The Church Fathers on this verse

John 20:6Meaning & Commentary from the Church Fathers

Then cometh Simon Peter, following him, and went into the sepulchre: and saw the linen cloths lying,

Douay-Rheims

ερχεται ουν σιμων πετρος ακολουθων αυτω και εισηλθεν εις το μνημειον και θεωρει τα οθονια κειμενα

Greek (Byzantine text)

The Church Fathers on this verse

12 Church Fathers comment on this verse

John Chrysostom

4th centuryChurch Father

When she came and told this, the disciples heard her and hastened to the tomb. They saw the linen cloths lying there, and this was a sign of the Resurrection.

Indeed, if someone had moved the body, he would have done so without stripping it. Likewise, if someone had stolen it, he would not have taken care to remove the sudarium, fold it, and place it "in another place."

How would he have done it? He would have taken the body just as it lay. For this reason the Evangelist had first said that much myrrh was used at Christ’s burial.

Myrrh fastens the linen cloths to the body no less firmly than lead. Therefore, when you hear that the head wrappings lay separately, do not believe those who say that He was stolen.

Read more (1870 words)

A thief would not have been so foolish as to take such care over something entirely unnecessary. For what reason would he have left the burial cloths?

And how could he have escaped if he had begun to do this? Naturally, he would have had to spend much time on it. If he had delayed, he would have been caught.

But why do the linen cloths lie separately, and the cloth folded separately? So that you may know this was done without haste and without confusion. One thing was placed separately, and another was both placed separately and folded.

For this reason the disciples believed in the Resurrection. When Christ later appeared to them, they had already been convinced by what they had seen.

That they were separated, with some laid in one place and the others folded in another, showed that this was done by someone with care. It was not done casually or in confusion.

And you, when you hear that Christ rose naked, cease spending foolishly on burial. What indeed are these excessive and useless expenses?

They cause great loss to those who bury, but bring no benefit to the dead. To tell the truth, they even bring harm.

Lavish funerals have often caused graves to be plundered. They have brought it about that one once buried with every refinement later lay naked and unburied.

O vainglory! What great power it displays in the very midst of weeping. To what madness it drives men.

Many, to prevent robbery, tear the fine burial cloths and fill them with many aromatics. By this they make them doubly useless to thieves and so commit them to the earth.

Is this not madness? Is it not derangement of mind to display magnificence and destroy it at the same time?

No, you say, we devise all this so that the garments may lie safely on the dead man. What then? If thieves do not take them, will moths and worms not devour them?

And if moths and worms do not devour them, will time and corruption not destroy them?

But let us suppose that neither thieves, nor moths, nor worms, nor time, nor anything else destroys the things placed in the grave.

Let us suppose also that the body remains unharmed until the Resurrection, and that all those things remain new, strong, and fine. What benefit comes from this to those who have departed?

The body will rise naked, while all those things will remain here and bring us no benefit in the coming examination.

But why, you ask, was it so at Christ’s burial? You must not compare Christ’s burial with human burials. There too was the harlot who poured ointment on His holy feet.

Yet if something must be said about this also, first of all it was done by people who did not know the teaching about the Resurrection. Therefore it says: "as the Jews are accustomed to bury" (Jn 19:40).

Those who honored Jesus with burial were not from among the Twelve. They were men who did not value Him very highly.

The Twelve did not honor Him in that way, but by their death, by giving themselves over to slaughter, and by enduring many calamities for His sake.

True, that burial also was an honor, but far below the honor of which I have just spoken. On the other hand, as I have already said, we are now speaking about men.

Then all this was done for the Lord. And so that you may know that Christ did not desire this in the least, hear what He said.

"You saw Me hungry and fed Me, thirsty and gave Me drink, naked and clothed Me" (Mt 25:35-39). But nowhere did He say, "dead, and you buried Me."

I say this not to abolish the custom of burial. No. I say it to cut off luxury and unseemly magnificence.

Grief, sorrow, and compassion for the dead, you say, dispose one to this. No. This does not come from compassion for the dead, but from vainglory.

If you wish to show sympathy for the dead, I will point out another manner of burial. I will teach you to clothe him in garments that will rise with him and present him in splendid form.

These garments are not consumed by moths, nor destroyed by time, nor stolen by thieves. What garments are these? They are the clothing of almsgiving.

This garment rises with the dead man, because the seal of almsgiving remains with him forever. Those who then hear, "You fed Me when I was hungry," will shine in these garments.

These garments make the dead glorious, distinguished, and secure. The garments used now are nothing but food for moths and a table for worms.

I say this not to forbid care for the dead. I say it so that you may act with moderation, merely covering the body and not committing it naked to the earth.

If even the living should have nothing beyond a covering for the body, much more should the dead have nothing more. A dead body does not need garments as much as a living and breathing body.

While we live, we need clothing both because of cold and for decency. Once we have died, we have no such needs. We need burial cloths only so that the body may not lie naked.

The best burial cloth for us is the earth itself, the most beautiful covering and the one most fitting for our earthly body.

Therefore, if now, when we have so many needs, we must seek nothing excessive, much more is splendor out of place when such needs no longer exist.

But, you say, people who see this will laugh. If anyone does laugh, he clearly deserves little attention, since he is utterly foolish.

Many, on the contrary, will rather admire us and praise our love of wisdom. This is not worthy of laughter.

What is worthy of laughter is what we now do, when we weep, lament, and seem to bury ourselves with the dead.

This deserves both laughter and punishment. But love of wisdom in all this, and the observance of moderation in clothing, brings us crowns and praises.

In this case everyone will praise us, marvel at the power of Christ, and say: "O how great is the power of the Crucified One.

He has persuaded mortals and corruptible men that death is not death. See how they act, as though they were not dying, but moving to a better land.

He has persuaded them that this corruptible and earthly body will put on a garment far more brilliant than silk and gold-woven clothing. It will put on incorruption.

Therefore they are not greatly concerned with funerals, but consider a virtuous life the best adornment for burial."

So everyone will speak of us when they see us practicing wisdom. But if they see us torn by grief, fainthearted, and surrounded by a chorus of wailing women, they will laugh at us and mock us.

They will condemn us a thousand times, reproaching us for senseless expense and useless labor. We hear that everyone really does condemn us for this, and very justly.

Indeed, what excuse shall we have when we adorn our body, which is being destroyed by corruption and worms, while we despise Christ, Who is thirsty, naked, and a stranger?

Let us therefore abandon this vain concern. Let us bury the dead in such a way that it is useful both for us and for them, to the glory of God.

Let us distribute abundant alms on their behalf and send them forth with this most beautiful provision for the journey.

If the memory of famous men who have died protected the living, as the Lord says, "I will defend this city for My own sake and for the sake of David My servant" (2 Kgs 19:34), much more will almsgiving do this.

It was almsgiving, yes almsgiving, that even raised the dead. The widows stood around Peter, "showing tunics and garments which Dorcas made while she was with them" (Acts 9:39).

Therefore, when someone is dying, let the relatives of the dying person prepare a burial garment for him. Let them persuade him before his death to leave something to the poor.

Let him depart with this garment. Let him also leave Christ as his heir. If those who appoint kings as their heirs leave their relatives in greatest security thereby, consider what favor a man will obtain.

He will gain favor both for himself and for all his own, if he leaves Christ as heir together with his children. This is a beautiful garment for the dead.

It is useful both for those who remain alive and for those who depart. If we are buried in this way, we shall appear radiant at the Resurrection.

But if we care for the body and neglect the soul, then we shall suffer many evils and be subjected to great derision.

It is no small shame to depart from here without virtue. It is not so shameful for the body to be cast out unburied as for the soul to appear then without good works.

Therefore let us clothe the soul. Let us adorn it throughout our whole life. If during life we have been negligent of it, let us at least come to our senses at death.

Let us command our relatives to help us after death by almsgiving. Through such mutual assistance to one another, we shall receive great boldness.

This will be by the grace and love for mankind of our Lord Jesus Christ, with Whom be glory, dominion, and honor to the Father, with the Holy Spirit, now and ever, and unto the ages of ages. Amen.

Where, again, can you see a man naked and not ashamed? You find him in Christ.

Peter, John, and James came to the tomb seeking the body and did not find it. They found the folded garments, so that it might be clear that after Christ’s Resurrection the ancient image of Adam is restored in Him.

He remains without garments, yet not naked, but clothed. Christ rose and put off the garments in which Adam had clothed himself. He was naked and did not appear naked.

After the Resurrection the women see the garments cast down. Martha and Mary see Christ, recognize Him, fall down before Him, and do not see Him naked.

How was He clothed in garments? He cast them aside in the tomb. The former garments the soldiers divided.

How then was He clothed? Why is the Naked One not naked? I will ask yet another thing.

Why were the garments and the shroud seen in one place, while the cloth with which the Savior’s head had been bound was in another?

Holy grace wished to show that the Resurrection took place without confusion. Since the Jews intended to spread the rumor that the body had been stolen by the disciples, Christ leaves His garments in the tomb.

The one who steals a dead man steals him together with his garments. The Savior could be seen coming out of the tomb like Joseph out of Egypt.

Theophylact of Bulgaria

11th centuryChurch Father

But the ardent Peter entered the tomb and carefully examined everything. <...> Understand, then, how Peter is active and fervent, while John is penetrating and able to understand divine things. The purely contemplative one is ahead in knowledge and natural gift, while the active one lags behind. Yet by zeal and effort he surpasses the other's keenness, and the active one is the first to perceive some divine mystery.

Does not something similar happen in studies? There too, of two boys, the less gifted and slower one surpasses the one who is naturally quicker and more capable by diligence. So also in spiritual things, the active man, though unskilled in speech, often understands better than the contemplative.

Read more (49 words)

Every soul that rules over the passions is called Mary. Having been purified through dispassion, it sees in Jesus God and Man. For one of the Angels, sitting at the head, points to the Godhead. The other, sitting at the feet, points to the humbled Incarnation of the Word.

Cyrill of Alexandria

5th centuryChurch Father

Although they had not yet met Christ risen from the dead, they inferred the Resurrection from the gathered burial cloths. At last they believed that He had broken even the bonds of death, as Holy Scripture had proclaimed from of old. Therefore, understanding that the end of the events had occurred according to the true foretellings, they now received the firmest faith.

Augustine of Hippo

5th centuryChurch Father

Should we suppose that this signifies nothing? I would not think so. But we hasten to other questions on which we shall be compelled to linger. The need to examine them, and even a certain obscurity in them, requires it. To inquire into things that are clear in themselves, asking what each signifies, is indeed a holy delight. Yet it belongs to those who have leisure, and we are not such people.

Maximus the Confessor

7th centuryChurch Father

He who shares in the rest of God, which He appointed for our sake on the seventh day, also shares, by deification, in His activity for our sake on the eighth day, that is, in the mystical Resurrection. He left lying in the tomb the linen cloths and the napkin that had been on His head. Those who see these things, as Peter and John saw them, believe that the Lord has risen.

Read more (77 words)

The tomb of the Lord is this world, or else the heart of each believer. The linen cloths are the logoi of sensible things, together with the forms of the virtues. The napkin that was on the Lord's head is the simple and uniform knowledge of intelligible things, together with the theology received through knowledge. Through this God the Word was known, for without this He, being above sensible and intelligible things, is wholly beyond our perception.

Euthymios Zigabenos

11th centuryChurch Father

Simon Peter came after him and entered the tomb, fearing nothing, either to wipe away the fault of his former timidity or wishing to examine the matter more closely. Thus both surpassed each other: John by being first to run to the tomb, and Peter by entering the tomb. Find in the twenty-fourth chapter of Luke the place where it says, “Peter rose and ran to the tomb” (Lk 24:12), and read its explanation up to the words, “wondering at what had happened.” This is necessary for understanding this passage also. “And he saw the linen cloths lying.” See the commentary on Jn 20:7.

Gregory the Great

6th centuryChurch Father

“Simon Peter came after him, and entered the tomb,” because the Church of the Gentiles, which followed after her, came to know that the Mediator between God and men, the Man Jesus Christ, had died in the flesh, and believed in the living God. For the linen cloths lying alone, see Jn 20:7.

Romanos Melodos

6th centuryChurch Father

Yet even though he came first, he did not enter the tomb, but waited for the leader, so that, like a lamb, he might follow the shepherd. And this is how it was fitting to be. For it was said to Peter, “Peter, do you love Me? Then feed My lambs, if you will” (Jn 21:15). It was said to Peter, “Blessed are you, Simon. I will give you the keys of the kingdom” (Mt 16:19). To Peter He subjected the waves upon which the One who grants resurrection to the fallen had formerly walked.

Bogolepow D.P.

19th centuryChurch Father

From the Evangelist John's whole and connected account of Mary Magdalene's journey to the tomb and of the risen Lord's appearance to her, the first three Evangelists relate only certain separate parts. Thus Luke, summarizing the events experienced by the myrrh-bearing women on the morning of the first day of the week, mentions Peter's journey to the tomb as prompted by the message of all the myrrh-bearing women.

Read more (415 words)

From John's Gospel we see that this took place before all the women returned to the city. It happened because of Mary Magdalene's message, and Peter did not make this journey alone, but with John. Mark, after setting forth the angelic message to the women about the Lord's Resurrection, begins the history of the appearances of the Risen One Himself. First of all, he recounts the Lord's appearance to Mary Magdalene.

Yet he does not describe in detail the circumstances in which this appearance took place. He says only that it was the first appearance, and that the disciples did not believe Mary Magdalene's report.

On the first day of the week, while it was still dark, Mary Magdalene comes to the tomb and sees that the stone has been rolled away from the tomb. The thought arises in her that the body of her beloved Teacher and Lord had no rest even in the tomb, but had been carried away. With this sorrowful thought in her soul, she runs quickly to Peter and John, without having examined the tomb.

On the way she may have met her companions, who likewise were going to the Lord's tomb, and told them her sad supposition. Of course, she thought that after examining the tomb her companions had reached the same conclusion about the Lord's body. Therefore, when she came to the apostles, she said in the name of all the women: "They have taken the Lord out of the tomb, and we do not know where they have laid Him."

Peter and John rose and hurriedly ran with Mary to the tomb. The young John ran faster than Peter and reached the tomb first. He did not, however, enter the tomb, but only bent down to see its interior. Therefore he could make out only the linen cloths lying in the tomb.

When Peter came up, with his usual impetuosity he immediately entered the tomb. John entered after him. And behold, they saw that the linen cloths with which Jesus' body had been wrapped, and the napkin that had been on His head, lay carefully folded in their places. Their order and condition clearly showed that there had been no theft of Jesus' body.

This, however, produced a different effect on Peter and John. The latter saw and believed (Jn 20:8), while the former only marveled within himself at what had happened (Lk 24:12). Having examined the Lord's tomb, Peter and John returned again to their own.

Gladkow B.I.

19th centuryChurch Father

Peter also ran after him, entered the cave, and saw the linen cloths in one place and the napkin that had covered the head in another. The napkin was folded. And Peter went back, wondering at all that had happened (Lk 24:12).

Lopuchin A.P.

19th centuryChurch Father

John, stronger in his feet than in courage, only stooped toward the tomb. He did not enter it until Peter also arrived.

Wlastow G.K.

19th centuryChurch Father

Three testimonies to the Lord's Resurrection were given to the disciples Peter and John, so that, on their basis, they might rise on the wings of faith to understand the mystery accomplished. Mary Magdalene brings the news of the stone rolled away. They themselves see, first, the empty tomb. Second, they see the "garments," that is, the linen cloths, the napkin, and the shroud, not scattered in disorder, but laid in order; cf. Chrysostom, Homily 85 on John, pp. 507-508.

Read more (323 words)

At the moment when Mary Magdalene brings them the unexpected news, they know that the Lord's tomb had been sealed and guarded by a watch of Roman soldiers, Mt 27:66. She tells them that the stone has been rolled away from the tomb and that the guard is no longer there. The guard had probably already fled when Magdalene was at the tomb. Peter and John do not yet fully understand the event. Their hearts beat more strongly with anxiety and hope. Yet before all else they hasten to see with their own eyes exactly what has happened.

John, being younger than Peter, naturally runs faster than he and reaches the tomb first. Yet he does not enter the tomb, being seized by reverent fear. He only "stooped down," that is, bent over and looked with strained attention into the opened tomb, now guarded by no one and apparently empty.

He does not enter the tomb before Peter because, with his characteristic humility, he acknowledged Peter's seniority over himself. He also remembered the Lord's words: "You are Peter," Mt 16:18.

At this time Peter comes up and, without stopping, enters the burial cave, for his soul thirsted to grasp more quickly the mystery being disclosed. Before him is the second testimony, the empty tomb. There is also the third testimony, to which Chrysostom especially points: the linen cloths and the napkin that had wrapped the Lord, folded in order.

These testified that, in the event that had taken place, no criminal human hand had disturbed the repose of the tomb. Rather, something supernatural had occurred. The Jews would not have removed the garments and folded the napkin if they had carried away the Lord's body. It was clear to the disciples that the Lord's earthly burial garments were left in the tomb to signify that they were no longer needed. The following verses explain still more clearly the state of the disciples' souls.

Cross references

Passages read together with this verse.

The original text

Greek text, 17 words with lemma, transliteration and Strong’s number. Tap to expand.

  1. Ἔρχεται
    erchetai
    I come
    G2064 · ἔρχομαι
  2. οὖν
    oun
    therefore
    G3767 · οὖν
  3. καὶ
    kai
    and
    G2532 · καί
  4. Σίμων
    simōn
    Simon
    G4613 · Σίμων
  5. Πέτρος
    petros
    Peter
    G4074 · Πέτρος
  6. ἀκολουθῶν
    akolouthōn
    I accompany
    G190 · ἀκολουθέω
  7. αὐτῷ
    autō
    he
    G846 · αὐτός
  8. καὶ
    kai
    and
    G2532 · καί
  9. εἰσῆλθεν
    eisēlthen
    I go in
    G1525 · εἰσέρχομαι
  10. εἰς
    eis
    into
    G1519 · εἰς
  11. τὸ
    to
    the
    G3588 · ὁ
  12. μνημεῖον
    mnēmeion
    a tomb
    G3419 · μνημεῖον
  13. καὶ
    kai
    and
    G2532 · καί
  14. θεωρεῖ
    theōrei
    I behold
    G2334 · θεωρέω
  15. τὰ
    ta
    the
    G3588 · ὁ
  16. ὀθόνια
    othonia
    a linen bandage
    G3608 · ὀθόνιον
  17. κείμενα
    keimena
    I lie
    G2749 · κεῖμαι