John Chrysostom
He did well to say, "in the last days." This encourages them and comforts those who have despaired. In other places he says, "The Lord is near. Have no anxiety about anything" (Phil 4:5-6). Again he says, "For salvation is nearer to us now than when we first believed" (Rom 13:11). So also here.
What do his words mean? Anyone worn out in struggles is somewhat encouraged when he hears of the end of the struggles, seeing that the end of labors and the beginning of rest are approaching.
"In these last days He has spoken to us in the Son." Again he says "in the Son," that is, "through the Son," contrary to those who assert that this belongs to the Spirit. Do you see that "in" is used instead of "through"?
Read more (1631 words)
The words "of old" and "in the last days" also signify something else. What is that? After a long time had passed, when we were being punished, when spiritual gifts had grown scarce, when there was no hope of salvation, and when from every side we expected worse things, then we received the better things.
See how wisely he expressed this. He did not say, "Christ spoke," although He was the one speaking. Since the souls of the hearers were still weak and could not hear about Christ, he says, "He has spoken to us in the Son."
What are you saying? God spoke through the Son? Yes. Then where is the superiority? Here you show that both the New and the Old Testaments belong to one and the same God. Therefore there is no great superiority between them.
For this reason he goes on to explain these words, saying, "He has spoken to us in the Son." Notice how Paul includes all and places himself on the same level as the disciples. "He has spoken," he says, "to us."
Although He did not speak to him, but to the apostles and through them to the rest, Paul elevates the Jews and suggests that God spoke also to them. At the same time, he in some way reproaches them, because almost all those to whom the prophets spoke were wicked and corrupt.
Yet he does not yet enlarge on this. First he speaks of the gifts sent down from God. Therefore he continues, "whom He appointed heir of all things." Here he points to Christ's Incarnation, just as David says in the second psalm: "Ask of Me, and I will give You the nations as Your inheritance" (Ps 2:8).
Now Jacob is no longer the Lord's portion, and Israel is no longer His inheritance, but all things. What does "whom He appointed heir of all things" mean? It means that He made Him Lord of all, as Peter also said in Acts: "God has made this Jesus both Lord and Christ" (Acts 2:36).
The Apostle uses the title "heir" in order to express two ideas: the truth of His Sonship and the unalienable character of His dominion. "Heir of all things" means of the whole world.
Then he again turns the discourse back to what existed before: "through whom also He made the ages." Where are those who say that there was a time when He was not? Next the Apostle gradually utters concerning Him what is far greater than this.
"He," he says, "being the radiance of His glory and the image of His hypostasis, and upholding all things by the word of His power, when He had made purification of our sins by Himself. Sat down at the right hand of the throne of Majesty on high, having become so much better than the angels as He has inherited a more excellent name than they" (Heb 1:3, 4).
O apostolic wisdom. Or rather, we must marvel here not at Paul's wisdom, but at the grace of the Spirit. He did not utter this from his own reasoning, nor did he pronounce such wisdom from himself. How could one expect this from an awl, from leather, from a workshop?
Such sayings came from divine power. Indeed, such thoughts did not come from his own mind. His mind had formerly been so small and weak that it did not surpass the mind of common people. How could one expect otherwise from a man devoted to concerns about buying and leather?
They came from the grace of the Spirit, which manifests its power through whomever it wills. If someone wishes to lift a little child to some high place reaching to the very height of heaven, he does it gradually. Little by little he raises him from the lower steps to the higher.
Then, when he has placed him above and ordered him to look down, if he sees that the child is troubled, afraid, and dizzy, he takes him and brings him down again to a lower place, giving him the chance to rest. After he has rested, he raises him again, and then lowers him again.
Blessed Paul acts in exactly this way with the Hebrews, and everywhere else, having learned this from his Teacher. For Christ Himself acted in the same way, at times raising His hearers to the height, and at times bringing them down. He did not allow them to remain long on one and the same level.
Look, then, how here the Apostle leads his hearers through several steps and places them at the very height of piety. Before they are troubled and become dizzy, he brings them down again and gives them rest. "He has spoken," he continues, "to us in the Son," and then, "whom He appointed heir of all things."
The name "Son" is a common name. Yet when the true Son of God is meant, it is above all. However that may be, here the Apostle suggests and proves that He is exalted.
See how he first places them on a lower step, saying, "whom He appointed heir of all things." For "appointed heir" does not signify a lofty matter. Then he places them on a higher step, adding, "through whom also He made the ages."
Then he places them on the very highest step, after which there is no other: "He, being the radiance of His glory and the image of His hypostasis."
See how here also he opens two paths. He warns us against the novelties of Sabellius and Arius. The first denied the remaining distinction of persons in the essence of God. The second tore the one essence apart by making the Son unequal to the Father.
He powerfully refutes both. How does he do this? He speaks alternately in both ways, so that they may not think that the Son is without beginning, or that He is alien to God.
Do not be surprised at what has been said, beloved. Even after such proofs, there are people who consider the Son alien to the Father, give Him another father, and even say that He opposes the Father. What would they not have said if he had not said this?
When it is necessary to heal those in error, he finds it necessary to say something lowly. Thus he says, "whom He appointed heir of all things," and again, "through whom also He made the ages."
Then, so as not to cause harm in another respect, he passes from expressions that signify condescension to expressions that signify authority. He shows that the Son is equal in honor to the Father, and so equal in honor that many regarded Him as the Father.
See the Apostle's great wisdom. First he sets forth the former point and firmly proves it. Once he has proved that He is the Son of God and not alien to the Father, then without danger he presents all the exalted things he wished to present.
Since, by presenting exalted things about Him, he could lead many to the thought just mentioned, the Apostle first sets forth what is lowly. Then, without danger, he ascends to the height he wished.
After saying, "whom He appointed heir of all things," and, "through whom also He made the ages," he then adds, "upholding all things by the word of His power." He who governs all things by one word cannot need anyone in order to produce all things.
That this is really so, see how in the following words the Apostle ascribes authority to Him and no longer says, "through whom." Having said that God made what He wished through Him, he then leaves this expression and says, "In the beginning, You, Lord, founded the earth, and the heavens are the work of Your hands" (Heb 1:10).
He no longer says, "through whom," that is, that He made the ages through Him. But how then? Were they not made by Him? Certainly, but not as you say, not as you imagine. Not as through an instrument, and not as though He would not have made them unless the Father had lent Him a helping hand.
Just as "the Father judges no one," but is said to judge through the Son (Jn 5:22), because He begot Him as Judge, so also He creates through Him, because He begot Him as Creator. If the Father is His beginning, then much more is He the beginning of what was created by Him.
Therefore, when the Apostle wishes to show that the Son is from Him, he necessarily speaks in lowly terms. But when he wishes to speak loftily, a blow is dealt to Marcellus and Sabellius.
The Church has escaped the extremes of both groups and walks the middle way. It does not stop at the lowly expressions, lest Paul of Samosata find refuge. Nor is it limited only to the lofty expressions. At the same time it shows the Son's great nearness to the Father, so that Sabellius may not object.
When he said "Son," Paul of Samosata immediately rises up and says that He is a son like many others. But the Apostle inflicted a mortal wound on him by adding, "heir of all things."
Yet he still acts shamelessly together with Arius. The words "whom He appointed heir of all things" are accepted by both of them. The first asserts that these words signify weakness. The second tries to reinterpret even the words that follow.
Paul said, "through whom also He made the ages," and by this he decisively overthrew the shameless Paul of Samosata. Yet Arius still seems to hold his ground. See then how the Apostle overthrew him also, saying next, "He, being the radiance of glory."