The Church Fathers on this verse

John 2:10Meaning & Commentary from the Church Fathers

And saith to him: Every man at first setteth forth good wine, and when men have well drunk, then that which is worse. But thou hast kept the good wine until now.

Douay-Rheims

και λεγει αυτω πας ανθρωπος πρωτον τον καλον οινον τιθησιν και οταν μεθυσθωσιν τοτε τον ελασσω συ τετηρηκας τον καλον οινον εως αρτι

Greek (Byzantine text)

The Church Fathers on this verse

14 Church Fathers comment on this verse

John Chrysostom

4th centuryChurch Father

Such are the miracles of Christ: what they produce is far better and more excellent than what is produced by nature. So also in other cases, when Christ healed some damaged member of the body, He made it better than healthy members.

That what was produced from water was truly wine, and the best wine, could be testified not only by the servants, but also by the steward of the feast and the bridegroom. That it was produced by Christ could be confirmed by the servants who drew the water.

Thus, even if the miracle was not revealed at that time, they could not remain silent about it later. Therefore Christ left many necessary witnesses for the future. That He changed water into wine had the servants as witnesses. That it was good wine had the steward and the bridegroom as witnesses.

Read more (836 words)

It is likely that the bridegroom answered something to the steward's words. But the Evangelist, hastening toward more important matters, touched only on the miracle itself and passed over the rest. It was necessary to know that Christ changed water into wine. But the Evangelist did not consider it necessary to add what the bridegroom said to the steward.

Meanwhile, many miracles, though at first little known in their details, became better known with the passage of time, because those who had been eyewitnesses from the beginning recounted them in all their details.

As Jesus then changed water into wine, so then and now He does not cease to transform the dispositions of weak and distracted people. There are, I say, there are people who differ in nothing from water. They are so cold, so fluid, and firm in nothing.

It is our duty to bring people in such a state to the Lord, so that He may be pleased to impart to their dispositions the quality of wine. Then they will no longer be scattered, but will acquire steadfastness, to the joy of themselves and others.

Who are these cold people, if not those who devote themselves greatly to the affairs of the present life? They do not despise the pleasures of this world, but are lovers of glory and power.

All these things are streams which never stand still, but constantly rush with great force into the abyss. Today a man is rich; tomorrow he is poor. Today he appears with a herald, in a chariot, accompanied by many staff-bearers. The next day he often dwells in prison, yielding this self-deception to another, even against his will.

In the same way, one given over to luxury and satiety, however much he fills his belly, cannot keep this store within himself even for one day. After it is expelled, he is compelled to gather new stores. Thus he differs in nothing from a stream.

As in a stream, one current has scarcely passed before another follows, so here also one food decays and we need another. Such is the nature of worldly things. They never stand still, but always flow and are carried along one after another.

As for the pleasures of sensuality, they not only flow and pass away, but also bring us much disturbance. When people give themselves to them with passion, they weaken even bodily strength and deprive the soul of courage.

The strong current of rivers does not so greatly wash away and collapse the banks as sensuality and satiety undermine all the supports of our health. Go to the hospital and ask about this. There you will learn that almost all diseases arise from this.

A moderate and simple table is the mother of health. Physicians also call it so, recognizing that not eating to fullness is healthy. They say that moderation in food is health, and that scanty food is the mother of health.

If moderation in food is the source of health, it is clear that satiety is the source of illnesses and infirmities. It gives birth to sufferings which exceed even the art of physicians.

Indeed, pains in the feet, pains in the head, eyes, and hands, trembling of the whole body, strokes, jaundice, prolonged acute fevers, and many other diseases usually arise not from abstinence and a prudent way of life, but from gluttony and satiety. This is not the time to list them all.

If you wish also to know the diseases of the soul that arise from this, you will see that greed, fornication, despondency, laziness, lust, and every indecency have their beginning here. The souls of those nourished by such tables are no better than donkeys, so cruelly do these beasts torment them.

Need I speak further of how many sorrows and troubles those given over to satiety receive? It is impossible to count them all. I shall show everything in one chief point: they never enjoy their table with pleasure, not even the most luxurious one.

Temperance is the mother of both health and pleasure. Satiety is the source and root of both diseases and displeasure. Where there is satiety, there can no longer be appetite. Where there is no appetite, can there be pleasure?

Therefore among the poor we find people who are not only more prudent and healthier than the rich, but also have more cheerfulness than they do.

Reflecting on all this, let us flee satiety and drunkenness, not only at the table, but also in all circumstances of life. Instead, let us rather seek spiritual delights. As the prophet says, "Delight yourself in the Lord," for he says, "Delight yourself in the Lord, and He will give you the desires of your heart" (Ps 36:4).

Then we may taste both present and future good things, by the grace and love for mankind of our Lord Jesus Christ, through whom and with whom be glory to the Father, together with the Holy Spirit, unto the ages of ages. Amen.

Theophylact of Bulgaria

11th centuryChurch Father

By "wine" you may understand the Gospel teaching, and by "water" everything that preceded the Gospel, which was very watery and lacked the perfection of the Gospel teaching.

I will give an example. The Lord gave man various laws. One was in Paradise (Gen 2:16-17), another in the time of Noah (Gen 9), a third to Abraham concerning circumcision (Gen 17), a fourth through Moses (Ex 19:20), and a fifth through the prophets.

All these laws are watery in comparison with the precision and power of the Gospel, if one understands them simply and literally.

But if one penetrates into their spirit and understands what is hidden in them, he will find the water changed into wine.

Read more (41 words)

For one who spiritually discerns what is said simply and understood by many literally will undoubtedly find excellent wine in this water. This wine is drunk afterward and preserved by Christ the Bridegroom, since the Gospel appeared in the last times.

Cyrill of Alexandria

5th centuryChurch Father

The steward of the feast rebukes the bridegroom for spending the better wine at the end of the feast. In my opinion, with respect to the historical meaning of the narrative, he does so not without reason.

The Law did not possess perfection in good things, but the divine commandments of the Gospel teaching bring the full blessing.

The steward of the feast marvels at the new wine. So also, I think, everyone clothed with divine priestly ministry and entrusted with the house of our Savior Christ is struck by His teaching, which surpasses the Law.

Christ commands that the wine be served first to him, because, according to Paul's word, "the hardworking farmer must be first to partake of the fruits" (2 Tim 2:6). Let the hearer again understand what I am saying.

Augustine of Hippo

5th centuryChurch Father

If what is plain in the Gospel is understood, all the mysteries hidden in this miracle of the Lord will be disclosed. He passed over nothing from the ancient Scriptures. It was water, and therefore the Lord called them senseless, because they still thought the water, not the wine, had taste. How, then, did He make wine from water? He opened their understanding and expounded the Scriptures to them, beginning with Moses and going through all the prophets. Therefore, already made drunk, they said, "Did not our heart burn within us on the road, while He opened the Scriptures to us?" (Lk 24:32). For they understood Christ in those Scriptures in which they had not known Him. Thus our Lord Jesus Christ changed water into wine. What had no taste gained taste, and what did not intoxicate began to intoxicate. If He had ordered the water poured out and Himself had poured wine into the vessels from the hidden treasuries of creation, from which He also took bread when He fed so many thousands, wine could indeed have been poured in after the water was emptied. Yet if He had done this, He would have seemed to disapprove the ancient Scriptures. But He changed the water itself into wine, showing us that the ancient Scripture also is from Him. For at His command the water vessels were filled. That Scripture, of course, is from the Lord. Yet it has no taste if Christ is not understood there.

For Christ kept the good wine until now, that is, His own Gospel.

Let us begin, then, to disclose the hidden meanings of the mysteries, sacramentorum operta, as far as He permits in whose name we promised to do this for you. From ancient times there was prophecy, and there was no time without prophecy. Yet prophecy, when Christ was not found in it, was water. For in water wine is hidden in a certain manner. The Apostle says what we must understand by this water: "Until this very day, when they read Moses, a veil lies upon their heart, for it remains unlifted, because it is taken away in Christ. But when one turns to the Lord, then the veil is taken away" (cf. 2 Cor 3:14-16). By the veil he means the hiddenness of prophecy, because of which it was not understood. The veil disappears when you come to the Lord. Lack of understanding disappears when you come to the Lord. Then what was water becomes wine for you.

Read all the books of the prophets. If you do not understand Christ there, much will seem senseless and foolish to you. Behold Christ in them, and what you read there will not only become intelligible, but will intoxicate you. Your thought will be drawn away from the body. Forgetting what lies behind, you will stretch toward what lies ahead (cf. Phil 3:13).

Thus, from ancient times, from the very time when men began to be born and the human race began to multiply, prophecy spoke of Christ. Yet it was then hidden, because it was still water. How shall we prove that through all former times, until the age when the Lord came, prophecy declared Christ? We prove it from His own words. When He rose from the dead, He found His disciples full of doubt concerning the One whom they had followed. They had seen Him dead and had no hope that He would rise. All their hope had vanished. Why did the praised thief deserve to be in paradise that very day (cf. Lk 23:39-43)? Because, while crucified on the cross, he acknowledged Christ, whereas the disciples began to doubt Him.

He found them in perplexity, and in some way accusing themselves because they had hoped for resurrection in Him. Yet they grieved over Him as one slain without guilt, for they knew that He was innocent. They themselves said this after His resurrection, when He met some of them sorrowful on the road: "Are You the only stranger in Jerusalem who does not know the things that have happened there in these days?" And He said to them. "What things?" They said to Him, "Concerning Jesus of Nazareth, who was a prophet mighty in deed and word before God and all the people; how our chief priests and rulers delivered Him up to be condemned to death and crucified Him. But we had hoped that He was the One to redeem Israel. Besides all this, it is now the third day since these things happened" (Lk 24:19-21).

When one of the two disciples going to a nearby village spoke these and other words, He answered them: "O foolish ones, and slow of heart to believe all that the prophets have spoken! Was it not necessary that the Christ should suffer these things and enter into His glory?" And beginning with Moses and all the prophets, He explained to them in all the Scriptures the things concerning Himself (cf. Lk 24:44-46).

Elsewhere, when He wished the disciples to touch Him with their hands, so that they might believe He had risen bodily, He said: "These are My words which I spoke to you while I was still with you, that everything written about Me in the law of Moses, and in the prophets. And in the psalms must be fulfilled." Then He opened their mind to understand the Scriptures and said to them: "Thus it is written, that the Christ should suffer and rise from the dead on the third day, and that repentance and forgiveness of sins should be preached in His name to all nations, beginning from Jerusalem" (Lk 24:44-47).

When these words of the Gospel, which are wholly clear, are understood, then the mysteries hidden in the Lord's miracle are disclosed. Consider that He says everything written about Him had to be fulfilled in Christ. Where was it written? He says: in the Law, in the Prophets, and in the Psalms. He left no part of the Old Scriptures, Scripturarum veterum, without mention. This was water. Therefore the Lord called those disciples foolish, because they still had the taste of water, not of wine. How did He make wine from water? He opened their mind and explained the Scriptures to them, beginning with Moses and going through all the prophets. Therefore they, now filled with drink, said: "Did not our heart burn within us on the road, when He explained the Scripture to us?" (cf. Lk 24:32). Indeed, they understood Christ in those books in which they had not seen Him.

Thus our Lord Jesus Christ turned water into wine. What was not sensed came to be sensed. What did not intoxicate came to intoxicate. If He had commanded the water to be poured from those water jars and had Himself poured wine from the hidden depths of creation, from which He brought bread when He fed many thousands (cf. Mt 14:17-21), He could have done so. Five loaves by themselves could not feed five thousand men, nor fill twelve baskets. The Lord's almighty power was, as it were, a fountain of bread. Likewise, after emptying the jars, He could have poured wine into them. But if He had done this, it would have been evident that He rejected the Old Scriptures.

When, however, He changed the water itself into wine, He showed us that the Old Scriptures also are from Him. For by His command the water jars were filled (cf. Jn 2:6-7). Although those Scriptures also are from the Lord, nothing in them will be understood unless Christ is beheld in them.

Hear, then, what He Himself says: "This was written about Me in the law, and in the prophets, and in the psalms" (Lk 24:44). We know from what point the Law begins its narrative, namely, from the creation of the world: "In the beginning God created heaven and earth" (Gen 1:1). From then until the time in which we now live, six ages have passed, as you have often heard and know. The first age is reckoned from Adam to Noah. The second is from Noah to Abraham. As the Evangelist Matthew traces and divides the order (cf. Mt 1:17), the third is from Abraham to David. The fourth is from David to the deportation to Babylon. The fifth is from the deportation to Babylon to John the Baptist. The sixth extends from there to the end of the world.

Moreover, on the sixth day God created man in His own image (cf. Gen 1:27). So in the sixth age our mind was renewed through the Gospel according to the image of Him who created us (cf. Col 3:10). The water was changed into wine, so that we might know Christ, now revealed in the Law and the Prophets. Therefore there were six water jars there (Jn 2:6), which He commanded to be filled with water.

Those six water jars symbolized the six ages, during which there was no time without prophecy. Those times, divided and articulated as though into six joints, would have been empty vessels if they had not been filled with Christ. Why did I say that the times would have passed in vain if the Lord Jesus had not been foretold in them? The prophecies were fulfilled, and the water jars were filled. Yet for the water to become wine, Christ must be seen in all those prophecies.

But what does it mean that "they held two or three metretes apiece" (cf. Jn 2:6)? This phrase entrusts a great mystery to us. By metretes the Evangelist means certain measures, as if he had said urns, amphorae, or something similar. A metretes is the name of a measure, and this measure takes its name from the word measure, a mensum. The Greeks call a measure metron, μέτρον, mensuram. From this came the Latin word metreta. Thus, "they held two or three metretes apiece."

What shall we say, brethren? If he had said only "three," our mind would quickly have hastened to the mystery of the Trinity. Yet perhaps we must not pass too hastily over the phrase, since he said "two or three." When the Father and the Son are mentioned, the Holy Spirit must also be understood. For the Holy Spirit is not only the Spirit of the Father, or only the Spirit of the Son. He is the Spirit of the Father and of the Son. It is written: "If anyone loves the world, the Spirit of the Father is not in him" (cf. 1 Jn 2:15). It is also written: "If anyone does not have the Spirit of Christ, he is not His" (Rom 8:9). The Father and the Son have one and the same Spirit. When the Father and the Son are mentioned, the Holy Spirit is understood, for He is the Spirit of the Father and of the Son.

When the Father and the Son are mentioned, it is said, "two metretes apiece." When the Holy Spirit is understood with Them, it is "three metretes apiece." Therefore it is not said that some held two metretes and others three. Rather, the same six water jars "held two or three metretes apiece." It is as if he said: when I say two, I wish the Spirit of the Father and the Spirit of the Son to be understood with Them. When I say three, I point quite expressly to the Trinity itself.

Therefore anyone who mentions the Father and the Son must also understand the mutual love of the Father and the Son, that is, the Holy Spirit. Perhaps, if the Scriptures are examined, they will show that the Holy Spirit is love, caritas. I do not say that I could show this to you today, nor that no other proof can be found.

Do not consider love a thing of little value. How could it be of little value, when all things not called cheap are called dear, cara? If what is not cheap is dear, what is dearer, carius, than love itself, caritas? The Apostle commends love when he says: "I will show you a still more excellent way. If I speak with the tongues of men and of angels, but have not love, I am sounding brass or a clanging cymbal. If I have all knowledge, and know all mysteries, and have prophecy and all faith, so as to remove mountains, but have not love, I am nothing. If I distribute all my goods and give my body to be burned, but have not love, it profits me nothing" (cf. 1 Cor 12:31; 13:1-3). How precious is love! Without it men possess other things in vain. With it they truly possess all things. Yet the Apostle Paul, praising love with lofty and abundant speech, said less of it than the Apostle John said briefly. To him belongs this Gospel. For he said without hesitation: "God is love" (1 Jn 4:16). It is also written: "The love of God has been poured into our hearts by the Holy Spirit who has been given to us" (Rom 5:5).

Read the full text in the app

Ephraem the Syrian

4th centuryChurch Father

And he says this: "Every man first sets out the good wine, and afterward the inferior" (cf. Jn 2:10), in order to make clear that what came before was, as it were, a storehouse, since "the law was given through Moses; grace and truth came through Jesus" (Jn 1:17).

The earthly bridegroom invited the heavenly Bridegroom, and the Lord, preparing Himself for the wedding, came to the wedding. He who prepared a table for the whole universe in His Kingdom was invited by those reclining at table. He gave them a wedding gift, so that by it they might be consoled.

Read more (788 words)

His wealth did not disdain the poverty of those who could not even provide inferior wine according to the number of those invited. If something from His abundance had not been poured out upon them, they would have risen from the feast thirsty and sorrowful.

In turn, the Lord also invited them to the wedding, just as He Himself had been invited together with His disciples. Yet, although He reclined many times at their table, their souls despised His table, just as their fathers turned away from the manna in the wilderness (Num 11:4-6).

Angels ate at the table of Abraham and Lot (Gen 18:1-8; Gen 19:1-3). So also the Lord did not disdain to eat and drink with them.

They invited Him, and He came to them. But when He invited them, they did not wish to come to His wedding. They called Him, and He did not refuse. He called them, and they refused His feast (Lk 14:15-20).

He honored those who invited Him, but they despised those who invited them. He gave joy to those invited to the wedding, but they killed His servants. He supplied what was lacking at the wedding, but they rejected His whole table.

He gladdened them with good wine. They grieved and angered Him. Instead of the most pleasant wine, they gave Him gall (Mt 27:34) and vinegar (Mt 27:48; Mk 15:36 and others).

When invited, the Lord did not come with the other guests who preceded Him, so that they might consume the first and inferior wine. He came afterward in order to bring with Him the most pleasant wine.

The Lord was invited together with others, because in outward appearance He did not differ from them. Yet He performed a wondrous sign, by which they learned that in His nature He is not equal to them.

For if His appearance led them to think Him equal to them, then at the same time His wondrous sign taught them that He is greater than they.

He silently made water wine, so that His divine silence might turn the steward of the feast into a herald, who joyfully proclaimed this gladness to those reclining at table. For wine by nature gladdens man.

Because His command quickly made wine which surpassed every kind of wine in pleasantness of taste, they asked and inquired, because of its excellence, who its master and maker was.

On the third day, the wedding received with its feast the Victor returning from battle, so as to teach that after victory, joy awaits the victors.

By this occasion it was also clearly shown that Christ, though invited as an outside guest, is in truth the Master of the wedding. For by His word, which completes all that is imperfect, He supplied what was lacking at the wedding.

Moreover, in that miracle the Lord did not produce an entirely new thing, nor did He limit His action to the same old thing as it had been before. He did not give them water to drink instead of wine. Yet He did not pass wholly beyond the bounds of that thing, since He made the wine from water that had already been created.

Thus He did not reveal there a newly created thing, but changed the same former thing. By changing it, He showed Himself to be its Master. By not making it something else, He taught them that it is not despised or rejected by Him.

Likewise, at the end of time, these same creatures will be renewed. For the will which by a single command immediately changed plain water into pleasant wine will be able, at the end of time, to restore to all creation an aspect whose goodness is ineffable.

Finally, He performed this miracle in order to teach, by changing coarse things into attractive things, that they are not evil by nature. Rather, their Creator is wise by nature. He knew that it was necessary to create things for testing and correction, that the righteous might be tried and attain a reward, and that transgressors might be corrected and so receive benefit.

For He who by His command made all-consuming fire from a destroyer into a sweet comforter for the children in the furnace (Dan 3) will at the end of time command harmful things, and they will become useful. He will command evil things, and they will produce joy.

First He accustomed men's mouths to the taste of His wine, so that afterward He might conquer their hearing also, and lead it to receive His sweet teaching.

That is, a preparation.

Literally, "to restore the taste, whose sweetness is ineffable."

That is, for the children in the furnace (Dan 3). See also Jn 6:11.

Ambrose of Milan

4th centuryChurch Father

87. There in Cana one element is changed into another, and nature suffers no diminution and does not know its origin, yet it knows its use. Moreover, the taste of the transformed wine is better than ordinary wine, because the Creator decides what qualities to impart to nature and what nature to appoint for what comes into being. See by what works He proves His purpose. While the servant pours in the water, the fragrance that spreads intoxicates, the changed color instructs, and the taste perceived increases faith.

Maximus the Confessor

7th centuryChurch Father

The master of the feast is the discerning law. Therefore he says, “Every man first sets out the good wine, and then the worse.” For the pure discerning law, in making distinctions, says this: the mind ought first, in the process of knowledge, to have ascended to the Cause, and only then to have turned to what comes after Him. Adam did not do this. Or again: the Lord’s teaching ought to have been received before the Law and the teaching of the prophets.

Euthymios Zigabenos

11th centuryChurch Father

He calls the architriclinus the chief and steward of the feast, because the couches used at banquets for three persons were called triclinia.

He did not simply change the water into wine, but into good wine, as the architriclinus testified. Such miraculous works of Jesus Christ were far better than natural productions.

The servants were witnesses of the change of water into wine. The architriclinus and the bridegroom were witnesses that the wine was good. Thus a miracle with such close witnesses could not remain unnoticed.

It is likely that the bridegroom also said something about this. Yet the Evangelist passed it over as unnecessary.

O that I too, cold, weak, and unstable, and in this respect no different from water, might be changed into spiritual warmth, a density of virtues, and firmness of conduct, so that I may gladden others also.

Romanos Melodos

6th centuryChurch Father

Ikos 20: When Christ, as a sign of His power, openly changed the water into wine, all the people rejoiced, for they judged the taste of the wine to be wondrous.

Now we also all take part in the feast in the Church, where the Blood of Christ has been changed into the form of wine. We drink of It with holy joy, praising the great Bridegroom.

For He is the true Bridegroom, the Son of Mary, the Word Who exists before all ages, Who took the form of a servant. He is the One Who made all things in wisdom.

Ikos 21: O You Who dwell on high, Holy One, Savior of all, preserve this Wine in us. You Who hold all things in Your power, keep It in us untroubled.

Read more (72 words)

Drive away from here all evil-minded heretics, useless men who dilute Your Holy Wine with "water." Those who always dilute Your teaching with their own "water" are condemned to the fire of Hades.

But deliver us, Sinless One, from the weeping that will seize us if we hear the same sentence, O merciful God. Do this through the prayers of the holy Virgin and Theotokos, You Who made all things in wisdom.

Gladkow B.I.

19th centuryChurch Father

"When the steward had tasted the water that had become wine... he called the bridegroom." Why did he not call the servants? In that way he would have revealed the miracle.

The reason is that, if it had been disclosed at that time, the servants' account would not have been believed. Perhaps they would have been thought out of their minds, since they ascribed this deed to Him whom many then regarded as an ordinary man.

The servants themselves, of course, knew the matter well from their own experience, and could not disbelieve their own hands. Yet they had no way to convince others of it.

Read more (305 words)

Therefore Christ Himself did not reveal what had happened to everyone, but only to the one who could understand it better than others. He left the more exact knowledge of the miracle to a later time, after other miracles had been performed.

Then it had to become trustworthy. For that He changed the water into wine, He had the servants as witnesses. That the wine was good, He had the steward of the feast and the bridegroom as witnesses (St. John Chrysostom, Homilies on the Gospel of John, 22).

Even if the steward of the feast used the expression, "when they have drunk freely," one still cannot conclude that the guests were drunk. He was speaking only of the existing custom of not keeping the good wine until the end of the feast, but serving it at the beginning.

Moreover, the Jews were distinguished by moderation in the use of wine, and becoming drunk was considered improper among them. Wine was mostly drunk with water. The family celebrating the wedding was poor and did not have an abundance of wine.

Nor would Jesus Christ have taken part in such a celebration where there were, or could have been, drunken people.

The Evangelist says that by the miracle in Cana Jesus made a beginning of miracles. Therefore the miracle performed in Cana was the first in the series of miracles. Consequently, before this Jesus had not manifested His divine power before men.

Even if the miracle now performed remained unnoticed for the time by the guests, the steward, and the bridegroom, it could not have gone unnoticed by Jesus' disciples. They had fixed all their attention on Him and on His actions.

The Evangelist assures us of this when he says, "and His disciples believed in Him."

With Jesus' return to Galilee, His messianic ministry begins.

Lopuchin A.P.

19th centuryChurch Father

In every house in the East, several water jars usually stand by the entrance door. They contain cold spring water for the customary washing of feet after a journey and the washing of hands before food.

Six such stone vessels also stood in the house where the wedding feast was taking place. Little water remained in them, and Jesus Christ commanded that they be filled to the top.

Then, having ordered the servants to draw some of this fresh water into smaller vessels, He commanded them to take it to the guest chosen, according to established custom, as chief steward of the feast.

The steward tasted the water that had become wine. Knowing nothing of what had happened, he called the bridegroom and cheerfully observed that he had acted contrary to every order of hospitality.

Read more (229 words)

"Every man serves the good wine first, and when they have drunk freely, then the inferior. But you have kept the good wine until now."

Although wine was given freely at wedding feasts, excessive drunkenness was considered improper. The Hebrew people were always marked by moderation in the use of wine. One of their favorite parables was the following account of the origin of wine.

When Noah was planting his vineyard, Satan came up to him and asked what he was doing. "I am planting a vineyard," Noah answered.

"Why is that?" "Its fruits, fresh or dried, are sweet and pleasant. We make from it wine, which gladdens the heart of man."

"In that case," said Satan, "I would not mind taking part in the work." "Very well," said Noah.

Then Satan brought into the vineyard a lamb, a lion, a pig, and a monkey. He killed them there and watered the soil with their blood, beneath the roots of the vines.

For this reason, before drinking wine, a man is meek as a lamb. When he drinks moderately, he becomes like a lion and thinks that no one can equal him.

When he drinks too much, he turns into a pig and wallows in the mud. When he drinks still more, he becomes a filthy monkey, staggering from side to side and knowing nothing of what he does.

Michail (Lusin)

19th centuryChurch Father

“Every man,” and so forth, means that this is how it usually happens. Everywhere the custom is to serve the better wine first, and afterward the worse. “When they have drunk freely”: this expression does not necessarily show that in the present case the guests became drunk. It speaks of the general custom, and is not applied specifically to the present case. “You have kept the good wine”: this is impartial testimony from one who was not present at the very performance of the miracle, that the water was not only changed into wine, but into good wine.

Philaret (Gumilevski)

19th centuryChurch Father

"Draw some out now, and take it to the master of the feast." The architriclinus, αρχοτ τρικληνου, is the head and steward of the feast. In Pollux he is τραπεζοποιοτ, "the steward of the table, one who attends to everything concerning the table."

To this man the Savior commands that His new wine be offered for judgment. By his office he had to know the value of what belonged to the table. Busy with ordering the feast, he remained "sober and had drunk nothing" (Chrysostom).

The architriclinus was amazed whence such excellent wine had come, and how it had been kept until the end of the meal. Thus one who knew the worth of wine fully approved the new wine.

The servants knew well that they had poured in water. Now not only the servants and not only the architriclinus, but all who were at the feast learned that the water had become excellent wine.

Vissarion (Nechaev)

19th centuryChurch Father

The meaning of the miracle at the wedding in Cana of Galilee. The immediate purpose of the miracle was beneficent. Yet chiefly it was performed so that the disciples might see His divine glory, be convinced of His divine mission, and be strengthened in faith in Him.

They had believed in Him already, otherwise they would not have followed Him. Yet their faith was evidently not yet so firm that it did not need strengthening by some miraculous sign.

Besides this meaning, the miracle of changing water into wine, like all Christ's miracles, has a symbolic meaning. In the canon of Saint Andrew of Crete, read at Compline during the first four days of the first week of Great Lent, it is said that the first miracle in Cana of Galilee was wrought "that you might be changed, O soul" (Ode 9).

Read more (1443 words)

That is, in this miracle Christ visibly expressed the truth that He came to renew man. He came to regenerate us for the life of the new man, wholly different from the life of the old man.

Each of us receives that old life through natural birth, with inherited sinful corruption passing from Adam to all his descendants.

The old man and the new man do not differ at all by nature. Both have the same bodily constitution, the same outward senses, and the same soul endowed with reason, free will, and the capacity to feel pleasure and pain, love and hatred.

Yet when the life of the one and the other is compared more closely, a striking difference appears. The old man lives only for earth and for himself.

The new man, while living on earth, sighs for heaven and thinks on spiritual things. He prefers the joy of communion with God, in His holy word, in prayer, and in the Mysteries, to everything in the world.

He strives to bring his will into agreement with the will of God. In his deeds he is guided not by self-love, but by zeal for the glory of God and love for his neighbors.

The Lord Jesus has called us precisely to this life of the new man. He came to produce in us this change in our spiritual nature in all its aspects.

For this purpose, a miracle of God's grace must be wrought upon it, like the miracle of changing water into wine.

The whole account of Christ the Savior's visit to the wedding in Cana is not without deep spiritual meaning. First, by His presence at the marriage feast, He sanctified and blessed the conjugal union and the family state in general.

Blessed is celibacy, when those able to receive the unmarried life voluntarily take its vow upon themselves. They do so for greater freedom in serving God and for greater progress in the spiritual life.

The Lord Jesus Himself sanctified this way of life by His own example. Yet He also showed His favor toward married life, deeming the wedding in Cana worthy of His visit.

As the Creator's first act after creating man was to bless him to be fruitful and multiply, so one of the first acts of the Renewer of mankind was to sanctify married life.

Thus the members of a family might also be members of His Church, and the children of natural parents might also be children of God by grace.

Second, at the wedding in Cana of Galilee, Christ condescended to earthly joys and consolations. He even Himself assisted the gladness of the guests, preparing for them, by the power of His omnipotence, wine that gladdens the heart of man.

Such is the spirit of the Gospel teaching in general. It rises up against attachment to earthly pleasures that reaches forgetfulness of God. It opposes a distracted and crudely sensual life.

Yet it is by no means against innocent and quiet earthly joys. But under what conditions can our earthly joys be innocent? Under the same conditions as the gladness of the guests at the wedding in Cana of Galilee was innocent.

Christ's presence among them restrained them from excess in eating and drinking, and from immodest words and movements.

Likewise, our earthly joys will be pure and innocent if we choose them with the thought of Christ. Before allowing ourselves to take part in one amusement or another, we should ask whether it involves violating a commandment of Christ or the Church.

We should ask whether it is timely. For example, is it timely to arrange and attend entertainments on the eve of Sundays and feast days?

And we should sanctify lawful joys permitted to a Christian by the remembrance of Christ. By that remembrance we should restrain ourselves from sinful dissipation.

According to the prediction of Christ the Savior, His second coming will find men unready to meet Him. Then, as in the days before the flood, people will be eating, drinking, marrying, and being given in marriage (Mt 24:38-39).

The misfortune is not that people will eat, drink, and celebrate weddings. It is that, though Christians, they will do all this in forgetfulness of Christ, of their Christian calling, and of their eternal destiny.

They will do it with the carelessness of those before the flood, and perhaps with mockery of warnings against such carelessness.

Is it surprising if, for such careless Christians who are strangers to the fear of God, the second coming of Christ will be as destructive as the flood was for the contemporaries of Noah?

Whoever does not willingly remember Christ, and does not temper his inclination toward earthly pleasures by thinking of Him, will be made to remember Him unwillingly as the strict Judge.

Here one cannot help recalling, with bitter regret, the unchristian character of wedding celebrations in many Christian families.

One cannot but call impious the custom of holding balls after the crowning, with drinking, card playing, and immodest dances. The newlyweds themselves usually take part in these dances.

They do not consider how improper such amusement is after the great Mystery has been performed over them, by which their conjugal union has been sanctified.

Third, Jesus Christ did not immediately fulfill the desire of His most pure Mother concerning help at the wedding in Cana of Galilee. He told Her that His hour had not yet come.

If He so responded to the desire of a Being most pure and most holy, is it any wonder if He sometimes acts likewise toward us sinners when we ask Him for help?

As we make Him wait long for our repentance and conversion, so He does not always quickly heed our prayers to Him, or the prayers of others for us.

He wants us not only to nourish a humble sense of dependence on Him and to turn to Him with hope in prayer for help. He also wants us to learn patience in prayer and surrender to His holy will.

He wants us to become accustomed to loving Him not only when He shows clear signs of His favor toward us, but also when He seems to turn His face away from us.

We ourselves are not always ready to receive from God the mercy for which we ask Him. Rain is useful for the soil not when it has not yet been freed from snow and ice, but when it has been warmed by the sun's rays.

Likewise, the goodness of God finds sufficient receptivity only in hearts warmed by love for God.

Fourth, the steward of the feast at the wedding in Cana of Galilee said that guests are first served good wine, and when they have drunk freely, then inferior wine is served.

Is this not an image of the fate of those who love the world? As long as they have something to live on, the world gives them a full cup of its comforts and joys.

It surrounds them with flatterers and admirers. It clouds their heads with praise of their supposed merits, both of soul and body.

Yet it ends with the lover of the world either becoming sated and falling from satiety into boredom and despair, or falling into poverty through extravagance.

In that poverty his supposed friends abandon him. They valued not him, but his hospitality.

Like the prodigal son in the parable, brought to the necessity of feeding on swine's food, he drinks to death the bitter cup of every deprivation.

And it is still well if this poverty and grief turn him, like the prodigal son, to repentance and through repentance lead him to the Lord.

But it also happens that lovers of the world, abandoned by the world and deprived of human sympathy, do not seek consolation in God, and so they die.

Truly, after sweet and costly wine, they must drink only what is bitter and worthless.

Thus the world acts toward its pitiable worshipers. But Christ, the Bridegroom of the Church, does not act so toward souls betrothed to Him.

The more devoted they are to Him, the more they must drink from the cup of sorrows. The more crosses they must bear in the struggle against temptations from the world, the flesh, and the devil.

Yet as He Himself reached glory by the way of the cross, so glorification is prepared in the heavens, in the Kingdom of Heaven, for His followers who share with Him the sufferings of this present life.

There He promised to drink with them the new wine of eternal joy, which never diminishes (Mk 14:25).

Cross references

Passages read together with this verse.

The original text

Greek text, 22 words with lemma, transliteration and Strong’s number. Tap to expand.

  1. καὶ
    kai
    and
    G2532 · καί
  2. λέγει
    legei
    I say
    G3004 · λέγω
  3. αὐτῷ
    autō
    he
    G846 · αὐτός
  4. Πᾶς
    pas
    all
    G3956 · πᾶς
  5. ἄνθρωπος
    anthrōpos
    a man
    G444 · ἄνθρωπος
  6. πρῶτον
    prōton
    first
    G4413 · πρῶτος
  7. τὸν
    ton
    the
    G3588 · ὁ
  8. καλὸν
    kalon
    beautiful
    G2570 · καλός
  9. οἶνον
    oinon
    wine
    G3631 · οἶνος
  10. τίθησιν
    tithēsin
    I put
    G5087 · τίθημι
  11. καὶ
    kai
    and
    G2532 · καί
  12. ὅταν
    hotan
    when
    G3752 · ὅταν
  13. μεθυσθῶσιν
    methysthōsin
    I am drunk
    G3184 · μεθύω
  14. τὸν
    ton
    the
    G3588 · ὁ
  15. ἐλάσσω
    elassō
    less
    G1640 · ἐλάσσων
  16. σὺ
    sy
    you
    G4771 · σύ
  17. τετήρηκας
    tetērēkas
    I keep
    G5083 · τηρέω
  18. τὸν
    ton
    the
    G3588 · ὁ
  19. καλὸν
    kalon
    beautiful
    G2570 · καλός
  20. οἶνον
    oinon
    wine
    G3631 · οἶνος
  21. ἕως
    heōs
    until
    G2193 · ἕως
  22. ἄρτι
    arti
    now
    G737 · ἄρτι