He never resorted to violence or weapons. Rather, by persuasion and miracles He sought to bring people to the knowledge of truth and true piety.
He Himself teaches us this, saying that He received no worldly authority from the Father. When the Jews accused Him before Pilate of calling Himself king of the Jews, Pilate asked whether He was the king of the Jews.
Christ answered in words showing that He had no worldly authority on earth: “My kingdom is not of this world. If My kingdom were of this world, My servants would fight, that I should not be delivered to the Jews. But now My kingdom is not from here” (Jn 18:36).
Pilate again says to Him: “Are You a king then?” Jesus answered: “You say that I am a King. For this I was born, and for this I came into the world, that I should bear witness to the truth” (Jn 18:37).
Could He have testified more plainly that He did not come into the world in order to use worldly authority?
The passages of Holy Scripture that speak of this show best what authority Christ actually gave the Apostles. The Church has no authority other than that which Christ gave His disciples, and through them their successors.
If Holy Scripture does not show that Christ’s disciples received any authority other than spiritual authority, then the claims of certain hierarchs are vain. They try to prove that they may also perform the functions of secular authority.
The first and chief authority which Christ gave the Apostles is the authority to preach the Gospel throughout the whole earth and to baptize those who have faith (Mt 28:18). It is entirely clear that this authority is only spiritual.
Another authority given to the Apostles, and through them to the Church, is the authority to bind and loose: “Truly I say to you, whatever you bind on earth will be bound in heaven. Whatever you loose on earth will be loosed in heaven” (Mt 18:18).
Appealing to these words of Christ, some began to prove that this also applies to worldly matters. Such proofs are unfounded, because Christ Himself answers them in the following words.
“As the Father has sent Me, even so I send you.” And when He had said this, He breathed on them and said: “Receive the Holy Spirit. If you forgive the sins of any, they are forgiven. If you retain the sins of any, they are retained” (Jn 20:21-23).
From this it is clear that the authority to bind and loose, received from Christ by the Apostles, applies only to sins. Thus it applies only to the soul, and by no means to the body, as Chrysostom wisely observes on this matter.
The third authority granted by Christ to the Apostles is the authority to celebrate the mystery of the Eucharist in remembrance of Him (Lk 22:19). This truly cannot be called worldly authority.
The Evangelist Matthew mentions the last authority, which consists in punishing offenders: “If he refuses even to hear the Church, let him be to you as a heathen and a tax collector” (Mt 18:17).
These words show that the Church cannot impose on offenders any punishments other than removal from ecclesiastical communion and exclusion from the Christian community.
How far Christ and the Apostles were from the thought of any secular authority is clear from this. They most decisively kept such authority away from the Church, preserving for her exclusively spiritual authority.
First turning away from such authority Himself, Christ then told His disciples that this authority belongs not to them, but to worldly sovereigns: “The kings of the nations rule over them, and those who exercise authority over them are called benefactors. But you shall not be so” (Lk 22:25; Mk 10:42-43).
By these words Christ teaches His disciples two truths. First, they and their successors must stand far apart from every worldly authority and jurisdiction.
Second, the spiritual authority they possess is not an authority of domination, but an authority of love and goodness. The task of worldly authority is to govern external affairs, while spiritual authority governs the inner movements of the heart.
Origen, among others, says that spiritual persons are not called to lordship in the Church, but to serve their Church. Jerome sets forth the distinction between the authority of a prince and that of a bishop.
The prince rules over the unwilling, while the bishop rules over the willing. The prince subjects by fear, while the bishop himself becomes a servant. The prince guards the body unto death, while the bishop preserves the soul unto salvation.
This teaching of Holy Scripture on the character of ecclesiastical authority was what the fathers of the Council of Ephesus had in mind. In this decree, they reminded all that the arrogance of worldly authority must not creep in under the guise of sacred ministry.
In their sentence against bishops striving to obtain some preeminence over others, the fathers again showed that they had in mind the Savior’s words to His disciples concerning primacy.
“But you are not to be called teachers, for One is your Teacher, Christ, and you are all brethren. Call no man your father on earth, for One is your Father, He who is in heaven.
Neither be called instructors, for One is your Instructor, Christ. He who is greatest among you shall be your servant. Whoever exalts himself will be humbled, and whoever humbles himself will be exalted” (Mt 23:8-12).
The Ephesian fathers also had before them other words of the divine Teacher, in which He showed the equality of His disciples: “Whoever desires to become great among you shall be your servant. Whoever desires to be first among you shall be slave of all” (Mk 10:43-44).