The Church Fathers on this verse

John 13:3Meaning & Commentary from the Church Fathers

Knowing that the Father had given him all things into his hands and that he came from God and goeth to God,

Douay-Rheims

ειδως ο ιησους οτι παντα δεδωκεν αυτω ο πατηρ εις τας χειρας και οτι απο θεου εξηλθεν και προς τον θεον υπαγει

Greek (Byzantine text)

The Church Fathers on this verse

9 Church Fathers comment on this verse

John Chrysostom

4th centuryChurch Father

Here he expresses his wonder that He who is so great and so exalted, who came from God and goes to God, who holds all things in His power, did this. Despite all His greatness, He did not disdain to take such a work upon Himself.

By “giving over,” as it seems to me, he means here the salvation of the faithful. Christ means the same giving over when He says, “All things have been delivered to Me by My Father” (Mt 11:27).

So also He says elsewhere, “They were Yours, and You gave them to Me” (Jn 17:6). And again, “No one can come to Me unless the Father draws him” (Jn 6:44). And, “unless it has been given him from heaven” (Jn 3:27).

Read more (180 words)

Thus this expression either means this, or it means that the washing of the feet could in no way abase Him. For He came from God, goes to God, and holds all things.

When you hear of “giving over,” suppose nothing human. This only shows reverence toward the Father and unity of mind with Him.

For as the Father gives over to Him, so He also gives over to the Father. Paul shows this when he says, “when He delivers the Kingdom to God the Father” (1 Cor 15:24).

He speaks here in human terms, showing His great care for the disciples and revealing His ineffable love for them. For He now cared for them as His own.

He taught them the mother of all good things, humility, which He called the beginning and end of virtue.

The words, “He had come from God and was going to God,” are not added without reason. They were added so that we might know that He acted worthily of the One who came from there and goes there, trampling down every pride.

Theophylact of Bulgaria

11th centuryChurch Father

“Jesus, knowing that the Father had given all things into His hands,” that is, had entrusted to Him the salvation of the faithful. He must now reveal to them everything pertaining to salvation, including the washing of the disciples’ feet.

For by this humility is established as law.

Or again: knowing that the Father had delivered all things to Him, and that He had come from God and was going to God, He knew His glory would not be diminished if He washed the disciples’ feet.

For He did not seize glory, so as to fear losing it, and therefore avoid undertaking any humble work. Such a feeling belongs to those who do not possess true nobility.

Read more (218 words)

Because they have seized glory for themselves, they do not even wish to bend down, lest they lose what does not belong to them and what they have stolen.

But He was King of all and Son of God. This is what the words mean: “He had come from God,” that is, from the essence of the Father, and again, “He was going to God.”

Therefore His glory, since He is so exalted and so great, will not be diminished if He washes the disciples’ feet.

Notice, I ask you, that if humility is the work of Him who comes from God and goes to God, then pride is plainly the work of him who comes from demons and goes to demons.

When you hear that “the Father delivered to Him,” do not think that the Son’s weakness is being revealed here, but His equality of honor and unity of mind with the Father.

For if, because it is said that the Father delivered to Him, the Son seems weak to you, then consider the Father weak as well. For to Him also, as the Apostle says (1 Cor 15:24), the Son will deliver the Kingdom.

But this is not so. Rather, “delivering” signifies, so to speak, unity of mind, cooperation, and the good pleasure of the Father.

Cyrill of Alexandria

5th centuryChurch Father

But in order to raise our understanding of this deed, the washing of the feet, to its proper height, and so that we not think Christ did something of little importance, the divine Evangelist again finds it necessary to set forth His inherent glory and authority.

He does this by speaking of His possession of all things: “knowing that the Father had given all things into His hands.”

Although, he says, He was not ignorant that He has authority over all, and “that He had come from God,” that is, had been begotten from the essence of God the Father, “and was going to God,” that is, was returning again to heaven.

Plainly He would sit together with His Begetter. Yet He submitted to such abasement that He girded Himself with a towel and washed the disciples’ feet.

Read more (53 words)

Therefore, having from this the most excellent example of reverence and the most glorious pattern of love toward one another, let us be humble-minded, beloved. Let us think that our brethren possess greater advantages than we do, even if we ourselves are good.

This great model persuades us to think and desire this.

Augustine of Hippo

5th centuryChurch Father

Since the Evangelist was about to set forth such an exalted example of our Lord’s humility, he first judged it necessary to recall His majesty. Therefore he says, “knowing that the Father had given all things into His hands,” all things, including the one who betrayed Him.

Therefore He had given even the betrayer himself. For if He had not had him in His hands, He certainly could not have used him as He wished.

Thus the betrayer had already been delivered to Him whom he longed to betray. He did evil by his betrayal, yet from that betrayal came good, which he did not know.

For the Lord knew what He was doing for His friends, and patiently made use of His enemy. In this way the Father gave all things into His hands: evil for use, and good as the outcome.

“Knowing also that He had come from God and was going to God,” that is, without leaving God when He came from there, and without leaving us when He returned there.

Euthymios Zigabenos

11th centuryChurch Father

“Jesus, knowing that the Father had given all things into His hands,” as to His true and Only-begotten Son.

The Evangelist uses here an anthropomorphic expression, that the Father gave all things into the hands of the Son. In this he follows Jesus Christ Himself, who often spoke of Himself in this way.

He did so in order to reveal more clearly to people the designs of the divine economy, as we have already mentioned more than once. As the Father gives all things to the Son, so the Son gives them to the Father.

The Apostle Paul says of Jesus Christ, “when He delivers the Kingdom to God the Father” (1 Cor 15:24).

“And that He had come from God and was going to God,” as the Son of God and God.

Read more (55 words)

Thus the Evangelist says that Jesus Christ knew He was the Almighty, the Son of God, and that He had the same authority as dignity. Yet He descended to the lowest degree of abasement.

By this He showed, on the one hand, His love for the disciples, and on the other, He taught them humility.

Gladkow B.I.

19th centuryChurch Father

According to the Eastern custom, when guests entered a house, the servants or slaves of the master of the house washed their dusty feet.

In this case, when Jesus and the Apostles entered the house where the Passover had been prepared for them, no one washed their feet.

This was probably because, with the householder's permission, they merely occupied one room of his house, but were not his guests.

Jesus paid no attention to this circumstance and reclined at table at once.

He attached no significance to this and other customary washings. He required of His followers purity of heart and purity of thoughts more than purity of body.

Read more (578 words)

But a discussion arose among the Apostles about this matter. They wished to observe the custom of washing, which the Jews considered especially important on the evening of Passover.

Yet there were no servants there. One of them had to resolve to perform this service for his Teacher and companions.

Since this service was considered especially humiliating and inconsistent with the dignity of free Jews, a dispute arose among the Apostles about which of them should be considered greatest (Lk 22:24).

In other words, which of them was exempt from such humiliating work?

Although the Evangelist Luke does not say what occasioned this dispute, it is evident that there could have been no other occasion.

They had already disputed in due time about primacy in the kingdom of the Messiah, and Jesus had put an end to their dispute.

Jesus heard this dispute and reminded the Apostles of what He had said earlier about their quarrel over primacy.

"You know that the kings of the earth exercise lordship over the nations" (Lk 22:25). In general, all who have authority over men count the exercise of that authority as a benefit to them.

But in the kingdom of God, the kingdom of love and goodness, it must not be so.

"I chose you to establish this kingdom on earth, and through it to lead men into the Kingdom of Heaven. Therefore you must be the first to show by example that there is no place in this kingdom for love of power or pride.

Understand that authority or seniority first of all lays duties upon the one clothed with authority. Rights to honor and respect come later, of themselves, if one deserves them.

Therefore, if any of you for some reason considers himself greater, he must behave as though he were the least.

Whoever among you will be chief over others must not forget that, in ruling, he must serve everyone and be the first servant of all."

As He said this, Jesus immediately confirmed His words by His own example. He rose from the table, laid aside His outer garment, and took the towel prepared for washing.

He poured water into a basin and began to wash the Apostles' feet and wipe them with the towel with which He was girded.

In narrating this, the Evangelist John says, "And this was done by Him who knew that God had given all things into His power, and that He had come from God and was going to God."

Yes, Christ so loved men that, at the end, He did not disdain to show them by His own example how necessary humility and meekness are for entrance into the kingdom of God.

In washing the feet of His Apostles, He did not turn away even from Judas. At that time Judas was already at one with His enemies, and therefore was himself an enemy.

He commanded His followers to love their enemies and do good to those who hate them. Wishing to bring Judas to repentance, to do him good, and to save him, He bends before him and humbly washes his feet.

It would seem that even an iron heart should have melted from such a manifestation of all-forgiving love and humility.

But the heart of Judas had already become inaccessible to good. The humility of Jesus did not touch him.

Rather, it likely gave him confidence that his betrayal was being kept by the Sanhedrin in strict secrecy.

Lopuchin A.P.

19th centuryChurch Father

When Christ and the rest of the disciples arrived at this house, the supper was already prepared. The table was set, and the customary triclinium with couches had been arranged.

The custom of eating the Passover standing had long since been abandoned. Reclining was considered the most suitable and comfortable posture, especially because it was regarded as the posture of free men.

Each guest reclined at full length, leaning on his left arm, so that his right hand could remain free.

On the right side of Jesus Christ reclined the beloved disciple. Therefore his head could at any time lean upon the breast of his Teacher and Lord.

Read more (191 words)

In the East, in every house, the middle part of the floor is usually covered with rugs or mats. On entering the room, each person removes his sandals at the threshold.

This is done so as not to soil the white and clean mats with dust and uncleanness from the road or street.

All the disciples did this, and then began to take their places at table. But another pleasant custom, one that Christ valued not a little, was omitted.

Their feet must have been covered with dust from walking along the hot and stony road from Bethany to Jerusalem. In such a case it would have been pleasant to refresh themselves for supper by washing them after removing their sandals.

But washing feet was the work of slaves. Since no one volunteered to perform this good service, the Lord Jesus Himself, in His infinite humility and self-renunciation, rose from the table.

He did this to perform the slave’s service which none of His disciples had offered to do for Him. He removed His outer garment, took a vessel of water and a towel, and silently began to wash their feet.

Michail (Lusin)

19th centuryChurch Father

“Knowing that,” and so forth, means that although He fully knew His divine dignity and majesty, He humbled Himself so greatly that He took upon Himself the work of a servant and washed the disciples’ feet.

“The Evangelist expresses his wonder that He who is so great and exalted, who came from God and goes to God, who holds all things in His power, did this, washing the feet. Despite all His greatness, He did not disdain to take such a work upon Himself” (Chrysostom).

“The Father had given all things into His hands”: see the note on Mt 11:27 and Mt 28:18.

“He had come from God”: see the note on Jn 8:42.

“He was going to God”: see Jn 13:1 and the note on Jn 6:61-62.

Read more (359 words)

“He rose from supper”: from this expression, and likewise from what follows, that the Lord, after washing the disciples’ feet, reclined again (Jn 13:12), it is clear that the washing did not happen before supper, but during supper.

Compare Jn 13:2, “during supper.”

There was a custom of washing the feet before supper. This was usually done by the servant of the house (1 Sam 25:41). This custom, however, was not always observed; compare Lk 7:44.

Evidently it was not observed now in the Lord’s small company, for some reason. Most likely, the Lord Himself intended to show the disciples an example of humility and self-denying love.

The Evangelist Luke relates that at this supper a dispute arose among the Lord’s disciples over which of them was greater (Lk 22:34). Perhaps because of this dispute the Lord washed His disciples’ feet.

He did this to show them an example of humility and mutual love. This supposition is all the more probable because the Lord’s discourse concerning this dispute in Luke and His discourse after the washing of the feet in John have considerable likeness.

This is especially true of Lk 22:26-27 and Jn 13:13-15.

According to Luke, this dispute occurred during supper. According to John, the washing of the feet occurred during supper.

According to Luke, the dispute came after Judas had been indicated as the betrayer. According to John, the washing of the feet came before the indication.

But it must be accepted as certain that the betrayer was indicated at supper at least twice. The first time was quietly, so that the troubled disciples did not notice, by an affirmative answer to Judas’s question (Mt 26:25; compare Chrysostom and Theophylact).

The other time was by giving Judas the morsel (Jn 13:26).

Still, we repeat that the Evangelists do not narrate the particular events of Christ’s whole life in strict chronology. This is also true, in particular, of the history of the Lord’s Passion and Resurrection.

They arrange individual events in their own way, while being in general agreement. Thus their accounts complete one another, and from comparison of them all there emerges a connected and sequential history.

Philaret (Gumilevski)

19th centuryChurch Father

The upper room on Zion presented a wondrous sight at Christ’s last Paschal supper. He, the Lord of heaven and earth, with the humility of a servant and the love of a friend, washed the disciples’ feet.

Let us look more closely at the wondrous deed of our wondrous Lord.

Filled with love for His disciples, the Savior could not leave unreproved their weakness, which had raised a dispute about precedence. Yet He did not begin by admonishing them with words.

He first gives them a remedy in an extraordinary action, and only afterward offers instruction.

This wondrous action, besides being medicinal for the disciples, served as the final expression of the meaning of Jesus’ earthly ministry.

Read more (326 words)

Three great truths marked the earthly life of Jesus Christ, and He now sets the same seal before His disciples.

In Jesus’ life was expressed that “the Father had given all things into His hands.” He had entrusted Him with accomplishing the salvation of mankind (Mt 11:27) and had laid this whole great work upon Him (Jn 17:3).

No less clearly He showed in His life that “He had come from God.” He had descended from heaven, and all His works were not human works, but the works of the Son of God.

Finally, it was open to His gaze that “He was going to God.” His death was near, after which His labors of love for mankind would be crowned with glory from the heavenly Father.

These three exalted truths summoned Him in His earthly life to works of self-denial. By their prompting He now appears before His disciples not only as an ordinary Son of Man, but as the servant of His disciples.

He is full of heavenly love toward them.

Among the Hebrews, if the master of the house wished to show special attention to guests or to his household, he would at the beginning of the meal order a servant to wash the feet of those invited to table (1 Sam 25:41).

The Lord takes upon Himself the work of a servant. And how does He perform this work? With the fullest zeal of a sincere servant.

When He and His disciples entered the upper room on Zion, He and the disciples, according to custom, reclined at the prepared table (Lk 22:14; Jn 13:2).

The disciples rested and argued about precedence. But He rises, takes off His outer garment Himself, takes a towel, and girds Himself with it.

Nor does He stop there. He Himself pours water into the basin. “He does not command another to do it, but does all this Himself.”

On the order of the washing, see Jn 13:6.

Cross references

Passages read together with this verse.

The original text

Greek text, 20 words with lemma, transliteration and Strong’s number. Tap to expand.

  1. εἰδὼς
    eidōs
    I know
    G1492 · εἴδω
  2. ὅτι
    hoti
    that
    G3754 · ὅτι
  3. πάντα
    panta
    all
    G3956 · πᾶς
  4. ἔδωκεν
    edōken
    I offer
    G1325 · δίδωμι
  5. αὐτῷ
    autō
    he
    G846 · αὐτός
  6. ὁ
    ho
    the
    G3588 · ὁ
  7. Πατὴρ
    patēr
    father
    G3962 · πατήρ
  8. εἰς
    eis
    into
    G1519 · εἰς
  9. τὰς
    tas
    the
    G3588 · ὁ
  10. χεῖρας
    cheiras
    a hand
    G5495 · χείρ
  11. καὶ
    kai
    and
    G2532 · καί
  12. ὅτι
    hoti
    that
    G3754 · ὅτι
  13. ἀπὸ
    apo
    from
    G575 · ἀπό
  14. Θεοῦ
    theou
    God
    G2316 · θεός
  15. ἐξῆλθεν
    exēlthen
    I go out
    G1831 · ἐξέρχομαι
  16. καὶ
    kai
    and
    G2532 · καί
  17. πρὸς
    pros
    to
    G4314 · πρός
  18. τὸν
    ton
    the
    G3588 · ὁ
  19. Θεὸν
    theon
    God
    G2316 · θεός
  20. ὑπάγει
    hypagei
    I go away
    G5217 · ὑπάγω