The Church Fathers on this verse

Hebrews 7:19Meaning & Commentary from the Church Fathers

For the law brought nothing to perfection: but a bringing in of a better hope, by which we draw nigh to God.

Douay-Rheims

ουδεν γαρ ετελειωσεν ο νομος επεισαγωγη δε κρειττονος ελπιδος δι ης εγγιζομεν τω θεω

Greek (Byzantine text)

The Church Fathers on this verse

10 Church Fathers comment on this verse

John Chrysostom

4th centuryChurch Father

What does “made nothing perfect” mean? It means, he says, that the Law perfected no one, since they did not obey it.

Even if they had obeyed it, it still would not have made anyone perfect and virtuous. Yet the Apostle does not say this here. He says that it had no power, and rightly so.

For its letters commanded: do this, and do not do that. They only set forth commandments, but did not impart power. Our hope is not such.

What does “annulment” mean? It means cancellation and rejection. He explains precisely of what by adding, “of the former commandment.” So he calls the Law, because it has already been annulled because of its weakness.

Read more (312 words)

It formerly existed, but has passed away and grown old through its weakness. “Annulment” is the annulment of what had force. Hence it is clear that it had force, but was set aside because it was wholly without success.

Was the Law, then, altogether useless? No, it was useful, and very useful, but it could not make men perfect. Therefore the Apostle says, “The Law made nothing perfect.”

Everything in it was a type. Everything was a shadow: circumcision, sacrifices, and the Sabbath. None of it could penetrate the soul. Therefore it passed away and was annulled.

“But there is the bringing in of a better hope, through which we draw near to God. And inasmuch as this was not without an oath.” Do you see how necessary the oath was here?

For this reason the Apostle spoke much about God’s swearing, and about His swearing for greater assurance.

“There is the bringing in of a better hope.” What does this mean? The Law too, he says, had hope, but not such a hope.

Those who formerly pleased God hoped to inherit the land and suffer no calamity. But we, if we please God, hope to inherit not the earth, but heaven.

Or rather, what is far greater, we hope to be near God, to draw near to the very throne of the Father, and to serve Him with the angels.

See how he reveals these truths little by little. First he said, “and it enters the inner place behind the veil” (Heb 6:19).

Here he says, “there is the bringing in of a better hope, through which we draw near to God. And inasmuch as this was not without an oath.”

What does “And inasmuch as this was not without an oath” mean? It means not without oath-bound assurance. Here is yet another distinction. This was not promised, he says, simply.

Theophylact of Bulgaria

11th centuryChurch Father

For he adds, “For the Law made nothing perfect.” Why was the Law weak? Because in it only letters were proclaimed: do this, and do not do that.

But it communicated no power for fulfilling the commandments, which is now given to us by the Spirit.

Yet here the heretics who revile the Law attack, saying, “Even Paul disparages the Law.” But, senseless men, he did not call it bad, but useless and weak precisely for making men perfect.

Milk is useful for infants, in accordance with their age, but useless for the perfect. So also the Law was useful for the imperfect Jews, drawing them away from idols and leading them to God.

Read more (193 words)

It gave them commandments suited to them, but it was not such for those who needed more perfect commandments. For it commanded fleshly sacrifices and purifications, of which the spiritual have no need.

Therefore it has now been annulled. Annulment is the annulment of something that had force. Thus the Law had authority then, when its time existed.

“But there is the bringing in of a better hope, through which we draw near to God.” The commandment of the Law, he says, has been annulled, and a hope has been brought in which the Jews did not have.

For they also had a hope: by pleasing God, they hoped to possess the land, overcome their enemies, and in general receive bodily blessings.

But our hope is not such. It is more excellent, for we hope for heavenly things, to be near God, to stand before Him, and to serve Him with the angels.

Above he said, “it enters the inner place behind the veil” (Heb 6:19). Now he says, “through which we draw near to God.”

For hope brings us to the very throne of God and places us together with the cherubim.

Cyrill of Alexandria

5th centuryChurch Father

Therefore the Law is weak and appears now to be quite ineffective, I say, for being able to perfect unto sanctification.

That justification in Christ and His service are better, you may hear from God Himself. Through the mouths of the prophets He clearly cries out to those who honored the legal service and were, as it were, unshakably attached to the commandment that had grown old.

In one place He says, “Wash yourselves, make yourselves clean” (Isa 1:16). In another, He says, “I desire mercy and not sacrifice, and the knowledge of God more than burnt offerings” (Hos 6:6; cf. Mt 12:7).

For we have received mercy in Christ, and in Him we behold the Father spiritually and know Him who is God by nature.

Ephraem the Syrian

4th centuryChurch Father

Because of the earthly weakness and sensual character presented by the law, and because of the infirmity by which it made those under the law powerless before passions and desires, it brought none of them to the perfection for which we renounce all our possessions. But the introduction of the Gospel was made for the sake of a hope surpassing what had first been proclaimed to us in the law. This accomplished a great thing. Now, through this very freedom from the law and through hope, we draw near to God. Then, because of the sensuality and weakness of the law, we were rejected and withdrew from Him.

Theodoret of Cyrus

5th centuryChurch Father

The law, says the Apostle, ceases, and the hope of better things is introduced. Yet the law ceases not because it is evil, as heretics assert in their derangement of mind, but because it is weak and cannot bring perfect benefit. It must be observed, however, that the Apostle calls weak and unprofitable what is superfluous in the law: circumcision, the Sabbath, and the like. But such commandments as "You shall not kill," "You shall not commit adultery," and similar ones, the New Testament commands us to keep with still greater strictness (Mt 5:21-32). Therefore, in place of what is abolished, we have received the hope of future good things. It makes us God's own. The oath confirms God's promise to us.

Euthymios Zigabenos

11th centuryChurch Father

“For the Law made nothing perfect.” It taught nothing perfect and produced no perfection in the Hebrews. Everything in it was only shadow and type, such as circumcision, sacrifices, Sabbath observance, and the like.

It brought nothing to perfection, not by its own essence, but because of the weakness and dullness of those who received it. True, it communicated God’s will to men.

Nevertheless, it was powerless for the perfect fulfillment of what was prescribed, and in this sense it brought no benefit.

By “change” he means its cessation. For its shadowy indications and types ceased when the time came for the truth itself, which they had foretold.

Read more (120 words)

“But there is the bringing in of a better hope.” The Old Covenant was the introduction of a more perfect covenant. For the Apostle called the New Covenant “a better hope,” because it gives hope for better things.

Or otherwise, the Old Covenant gives earthly promises, while this one promises the Kingdom of Heaven.

“Through which we draw near to God.” By this hope, even while we are here on earth, we draw near to God through hope in the future.

“And inasmuch as it was not without an oath.” It was a “bringing in of a better promise” precisely insofar as the ministry of Christ was “not without an oath.” By this oath the above-mentioned “bringing in” is confirmed.

Ivanov A.V.

19th centuryChurch Father

"The law made nothing perfect." This refers to the Levitical law, that is, to what concerns the priesthood. "Nothing" stands for "no one." The law gave neither justification nor power for salvation. That is, it brought no one to perfection. As the Apostle Paul proved (Rom 8:3; Gal 3:2, 21), it was powerless and led only to condemnation.

Kochomski S.W.

19th centuryChurch Father

These words explain what constitutes the motive cause for the change of the Law or commandment. The commandment appears weak and useless and, as is said further in v. 19, brings nothing to perfection.

How are we to understand this weakness and uselessness of the commandment? Certainly, in itself it is holy (Rom 7:12), as the expression of the all-holy will of God.

It appears weak and useless because of human weakness. Therefore this concerns that part of it which is temporary and, as it were, human, connected with the conditions and circumstances of men’s life (8:3).

Certainly, “uselessness” must also be understood here relatively. If the commandment had been completely useless for all times, why would it have been given at all?

It is useless in the sense that its benefit is less in comparison with the commandment that replaces it.

Michail Cheraskov

19th centuryChurch Father

Third, by the time of the Messiah’s coming, the weakness and uselessness of the former law had become evident in fact. For it brought nothing to perfection.

Therefore human hope of drawing near to God required both a new foundation and a stronger assurance from the Lord God.

This foundation was revealed in the new and better covenant of God with men, of which Jesus became the surety. The assurance was revealed in the oath by which the Lord established this covenant with men and ordered the new and better priesthood.

All this again happened according to the words of Scripture concerning Melchizedek, the Old Testament type of Christ: “The Lord has sworn and will not repent: You are a priest forever, according to the order of Melchizedek.”

Rosanow N.P.

19th centuryChurch Father

Having thus proved that the Old Testament priesthood and the Old Testament Law did in fact cease to act with the appearance of Christ, the Apostle explains this by saying that the commandment concerning the priesthood is annulled.

By that very fact it is recognized as not satisfying its purpose. For indeed the Law of Moses brought no one to perfect nearness to God.

Therefore, in place of the Old Testament legal priesthood, a new way of drawing near to God is indicated. A new and better hope is set before men, closely bound to the new priesthood.

This hope tears the veil that separated the Holy of Holies from the sanctuary, and grants the people access there.

Cross references

Passages read together with this verse.

The original text

Greek text, 14 words with lemma, transliteration and Strong’s number. Tap to expand.

  1. οὐδὲν
    ouden
    no one
    G3762 · οὐδείς
  2. γὰρ
    gar
    for
    G1063 · γάρ
  3. ἐτελείωσεν
    eteleiōsen
    I complete
    G5048 · τελειόω
  4. ὁ
    ho
    the
    G3588 · ὁ
  5. νόμος
    nomos
    a law
    G3551 · νόμος
  6. ἐπεισαγωγὴ
    epeisagōgē
    bringing in
    G1898 · ἐπεισαγωγή
  7. δὲ
    de
    but
    G1161 · δέ
  8. κρείττονος
    kreittonos
    stronger
    G2908 · κρείσσων
  9. ἐλπίδος
    elpidos
    hope
    G1680 · ἐλπίς
  10. δι᾽
    di
    through
    G1223 · διά
  11. ἧς
    hēs
    who
    G3739 · ὅς, ἥ
  12. ἐγγίζομεν
    engizomen
    I come near
    G1448 · ἐγγίζω
  13. τῷ
    tō
    the
    G3588 · ὁ
  14. Θεῷ
    theō
    God
    G2316 · θεός