John Chrysostom
Then, after again saying something exalted in the words, "at the right hand of the throne of Majesty on high," he speaks once more of something lowly, adding: "having become so much better than the angels, as He has inherited a more excellent name than they."
Here he speaks of the divine economy in the flesh. The words "having become so much better" do not refer to the essence, which is one with the essence of the Father. That did not become, but was begotten.
They refer to the essence of the flesh. This did become. Yet he is not now speaking of the origin of the essence.
Rather, just as John said, "He who comes after me has become before me, because He was before me" (Jn 1:15), expressing that He is more honorable and more glorious, so also Paul speaks here.
Read more (339 words)
By the words "having become so much better than the angels," he expresses that He is higher and more excellent, "as He has inherited a more excellent name than they."
Do you see that this is said with reference to Christ's flesh? He always had the name "God the Word." He did not inherit it afterward. Nor did He become more excellent than the angels when He accomplished the purification of our sins.
He was always more excellent, indeed incomparably more excellent. Therefore this is said with reference to the flesh.
So too, when we reason about man, we usually say both lowly and exalted things about him. When we say, for example, "man is nothing," "man is earth," and "man is ashes," we refer all this to his lower part.
But when we say, "man is an immortal being," "man is rational," and "akin to the powers above," we refer all this to his higher part.
So also Paul speaks of Christ at times according to the lower aspect, and at times according to the higher. He wishes to explain the divine economy and to speak of His incorruptible being.
"Having become," he says, "so much better than the angels, as He has inherited a more excellent name than they." The word "having become" is used here in place of "having appeared." Otherwise one may say, "He is."
Then the Apostle confirms this. By what? By the name. Do you see that the name Son always signifies His true Sonship?
Indeed, if He were not the true Son, it would not have been said so. Why? Because one is truly Son only by receiving being from the Father Himself.
For this reason the Apostle brings forward such a proof. If He were Son by grace, He would not only fail to be more glorious than the angels, but would even be lower than they.
Why? Because righteous men also are called sons of God. If the name Son does not signify the true Son, it cannot prove superiority.