The Church Fathers on this verse

John 13:7Meaning & Commentary from the Church Fathers

Jesus answered and said to him: What I do, thou knowest not now; but thou shalt know hereafter.

Douay-Rheims

απεκριθη ιησους και ειπεν αυτω ο εγω ποιω συ ουκ οιδας αρτι γνωση δε μετα ταυτα

Greek (Byzantine text)

The Church Fathers on this verse

12 Church Fathers comment on this verse

John Chrysostom

4th centuryChurch Father

That is, afterward you will know what benefit comes from this, how profitable this lesson is, and how it can dispose us toward every humble-mindedness. What does “you will understand after this” mean? When exactly is “after this”? He says, when you cast out demons in My name, when you see My ascension into heaven, and when you learn from the Spirit that I sit at the right hand of the Father. Then you will understand what is now being done.

Theophylact of Bulgaria

11th centuryChurch Father

What, then, does the Lord say? He says, “What I am doing you do not know now.” My action contains profound humility, which I also teach you. Yet after you cast out demons in My name, when you see My ascension into heaven, and when through the Holy Spirit you learn that I sit at the right hand of the Father, then you will understand. The One who humbled Himself so far as to wash your feet is the very One who gives you such power over demons, who ascended, and who is glorified with the Father, having suffered no lowering through humility. Therefore implant in yourself humility, which does not abase, but rather exalts.

Cyrill of Alexandria

5th centuryChurch Father

But Christ postpones the explanation of this action until His own time, because He had a fully sufficient reason for Peter to understand what He had done “after this,” as He says. Clearly this means when He gives a fuller explanation of it. This, together with the rest, will bring us no small benefit. See how, when the time called for action, He postponed words. When, conversely, the time urged speech, He ceased from action. Everything must belong to its fitting and proper time.

Augustine of Hippo

5th centuryChurch Father

And he, frightened by the greatness of the Lord’s act, still does not permit that to be done whose reason he did not yet understand. He still does not wish to see, and cannot bear, the humble Christ at his feet.

Euthymios Zigabenos

11th centuryChurch Father

“Jesus answered and said to him, ‘What I am doing you do not know now.’” That is, you do not know what I teach by this action. “But you will understand after this,” when I explain it. Indeed, a little later the Lord said, “If I then, your Lord and Teacher, have washed your feet, you also ought to wash one another’s feet” (Jn 13:14). Or else, “you will understand after this” means: when you see that I have ascended into heaven, and when the Comforter descends upon you, then you will understand what I am, what work I have accomplished, and for what purpose.

Alexander Gorsky

19th centuryChurch Father

To see the divine Teacher in such a position was strange and painful for all. It was incompatible with the feeling of respect and reverence with which they had grown accustomed to look upon Him. Yet, with all this respect, no one dared contradict the fulfillment of His will. Only fiery, resolute Peter could not suppress this turmoil within himself. Even when the Lord, after his first refusal, pointed out to him that he did not yet understand the meaning of this action and would understand it afterward, his resistance had still not been overcome.

Bogolepow D.P.

19th centuryChurch Father

The supposition that the washing of the feet took place before the supper is not hindered by John’s expression in verse 2, δείπνου γενομενου. In itself, this expression can mean only, “when the supper had already been prepared.”

Thus the matter may be understood as follows. After the supper had already begun and Jesus had reclined at table, He still did not open the Paschal celebration itself. Rather, because of the disciples’ dispute about precedence, He rose from supper (v. 4) and began to wash the disciples’ feet.

If, further, the supposition is correct that the dispute about precedence mentioned by Luke gave Jesus Christ occasion to wash their feet, then we have this distinction between Luke and John. Luke intends only to transmit the teaching of Jesus Christ on humility.

Read more (159 words)

Therefore he only briefly indicates the disciples’ dispute about precedence as the occasion for this teaching. He does not explain in detail how this dispute began, nor does he recount the washing of the feet.

John turns his chief attention to this: in the washing of the disciples’ feet, beyond a lesson in humility, the supreme manifestation of Jesus Christ’s love for “His own” took place. They were to remain in the world after Him.

Among His disciples there was an enemy-disciple, who had already resolved in his heart to betray his Lord. At the same time, He was fully conscious of His divine authority and dignity.

Yet, wishing to teach the disciples by His own example self-denying love and humility, He takes upon Himself the office of a servant. He washes His disciples’ feet, not excluding even His betrayer, and thereby shows His love for them to the end (1-3).

The reading γενομενου favors this supposition even more.

Gladkow B.I.

19th centuryChurch Father

Not wishing yet to enter into explanations with Peter, Jesus said to him, “What I am doing you do not know now, but afterward you will understand.”

All who murmur against God, not understanding His foreordainings, should remember these words more often.

“Explain to me,” says Bersier, “why a beautiful and useful life is cut short, while so many useless beings remain to drag out their pitiable life in suffering.

Explain to me why trial often falls upon the most pious people, and seems to spare those whose arrogance it could have humbled by its blows.

Explain to me everything that seems fatal to us in nature and history. Explain to me all injustices and all undeserved sufferings.

Read more (310 words)

Explain to me why so many thousands of beings are condemned to be born and to live amid poverty and disgrace.

Oh, we reason about this. We clothe these sorrows in the miserable rags of our philosophy. But does this mean we have found an explanation?

Does it mean recognizing our own impotence, recognizing that the world moves along the path of fatal necessity?

Does it mean that nature, crushing us with its elemental powers, is no more rational or responsible than a mere machine, passionless before every tearful plea to return life to a man ground in the mesh of its wheels?

That is fine consolation, is it not? No, we are not fatalists.

When, refusing to understand our fate, we humbly bow our head, we bow before the will of the Father.

The Father says to us, ‘What I am doing you do not know now.’ He is Father, and that is enough for us.

What is surprising in the fact that His intentions do not agree with ours? What is surprising in the fact that we cannot comprehend them?

‘You will understand afterward,’ said Jesus Christ. These words have become for us a truth confirmed by experience.

How many dark pages of our life became understandable to us only when we ran through them after many years had passed.

You complained about your failures, about hopes that did not come true, about plans that were ruined, about trials that befell you.

You blamed your evil fate. Perhaps you reproached God. And behold, in all these trials lay your good.

This, surely, was enough for you to humble yourself and turn to God.

The last and final explanation will be given to us beyond this world.

Then we shall know the causes of all these disorders, disturbances, injustices, and the triumph of evil, which now trouble our faith.”

Michail (Lusin)

19th centuryChurch Father

“You do not know now,” that is, you do not understand the inner meaning of the action that I now perform. Peter saw only the Lord’s outward action, His fulfillment of a servant’s duty, and he was deeply struck by this. But, according to the Lord’s word, he was to understand the deeper meaning of this action afterward. This means after the Lord’s explanation of its meaning, which was soon to follow (Jn 13:12 and following). Then he would understand more and more the whole depth of this action through the experiences of his entire life and apostolic ministry toward believers in Christ.

Nikolaj Alexandrow

19th centuryChurch Father

Even the words of Christ did not stop the Apostle Peter: “What I am doing you do not know now, but afterward you will understand” (v. 7).

Feelings of boundless reverence before the divine Teacher prompt him to protest decisively: “You shall never wash my feet.”

These words of the Apostle Peter, though inspired by a pious feeling, nevertheless bore witness to his resistance to the unexpressed will of God.

Therefore the Lord gives the Apostle Peter a stern admonition: “If I do not wash you, you have no part with Me.”

Philaret (Gumilevski)

19th centuryChurch Father

This means that Peter’s task is to obey the Lord’s will and to testify to his humility through submission. This is necessary also because Peter does not now know the meaning of the Savior’s deed, and it can be understood by him only later.

Wlastow G.K.

19th centuryChurch Father

John Chrysostom, in Homily 70 on John, part 2, p. 302, points to the words of verse 6, “He came to Simon Peter.” He conjectures that before Peter the Lord had already washed someone’s feet.

He thinks that perhaps Judas, in his insolence, reclined above Peter, and that perhaps the Lord washed his feet before Peter’s. This is apparently a very ancient supposition.

Perhaps the washing of the feet is also to be understood partly in the prophecy of Ezek 16:9, in the Lord’s words: “I washed you with water and washed off your blood from you and anointed you with oil.”

Read more (386 words)

There is no doubt that this prophecy refers to the entire activity of our Lord Jesus Christ on earth. It contains baptism, the washing of mankind by the Lord’s blood, and the sanctification of man by the Holy Spirit in the symbolism of oil.

But in the Lord’s washing of the disciples’ feet there also takes place the mystery of their consecration and preparation for apostolic activity.

For the words of Isaiah’s prophecy refer to them: “How beautiful are the feet of those who preach peace, who preach good things” (Isa 52:7; cf. Rom 10:14-15).

Simon Peter, in resisting the Lord’s washing of his feet, did not sin with the great sin of self-reliance or pride. Yet he did sin with the sin of disobedience.

Not understanding what was taking place, he should have surrendered himself entirely to the will of Him whom he loved so fervently.

He sinned, however, from a feeling of love toward the Lord. In an impulse of reverence he probably expressed the feelings that stirred all the Apostles at that moment, except, of course, the betrayer.

The Lord points out to Peter, and in his person to all the disciples, that although they do not understand the action being performed, they must silently submit to Him.

They must do so with full assurance that the wisdom of God will disclose to them the understanding of this and all else afterward.

This would happen when the time came for their minds to be enlightened by the Holy Spirit, after the accomplishment of the coming mystery.

Peter, however, in his spiritual mind and reverence not yet fully developed, resists the Lord a second time.

At that moment sacred fear probably seizes him at the thought that He whom he had confessed to be the Christ and the Son of God (Mt 16:16; Jn 6:69) wishes to serve him as a slave.

So he resolves to say to the Lord, “You shall never wash my feet.”

Then the Lord, knowing Peter’s faithful heart, his honest soul, and his great love despite all his weaknesses and impulses, heals him with a threat: “You have no part with Me.”

In these words there is an indication that the Lord requires obedience above all. Then Peter, with his characteristic quickness of thought, falls into the other extreme.

Cross references

Passages read together with this verse.

The original text

Greek text, 16 words with lemma, transliteration and Strong’s number. Tap to expand.

  1. Ἀπεκρίθη
    apekrithē
    I answer
    G611 · ἀποκρίνω
  2. Ἰησοῦς
    iēsous
    Jesus
    G2424 · Ἰησοῦς
  3. καὶ
    kai
    and
    G2532 · καί
  4. εἶπεν
    eipen
    to say
    G2036 · ἔπω, ἐρῶ, εἶπον
  5. αὐτῷ
    autō
    he
    G846 · αὐτός
  6. Ὃ
    ho
    who
    G3739 · ὅς, ἥ
  7. ἐγὼ
    egō
    I
    G1473 · ἐγώ
  8. ποιῶ
    poiō
    I do
    G4160 · ποιέω
  9. σὺ
    sy
    you
    G4771 · σύ
  10. οὐκ
    ouk
    no
    G3756 · οὐ
  11. οἶδας
    oidas
    I know
    G1492 · εἴδω
  12. ἄρτι
    arti
    now
    G737 · ἄρτι
  13. γνώσῃ
    gnōsē
    I come to know
    G1097 · γινώσκω
  14. δὲ
    de
    but
    G1161 · δέ
  15. μετὰ
    meta
    with
    G3326 · μετά
  16. ταῦτα
    tauta
    this
    G3778 · οὗτος