John Chrysostom
Some think that this paralytic is the same man mentioned in the Gospel of Matthew (Mt 9:2-7). But this is not so, as is clear from many circumstances.
First, there was no one attending this paralytic. The other had many people with him, caring for him and carrying him. This man had no one. Therefore he said, “I have no man.”
Second, this is clear from the answer itself. The other says nothing, while this man tells everything concerning himself.
Third, it is clear from the time of the event. This man is healed on a feast and on the Sabbath, while the other was healed on another day.
The place also differs in each case. The other was healed in a house, but this man by the pool.
Read more (528 words)
The manner of healing also differs. There Christ said, “Son, your sins are forgiven you” (Mt 9:2). Here He first strengthens the body, and afterward applies care to the soul.
There is forgiveness there: “Your sins are forgiven you.” Here there is exhortation and warning, to guard him for the future: “Sin no more,” He says, “sin no more.”
Moreover, the accusations from the Jews are different. Here they condemn work on the Sabbath, while there they accuse Him of blasphemy.
But see how great the wisdom of God is. Christ does not heal him at once, but first disposes him toward Himself by a question, opening in him a ready path for faith.
He not only heals him, but commands him to take up his bed, so that the miracle which had occurred might have still greater credibility, and that no one might consider the event an apparition or a deception.
For if the members of his body had not been firmly and completely strengthened, he could not have carried the bed.
Christ often acted in this way, so as to stop completely the mouths of the shameless.
Thus, in the miracle of the loaves, lest anyone should say that the people were fed in an ordinary way, and that the miracle only seemed to occur, by His dispensation many fragments of bread remained.
To the leper who was cleansed He says, “Go, show yourself to the priest” (Mt 8:4), in order to give a more exact proof of the cleansing, and at the same time to stop the shameless mouths of those who called Him an opponent of God’s law.
He acted similarly when He turned water into wine. He did not simply show the wine, but ordered it to be taken to the steward of the feast.
Thus the steward, admitting his ignorance of what had happened, provided an unquestionable witness to the miracle.
For this reason the Evangelist said, “The steward did not know where the wine came from” (Jn 2:9), thereby expressing the impartiality of his testimony.
In another case, after raising the dead girl, Christ “commanded that she be given something to eat” (Lk 8:55). In this also He gives a sign of the true resurrection.
By all these things He convinced the senseless that He was not some deceiver or magician, but had come for the salvation of the common nature of mankind.
Why, then, does Christ not require faith from the paralytic, as He did from the blind men, to whom He said, “Do you believe that I am able to do this?” (Mt 9:28).
Because the paralytic did not yet know exactly who He was.
Christ was accustomed to do this not before miracles, but after them. Those who had seen His power in others rightly heard such a question from Him.
But those who did not yet know Him, and were to know Him through the signs, were questioned about faith only after the miracles.
Therefore Matthew presents Christ asking this not at the beginning of His wonderworking, but after He had already healed many. Then He asks about it, and specifically only of the two blind men.