The Church Fathers on this verse

John 4:46Meaning & Commentary from the Church Fathers

He came again therefore into Cana of Galilee, where he made the water wine. And there was a certain ruler, whose son was sick at Capharnaum.

Douay-Rheims

ηλθεν ουν παλιν ο ιησους εις την κανα της γαλιλαιας οπου εποιησεν το υδωρ οινον και ην τις βασιλικος ου ο υιος ησθενει εν καπερναουμ

Greek (Byzantine text)

The Church Fathers on this verse

10 Church Fathers comment on this verse

John Chrysostom

4th centuryChurch Father

The evangelist here brings the miracle to the hearer’s remembrance, thereby exalting the glory of the Samaritans.

The Galileans received Him after the miracles He had performed among them and in Jerusalem. The Samaritans received Him for His teaching alone.

Thus the evangelist says only that Jesus came to Cana, and does not add the reason for which He came. He withdrew into Galilee because of the Jews’ hatred. But why to Cana?

The first time He was invited there to a wedding. But why, and for what purpose, did He come now?

It seems to me that He came in order to strengthen still more, by His presence, the faith produced by the miracle. He also wished to draw them still more by coming to them freely, leaving His own country and preferring them.

Read more (116 words)

“In Capernaum there was a certain royal official whose son was sick. When he heard that Jesus had come from Judea into Galilee, he came to Him and asked Him to come and heal his son.”

This man was either of royal lineage, or he held some rank of authority that was called royal.

Some think that this is the same man mentioned in Matthew (Mt 8). But that he is another person is clear not only from his rank, but also from his faith.

Also in Matthew, Jesus comes to Capernaum after descending from the mountain. Here the royal official approaches Him when He has come from Samaria, and not to Capernaum, but to Cana.

Theophylact of Bulgaria

11th centuryChurch Father

The evangelist reminds us of the miracle in Cana, where the water was changed into wine, first to set forth more clearly the dignity of the Samaritans.

The Galileans, he says, received the Lord because of the signs performed in Jerusalem and among them. The Samaritans received Him solely because of the woman’s testimony and the teaching of the Lord Himself.

Second, he does this to show us that the royal official also received some good, though not yet wholly worthy, understanding of Christ from the miracle in Cana.

He calls him “royal” either because he was of royal descent, or because he held some office of authority bearing such a title.

Read more (130 words)

Someone may say: is this royal official not the same man as the centurion mentioned in the Gospel according to Matthew (Mt 8:5-15)? For that man too was in Capernaum.

I think he is not the same man, but another. When Christ wishes to come, the centurion restrains Him, saying, “I am not worthy that You should come under my roof” (Mt 8:8). This man urgently calls Jesus to his house.

In the former case the servant, that is, the slave, suffered from paralysis. In this case the son had a fever.

There the Lord came to Capernaum after descending from the mountain. Here He comes from Samaria, and not to Capernaum, but to Cana.

By every indication, the former was a centurion, while this man was royal by rank.

Cyrill of Alexandria

5th centuryChurch Father

“He came again to Cana of Galilee, where He had made the water wine.”

Christ generously bestows benefits upon those who are rightly disposed and readily show recognition and gratitude for the good they receive. He grants an abundant gift of greater blessings.

Therefore He comes to Cana in order to perform miracles. He judges it fitting to bring benefit to its inhabitants, since the signs already performed there had sown beforehand the conviction that He could accomplish all things.

Verses 46-48. “And there was a certain royal official whose son was sick in Capernaum. When he heard that Jesus had come from Judea into Galilee, he went to Him and asked Him to come down and heal his son, for he was about to die. Jesus therefore said to him...”

Read more (133 words)

The royal official comes to Him as to One who is able to heal. Yet he does not yet recognize Him as God by nature.

Although he calls Him “Lord” (Jn 4:49), he by no means ascribes to Him the true dignity of lordship.

Otherwise he would at once have fallen down and entreated Him not to journey to his house or go down with him to the sick child. He would have asked Him to drive out the attacking illness by almighty and divine authority.

Why did He need to be present with the sick one, when He was able to save easily even in absence?

And is it not the height of foolishness to regard Him as master of death and full of divine power, yet not recognize Him as God?

Augustine of Hippo

5th centuryChurch Father

But there, when He changed the water into wine, as John himself writes, His disciples believed in Him, though the house was filled with crowds of guests.

So great a miracle was performed, and no one believed except His disciples. To this country of Galilee He again made His way.

And there, when He turned water into wine, as John himself wrote, His disciples believed in Him. The house, of course, was full of guests.

So great a miracle was performed there by Him, and nevertheless no one believed in Him except His disciples.

And now He returned to this city of Galilee. And behold, a certain royal official whose son was sick came to Him.

He began to ask Him to come, that He might come to that city or house and heal his son, for he was at the point of death (cf. Jn 4:46-47).

Euthymios Zigabenos

11th centuryChurch Father

“Jesus came again to Cana of Galilee, where He had made the water wine.”

He came into Galilee because of the envy of those living in Judea. He did not go to the city called His own country, lest it fall under still greater condemnation for its inattention to Him.

Previously Jesus Christ had come to Cana for a wedding by invitation. Now He came in order to strengthen, by His presence, the faith that had arisen from the earlier miracle.

He also came to draw the inhabitants to Himself still more, since He came of His own accord, without any special request, and preferred them to His fellow countrymen.

“And there was a certain royal official whose son was sick in Capernaum.”

Read more (100 words)

This man was called a royal official either because he came from a royal family, or because he had received some office from which he was so called, or because he was a servant of the king.

Some say that this is the centurion whom Matthew (Mt 8:5) and Luke (Lk 7:2) mention, but this is not true.

Even if we omit the other differences between them, the former was a centurion and this man a royal official. The former had a sick slave, while this man had a son. There the sickness was paralysis, but here it was fever.

Ivanov A.V.

19th centuryChurch Father

The royal official (Basilikos) was, of course, one of the courtiers of the tetrarch Herod Antipas. Though Herod was not a king in the strict sense, he possessed royal rights, and in a figurative sense was even called king, as for example in Mt 14:9. His servants, therefore, were called royal officials. This could not have been a Gentile royal official, a Roman, because history does not show that there were Roman garrisons or officials in Capernaum, or in Galilee generally.

Lopuchin A.P.

19th centuryChurch Father

Having entered the territory of His native region, Jesus Christ nevertheless did not go to Nazareth. There the inhabitants were accustomed to seeing Him in the ordinary conditions of life, as a member of a family of carpenters well known to them.

Because of ordinary human weakness, they were least of all able to regard Him as a prophet, and still less as the Messiah, the Savior of the world.

Pointing to this circumstance, He “Himself testified that a prophet has no honor in his own country” (cf. Lk 4:24).

In the other Galilean cities, by contrast, the ground had already been prepared for His reception. Besides the well-known miracle He had performed in Cana of Galilee, many Galileans had witnessed “what He had done in Jerusalem at the feast.”

And the Savior came again “to Cana of Galilee, where He had made the water wine.”

Michail (Lusin)

19th centuryChurch Father

Thus, because the Galileans received Him with honor, He remained in their country and came to Cana. See the note on Jn 2:1 and following.

The Lord came now precisely to Cana because here the ground had been more prepared for His fruitful activity. His earlier miracle and the special disposition of some toward Him had prepared it, since they had previously invited Him to the wedding feast.

“In Capernaum,” see the note on Mt 4:13 and parallels, there was a certain royal official. He occupied a position at the royal court of Herod Antipas of Galilee, though precisely what position is unknown.

The word may denote either a military or a civil office.

Why he was in Capernaum, when the tetrarch’s residence was Tiberias, is also unknown. Perhaps he was no longer in office.

“His son was sick”: with a fever, as is clear from what follows (Jn 4:52).

Philaret (Gumilevski)

19th centuryChurch Father

Verses 46-47. “Jesus came again to Cana of Galilee, where He had made the water wine.”

Cana lay on the road from Nazareth to Capernaum and the lake of Tiberias. Why did Jesus stop here? To revive by His presence the faith awakened by the first miracle, as Zigabenus says.

“In Capernaum there was a certain royal official whose son was sick.”

He came to Jesus in Cana with a request for his dying son.

The petitioner is called Βασιλικος by the evangelist. The Syriac translator understands this as one serving the king. In the Ethiopic translation it means one serving at the king’s court.

Flavius, in de bello 7, 5.2, calls the ambassadors sent by the Parthian king to Titus Βασιλικοι. He also first calls Herod’s ministers υπηρεται, servants, and then Βασιλικοι (Antiq. 15, 8.4).

Read more (110 words)

If we add to this the circumstance that Herod Antipas, tetrarch of Galilee and Perea, bore the title of king, we arrive at the conviction that the Gospel Βασιλικος was one of Herod’s courtiers.

If this courtier, serving under such a king as Herod, who gave the Forerunner’s head to a dancing girl, appears to be at least somewhat good, this means there was enough firmness for good in him not to be carried away by examples of sin.

The courtier saw that neither wealth nor honors protect from death. He turned for help to the Nazarene Prophet and came himself to Jesus with a request for his sick son.

Wlastow G.K.

19th centuryChurch Father

The Lord, received by the people of Galilee with love and with the honor due to a great prophet, comes to Cana. There He "performed the beginning of His signs," as John the Evangelist indicates (Jn 2:11). Here also, by His almighty word, He works a second miracle.

The royal official (Βασιλικὸς), that is, a courtier of Herod Antipas the tetrarch, goes to the One of whom the people speak as the Messiah, as the One sent by God. Josephus, for example in De Bell. Iud. 1:11, calls all courtiers or those close to the king βασιλικοί. Herod Antipas the tetrarch was sometimes also called a king, as in Mt 14:9.

Read more (540 words)

The royal official has lost all hope for the recovery of his dying son. Learning that He has arrived in Cana, he hastens from his house, which was in Capernaum. Standing before the Lord, he begs Him to come to his house and heal his son.

The Greek says ἵνα καταβῇ, "that He might go down." This is because Cana, rather far from the shore of the lake, lies in relatively high country. Capernaum lay below, on the very shore of the lake, northeast of Cana.

Here it is fitting to mention that some critics of the German rationalist school, intentionally or unintentionally, wished to confuse two separate miracles into one. They merged the healing of the centurion's servant with the healing of the royal official's son, calling the centurion also a royal official because he held an official post.

But it must be emphasized strongly that these two miracles are distinct, not merely as two equal events. They also differ in their inner content, and by their very difference they give a very important lesson.

The royal official, coming fearlessly to the Lord, plainly shows himself to be a Jew, who has the right to speak with a kinsman, even though in his understanding He is a great prophet. He asks the Lord to make the fairly long journey from Cana to Capernaum, about twenty or twenty-five versts, and to visit his house.

At the same time it does not occur to him that the Lord could heal his son without seeing the sick man and without approaching his bed.

On the other hand, the healing of the centurion's servant, narrated in Mt 8 and following and Lk 7 and following, occurs first when the Lord Himself was in Capernaum, not in Cana.

Moreover, one must distinguish the centurion's remarkable faith, to which the Lord Himself graciously bore witness (Mt 8:10), from the initially weak faith of the royal official. He believed (Jn 4:53) only after the miracle of healing had been accomplished.

The centurion's humility is also worthy of notice. He does not even dare to appear before the Lord himself, because he is a foreigner. Not yet knowing the whole greatness of the mercy and love of the God-man, he sends Jews to ask the Lord on his behalf.

In his understanding, only they are worthy to approach the Lord. He, having been raised in paganism, though probably already conscious of its vanity, does not consider himself sufficiently pure or worthy to speak personally with the Lord.

It is clear that in his heart he had already confessed Him as sent by God, and perhaps had even acknowledged Him as God.

Even when the Merciful One, seeing in the centurion a chosen child of God, says, "I will come," the centurion begs Him through his messengers not to trouble Himself by coming. He asks Him only to command, for his house is not worthy to receive so great a One under its roof.

Thus it is clear that these are two distinct miracles. In them is also expressed the reason why pagans and sinners "went into the kingdom of God before" the boastful teachers of Israel. Humility, faith, and love: this is the path to the Lord.

Cross references

Passages read together with this verse.

The original text

Greek text, 23 words with lemma, transliteration and Strong’s number. Tap to expand.

  1. Ἦλθεν
    ēlthen
    I come
    G2064 · ἔρχομαι
  2. οὖν
    oun
    therefore
    G3767 · οὖν
  3. πάλιν
    palin
    again
    G3825 · πάλιν
  4. εἰς
    eis
    into
    G1519 · εἰς
  5. τὴν
    tēn
    the
    G3588 · ὁ
  6. Κανὰ
    kana
    Cana
    G2580 · Κανᾶ
  7. τῆς
    tēs
    the
    G3588 · ὁ
  8. Γαλιλαίας
    galilaias
    Galilee
    G1056 · Γαλιλαία
  9. ὅπου
    hopou
    where
    G3699 · ὅπου
  10. ἐποίησεν
    epoiēsen
    I do
    G4160 · ποιέω
  11. τὸ
    to
    the
    G3588 · ὁ
  12. ὕδωρ
    hydōr
    water
    G5204 · ὕδωρ, ὕδατος
  13. οἶνον
    oinon
    wine
    G3631 · οἶνος
  14. Καὶ
    kai
    and
    G2532 · καί
  15. ἦν
    ēn
    I am
    G1510 · εἰμί
  16. τις
    tis
    any one
    G5100 · τις
  17. βασιλικὸς
    basilikos
    connected with a king
    G937 · βασιλικός
  18. οὗ
    hou
    who
    G3739 · ὅς, ἥ
  19. ὁ
    ho
    the
    G3588 · ὁ
  20. υἱὸς
    huios
    a son
    G5207 · υἱός
  21. ἠσθένει
    ēsthenei
    I am weak
    G770 · ἀσθενέω
  22. ἐν
    en
    in
    G1722 · ἐν
  23. Καφαρναούμ
    kapharnaoum
    Capernaum
    G2584 · Καπερναούμ