The Church Fathers on this verse

Genesis 7:2Meaning & Commentary from the Church Fathers

Of all clean beasts take seven and seven, the male and the female.

Douay-Rheims

מִכֹּ֣ל ׀ הַבְּהֵמָ֣ה הַטְּהוֹרָ֗ה תִּֽקַּח־לְךָ֛ שִׁבְעָ֥ה שִׁבְעָ֖ה אִ֣ישׁ וְאִשְׁתּ֑וֹ וּמִן־הַבְּהֵמָ֡ה אֲ֠שֶׁר לֹ֣א טְהֹרָ֥ה הִ֛וא שְׁנַ֖יִם אִ֥ישׁ וְאִשְׁתּֽוֹ׃

Hebrew (Masoretic text)

The Church Fathers on this verse

9 Church Fathers comment on this verse · 10 commentaries

John Chrysostom

4th centuryChurch Father

The Lord instructed Noah to bring seven of each clean animal into the ark. Prior to this, there was a command to bring pairs of all creatures without distinction. Now, He specifies that for every clean animal, seven should be brought—both male and female—while for the unclean animals, only two of each, again male and female. He elaborates on His reasoning by stating, "I will destroy all that exists from the face of the earth" (Gen. 7:4). This prompts an important question: how did the righteous Noah discern which animals were clean and which were unclean? At that time, the classification given later by Moses to the Israelites was not yet established. How, then, did Noah know?

Read more (488 words)

He relied on the innate understanding bestowed by God in creation, enabling his intellect to make this determination. According to divine perspective, nothing God created is unclean. It raises a profound inquiry: how can we label any creature as unclean when God has declared that everything He made is "very good" (Gen. 1:31)?

Yet, human nature has imposed its own distinctions. Even today, in various cultures, some regard certain items as unclean and others do not. This indicates that the righteous One's innate knowledge guided him in identifying which animals were suitable for consumption and which were wrongly considered unclean. For instance, why do we view a donkey as unclean despite its strict seed diet, while permitting the consumption of other four-legged animals that may eat less clean substances? The wisdom given by God serves as our guide in this matter. Furthermore, it may also be argued that God directly imparted to Noah the understanding needed to differentiate between clean and unclean animals.

Now, having discussed the clean and unclean, another question arises: why were only two of each unclean animal commanded to enter the ark, while seven of each clean animal were to be included? Moreover, why seven specifically? While our discussion may be lengthy, if I may engage your patience, we will endeavor to clarify this loving inquiry with the assistance of God’s grace. Many have spun elaborate tales regarding this, speculating about numbers; however, this speculation often stems from misguided curiosity that has fueled various heresies.

We find that pairs frequently appear in Scripture. For example, when Jesus sent His disciples to preach, He sent them "two by two" (Mark 6:7), with twelve in total, and the gospels amount to four. But there’s no need to delve too deeply into these matters with you, for you are already well-informed to dismiss such empty discussions.

It is necessary to contemplate why God commanded that "seven by seven" of the clean animals be brought into the ark. God’s intent was to provide comfort to the righteous man and those who would partake of these animals with him. The instruction to bring in seven signifies the righteous man's devotion to God. The Lord, in His mercy, recognized Noah’s goodness and knew that, having experienced the Lord’s immense love and having survived the flood, he would wish to express his thankfulness through sacrifice upon exiting the ark. To prevent the sacrifice from depleting pairs unnecessarily, God commanded that seven of every kind of clean bird be brought in, allowing Noah to show gratitude without jeopardizing the animal pairs. This will be made clearer in subsequent teachings where we will see that the righteous man did exactly this.

Thus, you have now learned the reasoning behind the command to bring “seven in number” of clean animals into the ark. Be cautious, therefore, not to be swayed by fables that, in contradiction to Holy Scripture, introduce human fabrications into divine teaching.

Cyrill of Alexandria

5th centuryChurch Father

It is evident that the community of those who have been justified through faith is considerably larger than the Jewish community. This is illustrated by the account of Noah, who took seven of each clean animal into the ark, while only two of the unclean animals were included, representing those who opposed the Lord. For as the prophet states, a "remnant" will be preserved (Isaiah 10:22; cf. Romans 9:27).

Augustine of Hippo

5th centuryChurch Father

Critics often argue that an ark of such dimensions could not accommodate so many types of animals, including pairs of both clean and unclean species. They typically consider only its length of three hundred cubits and width of fifty; however, they overlook that the same dimensions apply to both the upper and the higher decks, resulting in a total of nine hundred and one hundred and fifty cubits respectively. As Origen wisely points out, Moses, the servant of God, who was ‘taught all the wisdom’ of the Egyptians (Acts 7:22) and had an affinity for geometry, might have provided measurements in geometrical cubits, which were known to be six times larger than our own. One cannot help but recognize the vast capacity that such an immense structure could offer for the myriad of creatures it was meant to house.

Let us acknowledge this ark, which symbolizes the Church. In it, let us be pure creatures, ensuring we do not prevent the impure from seeking shelter alongside us until the flood's conclusion. Both pure and impure animals coexisted within the ark; however, their sacrifices were not equally acceptable to the Lord. After the flood, Noah presented offerings to God using the clean animals only, disregarding the unclean. Yet, none of the clean creatures exited the ark prematurely due to the presence of the unclean ones. The raven did depart, leaving the community within the ark ahead of time; however, it was part of the unclean, taken two by two, and not among the clean, which were taken seven by seven. Let us reject the impurity inherent in such a division.

Read more (93 words)

That the Scriptures state that unclean animals accompanied Noah into the ark does not imply that leaders should bar any of the sinful actors—who are in actuality less corrupt than their comedic counterparts—from receiving baptism. Rather, it signifies that the unclean will ultimately find a place in the Church, not due to a degradation of doctrine or a dilution of discipline, but out of a spirit of acceptance. The entry of the unclean animals into the ark was not through any arbitrary part but rather through the single entrance established by the builder.

Ephraem the Syrian

4th centuryChurch Father

The pure creatures are referred to as gentle beings, while the impure creatures are known as destructive beings. In the beginning, God fashioned a greater multitude of the pure beings.

Jerome of Stridon

4th centuryChurch Father

This demonstrates that virginity is a natural state and that marriage emerged following the entrance of sin: through marriage, a virgin body is brought forth, and the loss at the root is restored in the fruit. It is also worth noting that the animals that entered Noah's ark in pairs were unclean, while the clean animals were of an odd number.

Ambrose of Milan

4th centuryChurch Father

A deeper understanding leads us to perceive that the influence of the intellect on the soul, and the soul on the body, mirrors the role of the head of a household within his home. Just as the intellect governs the soul, the soul, in turn, governs the body. When the intellect is healthy, the household is secure, and the soul remains in peace; likewise, a healthy soul ensures the well-being of the body. A disciplined mind manages passions, guides the senses, and oversees speech. Hence, the Lord instructs the righteous: ‘Enter,’ meaning to delve within yourself, to access your mind and the essence of your soul. Here lies salvation, here is refuge, and outside of it exists chaos and peril.

Read more (209 words)

Yet, should you dwell within, you shall be safeguarded outside, for where reason holds sway, there flourish good thoughts and righteous deeds. If the mind remains unclouded by vices, then its thoughts radiate light.

Let us now reflect on why God commands Noah to board the ark and to gather seven of each kind of clean animals, male and female, alongside two of each sex from the unclean animals, in order to preserve life for the entire earth. This number seven is significant as it denotes purity and sanctity, being unattached to any mixture, and not borne from another. It is referred to as virgin, as it engenders nothing by itself, remaining untouched by both maternal creation and union with a female. Thus, this virginity, while expressed through a feminine term, embodies the masculine virtue of sanctity, for every male being that unveils the hidden is termed holy by the Lord. The prophet notes: she was permitted a son, signifying holiness (Isaiah 66:7). In contrast, the number two lacks completeness, as it is vulnerable to division; thus, what is incomplete holds nothingness within. Conversely, the number seven signifies completeness, being akin to ten, reflective of the first, from which all virtues, each in its own form, emanate and thrive.

Dimitri of Rostov

17th centuryChurch Father

God instructed Noah to enter the ark along with his wife and children, as noted in Genesis 7:1, and to gather various animals, including livestock and birds, as specified in Genesis 7:3. The clean animals were to be taken in seven pairs, while the unclean ones were to be brought in two by two. All these creatures were gathered by the mighty hand of God, which subdued the wildness of beasts and the hunger of predatory birds, making the lion gentle like a lamb and the hawk serene like a dove. Noah and the animals entered the ark seven days before the deluge began, as referenced in Genesis 7:4.

Read more (91 words)

God directed Noah to bring only two of each unclean species, male and female, alongside seven of the clean ones, as He intended for the clean animals to flourish on the earth for humanity’s sustenance. Among the seven clean animals were three pairs, male and female, while the seventh was also male, designated for sacrifice to God by Noah after the flood. Recognizing this, we are moved to praise the merciful Providence of God for humanity, for though He chose one animal for His own sacrifice, He provided six for mankind.

Philaret of Moscow (Drosdow)

19th centuryChurch Father

The Scriptures mention seven clean animals, introducing for the first time a distinct category of clean creatures, without specifying which ones are included. This suggests that the sacred writer presumed the reader's familiarity with this classification based on other parts of his work or the common knowledge of his era. Based on this premise, it can be deduced that clean animals are those permitted for consumption by the law, a considerable number of which are detailed in Leviticus 11:1-47, or those designated for sacrifice, of which the law refers to only five categories (see Leviticus 1:2, 10, 14).

Read more (361 words)

When Noah offered sacrifices from all clean beasts and birds after the flood, as stated in Genesis 8:20, one might reasonably conclude that only sacrificial animals, specifically the five types outlined in the law, were brought into the ark. This is because otherwise Noah's sacrifices would have been unprecedented in both quality and quantity. It appears that the intent of bringing a greater number of pure animals was not solely for sacrifice but also for food, as sacrificial animals have historically also served dietary purposes.

The question arises, how could Noah identify clean creatures prior to the law's provisions and before they were used for consumption? It could be due to their inherent nature; in the intricate balance of creation, man finds reflections of his own essence among various animals; some exhibit qualities that make them particularly amiable and appropriate for human use, thus appearing more pure. The sevenfold entry of these animals into the ark may have been inspired by divine prompting, consistent with the traditions of sacrificial beings since the dawn of creation.

The arrangement of seven, or "seven seven" as expressed in Hebrew, in the context of saving pure animals seems at odds with the accounts elsewhere, where it indicates that other animals were saved two by two (Genesis 6:19; 7:9, 15). However, this discrepancy is reconciled when considering that "two two" can refer to pairs without specifying quantity (as seen in Mark 6:7, 39, 40), meaning both pairs and counts. Thus, the general phrase "two two" indicates they were to be taken in pairs, while in the distinction of clean and unclean, "seven seven" refers specifically to the quantity of animals rather than their pairings by gender.

Some interpret that the phrase "two two," following traditional Hebrew meaning, should refer to a singular pair for unclean creatures, while for clean animals, "seven seven" implies seven individuals of each kind, not differentiated by sex. Hence, it may suffice that the clean animals were brought in pairs, comprising both male and female for reproduction. Various interpretations suggest that each species of clean animals included three pairs for reproduction and one for sacrifice, a theory that aligns with the context.

Vissarion (Nechaev)

19th centuryCommentator

In the directive regarding the construction of the ark, it was stated that animals should enter the ark in pairs; however, now that the moment has arrived to execute this command about the creatures, it is articulated with greater detail. The earlier edict to admit the animals into the ark in pairs, specifically in even numbers, still stands, but it adds that the clean animals should not be represented by merely one of each kind, but by seven of each species—three of each along with one additional, making up the seventh. These, alongside others, are brought into the ark for the purpose of “nourishing the seed throughout the whole earth,” meaning for the safeguarding of their lineage that will multiply across the globe.

Read more (258 words)

The distinction between clean and unclean animals is delineated in the Mosaic Law: the clean refer to the animals and birds that are designated for sacrifice and permissible for consumption—such as a bull, a sheep, and a goat among the former, and a domestic pigeon along with a turtledove and a wild pigeon among the latter. Additionally, there are various four-legged creatures and birds designated solely for consumption and excluded from sacrifice, such as fallow deer and roe deer. The law unequivocally states which animals are unclean, forbidding their use in sacrifices or as food. A pair of unclean animals must be preserved in the ark solely for the purpose of species continuation, while a larger number of clean animals is required not only for reproduction but also for offerings of gratitude that Noah will present following the flood, as indicated in Genesis 8:20, and for sustenance, since after the flood, God will grant humanity the ability to consume meat (Genesis 9:2). The question arises, how could Noah differentiate between clean and unclean animals prior to the legal definitions provided? It is reasonable to surmise that Noah may have received a specific revelation from God. Yet, the distinction between sacrificial and non-sacrificial animals was likely known to humankind from the earliest days of human existence, also imparted through divine revelation. For if God instructed humanity to offer sacrifices even before the flood, it stands to reason that He also informed them which animals were meant for sacrifice. The Law of Moses merely reaffirmed what had been revealed before.

Cross references

Passages read together with this verse.