For it would indeed have caused no small harm to some if they thought that Christ was subjected to involuntary outrages. It would harm them to think that, against His will and by force, He came under the power of the Jews.
For He is God by nature and is proclaimed in the holy and God-inspired Scripture as King over all.
Thus He removed the occasion for our stumbling and, as it were, uprooted the error by the words, "unless it had been given you from above."
He says that authority was given to Pilate from above, not as though God the Father imposed involuntary suffering on the cross upon His own Son.
Rather, the Only-begotten Himself delivered Himself to suffering for us, with the Father's good pleasure that this mystery should be accomplished in Him.
Therefore, by this gift, "given from above," He clearly means and names the consent and permission of the Father, together with the Son's own desire.
Indeed, there can be no doubt that the crowd did not overpower the Savior's authority.
This is easy to see from the fact that, despite their frequent plots, they had no success. Instead, exposed as blasphemers, they came under condemnation.
Thus, as the Evangelist reports, they once wanted to seize Him. But He went out, "passed through the midst of them, and so went away" (Jn 8:59; cf. Lk 4:30).
He uses "so" in the sense of openly and without fear. He did not assume the appearance of those fleeing, but walked freely, in His usual way, and wholly without fear.
By a certain divine and ineffable power, He hid Himself and then vanished from the murderers' eyes. He did not yet wish to suffer.
Nor did He permit His raging persecutors to subject Him to death against His will.
Therefore, He says, by His own will and by the good pleasure of God the Father, "authority," or the full possibility, was given to Pilate to do with Him what he had already dared.
For the divine and supreme nature proves to be subject to nothing that exists. Dominion over all belongs to it by nature.
He presents the "sin" against Him as "greater," evidently the sin of the one who brought Him to Pilate. This is altogether just.
For the betrayer became, as it were, the beginning and door of impiety against Him. The judge, however, proved to be the executor of others' evil plots.
Through untimely cowardice, Pilate became a participant in the Jews' godlessness.
Who, then, delivered Him up, and on whom does the first guilt of the crime fall? I think it falls on the disciple easily bought for money, or rather on the betrayer and destroyer of his own soul.
It also falls on the crowd of rulers and on the Jewish people itself. He assigns to them the greatest share of impiety, yet does not leave Pilate's head altogether free from it.