We see in them complete impartiality toward themselves and total detachment from every thought of their personal “I.” The Apostle Peter, for example, in his Gospel accounts given to the evangelist Mark who recorded them. Was so attentive to the smallest movements of his personal human feeling that he passed over all events which, in one way or another, set him personally forward.
Then the event was expressed by them in a form of thought and speech strictly corresponding to it. Yet in the Gospels we find a precious indication that this correspondence does not consist in a detailed, minute, documentary description of what happened, or in a stenographically literal transmission of what was said.
No. Penetrating into the spiritual foundations of the events from the Lord’s life, the evangelists treated freely the incidental particulars that clothed and surrounded those events.
The evangelists describe the same event, each somewhat differently from the other, having in view either different moments in the event or its different aspects. The freedom with which they regarded the letter of description is clear from the fact that, for example, the same evangelist Luke recounts the Lord’s Ascension twice, in his Gospel and in Acts.
Each time he gives it in different features and words, supplementing one narrative with the other. Evidently he saw nothing in this that could cast even a shadow of doubt on the reliability of what he was reporting.
For them, what mattered was not that all moments and features of an event should be numbered in words. They recognized the utter impossibility of exhausting any reality in full. This was all the more true of a reality with such infinite inner content and meaning as passed before their eyes.
Indeed, for them this would have been entirely useless. Their aim was not a dead bookish entry of what had happened on this or that page of parchment.
Their spirit had before it an infinite, divine, and living task. They had to mark the event, perhaps with even one feature, but in such a way that it would tremble with life in the reader’s soul and draw his inner powers to the source of regeneration, Christ.
The thought of the evangelists was wholly directed toward fulfilling this task. They achieved it by uniting their will with the will of God, who desires only one thing in relation to man: to regenerate him in Christ and thereby save him.
The evangelist John says that everything written by him was written so that those who read might believe that Jesus is the Christ, the Son of God, and that believing they might have life in His name (Jn 20:31).
Thus the writer is only an organ of the divine will, a conduit of the activity of the divine Spirit. He does not intend to write about himself, nor does he wish to be a chronicler.
He is only the expression of the same saving power of God that created the events themselves about which he reports. He seems to merge with that power and to continue its living work, reproducing in narrative what had previously been accomplished in reality.
For this reason, the verbally reproduced event bears within itself the same living divine power that was present in the actual event. The evangelist’s will is like a small stream that has joined its waters to the mighty current of the Holy Spirit’s action upon the world.
This free and complete surrender of one’s will to the will of God, and this identification of one’s aims in narrating the event with the divine aims in its very accomplishment, make it possible for the writer to surrender himself completely to the contemplation of the event.
He does this without any indirect thought about himself. He depicts the event with the same freedom of words and outlines with which, in the details themselves, it could have taken place, while remaining just as real and saving for man.
From this it becomes clear what the “reminding by the Holy Spirit” consists in. The God-inspired power of the Gospel is in no way documentary precision in describing the remembered events. It is not the detail of particulars in their depiction.
Rather, it consists in this: they are transmitted to the reader’s spirit vitally, that is, by the Holy Spirit, and therefore just as effectively as they were in reality with respect to the writer himself.
Thus in the Gospel we have before us not dead descriptions of events, but the living events themselves, breathing upon us with their grace-filled influence. They are not passing human recollections, which always bear a personal imprint.
They are eternal reminders of God to the coming ages, of what was accomplished only once on earth and reflected forever in heaven, in His divine contemplation. They are the constant living reproduction, in the depth of the spirit, of what once took place in the flesh and in man’s material setting.
Now the living divine effectiveness of the Gospel upon human souls becomes understandable. In its narratives there lives the same divine power of the Holy Spirit that was present in the very events of the Lord’s earthly life.
They are not mere words and not simply stories. In them speaks the creative power that saves us. The narratives are only means by which the living Lord acts upon us, He who abides constantly with us, though He is invisible to us.
Therefore it is the incorruptible seed from which our spiritual regeneration arises (1 Pet 1:23). The reminders of the Holy Spirit, communicated to us by the evangelists, creatively penetrate our spirit and beget in it a new life, full of joy and consolation from the good tidings brought to us by the Lord.