The Church Fathers on this verse

Job 4:5Meaning & Commentary from the Church Fathers

But now the scourge is come upon thee, and thou faintest: It hath touched thee, and thou art troubled.

Douay-Rheims

כִּ֤י עַתָּ֨ה ׀ תָּב֣וֹא אֵלֶ֣יךָ וַתֵּ֑לֶא תִּגַּ֥ע עָ֝דֶ֗יךָ וַתִּבָּהֵֽל׃

Hebrew (Masoretic text)

The Church Fathers on this verse

3 Church Fathers comment on this verse

John Chrysostom

4th centuryChurch Father

Chrysostom and Polychronius highlight that he did not mention his actions during times of wealth when he could alleviate the plight of the needy; rather, he acknowledged how he had benefitted others through his words. He states that the current circumstances diverge from previous beliefs, questioning those who have consistently supported others with their words and uplifted those on the verge of despair. What trials are you facing? How can you not endure the tribulations you experience, while you have been quick to judge and condemn? This urgency is reflected in the notion that those troubled tend to hasten their steps. By recalling and honoring your own counsel, you should practice charity not only in response to the misfortunes of others but in your own struggles as well.

Read more (222 words)

Moreover, it's noted that Job, as affirmed by Eliphaz, possessed various virtues, including the gift of teaching, and through God’s grace, spoke words of encouragement that provided comfort to those in suffering. Eliphaz's words are not meant to offend; instead, he speaks without considering the condition of the one he's addressing.

It is a common tendency for people, upon witnessing someone in persistent hunger, illness, and severe hardship, to form negative judgments about them. They often wrongly conclude that such misfortunes stem from personal failings, thinking: 'If this individual were favored by God, He would not allow them to endure such poverty and hardships.' This was the perception with both Job and Paul. When encountered by others, they questioned whether words of encouragement might add to his burdens. However, who could deny offering support? Indeed, you have advised many, uplifted the weary, revitalized those who have fallen, and strengthened the weak. Yet now, the trials have turned on you, leaving you exhausted and disheartened. Should not your reverence for God be your assurance, and your integrity in your ways provide you with trust? The implication here is that if you had truly done good, you would not experience such suffering; instead, you are reaping the consequences of your transgressions and wrongdoings. This, indeed, weighed heavily on the heart of the righteous Job.

Ephraem the Syrian

4th centuryChurch Father

You have guided numerous individuals. Eliphaz highlights that Job has aided many through his deeds, steering them towards a state of proper moderation with his guidance and admonitions. Furthermore, you have supported those whose spirits have been low; as you have inspired others with unwavering resolve to endure the hardships they have faced, you too must now demonstrate patience in your own trials.

Ireneus (Orda)

19th centuryCommentator

Job's expressions of discontent regarding his circumstances provoke objections from his friends, leading to an extensive discussion about the reasons behind his suffering. Eliphaz is the first to voice his disagreement. After requesting the opportunity to speak, he expresses his astonishment that a man who has consistently offered comfort to the afflicted could now erupt in such intense complaints, especially when his awareness of his own righteousness should bring him hope for a joyful outcome. He invokes his experience, asserting that innocence typically shields a person from ruin, whereas force and brutality offer no defense against divine wrath. Therefore, he deduces that had Job truly been just, he would not have encountered such calamities.

Read more (138 words)

To bolster his argument, Eliphaz cites a profound revelation he received during the night, in which he understood that before God, who perceives flaws even in angels, no one is deemed innocent, and that humanity can easily face destruction from God’s anger, just as a worm can perish from a gust of wind. In the intensity of the debate, Eliphaz appears to overlook that all creatures, each within their own order, are inherently good, and that angels possess a relative form of perfection. As a result, his assertion that the angels are not free from faults is incorrect and does not substantiate the notion that Job was sinful due to any inherent imperfection in his nature. The Church Fathers, such as Athanasius and Chrysostom, provide insights regarding the fall of the angels, which adds context to this discussion.

Cross references

Passages read together with this verse.