John Chrysostom
Having said this, they do not leave the choice of the miracle to His will. Rather, they want to place Him under necessity to perform no other miracle, but precisely such a one as happened with their fathers.
For this reason they say, "Our fathers ate manna in the wilderness," thinking thereby to incite Him to perform a miracle that could feed them bodily.
Indeed, why did they recall no other former miracle, though many had then been performed in Egypt, at the sea, and in the wilderness, but manna in particular?
Was it not because they greatly desired it, being enslaved to gluttony? You called Him a Prophet and wished to make Him king because you saw the miracle.
Read more (131 words)
How then do you now, as though no miracle had happened, prove ungrateful and unthankful? You ask for a miracle as hangers-on and hungry dogs would ask. Is manna now precious to you, when your soul is wasting away?
Notice the craftiness of their words. They did not say, "Moses did such a miracle; what will You do?" They wished not to irritate Him.
Expecting food from Him, they still address Him with great deference. On the other hand, they do not say, "God did such a miracle; what will You do?" They wished not to suggest that they were making Him equal to God.
They do not mention Moses either, lest they seem to belittle Him. They choose a middle way and say, "Our fathers ate manna in the wilderness."