The Church Fathers on this verse

Genesis 38:11Meaning & Commentary from the Church Fathers

Wherefore Juda said to Thamar his daughter-in-law: Remain a widow in thy father's house, till Sela my son grow up: for he was afraid lest he also might die, as his brethren did. She went her way, and dwelt in her father's house.

Douay-Rheims

וַיֹּ֣אמֶר יְהוּדָה֩ לְתָמָ֨ר כַּלָּת֜וֹ שְׁבִ֧י אַלְמָנָ֣ה בֵית־אָבִ֗יךְ עַד־יִגְדַּל֙ שֵׁלָ֣ה בְנְ֔י כִּ֣י אָמַ֔ר פֶּן־יָמ֥וּת גַּם־ה֖וּא כְּאֶחָ֑יו וַתֵּ֣לֶךְ תָּמָ֔ר וַתֵּ֖שֶׁב בֵּ֥ית אָבִֽיהָ׃

Hebrew (Masoretic text)

The Church Fathers on this verse

5 Church Fathers comment on this verse

John Chrysostom

4th centuryChurch Father

Judah, witnessing the abrupt loss of his two sons, was filled with dread. In an effort to console Tamar, he pledged to provide her with his third son. However, he was apprehensive that this son might meet the same fate as his siblings and thus failed to keep his word. During this time, Tamar found solace in Judah's promise and remained ‘in her father's house,’ patiently awaiting the realization of her father-in-law's commitment. Although she recognized Judah's reluctance to follow through, she accepted the situation with patience, choosing not to seek another husband, and endured her state of widowhood, holding out hope for an opportunity to bear children through her father-in-law.

Read more (57 words)

Judah perceived Tamar as the reason for the demise of Ira and Abnan, and out of fear for Silom, he withheld this son from her despite his earlier assurances. Eventually, Judah realized through his own experiences that Tamar was not the source of his children's deaths; rather, his sons were suffering the consequences of their own wrongdoing.

Cyrill of Alexandria

5th centuryChurch Father

The third son, Silom, was prevented by his father from marrying Tamar, fearing he might meet a similar fate as his brothers. I will aim to explain what this signifies, with God’s assistance. The people in between, who demonstrated piety according to the law, mirrored those who had been disobedient, yet they too were slow to return to God and to transform into a renewed people, as if they were reborn through their deeds. This can be understood as restoring the seed to his brother. In this context, two were tragically lost for righteous reasons—the first was wicked, while the second was grieved in spirit. Consequently, the father forbade the third son from uniting with Tamar, anxious that he too might be lost.

Read more (382 words)

The third group, symbolically the youngest, existing in the latter times of the holy prophets (just before the appearance of the Divine Baptist, who revealed the one who descended from heaven, Christ), were not permitted by God to be accepted by the Jewish synagogue, nor to bear fruit, fearing for their demise. “For the law produces wrath” (Rom. 4:15), and no one is justified through the law (Rom. 3:20) (Gal. 2:16). Consider how profoundly Silom represents the last, faithful people. His name signifies ‘extraction’ or ‘deliverance.’ When Divine wrath seemingly annihilated the descendants of Israel due to their evil acts against Christ and their intolerable rage against Him, those who had faith were, in a sense, rescued from destruction and freed from the chains of punishment. “The remnant” is saved, as the Scriptures state (Rom. 9:27; Is. 10:22). God, through His prophet, declared, “as when a shepherd rescues out of the lion's mouth two legs or a piece of an ear, so shall the children of Israel be saved” (Am. 3:12). Thus, Silom is aptly descriptive of extraction or atonement in this regard. The faithful, rescued from the multitude of the lost, withdraw from Thamaria, meaning the fruitfulness of the law, which is further illustrated by the words of the Apostle Paul regarding those who adhere to the law: “But what was once gain to me, I have counted as loss for Christ” (Phil. 3:7). Paul aspired to possess not his own righteousness, that which stems from the law, but the righteousness that comes through faith in Christ Jesus. Consequently, the youngest, Silom, did not engage with Tamar, leading her to remain a widow for an extended period. Since God did not permit the Jewish synagogue to bear fruit at that time, she was perceived as a widow, childless, and without a spiritual husband. Christ Himself remarked, “For she is not my wife, nor am I her husband” (Hosea 2:2). Was there no longer any reason for this state? Was she unworthy of Divine attention? Do not assume so. Despite her exposure to extreme wickedness, God, in His boundless goodness, will show mercy in the end times, and she herself will yield the fruit expected of a follower of Christ. We learn from Scripture that she will approach Christ following the Gentiles.

Ephraem the Syrian

4th centuryChurch Father

When God, due to Abnan's wrongdoing, caused this man to die (Genesis 38:10), Judah interpreted it as a sign that both of Tamar's husbands had died on account of her transgressions. He then chose to send her back to her father's home, expecting that she would remarry before Silom grew up.

Ambrose of Milan

4th centuryChurch Father

Firstly, if we examine the context of the situation, it is clear that she is not a woman of questionable reputation but rather a virtuous individual. Her intentions were not to pursue fleeting desires but to seek the blessing of motherhood. In that time, being childless was regarded as shameful and could even be subject to legal consequences. Judah had pledged her as a wife to his son yet delayed in honoring that commitment. In the midst of this postponement, the bridegroom passed away. The dignities of both virginity and widowhood had not thrived prior to the arrival of Christ. Grieved by her childlessness, she resolved to resort to her wits to achieve motherhood and ensnared Judas, presenting herself to him at a moment of vulnerability after he learned of his wife's death.

Read more (51 words)

Notably, this woman conducted herself with integrity: she did not covet another’s matrimonial bond, nor did she adorn herself like a prostitute out of selfish desire; rather, she sought the rightful legacy of children from the family into which she had married, acting cunningly in response to her father-in-law’s unfulfilled promises.

Philaret of Moscow (Drosdow)

19th centuryChurch Father

Until my son Silas is of age. This could either be a reason for denial, or it may be that Judah hopes to preserve his third son for marriage when he is more mature. The first explanation appears more just, as Judah himself acknowledges.

Cross references

Passages read together with this verse.