For example, when Miriam was afflicted with leprosy simply for speaking against him, and her words rang true—"for he had taken, saith she, an Ethiopian wife"—Moses was unable to heal her and instead fell before God, pleading, "O God, I beseech Thee, heal her." Despite his earnest request, the consequence of her wrongdoing remained. Likewise, all the holy prophets who performed miraculous acts did so by the power of God alone. In contrast, observe how Christ, the Redeemer of all, does not resort to prayer but declares that the healing is performed through His own power, restoring her with His word and the touch of His hand. As Lord and God, He revealed that His flesh was equal to His divine power, capable of liberating humanity from sickness. It was essential for humankind to grasp the profound nature of the mystery that encompasses Him. If the synagogue leader were truly wise, he would recognize the greatness and identity of the Savior through such an extraordinary miracle and would not respond with the ignorance of the masses nor accuse those who performed acts of healing of violating the law regarding Sabbath rest. Yet undeniably, healing requires effort. Is it a breach of the law for God to extend mercy, even on the Sabbath? Who did He command to refrain from labor? Himself, or rather, you? If it is for Himself, then let His care for us cease on the Sabbath: let the sun stop its daily journey; let the rains cease; let the springs and rivers be still; let the winds calm. But if He instructed you to rest, do not lay blame on God, for He has abundantly exhibited mercy even on the Sabbath. Why was rest commanded on the Sabbath at all? He instructed that you and your servants, along with your animals, should observe rest. Thus, when He grants rest to the afflicted, freeing them from suffering, and you prevent it, you indeed contravene the Sabbath law by denying relief to those oppressed by illness, bound by Satan. Yet, the ruler of the ungrateful synagogue witnesses the woman, whose body was twisted and contorted, receive healing from Christ so that she is rendered upright and walks with a gait befitting a human, praising God for her deliverance. Yet, filled with indignation and jealousy over the glory of the Lord, he slanders this miraculous event. He overlooks the Lord, who could expose his hypocrisy, and chastises the crowd, portraying his wrath as concern for adherence to the Sabbath. In truth, he seeks to dissuade those preoccupied with their week’s concerns from becoming witnesses and worshipers of the Lord’s miraculous works on the Sabbath, lest they also come to believe. But answer me, servant of envy, what does the law actually forbid when it commands resting from all manual work on the Sabbath? Does it also ban the effort of speaking? If so, then refrain from eating and drinking, from conversation and singing psalms. But if you avoid all these, yet do not even read the law, what benefit is the Sabbath to you? If you limit the prohibition to physical labor, how can healing a woman through His words be categorized as manual labor? But if you assert it is a violation because the woman was genuinely healed, then you must also accuse her of working. “But,” he states, “He said, you are released from your infirmity, and she was healed.” Do you not loosen your girdle on the Sabbath? Do you not remove your shoes, make your bed, and wash your hands after eating? Why do you become incensed by the mere declaration, “You are made whole”? What sort of work did the woman undertake after those words were spoken? Did she take up the craft of a smith, a carpenter, or a mason? Did she commence weaving or loom work that same day? No! It is said that she was restored. This is what constitutes true labor. Yet no, your ire is not truly about the Sabbath; it arises from witnessing Christ honored and venerated as God. You are consumed with rage and jealousy, all the while hiding your true feelings, justifying yourselves through outward actions. For this, you stand rightly condemned by the Lord, who discerns your futile arguments, and you must bear the title that is fitting, called hypocrites, wicked and disingenuous.