The Church Fathers on this verse

John 13:28Meaning & Commentary from the Church Fathers

Now no man at the table knew to what purpose he said this unto him.

Douay-Rheims

τουτο δε ουδεις εγνω των ανακειμενων προς τι ειπεν αυτω

Greek (Byzantine text)

The Church Fathers on this verse

13 Church Fathers comment on this verse

John Chrysostom

4th centuryChurch Father

But even then He did not make the betrayer known. It might have happened that he would be torn apart and killed. Therefore “none of those reclining understood.” Not even John? Yes, not even John, because he did not suppose that a disciple could come to such great lawlessness. Since the apostles themselves were far from such wickedness, they could not suspect anything like it in others. Therefore, just as He had said earlier, “I do not speak of all of you,” and had nowhere revealed the betrayer, so now they thought He was speaking about some outsider.

Theophylact of Bulgaria

11th centuryChurch Father

And "no one of those reclining at table understood." It is worth examining why no one recognized this, when the Lord, in answer to the question about the betrayer, said that it was the one to whom He would give the morsel. Evidently the Lord said this quietly to John alone, so that none of the others heard. Moreover, John, leaning on His breast, asked almost into His ear, so that the betrayer was not made known. Otherwise Peter might perhaps have drawn his sword and killed him. Did John not recognize this either? Yes, even he did not, for he did not expect that a disciple could be capable of such lawlessness. In his holy soul, being far from such malice, he did not suppose it easy for another either.

Cyrill of Alexandria

5th centuryChurch Father

The disciples do not understand the meaning of these words, and Christ, it seems, prudently did not reveal it to them. So also in other cases He appears foretelling that He will be delivered into the hands of sinners, and that He will undergo crucifixion, be put to death, and rise on the third day (Mt 17:22-23; Mt 20:18-19; Lk 9:21). Yet at the same time He permits no one at all to speak of this. His purpose was to hide from the ruler of this age who He was by His true nature. Thus, when He came, He would undergo crucifixion, and by suffering crucifixion would destroy death and bring salvation to those who believe in Him. Therefore He prudently conceals much of what He said, for, as God, He knew all that was profitable.

Augustine of Hippo

5th centuryChurch Father

Thus the Lord also had a treasury, in which the offerings of the faithful were kept, and which He could spend for the needs of His followers or of the poor. From this point the custom was introduced of having monetary funds in the Church. The Lord shows that His commandment not to be anxious about tomorrow (Mt 6:34) does not mean that the saints may not collect money. Rather, the service of God must not pursue such an aim, and fear of falling into need must not turn us away from righteousness. Thus the Lord had a money box, in which the offerings of the faithful were kept. He distributed them for the needs of His disciples and of other people. Then the custom of having church funds was first established.

Read more (87 words)

From this we may understand that His commandment not to be anxious about tomorrow (cf. Mt 6:34) was given not so that the saints should have no money at all. It meant that they should not serve God for money, nor depart from righteousness out of fear of want. For the Apostle, foreseeing the future, said: "If any believing man or woman has widows, let them support them, and let not the Church be burdened, that it may support those who are truly widows" (1 Tim 5:16).

Euthymios Zigabenos

11th centuryChurch Father

The Evangelist also indicated the time, to show that even the night did not restrain Judas. See the explanation of all these verses in the same twenty-sixth chapter of the Gospel according to Matthew (Mt 26).

Alexander Gorsky

19th centuryChurch Father

After this they had to expect that Judas's conscience would awaken and restrain him from carrying out his infernal intention. Otherwise he had to leave this company quickly and take the final step toward the crime. He rose from his place, and the Lord said to him only as a parting word: "What you do, do quickly." These words were not a command. On the contrary, they could have brought about a saving change in a soul capable of receiving better impressions. But since Judas had once resolved on the deed, and since this deed constantly occupied him and was already almost accomplished in his intention, the Lord thereby revealed only this: He Himself was already ready, on His part, for everything that had to be.

Bogolepow D.P.

19th centuryChurch Father

In the account of Judas being revealed as the betrayer, there is the following difference among the Evangelists. Luke, who relates this history very briefly, says that after Jesus Christ's prediction of the betrayer, the disciples "began to question one another, which of them it could be who would do this." John also points to this circumstance, saying that "the disciples looked at one another, uncertain of whom He spoke" (22). Matthew and Mark, without indicating this circumstance, state that the disciples were greatly sorrowful and began to say to Him, each of them, "Is it I.

Read more (402 words)

Lord?" To this they received the answer: "He who has dipped his hand with Me in the dish will betray Me." Matthew alone adds that afterward Judas also asked the Lord, "Is it I, Rabbi?" and received an affirmative answer. Finally, John, while relating nothing about the questions of each disciple to the Lord, tells how John, who was reclining at that time on Jesus' breast, asked the Lord at Peter's sign and received the answer: "It is he to whom I shall give the morsel after I have dipped it." The conclusion of this history belongs to John alone. Clearly, the Evangelists relate different circumstances of this event. Luke, abridging the account, relates only the prediction of the betrayer and Jesus Christ's warning to him. Concerning the disciples, he relates their initial confusion and conversation among themselves. Matthew and Mark relate the questions each then put to the Lord, and the first, still general and unclear, indication of the betrayer, together with a warning to the latter. One may think that the fulfillment of this indication occurred at the same time as the fulfillment of the indication to John. Judas, trying either to be or to appear at ease and bold, addresses the Lord with the question, "Is it I, Rabbi?" and receives the quiet answer, "Yes, you." The disciples probably did not hear this last answer. They understood the Lord's words, "he who dipped his hand with Me in the dish," in the most general sense, as meaning "one of the Twelve," or "the hand of him who betrays Me is with Me at the table" (Lk 22:21). Then Peter turns to John and gives him a sign to ask Jesus who it is. If this happened during that part of the supper when the master of the house, having broken the bread, distributed it to those present, then the revelation of Judas as betrayer may be supposed to have occurred thus. Jesus Christ answered John: "It is he to whom I shall give the morsel after I have dipped it." This was the moment when He, handing out portions of bread in order, was to give a portion to Judas. Judas's agitated state and his effort to mask this inner condition made him move his hand toward the dish too early. The Lord was only just dipping His own hand into the dish with the morsel intended for him.

Gladkow B.I.

19th centuryChurch Father

No one except John understood why Jesus told Judas to fulfill his plan quickly. Since Judas was the treasurer and always carried out all commissions connected with monetary expenses, some of the Apostles thought that Jesus had now commanded him to buy what was needed for the feast, or to give something to the poor.

Lopuchin A.P.

19th centuryChurch Father

Since Judas’s presence at the supper had become impossible after all this, Christ made His last appeal to his conscience and said to him: “What you are doing, do quickly.” And Judas, as though burned by this remark, hastily rose from the table. Hiding in the darkness of night, he went to carry out his vile deed. Many of the simple-hearted disciples still did not understand what this deed was. Some even thought that the Teacher had sent him to buy things for the feast, or to distribute alms to the poor.

Michail (Lusin)

19th centuryChurch Father

“No one understood,” therefore not even John himself, who narrates this. He understood it only afterward. At that time the disciples gave another explanation to these words of the Teacher; cf. Chrysostom.

Nikolaj Alexandrow

19th centuryChurch Father

But even this attention from the Savior did not soften Judas's heart. As the Evangelist John observes, together with the morsel received by Judas from Christ's hands, Satan entered into him. That is, the satanically malicious decision to betray Christ was finally strengthened in him. "What you do, do quickly," Jesus said to him. Judas departed, but not all the disciples understood the meaning of the words Christ had spoken to him. They thought that Christ, regarding him as treasurer, had given him pre-festal errands and was urging him to carry them out quickly.

Philaret (Gumilevski)

19th centuryChurch Father

None of the disciples understood what was said to Judas, with the exception, of course, of John. The betrayer had been indicated to him, and therefore the words to the betrayer that followed the indication could not have been unclear to him. The other disciples, who had not heard what was said to the one reclining on the Savior’s breast, thought that the Lord had commanded Judas, who kept the money offerings, either to buy something for the feast or to give something to the poor. It would no longer have been possible to buy anything the next morning. On a feast, especially one such as Pascha, nothing was sold.

Wlastow G.K.

19th centuryChurch Father

Again we notice the words of an eyewitness, a participant in the events. Only such a man could indicate with such precision the thoughts of his companions, thoughts which he himself apparently shared, saying, "no one understood." We have said above that St. John, even after being warned by the Lord's words spoken quietly, did not understand the sign by which the Lord indicated the betrayer. Only after all the great events he had seen were his eyes opened, and he understood all that had taken place before him. Apparently, on the night of the Mystical Supper, the disciples even thought that Judas enjoyed the Lord's special trust. He carried the money box and received instructions on how these funds were to be used. St.

Read more (309 words)

John Chrysostom, in Homily 72 on John, raises the question: what money did Judas carry in the box? Apparently it was, first, the money of those disciples who possessed some means, such as the sons of Zebedee, and second, the money of those holy women who ministered to the Lord from their possessions, as is indicated in Lk 8:3. We see that the Lord's example sanctified common life. From the beginning of the founding of Christ's Church, after the outpouring of the grace of the Holy Spirit, this common life bound the first Christians into one family amid a corrupt generation; cf. Acts 2:45. Nowhere does the Lord impose common life as an obligation. By His gracious word He confirmed the family in its separate existence. The apostles also never required common life and the sale or surrender of property as obligatory, as, for example, the Pythagoreans did. The Apostle Peter says plainly to Ananias when he lied: "While it remained, was it not your own?" Why have you lied? Acts 5:4. Yet by His own example He blessed the common life of those who, having renounced the world completely, aim to serve their brothers through service to God. The Lord, with His apostles in His life of labor, did not abolish the laws given by God concerning the ordering of family and household life. But He also indicated a higher order of life, in which earthly care disappears completely from the human soul. In this first community of Christ, it would seem there was no place for crime, especially for love of money. But Judas proved that even amid holiness the human soul, with an evil will, can preserve a dark place. This can grow into a terrible ulcer, finally destroying the wretched man. Within the community of Christ, dreadful to say, Judas was a thief (Jn 12:6).

The original text

Greek text, 10 words with lemma, transliteration and Strong’s number. Tap to expand.

  1. τοῦτο
    touto
    this
    G3778 · οὗτος
  2. δὲ
    de
    but
    G1161 · δέ
  3. οὐδεὶς
    oudeis
    no one
    G3762 · οὐδείς
  4. ἔγνω
    egnō
    I come to know
    G1097 · γινώσκω
  5. τῶν
    tōn
    the
    G3588 · ὁ
  6. ἀνακειμένων
    anakeimenōn
    I recline
    G345 · ἀνάκειμαι
  7. πρὸς
    pros
    to
    G4314 · πρός
  8. τί
    ti
    who
    G5101 · τίς
  9. εἶπεν
    eipen
    to say
    G2036 · ἔπω, ἐρῶ, εἶπον
  10. αὐτῷ
    autō
    he
    G846 · αὐτός