The Church Fathers on this verse

John 2:2Meaning & Commentary from the Church Fathers

And Jesus also was invited, and his disciples, to the marriage.

Douay-Rheims

εκληθη δε και ο ιησους και οι μαθηται αυτου εις τον γαμον

Greek (Byzantine text)

The Church Fathers on this verse

12 Church Fathers comment on this verse

John Chrysostom

4th centuryChurch Father

Those who invited Him to the wedding certainly did not have a proper understanding of Him. They invited Him not even as a great man, but simply as an ordinary man and acquaintance. The evangelist hints at this when he says, “The mother of Jesus was there. Jesus also was invited to the wedding, with His disciples.” That is, Jesus was invited just as she and the disciples were.

Read more (1079 words)

But I ask you, collect your thoughts and attend to what is being said. Some excuse themselves by marriage. Others appeal to children, others to military service, others to trade, others to a craft, others to slavery, others to wealth, others to poverty, and others to similar things. Therefore I wish to show you that neither wealth nor poverty is an obstacle. Neither military service, nor trade, nor marriage, nor children, nor slavery, nor craft, nor anything of this sort is an obstacle. “Jesus was invited to the wedding.” Did He go, or did He not go? Clearly He went. If He went, then how can marriage be evil? And do you have no excuse? I say not only that He went, but that He also brought gifts, for He changed the water into wine. Therefore do not offer marriage as your excuse. Your Lord came to a wedding and glorified marriage, while you dishonor marriage and say that marriage is an obstacle. It is no obstacle to piety.

Do you wish to know that having a wife and children is in no way harmful? Did Moses not have a wife and children? Was Elijah not a virgin? Did not Moses bring manna down from heaven? Did not Elijah bring fire down from heaven? Did not Moses cause quails to come? Did not Elijah shut heaven by his word? Did not God speak with Moses? Did God not also speak with Elijah? Did not Moses divide the sea and bring the people through? Did not Elijah ascend in a fiery chariot? Virginity did not harm the one in the least. Wife and children did not hinder the other in the least. You have seen Elijah riding through the air. You have seen Moses journeying through the sea. Look also at Peter, the pillar of the Church, for he too had a wife. It is not written that Peter had a wife. From where, then, is it clear that he had one? I will tell you. “When Jesus came,” Scripture says, “to Peter’s mother-in-law, she was sick; and He touched her, and the fever left her, and she served them” (Mt 8:14-15). Do you see that Peter also had a wife? Where there is a mother-in-law, there clearly is also a wife.

So you see that Peter also had a wife. Do not slander marriage. I say this so that no one may put forward as a pretext either wife, or children, or military service, or trade, or craft, or slavery, or wealth, or poverty. These are excuses. These are pretexts. These are the schemes of the devil. You put forward military service as a pretext and say, “I am a soldier and cannot be devout.” Was not the centurion a soldier? Yet he says to Jesus, “I am not worthy that You should enter under my roof; only speak the word, and my servant will be healed” (Mt 8:8). And Jesus marveled and said, “Truly I say to you, not even in Israel have I found such faith” (Mt 8:10). Did military service hinder him at all?

But what are you? A craftsman? Paul was also one, he who had been a persecutor of the churches, and afterward became a preacher and apostle. But what are you? A rich man? Abraham was also rich, and he had wife and children. “Abraham believed God,” Scripture says, “and it was reckoned to him as righteousness” (Rom 4:3), and he was called the friend of God. Did wealth, or wife, or children hinder him at all? You have no excuse. See, he has three pretexts on which you rely for your excuse: wife, children, and wealth.

But what are you? A slave? Onesimus also was a slave. Paul, writing to Philemon, said of Onesimus, “Formerly he was useless, but now he is useful to you and to me” (Phlm 1:11). But what are you? A king? David also was a king. Nathan the prophet came in to him and rebuked him for the sin he had committed. Did the king act tyrannically toward him? Did he say anything against the prophet? Did he not acknowledge servitude even upon the royal throne, saying, “I have sinned against the Lord”? And the prophet, seeing his repentance, said to him, “The Lord has taken away your sin” (2 Kgs 12:13). Repentance was swift, and forgiveness swifter. The king did not pause and say, “I am king, clothed in purple and wearing a diadem. I have bow and arrows, shields and helmets, and soldiers for defenders. Shall I fear this poor man, and not kill him, but endure him?” He said nothing of the kind. Though he was king, he knew that he had sinned, and therefore he repented. He knew that he had committed a grievous sin. Did royal dignity hinder him at all?

But what are you? A youth? Daniel also was a youth, yet he stopped the mouths of lions, tore the dragon to pieces, overthrew Bel, condemned the elders, and saved Susanna. The imperfection of youth in no way hindered such great virtue. But what are you? A lover of your brother? Joseph was also this. What great philosophy and chastity he displayed toward the Egyptian woman. He tore his garment, but did not tear his faith. He overcame her shamelessness, but did not fulfill her passionate desire. But what are you? A widow? The woman of Sidon was also a widow, who received the prophet Elijah and nourished him with bread and water, so that hunger did not wear down the one who brought famine. But what are you? A harlot? Rahab also was one. She hid the spies, and after the sons of Israel took possession of the land of promise, she herself was saved, together with her house and her kin.

But what are you? A poor man? Lazarus also was poor. What great philosophy and patience he showed in poverty. Although he was in such need, he did not fall miserably. But what are you? A lover of women? Samson also was. Though he was betrayed by a woman, God granted him vengeance, and he was avenged with the help of foreigners. But what are you? A lover of children? Jacob also was. Do you see how many were saved? Do you have faith? You have everything. Do you lack faith, though you are a king? Royal dignity profits you nothing. Yet I have not forgotten my promise.

Theophylact of Bulgaria

11th centuryChurch Father

They invite the Lord to the wedding not because they had seen His miracles, and not as a great man, but simply as an acquaintance. Indicating this, the Evangelist says, “The Mother of Jesus was there,” and His brothers.

As they invited her and His brothers, so they invited the Lord. The Lord does not reject the invitation, but comes, because He looked not to His own dignity, but to what is useful and beneficial for us.

He who did not consider it beneath Him to be among servants could still less consider it beneath Him to go to a wedding.

[...] Cana of Galilee, that is, in the land of this low and perverted world, crooked in every respect and making things crooked. [...]

Cyrill of Alexandria

5th centuryChurch Father

<...> He Himself also came to this feast when invited, together with His disciples, more for the sake of the miracle than for the banquet. He came also to sanctify the very beginning of human existence, I mean in relation to the flesh.

He who was recapitulating the nature of man itself, and transforming it wholly for the better, had to bestow blessing not only on those already called into being.

He also had to prepare grace for those who were yet to be born, and to make holy their passage into existence.

You may add a third reason to this. God had said to the woman: 'In pains thou shalt bring forth children' (Gen 3:16).

Was it not therefore fitting that this curse also should be removed from us? Otherwise, how could marriage under condemnation have been escaped?

Read more (123 words)

This is what the Savior, in His love for mankind, resolved. He who is the joy and gladness of all honored marriage by His presence, so as to remove the ancient sorrow of childbearing.

'If anyone is in Christ, he is a new creation, and the old things have passed away,' as Paul says; 'behold, all things have become new' (2 Cor 5:17).

He comes to the wedding together with His disciples, because those who loved to behold miracles ought to be present with the Wonderworker. From the miracle being performed, they would receive something like nourishment for their faith.

The Savior comes to the wedding with saved humanity not without a summons. He was called by the many voices of the saints.

Augustine of Hippo

5th centuryChurch Father

The Lord came by invitation to the wedding feast. Is it marvelous that He came to a wedding feast in that house, when He came to a wedding feast in this world? Therefore His bride is the one whom He redeemed by His blood and to whom He gave the Holy Spirit as a pledge (1 Cor 1:22). He tore her from the devil’s claws, died for her sins, and rose again to justify her. Who has brought such gifts to his bride? Men may bring offerings of land, and also gold, silver, precious stones, horses, possessions, estates, and farms. But will anyone bring his own blood? If a man gave his blood to his bride, he would no longer be there to take her as wife. But the Lord, dying without corruption, gave His blood for the one whom, risen again, He was to take as wife. He had already betrothed her to Himself in His Mother’s womb. For the Word is the Bridegroom, and the bride is human flesh. You have all things in the one Son of God, who is also the Son of Man. He became the head of the Church. The womb of the Virgin Mary was His bridal chamber. From there He came forth like a bridegroom from his chamber, as Scripture prophesied: “And He, like a bridegroom coming forth from his chamber, rejoiced like a giant to run His course” (Ps 18:6). From the chamber He came forth as Bridegroom, and He was invited to a wedding feast.

That miracle of our Lord Jesus Christ, when He made wine from water, is not astonishing to those who know that God performed it. For on that day, during the wedding, He made wine in six jars, commanding them first to be filled with water. He is the same One who makes wine every year in the vines. As the water that the servants poured into the water jars became wine by the Lord’s act, so the water poured out by the clouds is changed into wine by the Lord’s act. Yet this latter deed does not astonish us, because it happens year after year. Through constant repetition it has ceased to be marvelous. It calls for far greater reflection than what was done in the water jars.

Who, when pondering the works of God by which this whole world is governed and ordered, will not marvel at wonders and be filled with them? If he thinks about the power of a single seed, of some tiny grain, he will see how great a thing it is, able to make the thoughtful tremble. But people have turned their attention elsewhere and have ceased reflecting on the works of God. For these works they ought daily to raise praise to the Creator. Therefore God has, as it were, kept for Himself the power to perform certain unusual deeds. By wonders He awakens people, as though from sleep, to worship Him. A man rises from the dead, and people marvel. So many people are born every day, and no one marvels. If we considered this more carefully, we would judge it more marvelous that one is born who has never lived, than that one who has lived rises again.

The same God, the Father of our Lord Jesus Christ, does all these things through His Word. He governs all these things as the Creator of beings. He performed the first miracles in His own realm through His Word as God. He performed the later miracles through the same Word of His, now incarnate and made man for our sake. As we marvel at what was done through Jesus the Man, let us likewise marvel at what was made through Jesus as God. Through Jesus as God were made heaven and earth, the seas, all that adorns the heavens, all the riches of the earth, and all the abundance of the sea. Everything that sight can encompass was made through Jesus as God. We see these things. If His Spirit abides in us, let them gladden us in such a way that we praise the Creator. Let us not turn toward creatures and turn away from their Creator, as though facing what He made and turning our backs on Him who made them.

We see these things and encompass them with our gaze. What then of the things we do not see, such as angels, powers, authorities, dominions, and all that abides in that heavenly order and is inaccessible to our eyes? Yet angels, when necessary, show themselves to human beings. Did not God create all these things through His Word, that is, through His Only-begotten Son, our Lord Jesus Christ? And what of the human soul itself? It is not visible to us, yet it manifests itself through the deeds of the flesh and greatly astonishes those who ponder it seriously. By whom was it created, if not by God? And through whom was it created, if not through the Son of God? I am not yet speaking of the human soul. Take the soul of any animal. How it governs a vast body. It sets all the senses in motion: the eyes to see, the ears to hear, the nostrils to receive odors, the mouth to discern taste, and finally the members themselves to perform their proper functions. Does the body do this, and not the soul, the inhabitant of the body? It cannot be seen with the eyes, yet it causes wonder by what it does.

Now turn your reasoning to the human soul, to which God has granted understanding. He did so that it might have knowledge of its Creator, and might discern and distinguish good from evil, that is, the righteous from the unrighteous. How many things it accomplishes through the body. Look upon the whole circle of the earth, ordered as a human commonwealth. What organs of administration, what ranks of authority, what organization of cities, what laws, customs, and arts it contains. All this is born from the soul, and yet this power of the soul is not visible. When it departs from the body, a corpse remains. When it abides in the body, it preserves it in a certain way from corruption. For all flesh is subject to decay and would decompose if it were not preserved by the soul as by a seasoning. This, however, it has in common with the soul of animals. But the qualities in it most worthy of wonder are those I have already mentioned. They belong to reason and knowledge, in which the soul is renewed according to the image of its Creator (cf. Col 3:10), according to whose image man was made.

What will be the power of this soul when the body also is clothed with incorruption, and the mortal is clothed with immortality (cf. 1 Cor 15:53)? If it can do so much through corruptible flesh, what will it be able to do through a spiritual body after the resurrection from the dead? Yet this soul, as I have said, has a wondrous nature and substance. It is invisible and apprehended by reason. Nevertheless, it was created through Jesus Christ, for He is the Word of God. “All things were made through Him, and without Him nothing was made” (cf. Jn 1:3).

Therefore, when we see that such things were created through Jesus as God, why should we marvel that water was changed into wine through Jesus as man? He did not become man in such a way as to cease being God. Man was added to Him, but God was not lost by Him. Therefore He who made all things made this wine from water.

Let us therefore not marvel at this because God did it, but let us love Him because He did it among us and for our restoration. In these acts He also gave us a certain sign. I believe that He did not come to the wedding without reason. Besides the miracle, a certain mystery and sacred action is hidden in this deed. Let us knock, then, that He may open to us and make us drink invisible wine. We were water, and He made us wine. He made us rational.

For we understand His faith, we who before were without understanding. And perhaps it belongs to Wisdom Herself, and to the honor of God, the glory of His power, and the love of His greatest mercy, to know what was accomplished in that miracle.

The Lord came, having been invited to a wedding. What is astonishing if He came to a wedding in that house, when He came to a wedding in this world? If He did not come into this world for a wedding, then He has no bride here. But what then do the apostle’s words mean: “I betrothed you to one husband, to present you as a pure virgin to Christ” (2 Cor 11:2)? Why does he fear lest the virginity of Christ’s bride be violated by the devil’s cunning? “I fear,” he says, “lest, as the serpent deceived Eve by his cunning, so your minds may be corrupted from simplicity and purity in Christ” (2 Cor 11:3).

Thus He has a bride here, whom He purchased with His blood and to whom He gave the Holy Spirit as a pledge (cf. 2 Cor 1:22). He purchases her from the devil. He died for her trespasses and rose for her justification (cf. Rom 4:25). Who can present such gifts to his bride? Men present some earthly ornaments: gold, silver, precious stones, stallions, slaves, landed possessions, estates. Will anyone present his own blood as a gift? If a man gave his blood to his bride, then in taking a wife he would lose his life. But the Lord, calmly accepting death, gave His blood for her whom He, risen again, took back to Himself. He had bound her to Himself already in the womb of the Virgin. For the Word is the Bridegroom, and the bride is human flesh. In both respects He was the Son of God and at the same time the Son of Man. The womb of the Virgin Mary, where He became the head of the Church, was His bridal chamber. From there He came forth like a Bridegroom from His chamber, as it was foretold in Scripture: “And He comes forth like a bridegroom from his bridal chamber; He rejoices like a giant to run His course” (cf. Ps 18:6). He came forth from the chamber like a bridegroom, and being invited, He came to a wedding.

May the Lord our God abide with us, and may He grant us to deliver what we promised. Yesterday, beloved, if you remember, the shortness of time prevented us from finishing the sermon we had begun. We postponed it until today, so that with His help the hidden meaning placed in the Gospel event might be disclosed. Therefore let us not delay long, but speak about the miracle of God. For this is the same God who daily works miracles throughout the world He created. People do not notice them very much, not because they are insignificant, but because they are constantly repeated. The rare deeds performed by the same God, that is, by the Word incarnate for our sake, brought people into great astonishment. This is not because they are greater than those He performs daily in the created world. Rather, those performed each day occur as though naturally, while these appear to human eyes as a manifestation of God’s authority visibly present. We said, as you remember, that one dead man rose, and people marvel. Yet every day people are born who did not exist, and no one is astonished. Likewise, who would not marvel that water was changed into wine, although God does this every year in the vines? But since everything the Lord Jesus did serves not only to awaken our hearts through wonders, but also to instruct them in the teaching of faith, we must consider what all those miracles contain, that is, what they signify. The discussion of the meaning of all these miracles, as you remember, we postponed until today.

When the Lord came, having been invited to a wedding, then apart from its hidden meaning He wished to show that He Himself established marriage. For there will arise those forbidding marriage, of whom the apostle spoke (cf. 1 Tim 4:3). They assert that marriage is evil and an institution of the devil. Yet in the Gospel, when the Lord was asked whether a man should divorce his wife for any reason, He made known that he should not do so except for fornication. In that answer, if you remember, He said, “What God has joined together, let not man separate” (cf. Mt 19:3-9).

Those who are well instructed in the catholic faith know that God established marriage. As the union of husband and wife is from God, so divorce is from the devil. Yet divorce from a wife is permitted on account of fornication, because she herself first chose not to be a wife by failing to keep marital fidelity toward her husband. Even women who vow virginity to God, though they stand on a higher step of honor and holiness in the Church, do not live outside marriage. Together with the whole Church they are in the marriage whose Bridegroom is Christ.

Read the full text in the app

Maximus the Confessor

7th centuryChurch Father

What is signified by the wedding in Cana and by the mysteries performed there? The word “Cana” is translated “possession,” and “Galilee” as “revelation.” Every intellect that has a capacity to receive divine revelation, when joined to virtue or to sense perception, needs the mediation of the Word. Thus virtue, joined with knowledge, may be attuned to the intellect, and sense perception may be subject to its authority, since by nature it obeys the intellect. But because, through disobedience, the power of knowledge was diluted by the stream of pleasures, the Word appeared upon earth, restoring the original firmness. The mother who asks is faith, or humility, or wisdom founded on knowledge. Each of these naturally gives birth in human beings to a higher, Godlike state.

Read more (1313 words)

The words “My hour has not yet come” (Jn 2:4) mean this. Teaching through signs comes first, because on account of unbelievers doctrine requires instruction by signs. There Jesus had not yet taught, perceiving their unbelief, and therefore He said, “My hour has not yet come.” The servants signify the prophets, who through their teaching [...] the nature emptied by apostasy. But the Lord, when He came, turned it into spiritual knowledge and, by faith, raised what is natural to what is beyond nature. For the Theotokos represents faith. The Theotokos was created by the Lord and by Her own Son, and according to the flesh She Herself gave birth to Him. So also faith came forth from the Word, yet faith itself leads the Word into actuality through the practice of good works. The water jars, since they are six, signify the creative power of doing good works. For the Lord also created the visible world in six days. The ruler of the feast is the discerning law. Therefore he says, “Every man serves the good wine first, and then the inferior” (Jn 2:10). For the pure discerning law, in making discernment, says this: the intellect in the process of knowledge ought first to have ascended to the Cause, and only then turned to what comes after Him. Adam did not do this. Or again: the teaching of the Lord ought to have been received before the Law and the teaching of the prophets.

The place-name Qanä is akin to the verb qäna, “to buy,” and in the passive, “to be bought.” A similar interpretation appears in Epiph., Panarion 2.303.6, ed. Holl. The place-name Gälil is akin to the word gälil, “that which turns,” and also to the verb gäla, “to reveal.” A noun from this verb meaning “revelation” is not attested in Scripture. In the Talmud, that is, already in Aramaic, the words gataya and gallayyä have this meaning. The phrase is νοῦς ἕζιν ἀποκαλυπτικὴν ἔχων. The expression occurs in Maximus in qu. Theop., PG 90, 1400D. This may refer to human reason, λόγος, which Maximus often understands as practical reason mediating between the intellect and the vital power, as in Mystagogy, chapter V. Thus, evidently, Maximus interprets the changing of water into wine.

Compare Thal. 40, where Maximus again turns to the interpretation of the wedding at Cana of Galilee: “The mother of the Word is true and undefiled faith. For as the Word, as God, is by nature the Creator of the Mother who bore Him according to the flesh, and made Her such through His love for mankind by receiving birth from Her as man, so also in us the Word first creates faith. Then He becomes the Son of our faith, being incarnate from it in the virtues according to spiritual practice. Through this faith we also accomplish every good thing, receiving from the Word the gifts of grace for our salvation. For without faith, of which the Word is God by nature and Son by grace, it is altogether impossible to have boldness to approach Him with petitions” (PG 90, 400B-C). Some of these thoughts first occur in Maximus in qu. dub. 35. Or it may mean “a Godlike disposition,” θεοειδῆ ἕζιν.

There is a lacuna in the manuscripts. The point is evidently what the prophets accomplished through their instruction for our nature after the fall, preparing us for the coming of the Word. This action of the prophets is compared with the servants filling the vessels with water at the feast (cf. Jn 2:5-8). Compare Thal. 40: “Those who draw water are the servants of the Old and New Testaments. I mean the holy patriarchs, lawgivers, judges, kings, prophets, evangelists, and apostles, by whom the water of knowledge is drawn and returned again to nature. The Word, as the good Creator of nature, changes this water of knowledge into the grace of deification, deifying nature by grace through His love for mankind. If someone says that the servants are knowing and pious thoughts, drawing the water of knowledge from the good order of existing things at the command of the Word, I think he will not depart from the truth” (PG 90, 400A). As this comparison shows, in Thal. 40 Maximus somewhat shifted the interpretation. He included among those drawing water not only the prophets, but also the evangelists and apostles. That is, he included all who prepare human beings for what only God Himself can accomplish, namely deification.

Compare cap. theol. 1.55: “The sixth day is the perfect fulfillment of virtuous deeds according to nature.” Compare the interpretation of the water jars in Thal. 40: “Scripture speaks of water jars holding two or three measures (Jn 2:6), because, according to the nature of the active power, they contain by natural contemplation, as though by two measures, the whole knowledge of created things. Or they contain knowledge embracing bodily and bodiless things, that is, bodily natures composed of matter and form, and intelligible beings composed of essence and accidental property” (PG 90, 396C). The term may also be rendered “discriminating law,” διακριτικός νόμος. Literally, άκραιφνής means “unmixed,” or “untouched,” “unharmed.”

Maximus later expresses a similar thought from a somewhat different perspective in Thal. 40. There he first calls reason the principal power of our nature, which builds up the virtue of love, for he is interpreting the mystery of marriage. He then continues: “Coming into being according to this power, nature receives its chief law, the unerring judge of truth, whom Scripture calls the ruler of the feast. He clearly discerns that the good wine which the Word prepared at the end through His coming ought to have been drunk from the beginning, and ought to have intoxicated human nature (Jn 2:10). I mean that one should first be initiated into the best and highest logos concerning God. Then, as though tasting the inferior wine, one should be initiated into the logoi of created things, which are inferior to the first logos. For it is most just and fitting to be initiated first into the logos that is the cause of nature’s coming into being. Only then may one investigate the logoi of the things that came into being as the effects of this nature” (PG 90, 397B-400A).

Above, Maximus describes the order of divine economy that took place because of the fall, namely the gradual preparation of humanity for the coming of Christ. In this economic order, the prophetic word preceded the Gospel word. Yet the discerning law corresponds to the reverse perspective. It affirms the primacy of the Gospel in relation to the Law and the Prophets, and the primacy of the knowledge of God in relation to the knowledge of creation. Maximus evidently regards this reverse perspective as true, while also acknowledging the necessity of the economic and historical sequence. Historically, human beings come from the Law and the Prophets to the Gospel. Yet the Gospel is primary. In the end, it is from the Gospel that the Law and the Prophets must be understood, as he does in his interpretations. Likewise, after the fall human beings ascend to knowledge of the Creator through knowledge of creation. Yet knowledge of the Creator is primary. In the end, the right approach to creation must also proceed from knowledge of God as its Creator. Compare this theme in the Prologue to the Questions and Answers to Thalassius. In qu. dub. 64, Maximus establishes the right perspective of the spiritual life on the basis of what was accomplished with our nature in Christ. He says that we should “first ascend to God, strengthening the soul and directing all its loving desire toward Him. Then we should descend for the study of beings, examining what the nature of each thing is. And again, through these created things, we should ascend by contemplative knowledge to their Creator.”

Euthymios Zigabenos

11th centuryChurch Father

“Jesus and His disciples were also invited to the wedding,” that is, as acquaintances. The Savior came, not looking to His divine dignity, but having in view the benefit of men.

He who established marriage came to honor it and sanctify it by His presence. He who took the form of a servant did not disdain to be present at the wedding of servants.

Those who invited Him did not yet have a proper understanding of Him. They invited Him simply as an acquaintance, one among many.

Maximus of Turin

5th centuryChurch Father

Therefore the Son of God comes to a wedding, so that what He had long ago established by His authority He might now sanctify by His blessing.

He comes to the wedding of the old institution in order to make for Himself a new bride of eternal virginity from the fellowship of men. He comes to a wedding, He who was not created in marriage.

He comes to a wedding not to take pleasure like the other guests, but to become known in a wondrous way. He comes to a wedding not to drink the cup, but to give it.

Romanos Melodos

6th centuryChurch Father

Ikos 2: Therefore He who had no mortal marriage at all, the only Holy and Fearful One, was present at the wedding in Cana of Galilee, as the divine John has told us.

He who was born without marriage came to a marriage. The only One borne upon the wings of the cherubim, He who is in the bosom of the Father and inseparable from Him, rested in the house of mortals.

He who knew no sin supped with sinners, so that by His presence He might show that marriage is worthy of honor. He is the One who made all things in wisdom.

Ikos 3: Taking its start from this, the great Paul wisely began and wrote, saying that 'marriage is honorable and the bed undefiled' (Heb 13:4).

Thus even virgins shine forth because of marriage, for they came into the world through the marriage of their parents.

Read more (52 words)

Truly, the Theotokos, the holy Virgin, remained a pure Virgin even after giving birth. Yet it was marriage that gave Her to the world.

So also the multitude of those who remain virgins for Christ were born from marriage. He who made all things in wisdom sanctified them from their mother's womb.

Gladkow B.I.

19th centuryChurch Father

Jesus and His disciples were also invited to the wedding. But how was He invited? As an ordinary man, as an acquaintance, or as the Deliverer proclaimed by John, the Messiah-Christ?

The Evangelist is silent about this. Yet from the further narrative one may conclude that those at the wedding feast did not yet know John’s solemn testimony about Jesus before those sent to him from the Sanhedrin.

Therefore one must suppose that Jesus was invited as an ordinary man, as an acquaintance. His disciples, as those who had come with Him, were invited only according to the custom of hospitality.

Ivanov A.V.

19th centuryChurch Father

Jesus Christ was invited not as a teacher, because He was not yet a well-known person, but as a close acquaintance, perhaps as a relative. The disciples were invited as fellow countrymen.

Michail (Lusin)

19th centuryChurch Father

'He was invited,' and so forth: when this happened is unknown. Yet it is unlikely that it was while He was in Judea, at the Jordan.

Perhaps, after arriving in Galilee, and precisely in Nazareth, He received this invitation there. From there to Cana was near, about four hours' journey.

'And His disciples': these were those just called on the banks of the Jordan. They followed Him into Galilee, the place of their birth and residence.

They were still inseparably with the Lord, though afterward they left Him for a time. A little later they were definitively called to the work of apostleship and appointed to this ministry; cf. Mt 4:18 and following; Mt 10:1 and following, and parallels.

Philaret (Gumilevski)

19th centuryChurch Father

The third day, on which the wedding took place, must be counted from the day of Nathanael's calling. The Evangelist counts the days in this way, from the last event, in 1:29, 35, and 43.

The Cana where the wedding took place is called Cana of Galilee. This distinguishes it from the Cana beyond the Jordan, which was near Bethsaida beyond the Jordan. Cana of Galilee was not far from Capernaum (Jn 4:48; Josh 19:28).

The Mother of Jesus Christ was present at the wedding as one managing the wedding feast. She was concerned about the lack of what was needed for the banquet.

Among those invited were Jesus and His disciples, those mentioned earlier. The heavenly Comforter honored with His presence even the earthly consolations of earthly pilgrims.

Marriage was blessed already in Paradise. He also blesses it who appeared in order to restore to men the Paradise they had lost.

Cross references

Passages read together with this verse.

The original text

Greek text, 12 words with lemma, transliteration and Strong’s number. Tap to expand.

  1. ἐκλήθη
    eklēthē
    I call
    G2564 · καλέω
  2. δὲ
    de
    but
    G1161 · δέ
  3. καὶ
    kai
    and
    G2532 · καί
  4. ὁ
    ho
    the
    G3588 · ὁ
  5. Ἰησοῦς
    iēsous
    Jesus
    G2424 · Ἰησοῦς
  6. καὶ
    kai
    and
    G2532 · καί
  7. οἱ
    hoi
    the
    G3588 · ὁ
  8. μαθηταὶ
    mathētai
    a learner
    G3101 · μαθητής
  9. αὐτοῦ
    autou
    he
    G846 · αὐτός
  10. εἰς
    eis
    into
    G1519 · εἰς
  11. τὸν
    ton
    the
    G3588 · ὁ
  12. γάμον
    gamon
    a marriage
    G1062 · γάμος