The Church Fathers on this verse

John 18:22Meaning & Commentary from the Church Fathers

And when he had said these things, one of the servants standing by gave Jesus a blow, saying: Answerest thou the high priest so?

Douay-Rheims

ταυτα δε αυτου ειποντος εις των υπηρετων παρεστηκως εδωκεν ραπισμα τω ιησου ειπων ουτως αποκρινη τω αρχιερει

Greek (Byzantine text)

The Church Fathers on this verse

11 Church Fathers comment on this verse

John Chrysostom

4th centuryChurch Father

What then does the high priest do? He ought to have conducted such an inquiry, but he did not.

Meanwhile, because Christ spoke in this way, "one of the officers standing by struck Jesus on the cheek." What could be more insolent than this?

Let heaven be aghast and earth tremble at such long-suffering in the Master and such injustice in the servants.

And what had He said? He said, "Why do you ask Me," not because He refused to answer, but because He wished to remove every occasion for injustice.

Theophylact of Bulgaria

11th centuryChurch Father

And after such an answer they do not marvel at Him, but strike Him on the cheek. What could be more insolent than this?

Yet He who can shake and destroy all things does nothing of the kind. Instead He speaks words able to tame every savagery.

Cyrill of Alexandria

5th centuryChurch Father

This also, as something that was to be done to Christ, was foretold by the voice of the prophet: "I gave My back," He says, "to scourges, and My cheeks to blows" (Is 50:6).

And now what was once foretold comes to fulfillment. It condemns the pride of the Jews and removes and destroys the dishonor that lay upon us, since we sinned in the first Adam by transgressing the divine commandment.

For He is dishonored for us, since He bears our sins, according to the word of the prophet (Is 53:4), and suffers for us.

As He brought about the destruction of death by giving His own body over to death, so also, I think, the blow that dishonored Christ leads to the destruction of the dishonor resting upon us.

Read more (388 words)

That dishonor came from transgression and from sin, the begetter of evil. For He alone, equivalent to all, was dishonored for all.

And I think the whole creation would have trembled, had it possessed the capacity to perceive this audacity. For the Lord of glory was insulted by the impious hand of the man who struck Him.

Yet I think that an inquisitive investigator will naturally wish to know why this utterly reckless and wholly impious servant struck Jesus on the face.

For He had said absolutely nothing harsh or angry, but had given very meek answers to everything of which He was accused.

As it appears, however, the ruler of the Jews himself did not command Him to be struck, nor to be assaulted with such incredible insults.

Perhaps someone might suppose here the ordinary and frequent behavior of servants. When they bring before rulers those accused of some lawlessness, they violently compel them to speak as meekly as possible.

And if they say anything unfitting, they subject them to insult. But I do not think that this frenzy against Christ took place then for this reason.

We shall find another pretext for this audacity if we attend to what was said before. We have just said that some of the servants had grieved the rulers.

These were the men who, when commanded to seize Jesus, returned after receiving such mystagogy from Him and such amazement before Him that they openly declared, "Never did a man speak like this Man."

Greatly distressed by this, the Pharisees said, "Have you also been deceived? Have any of the Pharisees or of the rulers believed in Him? But this crowd, which does not know the Law, is accursed" (Jn 7:46-49).

Since, therefore, the Savior's words reminded the rulers of the displeasure that had then arisen in them against the servants, the servant tried to turn suspicion away from himself.

For the Savior had presented them as witnesses of His teaching, saying, "Behold, these know what I said."

The servant, who was accused by them of respect for Christ, deflected from himself the suspicion of goodwill toward Him. As though directing the rulers' attention to other thoughts, he stopped Christ's speech with blows.

He would not allow Him to say what might have harmed the insolent crowd among the high-priestly servants.

Augustine of Hippo

5th centuryChurch Father

What could be truer, more evident, or more righteous than such an answer? For His answer is the one proclaimed by the prophetic voice: "Go forth, prosper, and reign in the name of truth, meekness, and righteousness" (cf. Ps 44:5).

If we consider who received the blow, would we not have wished that the one who struck Him be consumed by heavenly fire, buried by the opening earth, carried off after being seized by a demon, or punished by some similar or even heavier sentence?

For what could He who created the world not have commanded by His authority, had He not wished to teach us the patience by which the world is overcome?

Read more (200 words)

Here someone may say, "Why did He not do what He Himself commanded?" That is, He should not have answered the one who struck Him, but should have turned the other cheek to him (cf. Mt 5:39).

But what of the fact that He answered rightly, humbly, and justly? He did not merely offer the other cheek to the assailant, but His whole body, that it might be nailed to the tree.

By this He rather showed what had to be shown. Namely, that His great commandments concerning patience must be fulfilled not by offering the body, but by preparing the heart.

For it may even happen that a man filled with anger outwardly offers the other cheek.

How much better it is, with inward peace, to speak the truth in reply and to be ready, with a tranquil soul, to endure still heavier sufferings.

Blessed is the man who, in everything unjustly suffered for righteousness, can truly say, "My heart is ready, O God, my heart is ready."

From this, of course, what follows will take place: "I will sing and give praise" (Ps 56:8). Paul and Barnabas were able to fulfill this in harshest bonds (cf. Acts 16:25).

Euthymios Zigabenos

11th centuryChurch Father

Tremble, O heaven, and be aghast, O earth, at such boldness from the servants and such long-suffering from the Master.

O most senseless man! What offensive answer did the Lord give? Did He not rather honor the high priest by not exposing him, since he was asking with deceitful intent about what he already knew?

Though He could have scattered them all, struck them down, or destroyed them harshly in some other way, He endures patiently. He speaks words able to tame every savagery, though not theirs.

Cyrill of Jerusalem

4th centuryChurch Father

When the high priest questioned Him and heard the truth, he became indignant, and the evil servant struck Him.

And the face that shone like the sun endured blows from lawless hands. Others came and spat in the face of Him who, with clay, healed the man blind from birth (Mt 26:67).

"Do you thus repay the Lord, O foolish and unwise people?" (Deut 32:6). The Prophet, marveling at this, says, "Lord, who has believed our report?" (Is 53:1).

For the matter is beyond belief: the only God, the Son of God and the power of the Lord, suffers these things.

Read more (43 words)

Yet, so that those who are being saved should not fall into unbelief, the Holy Spirit wrote beforehand concerning this in the person of Christ speaking. For the same One who then spoke later appeared: "I gave My back to scourges" (Is 50:6).

Dimitri of Rostov

17th centuryChurch Father

And behold, when He did not open His mouth from fear, "one of the officers struck Jesus on the cheek, saying, 'Do You answer the high priest so?'"

Job cries out, "The lawless man stretched out his hand against God Almighty!" (Job 15:25). "Be astonished, be afraid, O heaven, and let the foundations of the earth be moved!"

In ancient times there was a custom: when a slave was set free, he was struck on the cheek.

The Lord endures a blow on the face in order to make us free from the slavery of sin. For "he who commits sin is a slave of sin" (Jn 8:34).

He does this in order to free us from the bonds of Hades. Therefore Damascene says in the Octoechos: "When You were struck by a hand upon the cheek, we obtained freedom."

Read more (293 words)

"King Jeroboam stretched out his hand from the altar" against the prophet, "and said, 'Seize him.' And his hand, which he stretched out against him, withered" (3 Kgs 13:4).

Why, then, did the hand of that lawless man not wither, when it was stretched out not against a prophet, but against Him whom the prophets foretold?

"He who created man with His hand is struck on the face by a hand of clay."

He says, "I gave My back to those who struck Me, and My cheeks to those who smote Me" (Is 50:6).

These are the cheeks which shone on Tabor like the sun. These are the cheeks of which the bride says, "His cheeks are like a bed of spices, yielding fragrance" (Song 5:13).

These are the cheeks, the face which David seeks: "My face has sought You; Your face, O Lord, I will seek" (Ps 26:8).

He is struck so mercilessly by an iron hand. How did the structure of the world endure the dishonor of its Creator?

How many thousands of people did the earth swallow for the dishonor shown to Moses (Num 16)? How many tens of men did fire consume at the word of Elijah (4 Kgs 1)?

And what army was struck blind through the anger of Elisha (4 Kgs 6)? Yet now, when the Master endures such cruel dishonor, all the elements are silent.

The Angel cries to Abraham, "Do not lay your hand upon your son Isaac" (Gen 22:12). Why, then, does he raise his hand against the guiltless Isaac, the Son of God?

Woe to you! "The Lord is the God of vengeance" (Ps 93:1). Whom are you touching? The tabernacle of the Holy of Holies. Do you not see His silent innocence?

Gladkow B.I.

19th centuryChurch Father

Christ did not understand literally the example He had given of not resisting evil, namely, turning the other cheek.

The Evangelist John bears witness that when Annas the high priest was questioning Jesus, one of the attendants standing nearby struck Jesus on the cheek and said, "Do You answer the high priest so?"

Jesus did not turn the other cheek, but answered him, "If I have spoken evil, bear witness to the evil; but if well, why do you strike Me?"

Christ did not refuse to turn the other cheek because He wished to avoid a second insult. In fulfilling the will of His Father, He was already prepared to give Himself over to a tormenting death, which He had foretold more than once.

Read more (281 words)

Therefore a blow from the attendant on the other cheek could not have frightened Him. If it had truly been necessary to turn the other cheek, and if His commandments had to be fulfilled literally, He would certainly have turned the other cheek to the man who struck Him.

But He acted otherwise. By a meek question He resisted the evil servant and thereby spared him from repeating a most grievous crime.

These examples prove that Jesus Christ did not understand or fulfill literally His commandment concerning nonresistance to evil. Consequently, He commanded us also not to fulfill it literally.

The Insult to Jesus by the Attendant of Annas. Annas understood that no other answer could have been expected and probably would have ended the interrogation.

But his attendant, standing there, found in this answer something disrespectful toward so important a person as the former high priest. Wishing to show special zeal for his master, he struck Jesus on the cheek.

He insolently said, "Is that how You answer the high priest?"

If Jesus had borne this insult in silence, people might have thought that He acknowledged it as deserved. The overly zealous servant would especially have become proud beyond measure at such silent approval of his deed.

Therefore, in order to cut off evil at its very beginning and make the servant feel the full weight of his sin, Jesus overcame evil by a good word.

"If I have spoken evil," He says, addressing the man who insulted Him, "then bear witness to the evil. Point out exactly what you consider wrong in My answer to the high priest.

But if I have spoken well, why do you strike Me?"

Lopuchin A.P.

19th centuryChurch Father

When the accused had thus declared His rights, one of the attendants struck Jesus on the cheek and said, "Do You answer the high priest so?"

This class of people is usually especially zealous for the observance of form, and only of form.

The Trial of Jesus Christ from the juridical point of view. By this answer Christ reminded the unjust judge of his flagrant violation of judicial laws.

These required a public, daytime trial with witnesses, not a nocturnal, secret one before an armed gathering.

For this reason the answer so enraged the surrounding attendants that one of them insolently struck Christ on the cheek, crying out, "Do You answer the high priest so?"

Read more (47 words)

Such savage self-will by an attendant forced even the high priest himself to feel the sting of conscience. This was especially so when he heard Christ's infinitely meek remark: "If I have spoken evil, bear witness to the evil; but if well, why do you strike Me?"

Michail (Lusin)

19th centuryChurch Father

When He had said this, and so forth: the Lord's answer contained nothing offensive to the high priest. He spoke the truth.

But to one of the servants the answer seemed either improper before such a person as Annas, or offensive to Annas himself. So he struck the Lord out of servility toward his master.

This action of the servant shows that the interrogation before Annas was private, not official before the Sanhedrin, where such an act would hardly have been possible.

After the first session of the Sanhedrin that night, they mocked the Lord and struck Him. But this was not during the interrogation itself. It was afterward, when the members of the Sanhedrin had withdrawn; cf. Lk 22:63-65.

Philaret (Gumilevski)

19th centuryChurch Father

The silence of Annas served to confirm that the enemies of Jesus could say nothing against the truth and purity of Jesus' teaching. Jesus challenged all, each and every one, to speak against His teaching, and all were silent.

Thus was fulfilled what the Prophet said of the servant of Jehovah: "There was no deceit in His mouth" (Is 53:9).

"When He had said this, one of the officers who stood by struck Jesus with the palm of his hand, saying, 'Do You answer the high priest so?'"

"Be astonished, O heaven; tremble, O earth, before the meekness of the Lord and the shamelessness of the servant," says St. Chrysostom.

"What was said? He did not say, 'Why do you ask Me?' in order not to answer. He said it because He wished to cut off every occasion for injustice.

Read more (61 words)

And when He was struck for this, He who could shake and destroy all things did nothing of the kind.

Do you see a court breathing agitation, disorder, anger, and lawlessness? The high priest asked treacherously. Christ answered rightly and fittingly.

What remained to be done? To refute Him or be silent. But this was not done. The servant struck Him."

Cross references

Passages read together with this verse.

The original text

Greek text, 17 words with lemma, transliteration and Strong’s number. Tap to expand.

  1. Ταῦτα
    tauta
    this
    G3778 · οὗτος
  2. δὲ
    de
    but
    G1161 · δέ
  3. αὐτοῦ
    autou
    he
    G846 · αὐτός
  4. εἰπόντος
    eipontos
    to say
    G2036 · ἔπω, ἐρῶ, εἶπον
  5. εἷς
    heis
    one
    G1520 · εἷς
  6. παρεστηκὼς
    parestēkōs
    I bring
    G3936 · παρίστημι
  7. τῶν
    tōn
    the
    G3588 · ὁ
  8. ὑπηρετῶν
    hypēretōn
    a servant
    G5257 · ὑπηρέτης
  9. ἔδωκεν
    edōken
    I offer
    G1325 · δίδωμι
  10. ῥάπισμα
    rhapisma
    a slap
    G4475 · ῥάπισμα
  11. τῷ
    tō
    the
    G3588 · ὁ
  12. Ἰησοῦ
    iēsou
    Jesus
    G2424 · Ἰησοῦς
  13. εἰπών
    eipōn
    to say
    G2036 · ἔπω, ἐρῶ, εἶπον
  14. Οὕτως
    houtōs
    thus
    G3779 · οὕτω, οὕτως
  15. ἀποκρίνῃ
    apokrinē
    I answer
    G611 · ἀποκρίνω
  16. τῷ
    tō
    the
    G3588 · ὁ
  17. ἀρχιερεῖ
    archierei
    high priest
    G749 · ἀρχιερεύς