The apostle expresses a similar sentiment: “I could wish that I myself were accursed from Christ for my brethren, my kinsmen according to the flesh” (Romans 9:3). This does not suggest that he, for whom life is Christ and death is gain (Philippians 1:21), truly desires his own demise; rather, he is deemed more deserving of life when he longs to bring salvation to others. Furthermore, Jonah understood that other prophets were sent to the lost sheep of Israel to encourage repentance, and he realized that Balaam also prophesied about Israel's salvation (Numbers 23-24). Jonah felt sorrow that he was uniquely selected to go to the Assyrians, Israel’s adversaries, especially to their greatest city, where idolatry flourished and knowledge of God was present. Most troubling for him was the fear that, should they repent as a result of his preaching, Israel might ultimately be abandoned. The same Spirit that empowered his mission to the Gentiles revealed to him that the faith of the Gentiles would lead to the downfall of Israel, provoking his anxiety about what might follow during his tenure. Consequently, Jonah sought to escape, like Cain (Genesis 4), by fleeing to Tarshish, which Josephus identifies as a city in Cilicia, though he alters the first letter; according to the books of the Chronicles, it could refer to a location in India. Hebrew sources interpret ‘Tarshish’ as representative of the sea in general, as illustrated in “with a tempestuous spirit shatter the ships of Tarshish” (Psalms 47:8), meaning the sea, and in Isaiah: “weep, ye ships of Tarshish” (Isaiah 23:1, 14). In a letter to Marcellus, I mentioned this years ago. Thus, the prophet aimed not merely for a specific destination but, embarking on a ship, sought to remove himself as far as possible from where he was. It is more indicative of a man in flight and fear to seize the first chance to set sail than to opt for a secure refuge. It can be inferred that Jonah believed God was confined to Judah, perceiving Israel as significant (Psalms 75:2); yet, having felt God’s influence upon the waters, he admits, “I am a Hebrew, and I fear the Lord, the God of heaven, who made the sea and the dry land” (Jonah 1:9). If He is the Creator of both the sea and the dry land, what led you to think that leaving the dry land would spare you from Him in the sea? Simultaneously, through the salvation and conversion of the sailors, Jonah realizes that Nineveh’s multitude can also attain salvation through a similar confession. Concerning our Lord and Savior, it can be stated that He abandoned His home and His homeland, taking on flesh as if He fled from heaven and came to Tarshish, or this age's sea, consistent with what is noted elsewhere: “This sea is great and vast; there are creatures innumerable, both small and great; there go the ships; there is that leviathan, which Thou hast made to play therein” (Psalm 103:25-26). For this reason, while He endured suffering, He said, “Father, if it is possible, let this cup pass from me” (Matthew 26:36), so that because of the collective outcries of the people, “Crucify Him, crucify Him” (John 19:6) and “We have no king but Caesar” (John 19:15), the full number of Gentiles would not be counted, and the branches of the olive tree would not break, giving way instead to branches from the wild olive (Romans 11). His love and commitment to the people were profound due to the patriarchs’ selection and the promises made to Abraham, as, while on the cross, He proclaimed, “Father, forgive them; for they know not what they do” (Luke 23:34). Since ‘Tarshish’ signifies ‘contemplation of joy,’ it is possible that the prophet, upon reaching Joppa, which means ‘beautiful,’ hurried to seek joy, to enjoy blissful peace, surrendering himself fully to contemplation, believing it preferable to revel in the beauty and richness of knowledge than to witness the downfall of the nation from which Christ was to come in the flesh. “Jonah 1:3. And he went down to Joppa, and found a ship going to Tarshish; and he paid the fare thereof, and went down into it, to go with them to Tarshish from the presence of the Lord.” The Septuagint states, “And he went up to Joppa, and found a ship going to Tarshish, and paid its freight, and went aboard, to sail with them to Tarshish from the presence of the Lord.” Joppa is a port in Judea, where, as recorded in the Kings and Chronicles, Hiram, king of Tyre, brought timber from Lebanon, which was then shipped dry to Jerusalem. This locale is marked by the rocks along the shore, to which Andromeda was once chained, saved by the help of Perseus. The knowledgeable reader is familiar with this tale. Likewise, due to the region’s geography, it is with good reason that it is noted of the prophet, who descended from the mountainous, elevated area into the plain at Joppa, that he went down, discovered a ship setting sail from the shore to go to sea, and paid its freight, or the freight for the ship, corresponding to the Hebrew text, or the freight for himself, as rendered by the Septuagint. The phrase “descended upon him,” as per the proper Hebrew text, denotes ‘yered,’ meaning ‘descended,’ portraying Jonah’s urgent search for shelter. Similarly, the commonly accepted version (Vulgate) states he ‘ascended’ to where the ship would take him, believing he would escape by leaving Judea. Additionally, our Lord, at the very edge of Judea, which was termed beautiful, often took bread from the children to give to the dogs (Matthew 15:26); however, since He came to the lost sheep of the house of Israel, He pays the shipwrights, intending primarily to save His own people, while also delivering those who dwell by the sea, and amidst tempestuous waters and storms—in His suffering and crucifixion, sinking into the abyss, He rescues those whom He left seemingly unattended, much like being asleep on the ship (Matthew 8). To the discerning reader, I must stress that one should not expect the allegorical interpretation to follow the same order as the historical accounts. For instance, the apostle recognizes in Hagar and Sarah a representation of the two covenants (Galatians 4), yet it would not be appropriate to render all historical details regarding them into an allegorical framework. Also, in his epistle to the Ephesians, when discussing Adam and Eve, he states, “For this cause shall a man leave his father and mother, and shall cleave unto his wife; and they two shall become one flesh. This is a great mystery: but I speak concerning Christ and the church” (Ephesians 5:31-32). Can we then link the entirety of Genesis, the creation of the world, and the lordship of humanity to Christ and the church merely because the apostle employs this passage in that manner? It is conceivable that we could connect the phrase “the man shall leave his father” to signify that Christ would abandon God the Father to unite the Gentile nations with the church; but how can we interpret the subsequent phrase “his mother”? Perhaps this indicates He departed from the celestial Jerusalem, which serves as the mother of the saints? We face numerous other, larger conundrums. Similarly, the apostle's claim, “they all drank of that spiritual Rock that followed them, and that Rock was Christ” (1 Corinthians 10:4; cf. Exodus 17), does not compel us to understand the entire book of Exodus as alluding to Christ. For what can we deduce? Only that Moses struck the rock multiple times, producing water that filled the channels (Numbers 20). Should we then allegorically interpret the complete historical narrative within this context? Instead, each account should each receive its distinct spiritual interpretation based on its narrative context. Just as these statements have meanings suited to them, and the earlier does not demand the same allegorical interpretation as the later; similarly, the book of the prophet Jonah ought not to be fully ascribed to the Lord without risking confusion for the interpreter, even though the Gospel states: “An evil and adulterous generation seeks a sign; and there shall no sign be given to it, but the sign of the prophet Jonah. For as Jonas was three days and three nights in the whale's belly; so shall the Son of man be three days and three nights in the heart of the earth” (Matthew 12:39-40).