The Church Fathers on this verse

John 13:26Meaning & Commentary from the Church Fathers

Jesus answered: He it is to whom I shall reach bread dipped. And when he had dipped the bread, he gave it to Judas Iscariot, the son of Simon.

Douay-Rheims

αποκρινεται ο ιησους εκεινος εστιν ω εγω βαψας το ψωμιον επιδωσω και εμβαψας το ψωμιον διδωσιν ιουδα σιμωνος ισκαριωτη

Greek (Byzantine text)

The Church Fathers on this verse

12 Church Fathers comment on this verse

John Chrysostom

4th centuryChurch Father

On this occasion Jesus exposes the betrayer for the first time, yet even now He does not name him. How does He do it? "It is he to whom I shall give this morsel when I have dipped it."

This very manner of exposure could have moved Judas, if he had not already been ashamed by the table itself, while eating from one bread. Indeed, suppose fellowship at the table did not move him. Yet who would not be drawn by receiving bread from Christ?

Here someone may be perplexed. After the disciples asked, "Who is it?" and received the answer, "It is he to whom I shall give this morsel when I have dipped it," why did they still not recognize the betrayer?

Read more (46 words)

Probably Christ spoke quietly, so that no one heard. For this reason John, leaning upon His breast, asked almost in His ear, so as not to make the betrayer manifest. Christ answered in the same manner, so that even then He did not make him manifest.

Theophylact of Bulgaria

11th centuryChurch Father

The Lord, when asked in this way also, does not announce the betrayer by name. Rather, He makes him known by means of the morsel, in order to turn the betrayer back and remind him of their common table and bread.

One who had shared in these ought not to betray the One who nourished him, nor to rage against Him. "Receive," He says, "this bread which you shared with Me. Recognize that we had a common table."

But Judas, his soul put to sleep by passion, did not understand this.

If you yourself also wish to recline nearer to Jesus, to lean upon His breast, and to learn mysteries from Him, strive to deserve His love by simplicity and goodness. For John was more guileless, simpler, and meeker than all, and for this he was loved.

Read more (116 words)

So you too, if you are likewise guileless, will be counted worthy to lean upon Jesus' breast. This is a sign of theological dignity. For Scripture assures us that the words of the Lord are hidden in the heart (Ps 119:11).

In this way the whole mystery will be opened to you, and also the betrayer of the Word. For to him who is entrusted with the grace of theology, the betrayer of the Word becomes manifest, that is, the one who does not think according to the right faith.

For the heretic, who substitutes something for the word of truth, which is bread, is shown to possess it not without admixture, but soaked and altered.

Cyrill of Alexandria

5th centuryChurch Father

See the commentary on Jn 13:23. The Savior gave His disciples the clearest indication of the betrayer. For, having dipped the morsel of bread, He gave it to him. By this He made manifest the one “who ate His bread” and was about to “lift up his heel.”

Augustine of Hippo

5th centuryChurch Father

Judas did not then receive the body of Christ, as some careless readers suppose. We must understand that our Lord had already communicated all the disciples in the mystery of His Body and Blood, among whom Judas was included, as St. Luke most clearly relates (cf. Lk 22:19-21).

After this He dipped the morsel, as John relates, and gave it to the betrayer. Perhaps by dipping the bread He indicated his deceit. Dipping in water does not always signify washing, for some things are dipped in order to be dyed.

But if this dipping signified something good, then Judas was unworthy of it, and therefore deserved the condemnation which followed.

Read more (72 words)

The betrayer was exposed, and the hiding places of darkness were uncovered. What he received was good, but he received it to his own evil, because an evil man receives a good thing in an evil way.

Yet concerning this morsel of bread, which was given to the false Apostle, and concerning what follows, much must be said. This requires more time than we now have at the end of this discourse.

Ephraem the Syrian

4th centuryChurch Father

As truly and surely as the Lord, when distributing bread to His disciples, gave them the Mystery of His Body, so one must also believe that the bread given by the Lord to His murderer was given as a mystery of the slaying of His Body.

He dipped it in order thus to name Judas's participation in the already fully resolved murder of Him, in which His Body was to be soaked with His Blood. Or He dipped the bread so as not to give him the Covenant together with the bread.

First He washed the bread, and then He gave it to him. The former covenant was washed from this bread, since it had been prepared by the New Covenant.

Read more (233 words)

In the same way, the Lord separated Judas from the disciples by means of water when He gave him bread dipped in water. Judas was unworthy of that bread which, together with wine, was distributed to the twelve Apostles.

For it was unfitting that the one who betrayed Him to death should, through bread, receive within himself the One who saves from death.

All drew near and drank from the cup, that is, only eleven of them. When Jesus offered the bread to all eleven, Judas also approached like his companions. They came and received.

But Jesus dipped the bread and gave it to Judas in that form. He washed away the blessing and thus marked the criminal. In this way the Apostles learned that it was he who would betray Him.

Jesus dipped the morsel and gave it to him so that the blessing would not remain on the bread. Judas did not partake of the blessed bread and did not drink from the cup of life.

He was disturbed that Jesus had dipped the bread, because by this he learned that he was unworthy of life. Then fury kept him from drinking from the cup of Jesus' blood.

He went away to the torturers and no longer saw the holy cup. Satan hastened to lead Iscariot away from his companions, lest he share with them in the living and life-giving mystery.

Euthymios Zigabenos

11th centuryChurch Father

Find in the above-mentioned twenty-sixth chapter of the Gospel according to Matthew the place where it says, “But I say to you, I shall not drink henceforth of this fruit of the vine, until that day...” and so forth (Mt 26:29). Read the whole explanation of it. There the words of this verse and the following verses are also explained.

Bogolepow D.P.

19th centuryChurch Father

In the account of the revelation of Judas as the betrayer, there is the following difference among the Evangelists. Luke, who relates this history very briefly, says that after Jesus Christ foretold the betrayer, the disciples "began to question one another, which of them it was who would do this."

John also points to this circumstance, saying that "the disciples looked at one another, uncertain of whom He spoke" (22). Matthew and Mark, however, do not mention this circumstance. They state that the disciples were greatly saddened and began to say to Him, each of them, "Is it I, Lord?"

Read more (409 words)

To this they received the answer, "He who has dipped his hand with Me in the dish will betray Me." Matthew alone adds that afterward Judas also asked the Lord, "Is it I, Rabbi?" and received an affirmative answer.

Finally, John says nothing about the questions each disciple put to the Lord. He relates how John, who was reclining at that time on Jesus' breast, asked the Lord at Peter's sign and received the answer, "It is he to whom I shall give this morsel when I have dipped it."

The end of this history belongs to John alone. Clearly the Evangelists relate different circumstances of the same event.

Luke, shortening the account, gives only the prediction of the betrayer and Jesus Christ's warning to him. Concerning the disciples, he gives their first confusion and their conversation with one another.

Matthew and Mark give the questions which each of them then addressed to the Lord. They also give the first indication of the betrayer, still general and unclear, together with a warning to him.

One may think that the fulfillment of this indication occurred at the same time as the indication given to John. Judas, striving either to be unconstrained and bold, or to appear so, turned to the Lord with the question, "Is it I, Rabbi?" He received the quiet answer, "Yes, you."

The disciples probably did not hear this last answer. They understood the Lord's words, "He who has dipped his hand with Me in the dish," in the most general sense. It meant, "one of the twelve," or, "the hand of him who betrays Me is with Me at the table" (Lk 22:21).

Then Peter turned to John and gave him a sign to ask Jesus who it was. If this happened during that part of the supper when the master of the house broke the bread and distributed it to those present, the revelation of Judas as the betrayer may be understood in this way.

Jesus Christ answered John, "It is he to whom I shall give this morsel when I have dipped it." This was the moment when, passing the portions of bread in order, He was to give a portion to Judas.

Judas's agitated state, and his effort to mask that state of soul, made him move his hand toward the dish too early. The Lord was still only lowering His hand into the dish with the morsel of bread intended for him.

Gladkow B.I.

19th centuryChurch Father

The thoughts of the Apostles were so occupied with the news that had struck them that they either did not hear or did not understand Jesus' answer to Judas's question. Meanwhile they wished to know the betrayer's name.

So Peter looked at John, who was reclining beside Jesus, and by signs asked him to ask Jesus who would betray Him. John, leaning upon Jesus' breast, quietly asked, "Lord, who is it?" Jesus answered him just as quietly, "It is he to whom I shall give this morsel when I have dipped it."

The Evangelist Matthew relates that to the Apostles' questions, "Is it I, Lord?" Jesus answered, "He who has dipped his hand with Me in the dish will betray Me" (Mt 26:23).

Read more (150 words)

Since we do not admit contradiction in the Evangelists' accounts, we must recognize that Jesus first said, as it were to all, that the one who would betray Him was he who would put his hand into the dish at the same time as He did.

But the troubled Apostles were probably so occupied by the news that had struck them that they did not even follow which of them stretched out his hand to the dish at the same time as Jesus. Therefore, in answer to John's question, Jesus gave another indication.

At the Paschal supper, besides the roasted lamb, unleavened bread, and bitter herbs, a thick sauce of dates, figs, and other fruits was served on a separate dish. Forks and knives were not then used. Food was taken simply with the hands.

They ate unleavened bread by dipping its pieces into the dish with the sweet sauce.

Lopuchin A.P.

19th centuryChurch Father

The disciples did not pay proper attention to this indication. After the washing was finished, they took their places at the supper.

The Teacher took the middle and chief place. John reclined at His right, and Judas Iscariot seems to have reclined at the Savior's left. He had brazenly taken this place himself, claiming some advantage over the other disciples as keeper of the common purse.

Peter's place was apparently at the edge of the next couch, to the left of Judas. When the supper began, the Savior explained to them the meaning of His action. It was a visible lesson in the humility with which they must treat one another.

Read more (186 words)

But His gaze fell upon Judas, and His spirit was troubled. Seeing that the disciples had not noticed His earlier hint, Christ now declared openly, for all to hear, "Truly, truly, I say to you, one of you will betray Me."

This declaration struck them like thunder. Fear seized them, and each, feeling a certain uncertainty within himself, turned to the Teacher with the question, "Is it I, Lord?"

In order not to reveal his guilt before his brethren, Iscariot too asked unwillingly, "Is it I, Teacher?" He received the answer, "You have said it."

But again this clear answer was not noticed by the Apostles. Peter, with his usual impatience, wished to know more exactly who the betrayer was. He urged John, whose head was inclined close to the Savior's breast, to ask Him who would betray Him.

To this Christ answered, "It is he to whom I shall give this morsel when I have dipped it." Then indeed, "having dipped the morsel, He gave it to Judas, the son of Simon Iscariot." This revelation bound John's tongue with horror, and he told no one.

Michail (Lusin)

19th centuryChurch Father

"I shall give it after dipping the morsel." During the Paschal supper, the head of the household sometimes distributed pieces of bread to those reclining, dipping them in a dish with liquid food. These symbolically signified the blessings of the promised land, flowing with milk and honey.

This custom sometimes expressed the special favor of the head of the house toward the one to whom he gave such a morsel. In that case it was not given to all.

The Lord now used this custom to indicate the betrayer to the disciple who asked. Earlier He had said that the betrayer was the one who dipped his hand into the dish with Him (Mt 26:25). Now He indicates him still more clearly by giving him the morsel.

This was perhaps the last summons of the Lord's love to the betrayer at this supper, the last call given him to repentance. But with Iscariot's darkened soul, the very opposite occurred.

Philaret (Gumilevski)

19th centuryChurch Father

The Savior does not refuse the beloved and loving disciple the fulfillment of his desire, to know the betrayer. He had revealed him to no one else.

"John, leaning upon His breast, asked almost at His ear, and Christ answered in the same way, so that even then He did not disclose the betrayer." Even for John He did not name the betrayer, but pointed him out by a sign.

What sign was this? In the East, at the end of a supper, it was customary for the master of the house, as a sign of sincere love, to give those seated at table a piece of bread dipped in salt or broth.

The Savior now acted in this way toward Judas. By this very sign He distinguished the betrayer for the beloved disciple.

Read more (43 words)

So heavenly Love still struggles with the hardened soul of the betrayer. So it still breathes upon him with the breath of tender meekness and sincere affection. What, then, does Judas do?

Chrysostom, Homily 72 on John. Apollinarius, in Catena Patrum on John.

Wlastow G.K.

19th centuryChurch Father

The Lord's dipping of the bread and giving it to one of those present could not have attracted the disciples' special attention. It was one of the customary courtesies in the East.

Moreover, the words spoken by the Lord seemed to explain why this courtesy was shown by the presider at the meal to the one whom, as the disciples thought, He was giving a special commission.

The deep, hidden meaning of the Lord's action and words was understood only by the betrayer, already hardened in wickedness. Chrysostom makes a very remarkable observation on this point.

"So long as Judas was in the company of the Apostles," he says, "Satan did not dare enter him, but attacked him only from without. But when Christ exposed him and separated him, then he entered him without fear."

Read more (115 words)

From that moment a demonic power takes possession of Judas. His human will, which Judas had used for evil, ceases to be his own possession. For to the end he rejected the merciful hand, and he becomes the contemptible instrument of the enemy.

Even the Lord's last words to Judas, as Chrysostom observes, were words of love. They could have stopped the betrayer, had he not been beyond correction.

"What you do, do quickly," the Lord says with deep sorrow. He reminds Judas that the night is passing. If he does not wish to abandon his criminal design, and if he persists in malice, then the time has come for him to carry it out.

Cross references

Passages read together with this verse.

The original text

Greek text, 23 words with lemma, transliteration and Strong’s number. Tap to expand.

  1. Ἀποκρίνεται
    apokrinetai
    I answer
    G611 · ἀποκρίνω
  2. ὁ
    ho
    the
    G3588 · ὁ
  3. Ἰησοῦς
    iēsous
    Jesus
    G2424 · Ἰησοῦς
  4. Ἐκεῖνός
    ekeinos
    that
    G1565 · ἐκεῖνος
  5. ἐστιν
    estin
    I am
    G1510 · εἰμί
  6. ᾧ
    hō
    who
    G3739 · ὅς, ἥ
  7. ἐγὼ
    egō
    I
    G1473 · ἐγώ
  8. βάψω
    bapsō
    I dip
    G911 · βάπτω
  9. τὸ
    to
    the
    G3588 · ὁ
  10. ψωμίον
    psōmion
    a bit
    G5596 · ψωμίον
  11. καὶ
    kai
    and
    G2532 · καί
  12. δώσω
    dōsō
    I offer
    G1325 · δίδωμι
  13. αὐτῷ
    autō
    he
    G846 · αὐτός
  14. βάψας
    bapsas
    I dip
    G911 · βάπτω
  15. οὖν
    oun
    therefore
    G3767 · οὖν
  16. τὸ
    to
    the
    G3588 · ὁ
  17. ψωμίον
    psōmion
    a bit
    G5596 · ψωμίον
  18. λαμβάνει
    lambanei
    I receive
    G2983 · λαμβάνω
  19. καὶ
    kai
    and
    G2532 · καί
  20. δίδωσιν
    didōsin
    I offer
    G1325 · δίδωμι
  21. Ἰούδᾳ
    iouda
    Judah
    G2455 · Ἰούδας
  22. Σίμωνος
    simōnos
    Simon
    G4613 · Σίμων
  23. Ἰσκαριώτου
    iskariōtou
    Iscariot
    G2469 · Ἰσκαριώτης, Ἰσκαριώθ