The Church Fathers on this verse

Genesis 38:16Meaning & Commentary from the Church Fathers

And going to her, he said: Suffer me to lie with thee: for he knew her not to be his daughter-in-law. And she answered: What wilt thou give me to enjoy my company?

Douay-Rheims

וַיֵּ֨ט אֵלֶ֜יהָ אֶל־הַדֶּ֗רֶךְ וַיֹּ֙אמֶר֙ הָֽבָה־נָּא֙ אָב֣וֹא אֵלַ֔יִךְ כִּ֚י לֹ֣א יָדַ֔ע כִּ֥י כַלָּת֖וֹ הִ֑וא וַתֹּ֙אמֶר֙ מַה־תִּתֶּן־לִּ֔י כִּ֥י תָב֖וֹא אֵלָֽי׃

Hebrew (Masoretic text)

The Church Fathers on this verse

3 Church Fathers comment on this verse

John Chrysostom

4th centuryChurch Father

Let no one blame Tamar upon hearing this; as previously mentioned, she acted as an instrument of Divine Providence in this matter, and thus she faced no reproach, nor did Judas receive condemnation. As we delve deeper, we come to understand that Jesus Christ traces His lineage to the descendants resulting from this union. Furthermore, the two sons born to Judah gave rise to two nations, symbolizing both Jewish identity and spiritual existence. If we choose not to explore the justifications and divine intentions behind these occurrences, we risk not only blaming Tamar for her act with her father-in-law but also finding fault with Abraham for his willingness to sacrifice his child and with Phinehas for his dual acts of violence.

Read more (43 words)

Yet, upon a thorough examination of their situations, we would find no grounds for reproach, rather we would gain significant insight from their stories. Regarding the narrative of Judah and Tamar, we have sought to illuminate your love as much as is feasible.

Ephraem the Syrian

4th centuryChurch Father

As Tamar engaged in her prayers, Judas entered and beheld her, bowing to her inappropriately like one would to a prostitute, drawn in by the sincerity of her supplication. However, when he uttered the sign she had requested, she understood that her actions had found favor with God. With newfound confidence, she revealed her countenance, boldly requesting a reward from the owner of the riches.

Ambrose of Milan

4th centuryChurch Father

Who is more virtuous: the woman who awaited the promise for so long or the man who succumbed to the love presented to him? Is it she who remained loyal to her fiancé's lineage, or he who viewed her as immoral? Was it she who rejected those who sought to violate her purity, or he who was initially led by base desires and, through Tamar's virtue, was granted the blessing of descendants? Is it she who remained childless and feared that delaying marriage would jeopardize her chance for motherhood, the one who chose an older partner, or he who was entranced by her youthful beauty? He himself acknowledged: Tamar is more righteous than I, for I have not given her to my son Shelah (Genesis 38:26). She sought to challenge this moral guardian who insisted on her purity.

Read more (124 words)

Yet we do not vindicate her at the expense of his honor; rather, we affirm both their righteousness—not for themselves, but for the profound revelation embodied in their union: Tamar bore twins, named Perez and Zerah. We have explored the ethical implications: Tamar did not behave like a harlot but embraced the blessing of motherhood. Let us delve deeper into the historical context to uncover the hidden significance, as it is impossible for there not to be a mysterious meaning behind her receiving a ring, a necklace, and a staff (see Gen. 38:18, 25). It is no ordinary man who is bestowed with adornments, a seal, and authority: the seal of his actions, the adornment upon his chest, and the emblem of royal freedom.

Cross references

Passages read together with this verse.