The Church Fathers on this verse

Job 4:6Meaning & Commentary from the Church Fathers

Where is thy fear, thy fortitude, thy patience, and the perfection of thy ways?

Douay-Rheims

הֲלֹ֣א יִ֭רְאָתְךָ כִּסְלָתֶ֑ךָ תִּ֝קְוָתְךָ֗ וְתֹ֣ם דְּרָכֶֽיךָ׃

Hebrew (Masoretic text)

The Church Fathers on this verse

3 Church Fathers comment on this verse

John Chrysostom

4th centuryChurch Father

Aquila reflects on "your enduring patience and the straightforwardness of your conduct," but he mistakenly seeks to rationalize his plight. He expresses, "the dreadful fate I feared has come upon me" (Job 3:25), suggesting that this dread stemmed from "foolishness" and that "hope" emerged from the "wickedness" of the heart. It is unfathomable for someone living righteously to anticipate such outcomes; thus, you have acknowledged that your life was wrong; where there is a desire for holiness, fear is unwarranted.

Read more (82 words)

In essence, this refers to the motivation behind your actions. He implies: either you acted without true intent, or your life is riddled with sin, or you did not fear God with genuine understanding, treating it all as mere words. "Your hope was in foolishness, steeped in absurdity," he asserts. Why is that? What necessity is there for such? "Could it be that you, who have frequently provided assistance to others, found yourself in distress? No, that simply cannot be," he contends.

Didymus the Blind

4th centuryTeacher of the Church

Although the Scriptures affirm that Job did not speak wrongly about God (Job 1:22), one of his friends, holding a differing view regarding his afflictions, assumed Job's suffering was a consequence of his sins and perceived his words as lacking reverence. He remarked that Job's fear was not without merit, as he considered himself to be in the right, along with his hope and the wickedness of his conduct. This friend deemed Job's expectation of being vindicated as illogical, arguing that the righteous do not endure such tribulations. Eliphaz labeled Job's conduct as a path of vice, firmly believing that the blessed could only suffer due to wrongdoing. Consequently, he also deemed Job's reasoning as irrational.

Notes: * LXX. Synod. translation: Shall not thy fear of God be thy hope, and the integrity of thy ways thy trust? -

Ireneus (Orda)

19th centuryCommentator

Job's lamentations regarding his circumstances provoke responses from his friends, sparking an extensive discourse on the reasons behind his afflictions. Eliphaz takes the initiative as the first to contest Job's words. After seeking permission to express his thoughts, he expresses his astonishment that someone who has often comforted others in distress now voices such intense grievances, particularly when Job's own righteous actions should assure him of a favorable outcome. He draws from personal experience to argue that integrity typically protects one from calamity; conversely, cruelty and aggression cannot shield anyone from divine displeasure. This leads him to assert that were Job genuinely virtuous, he would not endure such tribulations.

Read more (129 words)

To bolster his claim, Eliphaz recounts a special revelation he received in a dream, wherein he discerned that before God—who can find fault even in angelic beings—there exists no one who is truly innocent. He further emphasizes that mere mortals are just as susceptible to divine wrath as a worm is to the gust of a breeze. Amidst the intensity of the debate, Eliphaz appears to overlook the truth that every creature, each within its own order, was deemed good, and that angels possess a form of relative perfection. Therefore, his assertion regarding the angels' imperfections inaccurately lends credence to the belief that Job's suffering must stem from sinfulness due to inherent flaws. However, the Church Fathers, including Athanasius and Chrysostom, provide clarification regarding the fall of the angels.

Cross references

Passages read together with this verse.