The Church Fathers on this verse

Isaiah 7:8Meaning & Commentary from the Church Fathers

But the head of Syria is Damascus, and the head of Damascus is Rasin: and within threescore and five years, Ephraim shall cease to be a people:

Douay-Rheims

כִּ֣י רֹ֤אשׁ אֲרָם֙ דַּמֶּ֔שֶׂק וְרֹ֥אשׁ דַּמֶּ֖שֶׂק רְצִ֑ין וּבְע֗וֹד שִׁשִּׁ֤ים וְחָמֵשׁ֙ שָׁנָ֔ה יֵחַ֥ת אֶפְרַ֖יִם מֵעָֽם׃

Hebrew (Masoretic text)

The Church Fathers on this verse

5 Church Fathers comment on this verse

John Chrysostom

4th centuryChurch Father

What does the Lord declare? "It shall not come to pass, nor shall it be fulfilled; for the head of Syria is Damascus." The Lord indicates that the authority of this region will remain limited to Damascus and will not extend beyond that boundary. "And the head of Damascus is Rezin." He asserts that the leader and ruler of Damascus will be Rezin, meaning he will maintain his position without expanding his dominion. "And in sixty and five years Ephraim shall cease to be a nation." This points to a period when Ephraim’s population will diminish significantly. This prophecy serves as compelling evidence of its truth, as the prophets have the ability to predict the timing of future events, allowing those who seek a deeper understanding to explore the true significance of these proclamations.

Read more (46 words)

The prophet explains that the people will depart from the city, but after sixty-five years, the entire nation will be laid waste; their adversaries will seize control and carry them away, and prior to this captivity, they shall have nothing more than what they currently hold.

Cyrill of Alexandria

5th centuryChurch Father

To interpret the truths found in the sacred Scriptures, one must first have a historical context that allows the Divine message to resonate throughout. The prophet recounts what is detailed in these Scriptures, providing clarity on the intended meaning. During the reign of Ahaz, Rezin, the king of Syria and Damascus, along with Pekah, the son of Remaliah, who ruled over Israel in Samaria, conspired to attack Judah and Jerusalem. In response to the impending threat, Ahaz sought the aid of Tiglath-Pileser, king of Assyria, persuading him with treasures to defend against the invaders. The Assyrian king responded by conquering Damascus, the capital of Syria, and executing Rezin.

Read more (377 words)

Following Pekah’s death in Samaria, Hosea, the son of Elah, a wicked ruler given to idolatrous practices, ascended to the throne. During Hosea’s rule, Shalmaneser, king of Assyria, besieged Samaria, capturing Hosea and forcing him into servitude. After ravaging the entire region and removing the Israelites, he settled his own peoples from Halah and the cities of Sepharvaim in their place. It is suggested that these may have been tribes from Persia, as noted in the accounts of the kings.

This historical narrative serves as a reminder, as the prophet proclaims: ‘And the Lord saith, this counsel shall not remain, neither shall it be fulfilled: but the head of Aram shall be Damascus, and the head of Damascus is Rezin: but yet six hundred and five years, the kingdom of Ephraim shall be emptied of men.’ The complicated wording can be rearranged to clarify: the leader of Aram, which refers to Syria, is Damascus, and the leader of Damascus is Rezin, meaning that the one who reigns over both the region and the city is their king. Moreover, the kingdom of Ephraim will dwindle in population, as it is destined to decline significantly in sixty-five years. Similarly, the head of Aram, Damascus, and the head of Damascus, Rezin, shall also face a decline. Tiglath-Pileser captured Damascus and Rezin, while Shalmaneser took Hosea, the king of Ephraim, which signifies that Samaria, the center of Ephraim, will experience a loss in its populace. The king of Ephraim is referred to as Samaria, reflecting the fact that Samaria was the principal city of the region.

When the prophet mentions Ephraim, he indicates Israel. The head of Samaria is the son of Remaliah, referred to as Pekah. This concept of dwindling is echoed throughout the message. The prophet further insists: ‘and if ye do not believe, ye cannot understand.’ This statement holds profound truth; those who reject God’s words through disbelief are unable to grasp their meaning. Thus, we must wholeheartedly embrace the revelations from God and readily accept His promises and declarations, for through such faith, understanding will flourish within us, and His wisdom will illuminate our minds.

To genuinely perceive the divine Scriptures, one must have faith, for as the prophetic declaration asserts, ‘unless ye believe, ye cannot understand.’

Basil the Great

4th centuryChurch Father

The statement regarding the head of Aram identifies Damascus as its leader, with Racine being the head of Damascus. This implies that the ruler of the lofty or proud is one who is accursed and steeped in blood. The name Damascus symbolizes the blood of the sacrificial garment, which itself signifies repentance. However, when this garment is stained with blood, it becomes impure, suggesting a false form of repentance that does not adhere to sound teaching. Moreover, the head of Damascus represents a repentance that is not genuine but rather marred by sinful practices, and this is represented by Racine, which symbolizes corrupt and unwholesome doctrine.

Ephraem the Syrian

4th centuryChurch Father

The leader of Aram is Damascus, which serves as the principal city in Syria. Similarly, the chief city of Ephraim is Samaria; however, in sixty-five years, the kingdom of Ephraim will be left desolate, meaning that the people of Ephraim will be taken captive by the Assyrians.

Vissarion (Nechaev)

19th centuryCommentator

Damascus served as the capital of Syria while Samaria was the capital of the kingdom of Israel. The authorities based in Damascus and Samaria will continue to hold sway only over Syria and Israel. Conversely, Jerusalem, the capital of the kingdom of Judah, along with the kingdom itself, must not come under the dominion of either the Syrians or the Israelites. Specifically regarding the kingdom of Ephraim, it will not only fail to conquer Judah but will also see a significant loss of its population in 65 years, as it will face devastation and subjugation by the Assyrians. The destruction of Israel by King Salmanassar of Assyria occurred in the fifth year of Hezekiah, who succeeded Ahaz, two decades after the prophetic warning was given.

Read more (125 words)

Ultimately, the complete removal of the remnants of Israel transpired under King Assargaddon of Assyria-Babylon during Manasseh's reign. Indeed, sixty-five years had passed: 15 years of Ahaz, 29 years of Hezekiah, and 21 years of Manasseh. Some, including Jerome, trace the start of these 65 years to the prophecy of Amos concerning the Israelites' exile, delivered during the reign of Ozias, king of Judah, 65 years prior to Samaria's downfall. The fate of nations, including those of Israel, Syria, and Judah, is determined by the will of the Lord Almighty. However, recognizing this truth requires faith. As the Lord states, addressing the disbelief of Ahaz and others who failed to acknowledge the supreme power of the one true God, understanding cannot be attained without belief.

Cross references

Passages read together with this verse.