The Church Fathers on this verse

John 2:9Meaning & Commentary from the Church Fathers

And when the chief steward had tasted the water made wine and knew not whence it was, but the waiters knew who had drawn the water: the chief steward calleth the bridegroom,

Douay-Rheims

ως δε εγευσατο ο αρχιτρικλινος το υδωρ οινον γεγενημενον και ουκ ηδει ποθεν εστιν οι δε διακονοι ηδεισαν οι ηντληκοτες το υδωρ φωνει τον νυμφιον ο αρχιτρικλινος

Greek (Byzantine text)

The Church Fathers on this verse

11 Church Fathers comment on this verse

John Chrysostom

4th centuryChurch Father

Why then did he not summon the servants? In that way the miracle would have been disclosed.

The reason is that Jesus Himself did not reveal the miracle that had been performed. He wished the power of His signs to be known not at once, but little by little.

If it had been revealed at that very moment, the servants' account of Him would not have been believed. Perhaps people would have thought them out of their minds.

They would have been attributing this deed to One whom many at that time considered an ordinary man.

The servants themselves certainly knew the matter well from their own experience, and could not disbelieve their own hands. But they had no ability to convince others of it.

Read more (120 words)

Therefore Christ Himself did not reveal what had happened to everyone, but only to the one who could understand it better than others.

He left the more exact knowledge of the miracle to the future. After other miracles had been performed, this one also was to become credible.

So later, when He healed the nobleman's son, the Evangelist, in narrating this, also lets us understand that this miracle had already become more widely known.

The nobleman especially summoned Jesus because, as I say, he had learned of this miracle.

John explains this when he says: 'Jesus came again to Cana of Galilee, where He had made the water wine' (Jn 4:46). And not simply wine, but the very best wine.

Theophylact of Bulgaria

11th centuryChurch Father

The steward of the feast asks not the servants, but the bridegroom. Why? Certainly by divine ordering.

If he had asked the servants, they would surely have revealed the miracle. But no one would have believed them, because it was the beginning of the signs.

No one yet had a great understanding of Christ, so no one would have believed if the servants had told of the miracle.

Nevertheless, after this He performed other miracles. Then the present one also had to become credible, and the servants, telling everyone about it, could little by little gain trust.

For this reason the Lord arranged that the servants were not asked, but the bridegroom.

Read more (163 words)

The Lord did not simply make wine from water, but excellent wine. The miracles of Christ are such that they far surpass what is produced by nature.

The servants who drew the water bear witness that the water was changed into wine. The steward of the feast bears witness that it was excellent.

All this was preached in the course of time, and those who heard of it had to be very firmly convinced.

Thus our Lord Jesus Christ, the Gospel Word, heals our falls, whether in the active life, the intellectual life, or the contemplative life.

He changes what is fluid and unstable in us into 'wine,' that is, into life and teaching that binds and gladdens.

In this way our six water jars are filled with this excellent drink. The senses are filled so that they do not err in action.

Reason is filled so that we do not err in opinions. By 'wine' you may understand the Gospel teaching. <...>

Cyrill of Alexandria

5th centuryChurch Father

The servants carry out the command, and by an ineffable power the water was then changed into wine. Can anything be difficult for Him who can do all things? Can He who calls what does not exist into being meet difficulty in transforming what has already been created into whatever He wills? They marvel at this deed as extraordinary, for what Christ performed could not have been otherwise.

Ambrose of Milan

4th centuryChurch Father

87. There in Cana one element is changed into another, and nature suffers no diminution and does not know its origin, yet it knows its use. Moreover, the taste of the transformed wine is better than ordinary wine, because the Creator decides what qualities to impart to nature and what nature to appoint for what comes into being. See by what works He proves His purpose. While the servant pours in the water, the fragrance that spreads intoxicates, the changed color instructs, and the taste perceived increases faith.

Euthymios Zigabenos

11th centuryChurch Father

He calls the chief steward the architriklinos, the chief and manager of the feast, because the couches used at banquets for three persons were called triklinia.

He did not simply change the water into wine, but into good wine, as the chief steward bore witness. For such miraculous works of Jesus Christ were much better than natural products.

The servants were witnesses that water had been changed into wine. The chief steward and the bridegroom were witnesses that the wine was good.

Thus the miracle, having such close witnesses, could not remain unnoticed. Probably the bridegroom also said something further about this, but the Evangelist omitted it as unnecessary.

O that I too, cold, infirm, and unstable, and in this respect no different from water, might be changed into spiritual warmth, density of virtues, and firmness of conduct, so that I might gladden others also.

Hilarius of Poitiers

4th centuryChurch Father

On the day of the wedding in Galilee, wine was changed from water. Yet does this give us an explanation or understanding of how nature was changed, so that the simplicity of water vanished and the taste of wine appeared?

This was not a mingling, but a creation. It was not the creation of something that began of itself, but the transformation of one existing thing into another.

What was weaker was not overcome by the pouring in of something stronger. Rather, what had been was abolished, and what had not been began.

The bridegroom is saddened, the household is in confusion, and the solemnity of the wedding feast is in danger. Jesus is asked. He does not rise in agitation or insist, but this deed is the deed of His calm.

Read more (84 words)

Water is poured into the vessels, and wine is drawn in cups. The perception of those who poured does not correspond to the perception of those who draw.

Those who poured think that water is being drawn. Those who draw think that wine had been poured in.

The time separating these two actions does not allow the nature of the liquid to arise and disappear. Sight and sense refuse to understand what happened, yet in what was accomplished the power of God is perceived.

Romanos Melodos

6th centuryChurch Father

Kontakion: Thou who by Thy power didst change water into wine, change into joy the sorrow that oppresses me because of my sins, through the intercession of the Virgin, O Christ God, who hast made all things in wisdom.

Ikos 4: Now we set forth the account of the miracle worked in Cana by Him who first showed His power to the Egyptians and to the Hebrews themselves by performing a wonder.

Then the nature of the waters was miraculously changed into blood. He poured out His wrath upon the Egyptians in the ten plagues.

He made the sea passable for the Hebrews, and they traveled through it as though it were dry land.

In the waterless wilderness He provided them with water flowing from a rock. And now, at the wedding feast, He again changes the nature of matter, He who made all things in wisdom.

Gladkow B.I.

19th centuryChurch Father

"When the steward had tasted the water that had become wine... he called the bridegroom." Why did he not call the servants? In that way he would have revealed the miracle.

The reason is that, if it had been disclosed at that time, the servants' account would not have been believed. Perhaps they would have been thought out of their minds, since they ascribed this deed to Him whom many then regarded as an ordinary man.

The servants themselves, of course, knew the matter well from their own experience, and could not disbelieve their own hands. Yet they had no way to convince others of it.

Read more (305 words)

Therefore Christ Himself did not reveal what had happened to everyone, but only to the one who could understand it better than others. He left the more exact knowledge of the miracle to a later time, after other miracles had been performed.

Then it had to become trustworthy. For that He changed the water into wine, He had the servants as witnesses. That the wine was good, He had the steward of the feast and the bridegroom as witnesses (St. John Chrysostom, Homilies on the Gospel of John, 22).

Even if the steward of the feast used the expression, "when they have drunk freely," one still cannot conclude that the guests were drunk. He was speaking only of the existing custom of not keeping the good wine until the end of the feast, but serving it at the beginning.

Moreover, the Jews were distinguished by moderation in the use of wine, and becoming drunk was considered improper among them. Wine was mostly drunk with water. The family celebrating the wedding was poor and did not have an abundance of wine.

Nor would Jesus Christ have taken part in such a celebration where there were, or could have been, drunken people.

The Evangelist says that by the miracle in Cana Jesus made a beginning of miracles. Therefore the miracle performed in Cana was the first in the series of miracles. Consequently, before this Jesus had not manifested His divine power before men.

Even if the miracle now performed remained unnoticed for the time by the guests, the steward, and the bridegroom, it could not have gone unnoticed by Jesus' disciples. They had fixed all their attention on Him and on His actions.

The Evangelist assures us of this when he says, "and His disciples believed in Him."

With Jesus' return to Galilee, His messianic ministry begins.

Michail (Lusin)

19th centuryChurch Father

“He did not know whence it was,” and so forth. One may suppose that the Evangelist makes this remark to mark more strongly the importance of the master of the feast’s testimony to the miracle. Had he known what had happened, his testimony might not have been as impartial as it appears in the present circumstances. “He calls the bridegroom”: from this it is evident that the feast was in the bridegroom’s house, and that he was the chief host there. Therefore the master of the feast addresses him as the host. Without doubt, only the substance of their conversation is given here.

Philaret (Gumilevski)

19th centuryChurch Father

"Draw some out now, and take it to the master of the feast." The architriclinus, αρχοτ τρικληνου, is the head and steward of the feast. In Pollux he is τραπεζοποιοτ, "the steward of the table, one who attends to everything concerning the table."

To this man the Savior commands that His new wine be offered for judgment. By his office he had to know the value of what belonged to the table. Busy with ordering the feast, he remained "sober and had drunk nothing" (Chrysostom).

The architriclinus was amazed whence such excellent wine had come, and how it had been kept until the end of the meal. Thus one who knew the worth of wine fully approved the new wine.

The servants knew well that they had poured in water. Now not only the servants and not only the architriclinus, but all who were at the feast learned that the water had become excellent wine.

Vissarion (Nechaev)

19th centuryChurch Father

The meaning of the miracle at the wedding in Cana of Galilee. The immediate purpose of the miracle was beneficent. Yet chiefly it was performed so that the disciples might see His divine glory, be convinced of His divine mission, and be strengthened in faith in Him.

They had believed in Him already, otherwise they would not have followed Him. Yet their faith was evidently not yet so firm that it did not need strengthening by some miraculous sign.

Besides this meaning, the miracle of changing water into wine, like all Christ's miracles, has a symbolic meaning. In the canon of Saint Andrew of Crete, read at Compline during the first four days of the first week of Great Lent, it is said that the first miracle in Cana of Galilee was wrought "that you might be changed, O soul" (Ode 9).

Read more (1443 words)

That is, in this miracle Christ visibly expressed the truth that He came to renew man. He came to regenerate us for the life of the new man, wholly different from the life of the old man.

Each of us receives that old life through natural birth, with inherited sinful corruption passing from Adam to all his descendants.

The old man and the new man do not differ at all by nature. Both have the same bodily constitution, the same outward senses, and the same soul endowed with reason, free will, and the capacity to feel pleasure and pain, love and hatred.

Yet when the life of the one and the other is compared more closely, a striking difference appears. The old man lives only for earth and for himself.

The new man, while living on earth, sighs for heaven and thinks on spiritual things. He prefers the joy of communion with God, in His holy word, in prayer, and in the Mysteries, to everything in the world.

He strives to bring his will into agreement with the will of God. In his deeds he is guided not by self-love, but by zeal for the glory of God and love for his neighbors.

The Lord Jesus has called us precisely to this life of the new man. He came to produce in us this change in our spiritual nature in all its aspects.

For this purpose, a miracle of God's grace must be wrought upon it, like the miracle of changing water into wine.

The whole account of Christ the Savior's visit to the wedding in Cana is not without deep spiritual meaning. First, by His presence at the marriage feast, He sanctified and blessed the conjugal union and the family state in general.

Blessed is celibacy, when those able to receive the unmarried life voluntarily take its vow upon themselves. They do so for greater freedom in serving God and for greater progress in the spiritual life.

The Lord Jesus Himself sanctified this way of life by His own example. Yet He also showed His favor toward married life, deeming the wedding in Cana worthy of His visit.

As the Creator's first act after creating man was to bless him to be fruitful and multiply, so one of the first acts of the Renewer of mankind was to sanctify married life.

Thus the members of a family might also be members of His Church, and the children of natural parents might also be children of God by grace.

Second, at the wedding in Cana of Galilee, Christ condescended to earthly joys and consolations. He even Himself assisted the gladness of the guests, preparing for them, by the power of His omnipotence, wine that gladdens the heart of man.

Such is the spirit of the Gospel teaching in general. It rises up against attachment to earthly pleasures that reaches forgetfulness of God. It opposes a distracted and crudely sensual life.

Yet it is by no means against innocent and quiet earthly joys. But under what conditions can our earthly joys be innocent? Under the same conditions as the gladness of the guests at the wedding in Cana of Galilee was innocent.

Christ's presence among them restrained them from excess in eating and drinking, and from immodest words and movements.

Likewise, our earthly joys will be pure and innocent if we choose them with the thought of Christ. Before allowing ourselves to take part in one amusement or another, we should ask whether it involves violating a commandment of Christ or the Church.

We should ask whether it is timely. For example, is it timely to arrange and attend entertainments on the eve of Sundays and feast days?

And we should sanctify lawful joys permitted to a Christian by the remembrance of Christ. By that remembrance we should restrain ourselves from sinful dissipation.

According to the prediction of Christ the Savior, His second coming will find men unready to meet Him. Then, as in the days before the flood, people will be eating, drinking, marrying, and being given in marriage (Mt 24:38-39).

The misfortune is not that people will eat, drink, and celebrate weddings. It is that, though Christians, they will do all this in forgetfulness of Christ, of their Christian calling, and of their eternal destiny.

They will do it with the carelessness of those before the flood, and perhaps with mockery of warnings against such carelessness.

Is it surprising if, for such careless Christians who are strangers to the fear of God, the second coming of Christ will be as destructive as the flood was for the contemporaries of Noah?

Whoever does not willingly remember Christ, and does not temper his inclination toward earthly pleasures by thinking of Him, will be made to remember Him unwillingly as the strict Judge.

Here one cannot help recalling, with bitter regret, the unchristian character of wedding celebrations in many Christian families.

One cannot but call impious the custom of holding balls after the crowning, with drinking, card playing, and immodest dances. The newlyweds themselves usually take part in these dances.

They do not consider how improper such amusement is after the great Mystery has been performed over them, by which their conjugal union has been sanctified.

Third, Jesus Christ did not immediately fulfill the desire of His most pure Mother concerning help at the wedding in Cana of Galilee. He told Her that His hour had not yet come.

If He so responded to the desire of a Being most pure and most holy, is it any wonder if He sometimes acts likewise toward us sinners when we ask Him for help?

As we make Him wait long for our repentance and conversion, so He does not always quickly heed our prayers to Him, or the prayers of others for us.

He wants us not only to nourish a humble sense of dependence on Him and to turn to Him with hope in prayer for help. He also wants us to learn patience in prayer and surrender to His holy will.

He wants us to become accustomed to loving Him not only when He shows clear signs of His favor toward us, but also when He seems to turn His face away from us.

We ourselves are not always ready to receive from God the mercy for which we ask Him. Rain is useful for the soil not when it has not yet been freed from snow and ice, but when it has been warmed by the sun's rays.

Likewise, the goodness of God finds sufficient receptivity only in hearts warmed by love for God.

Fourth, the steward of the feast at the wedding in Cana of Galilee said that guests are first served good wine, and when they have drunk freely, then inferior wine is served.

Is this not an image of the fate of those who love the world? As long as they have something to live on, the world gives them a full cup of its comforts and joys.

It surrounds them with flatterers and admirers. It clouds their heads with praise of their supposed merits, both of soul and body.

Yet it ends with the lover of the world either becoming sated and falling from satiety into boredom and despair, or falling into poverty through extravagance.

In that poverty his supposed friends abandon him. They valued not him, but his hospitality.

Like the prodigal son in the parable, brought to the necessity of feeding on swine's food, he drinks to death the bitter cup of every deprivation.

And it is still well if this poverty and grief turn him, like the prodigal son, to repentance and through repentance lead him to the Lord.

But it also happens that lovers of the world, abandoned by the world and deprived of human sympathy, do not seek consolation in God, and so they die.

Truly, after sweet and costly wine, they must drink only what is bitter and worthless.

Thus the world acts toward its pitiable worshipers. But Christ, the Bridegroom of the Church, does not act so toward souls betrothed to Him.

The more devoted they are to Him, the more they must drink from the cup of sorrows. The more crosses they must bear in the struggle against temptations from the world, the flesh, and the devil.

Yet as He Himself reached glory by the way of the cross, so glorification is prepared in the heavens, in the Kingdom of Heaven, for His followers who share with Him the sufferings of this present life.

There He promised to drink with them the new wine of eternal joy, which never diminishes (Mk 14:25).

Cross references

Passages read together with this verse.

The original text

Greek text, 27 words with lemma, transliteration and Strong’s number. Tap to expand.

  1. ὡς
    hōs
    as
    G5613 · ὡς
  2. δὲ
    de
    but
    G1161 · δέ
  3. ἐγεύσατο
    egeusato
    I taste
    G1089 · γεύω
  4. ὁ
    ho
    the
    G3588 · ὁ
  5. ἀρχιτρίκλινος
    architriklinos
    master of the feast
    G755 · ἀρχιτρίκλινος
  6. τὸ
    to
    the
    G3588 · ὁ
  7. ὕδωρ
    hydōr
    water
    G5204 · ὕδωρ, ὕδατος
  8. οἶνον
    oinon
    wine
    G3631 · οἶνος
  9. γεγενημένον
    gegenēmenon
    I come into being
    G1096 · γίνομαι
  10. καὶ
    kai
    and
    G2532 · καί
  11. οὐκ
    ouk
    no
    G3756 · οὐ
  12. ᾔδει
    ēdei
    I know
    G1492 · εἴδω
  13. πόθεν
    pothen
    whence
    G4159 · πόθεν
  14. ἐστίν
    estin
    I am
    G1510 · εἰμί
  15. οἱ
    hoi
    the
    G3588 · ὁ
  16. δὲ
    de
    but
    G1161 · δέ
  17. διάκονοι
    diakonoi
    a waiter
    G1249 · διάκονος
  18. ᾔδεισαν
    ēdeisan
    I know
    G1492 · εἴδω
  19. οἱ
    hoi
    the
    G3588 · ὁ
  20. ἠντληκότες
    ēntlēkotes
    I draw
    G501 · ἀντλέω
  21. τὸ
    to
    the
    G3588 · ὁ
  22. ὕδωρ
    hydōr
    water
    G5204 · ὕδωρ, ὕδατος
  23. φωνεῖ
    phōnei
    I crow
    G5455 · φωνέω
  24. τὸν
    ton
    the
    G3588 · ὁ
  25. νυμφίον
    nymphion
    a bridegroom
    G3566 · νυμφίος
  26. ὁ
    ho
    the
    G3588 · ὁ
  27. ἀρχιτρίκλινος
    architriklinos
    master of the feast
    G755 · ἀρχιτρίκλινος