John Chrysostom
Can you recognize the remarkable impact of vision and the fear it inspired? A parallel can be drawn with Moses; although no angelic beings appeared nor did the Lord preside on a throne, Moses was granted an astounding vision which no human was capable of fully grasping. The Scripture recounts, “the bush burned with fire, and the bush was not consumed” (Exodus 3:2). Yet, even after experiencing this revelation and receiving countless divine summons, Moses resisted, protested, and offered numerous excuses for his reluctance, claiming, “I am slow of speech and of a slow tongue” and, “send someone else whom You can send” (Exodus 4:10, 13). Similarly, Jeremiah pointed to his youth as a reason for hesitation (Jer. 1:6).
Read more (732 words)
When Ezekiel received God’s command, he hesitated for seven days by the river, prompting God to use a parable instructing him, “I have made you a watchman for the house of Israel” (Ezek. 3:17) and, “I will hold you accountable for their blood” (Ezek. 3:18). Jonah not only declined, but he ran away (Jonah 1:3). So what about Isaiah? Was he braver than these others, including the esteemed Moses? This cannot certainly be claimed. Why did Moses fail to respond when commanded, while Isaiah, not given a direct command, readily made himself available? God did not say, ‘Go,’ but rather asked, “Whom shall I send?” to which Isaiah immediately replied, “Here am I, send me.” Some suggest that Isaiah’s willingness stemmed from his regret over not condemning Hosea for his transgression in the sanctuary, and that he sought to atone for this lapse through diligent service. They argue this compelled him to confess his unworthiness, stating his lips were unclean for not speaking with courage. Yet I find these assertions unconvincing, for the Apostle Paul, who commended Isaiah’s boldness by stating, “But Isaiah is very bold” (Romans 10:20), provides more valid insight. Thus, it is claimed that Isaiah did not meet an ordinary end, but rather suffered severe persecution, as the Jews could not tolerate his fearless proclamations. Furthermore, the Scripture does not state he was present during Hosea's actions and remained silent; rather, such claims are fabrications of interpretations.
What can we deduce? Moses faced a different context than Isaiah. He was sent to a foreign, hostile land, confronting a ruthless tyrant, whereas Isaiah was sent to his own people, who had often received God’s messages over time. Thus, the courage required in each scenario was not the same. Some suggest that Isaiah's readiness arose from his recognition of God’s grace when he confessed for himself and his people, saw the seraphim, and felt his mouth purified, hoping for similar mercy toward his kin, prompting him to embrace the divine call. The saints exhibited love for both God and humanity in ways unparalleled by others. Therefore, anticipating the potential for deliverance from distress, he promptly offered his consent, stating, “Here am I, send me.” Additionally, his spirit was marked by great resolve in the face of peril, as evident throughout his prophetic messages. When he agreed to embark on this mission and felt unable to refuse, he received certain challenging directives. God orchestrated these circumstances wisely; He did not announce from the outset, “Go and proclaim”; instead, He presented the call more broadly without disclosing the specific mission.
The accusation leveled against Christ is clearly established. Who did Isaiah witness on the throne? He recounts, “And I heard the voice of the Lord saying, Whom shall I send, and who will go for Us?” While God reconciled with the servant, His countenance remained stern. Much like ourselves, when reconciling with a servant, we may not immediately show our approval but rather withhold it for a time. Hence, God, not wishing to reveal His full disposition to the prophet, inquired, “Whom shall I send?” Like a master addressing his servants, aiming to reprimand them for negligence, He asks, “Whom shall I send? I have no one to fulfill the necessary work,” not because there were none but because none demonstrated sufficient zeal. In this way, God posed, “Whom shall I send?” instead of asking, “Should I send someone who remained silent in the face of violations of the sacred? What of Isaiah? Like a servant sorrowful due to conflict but eager to mend relations, he responded, “Here am I, send me.”
How can we affirm that this exemplifies the glory of Christ? The Evangelist John states, “Though He had done so many miracles before them, yet they believed not in Him: that the saying of Isaiah the prophet might be fulfilled, which he spoke, ‘Lord, who hath believed our report? and to whom hath the arm of the Lord been revealed?’ Therefore they could not believe, because that Isaiah said again, ‘He hath blinded their eyes, and hardened their heart; that they should not see with their eyes, nor understand with their heart, and be converted, that I should heal them.’ These things said Isaiah, when he saw His glory, and spake of Him” (John 12:37-41). Do you recognize the source of our salvation, our sanctification? Without sanctification, the sacrament remains unfulfilled.