The Church Fathers on this verse

John 10:21Meaning & Commentary from the Church Fathers

Others said: These are not the words of one that hath a devil. Can a devil open the eyes of the blind?

Douay-Rheims

αλλοι ελεγον ταυτα τα ρηματα ουκ εστιν δαιμονιζομενου μη δαιμονιον δυναται τυφλων οφθαλμους ανοιγειν

Greek (Byzantine text)

The Church Fathers on this verse

12 Church Fathers comment on this verse

John Chrysostom

4th centuryChurch Father

Since they could not stop their mouths by appealing to His words, they finally draw proof from His works.

They say that the very words are plainly not fitting for one possessed. But if the words do not convince you, be convinced by the works.

If these are not the works of one possessed, yet are above human power, then it is evident that they are the action of some divine power.

Do you understand the reasoning? That the works were above human power is clear from their words: "He has a demon." But that He did not have a demon, He proved by His works.

What then does Christ do? He answers nothing to this. Earlier He answered, "I do not have a demon," but now He does not answer.

Read more (191 words)

Since He had already presented proof from works, He now keeps silence. Those who called Him possessed for what they ought to have admired were worthy of no answer.

They should have recognized Him as God because of those very things. What further rebukes were needed from Him, when they themselves rose up against one another and rebuked one another?

For this reason He was silent and bore everything with meekness.

Yet this was not the only reason. He also wished to teach us meekness and all longsuffering.

Therefore let us imitate Him. He did not stop at silence alone, but came forward again. When He was questioned, He answered and showed His care.

Men who had received countless benefits from Him called Him possessed and deranged, not once or twice, but many times. Yet He not only did not take vengeance, but did not cease benefiting them.

And why do I say benefiting them? He laid down His soul for them, and on the Cross He interceded for them before the Father.

Let us also imitate this. To be Christ's disciple means to be meek and without remembrance of wrongs.

Theophylact of Bulgaria

11th centuryChurch Father

Others, understanding somewhat, said: “These are not the words of one possessed by a demon.” Since the Lord could not stop their mouths with words, for even the prudent neither fully understood His words nor would have persuaded their opponents, they try to defend Christ by His works. They say that these are not the words of one possessed by a demon. How is this clear? From the works. Can a demon open the eyes of the blind? And if this work is divine, then the words are necessarily such also.

Cyrill of Alexandria

5th centuryChurch Father

The word of the Savior descends into the hearts of His hearers. When it finds them very tender, it at once transforms them and brings them into a good condition. But when it meets hardened hearts, it withdraws and, as it were, turns aside.

Thus the one whose mind is ready for right understanding gladly receives the word of salvation. The one who is not such does not.

Something like this befell the Jewish people. When they heard the Savior's words, they were divided in disagreement. The more receptive already inclined toward the beginning of salvation, while the hardened became still harder than they had been at first.

The divine Evangelist is as though struck by wonder that through these words the Jewish people had to be divided.

Read more (610 words)

For, I think, pointing expressively and with astonishment to the hardness of those who did not believe, he says that "a division occurred because of these words." By these words, he says, the Jews ought to have been firmly convinced that He is the Christ.

So wondrous were the Savior's words. Yet when these words had been spoken, by which even a very obstinate man would naturally have been caught into good obedience, "a division" arose among them.

Thus he marvels at them, impiously twisted toward shameless unbelief. For the more the words of our Savior deserve fitting wonder, the more, I think, they are subject to just accusation.

Therefore He spoke what belongs to the Godhead and what surpasses man.

But the brilliance of words above man, and divine boldness, rouses many to unrestrained folly.

Those truly possessed had a particular inclination toward blasphemy. They easily fell into frenzy, were deprived of all reason, and considered the Lord a mere man, not understanding that He was God by nature.

Therefore the Jews called Him possessed, as one uttering unbridled blasphemy. They heard from Him what it befits God alone to say.

Since they saw Him as one of those like us, and did not yet know Who He is by nature, they thought He blasphemed when He said something befitting God.

Therefore, economically, because of the weakness of His hearers, He often uses language brought down to our level.

For this reason the Jewish people is divided. Some, understanding absolutely nothing of the mysteries concerning Him, impiously reproach Him.

Others, more modest in character, do not yield to hasty condemnations. They ponder His words, examine them closely, and perceive the sweetness contained in them.

Thus they make a most careful judgment. They do not find it possible to attribute such sober words, filled with heavenly wisdom, to the senselessness of demons, since those in seizures usually speak every absurdity.

Therefore the Pharisees themselves were rather the possessed ones, since they called Him so Who was free from every passion.

Without noticing it, they reveal their own disease and, in ignorance, openly disclose the evil that possesses them.

I think they say with great malice that the Lord is possessed.

For He had accused them as cowardly and hired shepherds, abandoning the sheep to the wolf and caring nothing for the flock.

They greatly feared that the people might understand these words, renounce their shepherding, and pass over to the teaching of Christ.

Therefore, misleading the mind of those they pastured, they say, "He has a demon; why listen to Him?"

Yet these malicious words of theirs produced the opposite of what they intended.

"Others," judging by the quality of His words, acknowledge that the Lord's words are right, since such words are not the words "of one possessed."

Moreover, he says, the miracles have unconquerable testimony. Although you accuse His words as unrighteous, it is impossible for someone both to have a demon and to do what only God can do.

Thus the true judges knew Him by His fruits, while also marveling at His words.

Others said, "These are not the words of one possessed," and so forth. Judging by the quality of His words, they delivered a right judgment.

For it was madness to say, of Him who spoke such things, that He has a demon and is mad. He had said that the good shepherd would die without delay and willingly face danger for His own sheep (Jn 10:11-14).

He had also said that the hireling, being no shepherd, would flee, stunned at the mere sight of the wolf. Yet they said, "Why listen to Him?"

Augustine of Hippo

5th centuryChurch Father

But when this had been said by the Lord, since the light shone in the darkness and the darkness did not overcome it (cf. Jn 1:5), a division again arose among the Jews. Many of them said: “He has a demon and is mad. Why do you listen to Him?” These were the densest darkness. Others said: “These are not the words of one possessed by a demon. Can a demon open the eyes of the blind?” (Jn 10:19-21). In these, their eyes had already begun to be opened.

Euthymios Zigabenos

11th centuryChurch Father

A supernatural power was needed for the performance of this miracle. Therefore they concluded that one possessed by a demon could not have performed it.

Jesus Christ does not now refute His blasphemers. He had answered them sufficiently before, when they said, "Do we not rightly say that You are a Samaritan and have a demon?" (Jn 8:48).

Moreover, the Jews did not say these insulting words directly before Him, but idly babbled among themselves.

Therefore, by His silence Jesus Christ taught us not to answer insults that are not spoken directly against us.

He not only paid no attention to these words of the Jews, but was wholly without remembrance of wrongs toward them, as will be clear from what follows.

Read more (49 words)

This can also be interpreted in another way. Jesus Christ was silent because He saw that those who disagreed with His revilers were defending Him.

He was also silent because those who dared revile Him in this way after so great a miracle were unworthy even of His word.

Alexander Gorsky

19th centuryChurch Father

By His final thought the Lord reminded the Jews of His departure. At the same time, He sets forth with particular force, first, that He freely gives His life, and second, that He will take it up again.

The Father Himself does not compel Him to this. The Father does not halt the boundless unfolding of love in the Son, but leaves the work of love to be purely the work of boundless love.

Yet according to the will of the same Father (v. 18), He has authority to take His life again, and of course He will use this authority.

With this the Lord concluded His discourses at the last great feast that He celebrated with His people. What great truths were revealed in them! Because of these words, a division arose among the Jews.

Bogolepow D.P.

19th centuryChurch Father

After Jesus Christ finished His figurative discourse, the listeners began repeating their impressions to one another.

Christ bore witness to Himself with great loftiness, and He strongly rebuked the Pharisees, the shepherds of the people. Yet because His speech was figurative, the light of spiritual truth was covered by an image.

For this reason it did not cut the fleshly eyes of the Jews so painfully. The severity of the rebukes was also softened by it.

Therefore there were some among them who received a good impression from Christ's discourse.

But many were all the more irritated. They were resolute enemies of Jesus, upon whom nothing could have an effect.

The good impression made by Christ's discourse upon some troubled them. They tried to turn such people away from the Lord. "Why listen to Him?" they said.

Gladkow B.I.

19th centuryChurch Father

The Pharisees who had believed in Jesus did not agree with their companions. “These are not the words of one possessed by a demon,” they said. “Can a demon open the eyes of the blind?” With this the Evangelist John ends his narrative of Jesus’ stay in Jerusalem at the Feast of Tabernacles.

Lopuchin A.P.

19th centuryChurch Father

All this exalted discourse produced extraordinary confusion among the Pharisees surrounding Him, so that lively disputes arose among them. Many of them said: “He has a demon and is mad. Why do you listen to Him?” But others answered them: “These are not the words of one possessed by a demon. Can a demon open the eyes of the blind?” Seeing the blindness of those disputing, among whom voices of sound judgment had nevertheless begun to awaken, Christ left His questioners and withdrew from them.

Michail (Lusin)

19th centuryChurch Father

"These are not the words of one possessed," and so forth. The judgment of the better-disposed concerning the Lord rested on two supports.

First, the Lord's speech itself did not make such an impression on them that it could be considered the speech of one possessed and mad.

Second, the miracle of healing the man born blind was so astonishing that attributing it to one possessed, and therefore to the demon himself, appeared to them completely unreasonable.

Their moral feeling was purer than that of the Lord's wholly blinded enemies. It did not allow them to see the action of an unclean power in the Lord's words and miracle.

Read more (41 words)

Nevertheless, it is evident that these were timid and intimidated voices. They were not like the courageous voice of the healed blind man, who sternly but justly mocked the supposed wisdom of the supposed spiritual guides of the people's religious life.

Philaret (Gumilevski)

19th centuryChurch Father

As before over the miracles (Jn 9:16), so now over the Lord's words disagreements and disputes arose among the hearers.

The malice and unbelief of self-satisfied pride showered the Teacher with abusive judgments, because they were incapable of understanding His thoughts.

But others, by the words and works of Jesus, convicted the unbelievers of their injustice.

"You do not deny," they said, "that the healing of the man born blind did not occur by the action of natural causes. Yet you prefer to believe that an evil spirit acts here, rather than that God acts.

Read more (43 words)

An evil spirit is a benefactor to no one. Why believe more in demonic power than in the power of God? The teaching of Jesus is the teaching of a lofty mind. To think otherwise is to offend one's own mind and conscience."

Wlastow G.K.

19th centuryChurch Father

"Again there was a division." The holy Evangelist recalls earlier cases of division among the people, the division that arose among those who heard the Lord when He revealed the mysteries of the kingdom of God.

So it was after the Lord cried out at the Feast of Tabernacles: "If anyone thirsts, let him come to Me and drink!" (Jn 7:43). So it was when the Lord gave sight to the man born blind (Jn 9:16).

Now again, as often before, the great works of God and the great words of revelation stir up division among the hearers.

In the hearts of spiritually dead men and spiritually blind men, who considered themselves seeing (Jn 9:41), the Lord's words chiefly awaken the unquenchable fire of malice from Hades.

Read more (482 words)

The gnashing of teeth begins in them already in this life. It is expressed in blasphemy unspeakable and unforgivable (Mt 9:34; 12:24, 31-32; Mk 3:22; Lk 11:15; Jn 7:20; 8:49, 52).

In it is expressed the complete corruption of a soul that understands nothing heavenly and has finally surrendered itself to "the prince of this world" (Jn 14:30).

But there was a division. Therefore, among those who listened there were souls ready to receive the word of God. They were still wavering and doubting.

They did not yet summon the inward feeling of nascent faith and love to help them, but reason and logic. They asked themselves and others, "Are these the words of one possessed? Can a demon open the eyes of the blind?"

These were not simple men, but learned men, unaccustomed to surrendering themselves to feeling. Yet because they were more honest than the others, a feeling of indignation arose in them against the blasphemous and insolent words of their companions.

Perhaps many of them later joined the community of Christ.

The absurd accusation of verse 20, repeated so often against the Lord, plainly came from the camp of the Pharisees with a special purpose. They wished to diminish, as much as possible, the effect of the Lord's words upon the people.

In this blasphemy we read not only malice. We also read the fear of the Pharisees and scribes, who feel the divine power of the Lord's words and "tremble like demons" (Jas 2:19).

They "closed their eyes" (Mt 13:15). The Vulgate has oculos suos clauserunt, and Biblia Sacra has conniverunt.

They deliberately shut or closed their eyes, so as not to see what they did not wish to see and acknowledge. They used every effort to close the spiritual eyes of others also, turning them away from the Lord by blasphemy.

Therefore the great protomartyr Stephen said to them: "You stiff-necked people, uncircumcised in heart and ears! You always resist the Holy Spirit; as your fathers did, so do you" (Acts 7:51).

In Israel, as one writer, Bedford, well expressed it, there had been "four centuries of silence" (p. 238). Yet there were people "standing watch on the height of faith in expectation of the Messiah."

Such were Anna the daughter of Phanuel, Simeon the God-receiver, Zacharias, Elizabeth, Joseph, the Holy Virgin, the shepherds to whom the angels appeared, and others "waiting for redemption."

The aged Anna spoke to them about the infant Lord (Lk 2:38; see especially the first chapter of Luke).

On the other hand, the rulers of the people, who had "sat on Moses' seat," had long "resisted the Holy Spirit." They brought God's wrath upon the whole people.

The people as a single body perished. Yet from the flame that consumed it, those were saved who asked the Lord Jesus for help. They were saved in the ship of the universal Christian community.

Cross references

Passages read together with this verse.

The original text

Greek text, 14 words with lemma, transliteration and Strong’s number. Tap to expand.

  1. Ἄλλοι
    alloi
    other
    G243 · ἄλλος
  2. ἔλεγον
    elegon
    I say
    G3004 · λέγω
  3. Ταῦτα
    tauta
    this
    G3778 · οὗτος
  4. τὰ
    ta
    the
    G3588 · ὁ
  5. ῥήματα
    rhēmata
    a thing spoken
    G4487 · ῥῆμα
  6. οὐκ
    ouk
    no
    G3756 · οὐ
  7. ἔστιν
    estin
    I am
    G1510 · εἰμί
  8. δαιμονιζομένου
    daimonizomenou
    I am demon-possessed
    G1139 · δαιμονίζομαι
  9. μὴ
    mē
    not
    G3361 · μή
  10. δαιμόνιον
    daimonion
    an evil-spirit
    G1140 · δαιμόνιον
  11. δύναται
    dynatai
    I am powerful
    G1410 · δύναμαι
  12. τυφλῶν
    typhlōn
    blind
    G5185 · τυφλός
  13. ὀφθαλμοὺς
    ophthalmous
    the eye
    G3788 · ὀφθαλμός
  14. ἀνοῖξαι
    anoixai
    I open
    G455 · ἀνοίγω