The Church Fathers on this verse

Genesis 38:27Meaning & Commentary from the Church Fathers

And when she was ready to be brought to bed, there appeared twins in her womb: and in the very delivery of the infants, one put forth a hand, whereon the midwife tied a scarlet thread, saying:

Douay-Rheims

וַיְהִ֖י בְּעֵ֣ת לִדְתָּ֑הּ וְהִנֵּ֥ה תְאוֹמִ֖ים בְּבִטְנָֽהּ׃

Hebrew (Masoretic text)

The Church Fathers on this verse

3 Church Fathers comment on this verse

John Chrysostom

4th centuryChurch Father

In conclusion, following the thorough narration of Tamar's deceit, the Holy Scriptures reveal the offspring she bore.

Cyrill of Alexandria

5th centuryChurch Father

Tamar, having endured the pain of bringing forth two children, ultimately witnessed their arrival. The firstborn extended his hand, but when he withdrew it, despite the presence of a scarlet cord, the second child emerged before him, as though a barrier had been dismantled; subsequently, the firstborn followed. This can be taken as a significant indication that the Gentiles are called prior to the descendants of Israel, and that the honor of the firstborn is bestowed upon the elect in the latter days. However, it is certain that Israel itself will follow after them, having accepted the sacrifice of Christ, since the scarlet represents the precious blood. Who then is the one that ‘broke down the barrier that stood in the midst’ (Eph. 2: 14), and, in the role of the firstborn, summoned the second, placing the first behind? Clearly, it is Christ, through whom, together with the Father, all glory belongs forever to God and the Holy Spirit. Amen.

Ambrose of Milan

4th centuryChurch Father

Tamar bore twins, named Phares and Zara. Matthew’s mention of both names is significant, even though the lineage only necessitates the mention of Phares, as he fathered Esrom, who fathered Aram (Matt. 1:3), and so forth in succession. Why is it that although Isaac had two sons and Jacob had many, the Scriptures only note one from each in the genealogy of the Lord, yet both of these? Could there be a profound mystery contained within their duality?

Cross references

Passages read together with this verse.