The Church Fathers on this verse

Leviticus 4:3Meaning & Commentary from the Church Fathers

If the priest that is anointed shall sin, making the people to offend, he shall offer to the Lord for his sin a calf without blemish.

Douay-Rheims

אִ֣ם הַכֹּהֵ֧ן הַמָּשִׁ֛יחַ יֶחֱטָ֖א לְאַשְׁמַ֣ת הָעָ֑ם וְהִקְרִ֡יב עַ֣ל חַטָּאתוֹ֩ אֲשֶׁ֨ר חָטָ֜א פַּ֣ר בֶּן־בָּקָ֥ר תָּמִ֛ים לַיהוָ֖ה לְחַטָּֽאת׃

Hebrew (Masoretic text)

The Church Fathers on this verse

5 Church Fathers comment on this verse

John Chrysostom

4th centuryChurch Father

Even prior to the prophets, when establishing the offerings, God intended to illustrate that the transgressions of the priests incur a far greater consequence than those of the laypeople. Thus, He commanded that a sacrifice be made for the priest akin to that which was made for the entire nation. This clearly indicates that the priest's wounds are in greater need of healing than those of the general populace. Their need is not due to an inherent nature, but rather stems from the esteemed role of the priest who commits those sins. Now, let us consider those in this sacred ministry: even the daughters of priests, who do not partake in the priesthood, face far harsher penalties for the same offenses due to their fathers' honor.

Read more (106 words)

The wrongdoing—such as adultery—remains the same whether committed by a priest's daughter or a commoner's daughter, yet the former faces significantly more severe repercussions (Leviticus 21:9; Deuteronomy 22:21). Do you perceive how strongly God emphasizes that those in higher positions warrant stricter judgment than those beneath them? He who disciplines a priest's daughter more severely than others, because of her father's standing, will undoubtedly impose a greater punishment on the priest himself, who is the source of her increased penalty, and justifiably so. The harm inflicted extends beyond the leader himself; it endangers the souls of those who are weaker and look to him for guidance.

Cyrill of Alexandria

5th centuryChurch Father

Paul, knowledgeable in the law and deeply respectful of Moses' commandments, addresses the Hebrew people with wisdom, drawing from his understanding of the law concerning profound and ineffable matters. He does so not by elaborating extensively on the narrative, but rather by briefly reminding them of truths they are already aware of. Should it please me, I will also provide the law surrounding these matters for those who are curious and desire clarity and accuracy in understanding the topics at hand.

Read more (442 words)

The Lord spoke to Moses, instructing him to convey to the Israelites: If anyone sins unintentionally against the commandments of the Lord and commits an act he should not, or if the anointed priest sins, causing the people to bear guilt, he must bring an unblemished bull as a sin offering to the Lord for his transgression. This bull must be taken to the entrance of the tabernacle, where he will lay his hands on its head and sacrifice it before the Lord. The anointed priest is to take the blood of the bull and bring it into the tabernacle, dip his finger into the blood, and sprinkle it seven times before the Lord, in front of the veil of the sanctuary. He will then place some blood on the horns of the altar of incense within the tabernacle, and the remaining blood will be poured out at the base of the altar of burnt offerings at the tabernacle's entrance.

He is to remove all the fat from the sin offering, including the fat covering the entrails, and the fat around the kidneys, and the omentum of the liver, separating it as it would be from an offering of peace. This fat will be burned on the altar of burnt offerings. The skin and all other parts of the bull, along with its waste, must be taken outside the camp to a clean place where the ashes are disposed of, and there it will be burned entirely. This is the directive of the law for when the leading priest is charged with any sins committed in ignorance.

Similarly, there will be a sacrifice for the people's unintentional sins, requiring a bull, which will likewise be slain at the entrance of the tabernacle before the Lord. The elders of the congregation will lay their hands on it, and its blood will be brought into the most holy place, following the same procedures as those for Aaron's sacrifice. It is clear that the purification for both the priests and the people comes through Christ, as in Him we find justification and cleansing from the pollution of sin.

We shall now discuss each element of the text in detail, as this will allow us to unveil the concealed aspects as thoroughly as possible. Palladius, you articulate your thoughts well. Cyril, thus, the bull is taken unblemished, symbolizing Christ who is truly without sin and who did not succumb to the contagion of sin. He declared, “For the prince of this world is coming, and he has no claim on Me” (John 14:30), demonstrating that He “committed no sin” as stated in Scripture (1 Pet. 2:22).

Ephraem the Syrian

4th centuryChurch Father

Four types of sacrifices were presented: for the priest, for the congregation, for the ruler, and for every individual. The priests symbolize the world prior to the flood. The purification through light transgressions was not readily extended to the Hebrews; this emphasized that the cleansing of serious sins would not be available to the Gentile nations. According to the law, regardless of their status—priest, council member, ruler, or commoner—if anyone committed a sin, even inadvertently, they were required to present a sacrifice from their possessions, resulting in the removal of that sin.

Read more (56 words)

Hence, it is stated: “Write My commandments in your heart, and on the posts of your gates…” (Deuteronomy 6:6-7, 9), and it is further emphasized, “Thou shalt write My commandments in thy heart, and upon the thresholds of thy gates, that thou mayest remember them when thou comest in and when thou comest out” (Numbers 15:38).

Theodoret of Cyrus

5th centuryChurch Father

The offerings were made for wrongdoing, unintentional sin, and lack of knowledge. The term 'wrongdoing' refers to a deliberate breach of a commandment, while 'transgression' encompasses a wrongful act that occurs due to certain circumstances. For example, an individual might find themselves in close proximity to a leper, a corpse, or a person engaging in the act of sowing, despite their wishes. The concept of 'lack of knowledge' is quite clear, as not everyone was aware of all the statutes. In terms of spiritual transgressions, one's very nature reveals them. However, regarding the specific obligations placed upon the Jewish people, they required the guidance of teachers.

Isidore of Pelusium

5th centuryChurch Father

Zosimas, Palladius, Maron, Eustathius, and the others you've mentioned have indeed tarnished the faith and sullied the sacred office, yet my reproach rests more heavily on Eusebius, who provided them the opportunity to do so. Had he not, as you state, conferred upon them the priesthood, they would not have stumbled into such grave transgressions. While they may have been deeply flawed prior to their ordination, the sin of a layperson differs from that of a priest. This truth is clear from the law, which instructs that the same atonement be made for a priest who sins as for all the people. If their sins were not of equal weight, the law would not stipulate a single sacrifice. The magnitude of sin is not determined by its nature but by the stature of the individual who commits it.

Read more (48 words)

When one entrusted with the duty to guide others falters, that fall carries a heavier significance due to the authority they hold. Hence, if the one who plants the seeds is also liable for their growth, it is only fitting to lament Eusebius more deeply than the others.

Cross references

Passages read together with this verse.