaoh.

Considering that such a conceptual framework can be applied universally to the entire historical account, should any part of the text not conform to this interpretation, let none dismiss everything entirely; rather, let the underlying intent of our discussion remain clear. It has been previously indicated that the lives of virtuous individuals serve as an enduring example for future generations. It is unrealistic for those who pursue excellence to walk the same path as these great figures. For instance, will another nation duplicate the growth of Israel after their exodus? Will there be a new oppressor who bears animosity toward their males while nurturing the fragile and weaker members of society? Are there not other elements in this story that are irreplaceable?

Thus, since it is unfeasible to replicate the miraculous deeds of these blessed individuals in the same historical context, let us extract moral teachings from the actual events and allow them to guide those who are zealous for virtue. If any historical incidents are fundamentally disconnected from accepted rational understanding, we should set those aside as irrelevant and not hinder the conveyance of moral teachings. I reference Aaron here to preempt potential objections regarding subsequent events. Some may argue that an angel, being a rational and incorporeal being, aligns more closely with the soul and is inherently more ancient in nature, serving as a guide against adversities. However, this does not justify the portrayal of Aaron, who supported the Israelites in their idolatry, as an angel.

In response, we maintain the earlier assertion: let anything that diverges from our purpose not negate the coherency of other points made. Both brother and angel share similar nomenclature, applied equally across both higher and lower beings. Scripture recognizes not only the angel of God but also that of Satan, and we refer to both virtuous and malevolent figures with the term brother. Of the righteous, it is written, “A friend loves at all times, and like a brother, will appear in time of trouble” (Proverbs 17:17). Conversely, regarding the wicked, “For every brother puts a stumbling block to another” (Jeremiah 9:4). Having briefly noted these ideas and reserving a more detailed examination for their appropriate context, let us now return to our primary focus. The individual who has fortified himself through the illuminating light bestowed upon him has become a champion and ally; he boldly guides the people in the truth, reminding them of their noble heritage and providing insight into liberation from bondage and labor.

Ephraem the Syrian

4th centuryChurch Father

In the meantime, the Lord appeared to Aaron and appointed him to serve alongside Moses, so that once he had fulfilled His command, he could have faith in the realization of what was to come.

Cross references

Passages read together with this verse.