The Church Fathers on this verse

Exodus 4:13Meaning & Commentary from the Church Fathers

But he said: I beseech thee, Lord, send whom thou wilt send.

Douay-Rheims

וַיֹּ֖אמֶר בִּ֣י אֲדֹנָ֑י שְֽׁלַֽח־נָ֖א בְּיַד־תִּשְׁלָֽח׃

Hebrew (Masoretic text)

The Church Fathers on this verse

4 Church Fathers comment on this verse · 5 commentaries

John Chrysostom

4th centuryChurch Father

When Moses was called to his mission, he seemed to hesitate, not only out of fear of Pharaoh but also due to apprehension regarding the very people of Israel. Conversing with God, he sought diligently to understand what message he should convey to the Jews who doubted his divine commission, and he received signs appropriate to their character. This response was entirely justified. If even one among them, who was favored in their eyes, had instilled such fear in him, one can only imagine the trepidation he must have felt at the thought of addressing this unruly crowd.

Read more (41 words)

Furthermore, the revered Moses was so disinclined toward seeking authority over the Israelites that he rejected even the very notion of leadership. He did not comply with God's command and, as a result, evoked displeasure in the One who sent him.

Basil the Great

4th centuryChurch Father

In essence, may the authentic Lawgiver arrive, the omnipotent Redeemer, who uniquely possesses the ability to forgive sins (cf. Mk. 2:10). However, because the appointed time had not yet arrived, and humanity needed instruction through symbols, the prayer of the prophet went unanswered.

Philaret of Moscow (Drosdow)

19th centuryChurch Father

Moses implored the Lord, saying, "I beseech You, O Lord: select another to follow after him." (Ex. 4:13). Here, Moses expressed his reluctance upon being appointed as the messenger and leader of the Israelites. Despite the fact that God, being all-good, undoubtedly had a righteous purpose for this choice, and that His omniscience leaves no room for error in His selection, and His omnipotence provides all necessary means to validate this choice, Moses hesitated. God had also disclosed to Moses the redemptive aim of this appointment, offered His support, imparted His name’s knowledge to him, and endowed him with miraculous powers. Yet, in spite of these divine assurances, Moses declined the appointment.

Read more (1095 words)

We must consider, however, the reason for gathering here to seek God's guidance and to confirm a pledge of loyalty in the upcoming election process. Is it truly essential for those chosen to lead to shy away from their duties, thereby creating uncertainty for those who elect them? It follows that if every individual renounced their potential roles as leaders and judges, there would ensue helplessness in governance, depriving society of the noble instruments necessary to maintain order. Conversely, if everyone desired to hold positions of power, that would result in a lack of those willing to be subordinate, thereby disrupting justice and governance.

Amidst these extremes—may God keep us from such scenarios—let us explore whether Moses’s initial refusal, which transformed into acceptance of his role, offers guiding wisdom not only for the elected but also for those who elect. A person chosen for public office may respond in one of three ways: either actively seeking the position, attempting to evade it, or remaining indifferent while awaiting the outcome. It is important not to disturb those who choose to remain indifferent; let them maintain their mental balance. What we hope for is that their center of trust exists in God’s visible election, as well as the invisible lottery of divine providence, for it never falls without purpose, being guided by the visible officiants.

For those who actively seek positions of authority, the example of Moses serves as a lesson. His repeated plea to "Choose another" illustrates a principle well worth considering. Prior to his selection and following it as well, Moses’s wisdom and prophetic abilities shone brightly. He had the capacity to protect an entire oppressed people and withstand oppressive forces with just a rod. Moses was not only a guide and judge under existing laws but also had the privilege of receiving new laws directly from the Divine Lawgiver, which he would enact. Though he was perceived as capable of mighty deeds, he regarded himself with humility—as an acorn unaware of its potential to grow into a great oak. This humility characterizes truly capable individuals; the more gifted they are, the loftier their ideals, and thus, the further they perceive themselves from perfection, leading them to rely less on self and seek external elevation less often.

It would benefit the ambitious seekers of leadership to reflect upon their inner spirit in the light of truth. What drives their desire for power? Is it a profound sense of capability? The truth is often contrary; genuine ability expresses itself differently. A discerning observer considers the moon's journey with calmness, while an infant may cry for it. Such urgency does not stem from true capability. How often do individuals seek authority without the careful contemplation of their abilities, content instead to bask in the allure of titles, benefits, and honors? We encourage those fond of titles to remember the fundamental truth that judgment is a serious responsibility, deserving respect and dignity rather than vanity.

If we find ourselves unwilling to engage in self-reflection, let’s at least heed wise counsel, which imparts timeless truths: "Do not ask of the Lord for dominion; do not ask the King for a seat of glory. Do not seek to be a judge when you cannot dispense justice; lest you fear the mighty and compromise your integrity." (Sir. 7:4, 6). For those who avoid seeking leadership, their humility may protect them from temptation, echoing the same sentiment expressed by Moses: "Choose another."

Moses’s refusal of the election cannot be attributed to the demands of his family or a contempt for the role of guiding a humble nation. Rather, he recognized his own frailty and humbly sought divine relief, praying earnestly: "I beseech Thee, O Lord!" When the Most High Elector reaffirmed His decision, Moses ultimately acquiesced, validating the election. Remarkably, true dignity often arises from renouncing personal ambition. Those who refuse public office do so out of sincere humility and not due to disdain for its potential. They may hesitate to accept the call when it looms but also understand the obligation to respond when the choice is irrevocably made.

Thus, ponder whether those who, without necessity, retreat from public duty to focus solely on private matters, are genuinely on the right path. Noble and enlightened individuals, does it demonstrate wisdom to prioritize personal affairs above collective needs? Is it more suitable for you to thrive independently while society falters? Does neglecting the common good not jeopardize your own safety? Such lofty thoughts merit reflection, especially when someone perceives certain roles as beneath them, rejecting the opportunity to serve. O Almighty God! If ruling this world were unworthy for You, would You have taken notice of humanity? "What is man, that thou art mindful of him? And the son of man, that thou visitest him?" (Psalm 8:5). If You deemed it beneath You, humanity would vanish. Yet, the Most High's willingness to care for even the lowly should prompt us to question our own stance.

Those who crave greatness should embrace the proper path to elevate their public service. "Whoever desires to be great among you shall be your servant." (Matthew 20:26). This principle aptly serves the elect. Now, let us direct our remaining words to the chosen. Moses displayed hesitance more than once, even prompting the Lord’s anger (Ex. 4:14). Yet, the Lord's favor remained upon him. Those who seek political power, like Korah, Dathan, and Abiram, often create discord, whereas those, like Moses, who humbly concede their desires, are chosen.

Electors, observe carefully the example of history and learn from these valuable lessons in governance. In any community, the choice between leaders like Moses and self-seekers like Korah is crucial. Identify those who exemplify Moses’s humility, as well as those who may simply imitate his attributes. It is not unusual for true leaders to shy away, hidden behind their modesty. When such an individual may initially reject their appointment, let your assessment be thoughtful—whether to respect their reticence or to support their election is a vital decision. Meanwhile, those who seek to gain power through flattery and persuasion must not be trusted.

Encourage the development of trustworthy leaders committed to restoring order and justice, distancing society from those who pursue self-interest. Such a system of governance, entrusted by Almighty Authority, empowers individuals through the right to elect from their ranks capable guardians. By establishing this framework, ensure that it operates effectively, thereby justifying the trust placed in it. Let it yield faithful leaders to carry forward God’s purpose, and may His will be fulfilled for the good of all. Amen.

It is important to recognize that genuine spiritual leaders and esteemed teachers rarely emerge from a large congregation. This is because the foundation of their honor lies in acknowledging their unworthiness, and the pinnacle of their wisdom is found in humility. As long as they are able, they prefer to blend in among their followers, and they do not willingly increase the number of those who teach. For instance, both Moses and Jeremiah, even when called by God to proclaim His message, attempt to avoid this role. Moses protests, “Thou shalt choose another, whom thou canst after” (Exodus 4:13), while Jeremiah expresses, “We cannot speak” (Jeremiah 1:6).

Read more (131 words)

The Apostles demonstrate a willingness to become fishers of men and to proclaim the kingdom of heaven; however, none of them proactively claim the title of Apostle, let alone position themselves as such.

Thus, if the inclination to avoid the pursuit of spiritual instruction characterizes many of the most deserving individuals, an eager desire to acquire such teaching is quite concerning. Therefore, when we observe numerous individuals hastily claiming positions of spiritual leadership or establishing themselves as teachers, it is reasonable to caution them: be mindful; your mixed assembly and your arbitrary quest for the honor of teaching indicate that you are not following in the footsteps of the Prophets, the Apostles, or the genuine educators of the Church. The Apostle reinforces this warning in his encouragement, “Be not many teachers.”

Wlastow G.K.

19th centuryCommentator

The disobedience exhibited by Moses appears to be intrinsic to his character, reflecting a nature that is reserved, introspective, and steadfast. Yet, as beautifully illustrated in the Gospel (Matt. 21: 29), he is likened to a son sent by his father to tend to his vineyard. Initially, he declared, ‘I will not,’ but later, filled with remorse, proceeded to fulfill his father's wishes. Even in this instance, the Lord allows for human free will, as He designates Aaron to support Moses, enabling him to convey the words he is to deliver before Pharaoh, thereby aiding Moses during his challenging task. We also echo A. C. B.’s observation that it is only Moses who would have had the audacity to express the frailty of faith detailed in the record of his own experiences, despite the multitude of miracles he witnessed and performed.

Cross references

Passages read together with this verse.